Irina B. Valtcheva
Imperial College London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Irina B. Valtcheva.
Green Chemistry | 2014
Jeong F. Kim; Gyorgy Szekely; Irina B. Valtcheva; Andrew G. Livingston
Membrane processes suffer limitations such as low product yield and high solvent consumption, hindering their widespread application in the pharmaceutical and fine chemicals industries. In the present work, the authors propose an efficient purification methodology employing a two-stage cascade configuration coupled to an adsorptive solvent recovery unit, which addresses the two limitations. The process has been validated on purification of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) from genotoxic impurity (GTI) using organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN). The model system selected for study comprises roxithromycin macrolide antibiotic (Roxi) with 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) and ethyl tosylate (EtTS) as API and GTIs, respectively. By implementing a two-stage cascade configuration for membrane diafiltration, the process yield was increased from 58% to 95% while maintaining less than 5 ppm GTI in the final solution. Through this yield enhancement, the membrane process has been “revamped” from an unfeasible process to a highly competitive unit operation when compared to other traditional processes. The advantage of size exclusion membranes over other separation techniques has been illustrated by the simultaneous removal of two GTIs from different chemical classes. In addition, a solvent recovery step has been assessed using charcoal as a non-selective adsorbent, and it has been shown that pure solvent can be recovered from the permeate. Considering the costs of solvent, charcoal, and waste disposal, it was concluded that 70% solvent recovery is the cost-optimum point. Conventional single-stage diafiltration (SSD) and two-stage diafiltration (TSD) configurations were compared in terms of green metrics such as cost, mass and solvent intensity, and energy consumption. It was calculated that implementation of TSD, depending on the batch scale, can achieve up to 92% cost saving while reducing the mass and solvent intensity up to 73%. In addition, the advantage of adsorptive solvent recovery has been assessed revealing up to 96% energy reduction compared to distillation and a 70% reduction of CO2 footprint.
Chemistry: A European Journal | 2015
Piers R. J. Gaffney; Jeong F. Kim; Irina B. Valtcheva; Glynn Williams; Mike S. Anson; Andrew M. Buswell; Andrew G. Livingston
Due to the discovery of RNAi, oligonucleotides (oligos) have re-emerged as a major pharmaceutical target that may soon be required in ton quantities. However, it is questionable whether solid-phase oligo synthesis (SPOS) methods can provide a scalable synthesis. Liquid-phase oligo synthesis (LPOS) is intrinsically scalable and amenable to standard industrial batch synthesis techniques. However, most reported LPOS strategies rely upon at least one precipitation per chain extension cycle to separate the growing oligonucleotide from reaction debris. Precipitation can be difficult to develop and control on an industrial scale and, because many precipitations would be required to prepare a therapeutic oligonucleotide, we contend that this approach is not viable for large-scale industrial preparation. We are developing an LPOS synthetic strategy for 2′-methyl RNA phosphorothioate that is more amenable to standard batch production techniques, using organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) as the critical scalable separation technology. We report the first LPOS-OSN preparation of a 2′-Me RNA phosphorothioate 9-mer, using commercial phosphoramidite monomers, and monitoring all reactions by HPLC, 31P NMR spectroscopy and MS.
Journal of Membrane Science | 2014
Irina B. Valtcheva; Santosh C. Kumbharkar; Jeong F. Kim; Yogesh Bhole; Andrew G. Livingston
Separation and Purification Technology | 2013
Jeong F. Kim; Ana M. Freitas da Silva; Irina B. Valtcheva; Andrew G. Livingston
Journal of Membrane Science | 2015
Irina B. Valtcheva; Patrizia Marchetti; Andrew G. Livingston
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering | 2014
Jeong F. Kim; Gyorgy Szekely; Marc Schaepertoens; Irina B. Valtcheva; Maria Fernanda Jimenez Solomon; Andrew G. Livingston
Reactive & Functional Polymers | 2015
Gyorgy Szekely; Irina B. Valtcheva; Jeong F. Kim; Andrew G. Livingston
Chemical Engineering Science | 2014
Ludmila G. Peeva; João da Silva Burgal; Irina B. Valtcheva; Andrew G. Livingston
Organic Process Research & Development | 2016
Jeong F. Kim; Piers R. J. Gaffney; Irina B. Valtcheva; Glynn Williams; Andrew M. Buswell; Mike S. Anson; Andrew G. Livingston
Procedia Engineering | 2012
Irina B. Valtcheva; Santosh C. Kumbharkar; Jeong F. Kim; Ludmila G. Peeva; Andrew G. Livingston