Iris Walraven

Long-term follow-up of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent hypofractionated chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation dose escalation using hypofractionation might improve overall survival (OS). We investigated OS in a phase II multicenter study in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients treated with hypofractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 2-armed phase II, multi-center study (NTR2230) was performed with the aim to assess the effect of cetuximab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in LA-NSCLC patients (stage II/IIIA/B). Arm A received high dose radiotherapy (24 × 2.75 Gy) and concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin (6 mg/m(2)). Arm B received an identical treatment regimen with additional weekly cetuximab. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and 1-, 2- and 5-year OS proportions were calculated. RESULTS Between February 2009 and May 2011, 102 patients were randomly allocated in two arms. Median OS was 31.5 months (range 12.8-52.3), not significantly different between arms A and B; 33.0 (range 17.0-57.0) and 30.0 (11.0-52.0) months. 1-, 2- and 5-year OS rates were 74.5%, 59.4% and 37.3%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, worse performance score, V35 of the esophagus and the existence of comorbidities were significantly (P-value<0.05) associated with a shorter OS. DISCUSSION In this phase II trial, the median OS for the entire group was remarkably high; 31.5 months. Furthermore, 5-year OS was still 37.3%. Hypofractionation might contribute to improved OS in LA-NSCLC patients.

Standard whole prostate gland radiotherapy with and without lesion boost in prostate cancer : Toxicity in the FLAME randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE To compare toxicity rates in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with standard fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without an additional integrated boost to the macroscopically visible tumour. MATERIAL AND METHODS FLAME is a phase 3 multicentre RCT (NCT01168479) of patients with pathologically confirmed localized intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. The standard treatment arm (n = 287) received a dose to the entire prostate of 77 Gy in 35 fractions. The dose-escalated treatment arm (n = 284) received 77 Gy in 35 fractions to the entire prostate, with an integrated boost up to 95 Gy to the multi-parametric MRI-defined (macroscopic) tumour within the prostate. Treatment related toxicity was measured using the CTCAE version 3.0. Grade 2 or worse GU or GI events up to two years were compared between groups by presenting proportions and by Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analyses for repeated measures. RESULTS Ninety percent of the 571 men randomly assigned between September 2009 and January 2015 had high-risk disease (Ash 2000), of whom nearly 66% were prescribed hormonal therapy up to three years. Median follow-up was 55 months at the time of this analysis. Toxicity prevalence rates for both GI and GU increased until the end of treatment and regressed thereafter, with no obvious differences across treatment groups. Late cumulative GI toxicity rates were 11.1% and 10.2% for the standard and dose-escalated group, respectively. These rates were 22.6% and 27.1% for GU toxicity. GEE analyses showed that both GU toxicity and GI toxicity (≥grade 2) up to two years after treatment were similar between arms (OR 1.02 95%CI 0.78-1.33p = 0.81 and (OR 1.19 95%CI 0.82-1.73p = 0.38), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients, focal dose escalation integrated with standard EBRT did not result in an increase in GU and GI toxicity when compared to the standard treatment up to two years after treatment. This suggests that the described focal dose escalation technique is safe and feasible.

Outcome of radical local treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with synchronous oligometastases

OBJECTIVES Patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are considered incurable and are mainly treated with palliative intent. This patient group has a poor overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The purpose of this study was to investigate PFS and OS of NSCLC patients diagnosed with synchronous oligometastatic disease who underwent radical treatment of both intrathoracic disease and metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with NSCLC and oligometastatic disease at diagnosis, who were treated with radical intent between 2008 and 2016, were included in this observational study. Treatment consisted of systemic treatment and radical radiotherapy or resection of the intrathoracic disease. Treatment of the metastases consisted of radical or stereotactic radiotherapy, surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Ninety-one patients (52% men, mean age 60 years) in good performance status were included. Thirty-eight patients (42%) died during follow-up (median follow-up 35 months). The cause of dead was lung cancer in all patients, except one. Sixty-three (69%) patients developed recurrent disease. Eleven recurrences (17%) occurred within the irradiated area. For the whole group, the median PFS was 14 months (range 2-89, 95%CI 12-16) and the median OS was 32 months (range 3-89, 95%CI 25-39). The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 85% and 58% and the 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 55% and 27%, respectively. Radical local treatment of a selected group of NSCLC patients with good performance status presenting with synchronous oligometastatic disease resulted in favorable long-term PFS and OS.

In Regard to Redmond et al

To the Editor: With interest we read the article by Redmond et al (1) reporting on a prospective study of hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (HSPCI) in limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Within this trial, 20 patients with limited-stage SCLC showing a complete response to chemoradiation therapy and no brain metastases received HS-PCI up to 25 Gy in 10 fractions. At baseline and at 6 and 12 months, magnetic resonance imaging and a battery of neuropsychological tests were performed. The authors conclude that their study “suggests a potential benefit of HS-PCI in limiting the neuropsychological sequelae of brain radiation with rates of brain and hippocampal metastases consistent with standard PCI.” There are some important considerations to mention. First, the authors compare their patients receiving HSPCI with a group of limited-stage SCLC patients from another study (2) receiving identical PCI but without HS using the Delayed Recall measure of the Hopkins Verbal Learning TestdRevised. The authors conclude that in comparison with these historical control patients, the current patients had less cognitive decline on the memory measure. In addition, there was no evidence for cognitive decline on any of the other neuropsychological tests covering a much wider spectrum of functions than memory alone, either 6 months or 12 months after PCI. This finding is in contrast to the authors’ own expectation and also opposite to the cognitive decline that was observed in the historical control group receiving PCI without HS. Without a direct comparison of patients receiving PCI with and without HS in a randomized design, the absence of cognitive decline on measures irrespective of their hippocampal dependency should be interpreted with caution. Although the authors tried to control for normal fluctuations with repeated testing by applying a reliable change index, it is questionable whether this is sufficient, inasmuch as for each test a different reference population was used, with a different test-retest interval compared with the

Treatment Variation of Sequential versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the Netherlands and Belgium

AIMS Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is considered the standard treatment regimen in non-surgical locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) is recommended in patients who are unfit to receive CCRT or when the treatment volume is considered too large. In this study, we investigated the proportion of CCRT/SCRT in the Netherlands and Belgium. Furthermore, patient and disease characteristics associated with SCRT were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS An observational study was carried out with data from three independent national registries: the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR), the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit-Radiotherapy (DLCA-R). Differences in patient and disease characteristics between CCRT and SCRT were tested with unpaired t-tests (for continuous variables) and with chi-square tests (for categorical variables). A prognostic model was constructed to determine patient and disease parameters predictive for the choice of SCRT. RESULTS This study included 350 patients from the BCR, 780 patients from the NCR and 428 patients from the DLCA-R. More than half of the stage III NSCLC patients in the Netherlands (55%) and in Belgium more than a third (35%) were treated with CCRT. In both the Dutch and Belgian population, higher age and more advanced N-stage were significantly associated with SCRT. Performance score, pulmonary function, comorbidities and tumour volume were not associated with SCRT. CONCLUSION In this observational population-based study, a large treatment variation in non-surgical stage III NSCLC patients was observed between and within the Netherlands and Belgium. Higher age and N-stage were significantly associated with the choice for SCRT.

Biochemical recurrence prediction after radiotherapy for prostate cancer with T2w magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features

Graphical abstract