Irini C. Voudouragkaki

Twenty-four hour efficacy with preservative free tafluprost compared with latanoprost in patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Aim To compare 24 h intraocular pressure (IOP) control obtained with preservative free (PF) tafluprost 0.0015% versus branded preservative containing latanoprost 0.005% administered as first choice monotherapy in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods This prospective, observer-masked, crossover study included consecutive newly diagnosed patients with POAG or OHT, and baseline IOP between 24 and 33 mm Hg. Qualifying patients underwent baseline untreated 24 h IOP monitoring in habitual positions, with Goldmann tonometry at times 10:00, 14:00, 18:00 and 22:00, and Perkins supine tonometry at times 02:00 and 06:00. They were then randomised to either latanoprost or tafluprost, administered in the evening, for 3 months and then switched to the opposite therapy for another 3 months. 24 h monitoring was repeated at the end of each treatment period. Results 38 patients completed the study. Mean untreated 24 h IOP (24.9 mm Hg) was significantly reduced with both prostaglandins (p<0.001). Tafluprost demonstrated similar mean 24 h efficacy compared with latanoprost (17.8 vs 17.7 mm Hg; p=0.417). Latanoprost demonstrated significantly better 24 h trough IOP (15.9 vs 16.3 mm Hg; p=0.041) whereas tafluprost provided significantly lower 24 h IOP fluctuation (3.2 vs 3.8 mm Hg; p=0.008). No significant difference existed between the two prostaglandins for any adverse event. Conclusions PF tafluprost achieved similar 24 h IOP reduction to branded latanoprost. The current study highlights the importance of complete assessment of efficacy over 24 h. Clinical trials registration NCT01162603.

Critical Appraisal on Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Literature Search.

IntroductionOrbital decompression is the indicated procedure for addressing exophthalmos and compressive optic neuropathy in thyroid eye disease. There are an abundance of techniques for removal of orbital bone, fat, or a combination published in the scientific literature. The relative efficacy and complications of these interventions in relation to the specific indications remain as yet undocumented. We performed a systematic review of the current published evidence for the effectiveness of orbital decompression, possible complications, and impact on quality of life.MethodsWe searched the current databases for medical literature and controlled trials, oculoplastic textbooks, and conference proceedings to identify relevant data up to February 2015. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more interventions for orbital decompression.ResultsWe identified only two eligible RCTs for inclusion in the review. As a result of the significant variability between studies on decompression, i.e., methodology and outcome measures, we did not perform a meta-analysis. One study suggests that the transantral approach and endonasal technique had similar effects in reducing exophthalmos but the latter is safer. The second study provides evidence that intravenous steroids may be superior to primary surgical decompression in the management of compressive optic neuropathy requiring less secondary surgical procedures.ConclusionMost of the published literature on orbital decompression consists of retrospective, uncontrolled trials. There is evidence from those studies that removal of the medial and lateral wall (balanced) and the deep lateral wall decompression, with or without fat removal, may be the most effective surgical methods with only few complications. There is a clear unmet need for controlled trials evaluating the different techniques for orbital decompression. Ideally, future studies should address the effectiveness, possible complications, quality of life, and cost of each intervention.

Comparison of 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Reduction Obtained with Brinzolamide/Timolol or Brimonidine/Timolol Fixed-Combination Adjunctive to Travoprost Therapy

BACKGROUND To determine the adjunctive 24-h efficacy obtained with brinzolamide/timolol, or brimonidine/timolol fixed combinations (FCs) in open-angle glaucoma patients insufficiently controlled on travoprost monotherapy. METHODS Prospective, observer-masked, active controlled, crossover, comparison. Qualified primary open-angle or exfoliative glaucoma patients with a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) >18 mm Hg at 10:00 on travoprost monotherapy were randomized for 3 months to either brinzolamide/timolol, or brimonidine/timolol FC therapy adjunct to travoprost. Patients were then crossed-over to the opposite therapy for another 3 months. At baseline and at the end of each treatment period, the patients underwent 24-h IOP monitoring. RESULTS Fifty patients completed the study. The mean 24-h baseline IOP on travoprost monotherapy was 20.1 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI): 19.6, 20.7 mm Hg]. Both adjunctive FC therapies significantly reduced the IOP at each time point and for the mean 24-h IOP (P<0.001) compared with travoprost monotherapy. Brinzolamide/timolol FC provided a significantly lower mean 24-h IOP (17.2 mm Hg, 95% CI: 16.4, 17.9 mm Hg) than brimonidine/timolol FC (18.0 mm Hg, 95% CI: 17.3, 18.8 mm Hg) (P<0.001). For all the 3 timepoints between 18:00 and 02:00, the brinzolamide/timolol FC provided a significantly lower IOP than the brimonidine/timolol FC (P≤0.036). For the other 3 timepoints, no significant differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that both FCs provide statistically and clinically significant incremental 24-h IOP lowering to travoprost monotherapy. The brinzolamide/timolol FC however achieves a better mean 24-h IOP control owing to the greater efficacy in late afternoon and during the night.

An overview of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL).

Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) was first described over a decade ago and is now considered to be one of the most important surgical innovations of modern ophthalmology. Prior to its introduction, no interventions were available to arrest, or slow down ectatic disease progression, with corneal transplantation required in the majority of cases. Unlike earlier treatments of corneal ectasias that attempted to only improve the consequences of the disease, CXL aims to address the corneal biomechanical weakening itself. The long-term safety and efficacy of CXL have been established in several studies that have documented significant improvements in all outcome measures (visual acuity, spherical equivalent, astigmatism, and keratometric findings). The emerging combination of CXL with other interventions (termed ‘CXL plus’) optimizes the visual and topographic outcomes. This, along with the expansion of the techniques’ indications for other clinical conditions, such as microbial keratitis, highlights the continuous improvement of the initial technique and confirms its wide acceptance. Overall, CXL has already demonstrated much promise and has several clinical indications, representing a clear example of recent advances in ocular therapy.

New Perspectives on Lamellar Keratoplasty

Lamellar (anterior and posterior) keratoplasty entails the surgical replacement of diseased-only corneal tissue, while healthy host corneal tissue is preserved. Selective keratoplasty offers several advantages in comparison to penetrating keratoplasty such as a lower rate of graft rejection, less endothelial cell loss, faster/superior visual rehabilitation and enhanced resistance to closed injury. The surgical approach of “partial corneal transplantation” may be divided into anterior and posterior: techniques including superficial and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (SALK and DALK, respectively) and endothelial keratoplasty as well as Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). These novel surgical procedures are rapidly becoming the preferred therapy option for specific corneal dysfunctions involving the corneal stroma (SALK, DALK), or corneal endothelium (DSAEK, DMEK). During the past decade, the continuing advancement of surgical techniques and the development of innovative surgical instruments have significantly enhanced corneal transplantation. Lamellar keratoplasty techniques facilitate corneal surgery, provide patients with superior outcomes and can successfully restore vision in corneal-related blindness. Nevertheless, more long-term evidence is needed to better evaluate these promising new techniques.

A Review of the Clinical Usefulness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Exfoliative Glaucoma

In the last decade, selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) has been commonly used in the management of several different types of glaucoma, as either primary or adjunct therapy. The technique has an excellent safety profile and is at least as effective as argon laser trabeculoplasty. Although the actual mechanism of action of SLT remains unclear, evidence has shown that it does not induce morphologically evident trabecular meshwork alterations. SLTs non-disruptive mode of action offers the advantage of repeatability. Exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) is a secondary open-angle glaucoma with unfavorable intraocular pressure (IOP) characteristics, which typically carries a poorer long-term prognosis than primary open-angle glaucoma. Consequently, patients with XFG often need multiple medications to achieve IOP levels that prevent disease progression. Because complicated pharmacotherapy regimens undermine the long-term tolerability and compliance of patients with XFG, options such as SLT may decrease the burden of multiple therapies and ultimately improve prognosis. In fact, SLT may be a particularly attractive option in XFG because the pigment-laden trabecular tissue of these patients enhances the absorption of laser energy and thus augments the biologic effects induced by this treatment. The current article reviews the postulated mechanisms of action of SLT, discusses practical aspects of SLT therapy, and examines selected peer-reviewed literature pertaining to the clinical usefulness of this modality in XFG patients.

Preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed combination: comparative 24-h efficacy administered morning or evening in open-angle glaucoma patients

ABSTRACT Background: Ideal dosing for the preservative-free (PF) tafluprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) remains to be elucidated. Research design and methods: This study was a prospective, observer-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover, comparison in 42 consecutive open-angle glaucoma patients whose intraocular pressure (IOP) was insufficiently controlled with preserved latanoprost monotherapy (mean 24-h IOP >20 mmHg). Patients were randomized to either morning (08:00) or evening (20:00) PF TTFC for 3 months and then crossed over. After each treatment period, patients underwent habitual 24-h IOP monitoring with Goldmann tonometry in the sitting position (at 10:00, 14:00, 18:00, and 22:00) and Perkins tonometry in the supine position (at 02:00 and 06:00). Results: Mean 24-h IOP on latanoprost was 22.2±3.9 mmHg. Both PF TTFC dosing regimens obtained greater reduction in mean 24-h, daytime, nighttime, and peak 24-h IOP (P < 0.001). Evening dosing provided tighter 24-h IOP fluctuation versus latanoprost (P < 0.001). Evening dosing was superior to morning dosing at four time points (P < 0.01), for the mean daytime IOP (P < 0.001) and mean 24-h IOP fluctuation (P < 0.001). Hyperemia was more common with preserved latanoprost (21.4 vs. 7.1%; P = 0.031). Patients (n = 19; 45%) preferred evening dosing. Conclusions: PF TTFC provided greater 24-h IOP control and less hyperemia compared with preserved latanoprost. Evening administration of this novel medication offered superior 24-h efficacy. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03612817)

Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure monitoring in normotensive patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis.

Purpose To investigate 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) changes caused by hemodialysis (HD). Methods A prospective, observational, comparative 24-hour trial was performed on consecutive subjects with normal IOP undergoing maintenance HD 3 days a week between 13:00 and 17:00 hours in an academic setting. Following a comprehensive ocular assessment, those with conditions that may influence IOP were excluded and one eye was randomly selected. Twenty-four-hour IOP monitoring was performed on HD day 1 and then on a day without HD. The IOP was measured at 10:00, 13:00, 15:00, 17:00, 22:00, 02:00, and 06:00 employing Goldmann and Perkins tonometry on habitual position. During the course of 1 year, 18 patients completed the study. Results Monitoring of IOP on HD day showed a significantly higher mean 24-hour IOP (15.4 ± 2.7 vs 14.1 ± 2.2 mm Hg; p = 0.025), higher mean peak 24-hour IOP (18.5 ± 3.5 vs 15.8 ± 2.5 mm Hg; p = 0.003), and wider 24-hour IOP fluctuation (6.2 ± 2.3 vs 4.0 ± 1.9 mm Hg; p = 0.001). When individual time points were compared, IOP was significantly higher at 17:00 on HD day, reflecting a gradual IOP elevation during HD (p = 0.021). Further, during the HD procedure (13:00-17:00), the mean IOP was significantly higher on a HD day (16.4 ± 3.0 vs 14.7 ± 2.4 mm Hg; p = 0.004). Conclusions This prospective, before/after trial suggests that HD significantly impacts 24-hour IOP characteristics in normotensive eyes. The long-term significance of these findings requires further elucidation in normotensive patients and, predominantly, in patients with glaucoma undergoing HD.