Isabel Amendoeira
University of Porto
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Isabel Amendoeira.
European Journal of Cancer | 2003
Gábor Cserni; Isabel Amendoeira; N. Apostolikas; Jean Pierre Bellocq; Simonetta Bianchi; G. Bussolati; Werner Boecker; B. Borisch; C.E. Connolly; Thomas Decker; P. Dervan; Maria Drijkoningen; I.O. Ellis; C.W. Elston; Vincenzo Eusebi; Daniel Faverly; Päivi Heikkilä; R. Holland; H. Kerner; Janina Kulka; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Manuela Lacerda; J. Martinez-Penuela; C. De Miguel; Johannes L. Peterse; F. Rank; Peter Regitnig; A. Reiner; Anna Sapino; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani
Controversies and inconsistencies regarding the pathological work-up of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) led the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology (EWGBSP) to review published data and current evidence that can promote the formulation of European guidelines for the pathological work-up of SNs. After an evaluation of the accuracy of SN biopsy as a staging procedure, the yields of different sectioning methods and the immunohistochemical detection of metastatic cells are reviewed. Currently published data do not allow the significance of micrometastases or isolated tumour cells to be established, but it is suggested that approximately 18% of the cases may be associated with further nodal (non-SN) metastases, i.e. approximately 2% of all patients initially staged by SN biopsy. The methods for the intraoperative and molecular assessment of SNs are also surveyed.
Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2004
Gábor Cserni; Isabel Amendoeira; N. Apostolikas; Jean Pierre Bellocq; Simonetta Bianchi; Werner Boecker; B. Borisch; C.E. Connolly; Thomas Decker; P. Dervan; Maria Drijkoningen; Ian O. Ellis; C.W. Elston; Vincenzo Eusebi; Daniel Faverly; Päivi Heikkilä; R. Holland; H. Kerner; Janina Kulka; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Manuela Lacerda; J. Martinez-Penuela; C De Miguel; Johannes L. Peterse; F. Rank; Peter Regitnig; A. Reiner; Anna Sapino; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; A.M. Tanous
Aims: To evaluate aspects of the current practice of sentinel lymph node (SLN) pathology in breast cancer via a questionnaire based survey, to recognise major issues that the European guidelines for mammography screening should address in the next revision. Methods: A questionnaire was circulated by mail or electronically by the authors in their respective countries. Replies from pathology units dealing with SLN specimens were evaluated further. Results: Of the 382 respondents, 240 European pathology units were dealing with SLN specimens. Sixty per cent of these units carried out intraoperative assessment, most commonly consisting of frozen sections. Most units slice larger SLNs into pieces and only 12% assess these slices on a single haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained slide. Seventy one per cent of the units routinely use immunohistochemistry in all cases negative by HE. The terms micrometastasis, submicrometastasis, and isolated tumour cells (ITCs) are used in 93%, 22%, and 71% of units, respectively, but have a rather heterogeneous interpretation. Molecular SLN staging was reported by only 10 units (4%). Most institutions have their own guidelines for SLN processing, but some countries also have well recognised national guidelines. Conclusions: Pathological examination of SLNs throughout Europe varies considerably and is not standardised. The European guidelines should focus on standardising examination. They should recommend techniques that identify metastases > 2 mm as a minimum standard. Uniform reporting of additional findings may also be important, because micrometastases and ITCs may in the future be shown to have clinical relevance.
Virchows Archiv | 1999
John P. Sloane; Isabel Amendoeira; N. Apostolikas; Jean Pierre Bellocq; Simonetta Bianchi; Werner Boecker; G. Bussolati; D.C. Coleman; C.E. Connolly; Vincenzo Eusebi; C. De Miguel; P. Dervan; R. Drijkoningen; C.W. Elston; Daniel Faverly; A. Gad; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Manuela Lacerda; J. Martinez-Penuela; C. Munt; Johannes L. Peterse; F. Rank; M. Sylvan; V. Tsakraklides; Brigitte Zafrani
Abstract A detailed analysis of the consistency with which pathologists from 12 different European countries diagnose and classify breast disease was undertaken as part of the quality assurance programme of the European Breast Screening Pilot Network funded by the Europe against Cancer Programme. Altogether 107 cases were examined by 23 pathologists in 4 rounds. Kappa (κ) statistics for major diagnostic categories were: benign (not otherwise specified) 0.74, atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) 0.27, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) 0.87 and invasive carcinoma 0.94. ADH was the majority diagnosis in only 2 cases but was diagnosed by at least 2 participants in another 14, in 9 of which the majority diagnosis was benign (explaining the relatively low κ for this category), DCIS in 4 (all low nuclear grade) and invasive carcinoma (a solitary 1-mm focus) in 1. The histological features of these cases were extremely variable; although one feature that nearly all shared was the presence of cells with small, uniform, hyperchromatic nuclei and a high nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio. The majority diagnosis was DCIS in 33 cases; κ for classifying by nuclear grade was 0.38 using three categories and 0.46 when only two (high and other) were used. When ADH was included with low nuclear grade DCIS there was only a slight improvement in κ. Size measurement of DCIS was less consistent than that of invasive carcinoma.The majority diagnosis was invasive carcinoma in 57 cases, the size of the majority being 100% in 49. The remainder were either special subtypes (adenoid cystic, tubular, colloid, secretory, ductal/medullary) or possible microinvasive carcinomas. Subtyping was most consistent for mucinous (κ, 0.92) and least consistent for medullary carcinomas (κ, 0.56). Consistency of grading using the Nottingham method was moderate (κ=0.53) and consistency of diagnosing vascular invasion, fair (κ=0.38). There was no tendency for consistency to improve from one round to the next, suggesting that further improvements are unlikely without changes in guidelines or methodology.
European Journal of Cancer | 2000
C.W. Elston; John P. Sloane; Isabel Amendoeira; N. Apostolikas; Jean Pierre Bellocq; Simonetta Bianchi; Werner Boecker; G. Bussolati; D.C. Coleman; C.E. Connolly; P. Dervan; Maria Drijkoningen; Vincenzo Eusebi; Daniel Faverly; R. Holland; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Manuela Lacerda; J. Martinez-Penuela; C. De Miguel; S Moss; C. Munt; Johannes L. Peterse; F. Rank; A. Reiner; M. Sylvan; C.A. Wells; Brigitte Zafrani
It is now widely recognised that classifying ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast and diagnosing atypical ductal hyperplasia are associated with significant interobserver variation. Two possible reasons for this inconsistency are differences in the interpretation of specified histological features and field selection where morphology is heterogeneous. In order to investigate the relative contribution of these two factors to inconsistent interpretation of intraductal proliferations, histological sections of 32 lesions were sent to 23 European pathologists followed 3 years later by images of small parts of these sections. Kappa statistics for diagnosing hyperplasia of usual type, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ were 0.54, 0.35 and 0.78 for sections and 0.47, 0.29 and 0.78 for images, respectively, showing that most of the inconsistency is due to differences in morphological interpretation. Improvements can thus be expected only if diagnostic criteria or methodology are changed. In contrast, kappa for classifying DCIS by growth pattern was very low at 0.23 for sections and better at 0.47 for images, reflecting the widely recognised variation in the growth pattern of DCIS. Higher kappa statistics were obtained when any mention of an individual growth pattern was included in that category, thus allowing multiple categories per case; but kappa was still higher for images than sections. Classifying DCIS by nuclear grade gave kappa values of 0.36 for sections and 0.49 for images, indicating that intralesional heterogeneity has hitherto been underestimated as a cause of inconsistency in classifying DCIS by this method. More rigorous assessment of the proportions of the different nuclear grades present could lead to an improvement in consistency.
Virchows Archiv | 2002
Joana Paredes; Fernanda Milanezi; Leda Viegas; Isabel Amendoeira; Fernando Schmitt
Cadherins are calcium-dependent cell–cell adhesion glycoproteins, separated into several subclasses with distinct adhesive specificities and tissue distribution, which play an important role in many cellular events. We analyse the expression of E-, N- and P-cadherin in a series of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, since this disease represents a heterogeneous group, with different risks of progression to invasive breast carcinoma. We also studied the correlation between cadherin expression and DCIS classification systems, namely the Van Nuys and the Holland et al. classification, this latter based on cytonuclear differentiation and cell polarity. Our results showed that, regardless the classification applied, P-cadherin expression is strongly associated with high histological grade of DCIS (P=0.0047) and lack of estrogen receptors (P=0.0008). The use of Holland et al. classification showed a significant correlation between P-cadherin expression and decreased cell polarity (P=0.01). In conclusion, P-cadherin expression seems to be more relevant in DCIS pathogenesis than the altered expression of any other cadherin, including the decrease of E-cadherin expression.
Cancer | 2003
Jorge S. Reis-Filho; Fernanda Milanezi; Isabel Amendoeira; André Albergaria; Fernando Schmitt
The presence of myoepithelial cells (MECs) in fine‐needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB) of the breast constitute an important criterion used to diagnose benign breast lesions. However, MECs sometimes have a distorted cytomorphology, and most of the previously evaluated myoepithelial markers do not have satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. p63, a recently characterized p53 homolog, is a nuclear transcription factor that is expressed in basal cells of multilayered epithelia and myoepithelial cells of the breast. The authors analyzed the immunocytochemical distribution of p63 in a series of 82 breast FNABs (30 benign lesions and 52 malignant breast lesions).
Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2004
Silvia Carvalho; A O e Silva; Fernanda Milanezi; Sara Ricardo; Dina Leitão; Isabel Amendoeira; Fernando Schmitt
Aim: To study the immunoexpression and mutational status of c-KIT and PDGFRA in a series of benign and malignant phyllodes tumours of the breast. Material/methods: Nineteen phyllodes tumours (13 benign and six malignant) were analysed by immunohistochemistry for the expression of c-KIT and PDGFRA. Direct sequencing of exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 of the c-KIT gene and exons 12 and 18 of PDGFRA was performed to check the mutational status of these two genes. Results: c-KIT expression was found in 12 of the 19 cases (six of the 13 benign cases and all six malignant ones) and PDGFRA expression was seen in two of the 19 cases (one benign and one malignant case); the 2415 C>T alteration in exon 17 of the c-KIT gene was found in two cases (both benign); the intronic insertion IVS17-50insT and the 2866 G>T alteration in the coding region of exon 18 of the PDGFRA gene were also found in two cases (one malignant and one benign). However, the activating mutations described for these genes in gastrointestinal stromal tumours were not present. Conclusion: c-KIT expression is a frequent finding in phyllodes tumours, particularly in malignant cases; however, no activating mutations similar to those described for gastrointestinal stromal tumours were found. The PDGFRA does not seem to be an alternative pathway to tumour development in phyllodes tumours because neither expression nor activating mutations were noteworthy.
The Breast | 2014
Gábor Cserni; András Vörös; Inta Liepniece-Karele; Simonetta Bianchi; Vania Vezzosi; Dorthe Grabau; Anna Sapino; Isabella Castellano; Peter Regitnig; Maria P. Foschini; Vassiliki Zolota; Zsuzsanna Varga; Paulo Figueiredo; Thomas Decker; Cm Focke; Janina Kulka; Handan Kaya; Angelika Reiner-Concin; Isabel Amendoeira; Grace Callagy; Emer Caffrey; Jelle Wesseling; Clive Wells
The Ki67 labelling index (LI - proportion of staining cells) is widely used to reflect proliferation in breast carcinomas. Several cut-off values have been suggested to distinguish between tumours with low and high proliferative activity. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the distribution of Ki67 LIs in breast carcinomas diagnosed at different institutions by different pathologists using the method reflecting their daily practice. Pathologists using Ki67 were asked to provide data (including the LI, type of the specimen, receptor status, grade) on 100 consecutively stained cases, as well as details of their evaluation. A full dataset of 1709 carcinomas was collected from 19 departments. The median Ki67 LI was 17% for all tumours and 14% for oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative carcinomas. Tumours with higher mitotic counts were associated with higher Ki67 LIs. Ki67 LIs tended to cluster around values ending with 5 or 0 both in cases where the values were obtained by counting the proportion of stained tumour cell nuclei and those where the values were obtained by estimation. On the basis of the distribution pattern described, some currently used Ki67 LI cut off values are not realistic, and it is proposed to select more realistic values ending with 0 or 5.
Virchows Archiv | 2004
Clive A. Wells; John P. Sloane; D.C. Coleman; C. Munt; Isabel Amendoeira; N. Apostolikas; Jean Pierre Bellocq; Simonetta Bianchi; Werner Boecker; G. Bussolati; C.E. Connolly; P. Dervan; Maria Drijkoningen; Ian O. Ellis; C.W. Elston; Vincenzo Eusebi; Daniel Faverly; Päivi Heikkilä; R. Holland; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Manuela Lacerda; J. Martinez-Penuela; C. De Miguel; Johannes L. Peterse; F. Rank; A. Reiner; E. Saksela; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; M. Sylvan; B. Borisch
To assess the variability of oestrogen receptor (ER) testing using immunocytochemistry, centrally stained and unstained slides from breast cancers were circulated to the members of the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology, who were asked to report on both slides. The results showed that there was almost complete concordance among readers (kappa=0.95) in ER-negative tumours on the stained slide and excellent concordance among readers (kappa=0.82) on the slides stained in each individual laboratory. Tumours showing strong positivity were reasonably well assessed (kappa=0.57 and 0.4, respectively), but there was less concordance in tumours with moderate and low levels of ER, especially when these were heterogeneous in their staining. Because of the variation, the Working Group recommends that laboratories performing these stains should take part in a external quality assurance scheme for immunocytochemistry, should include a tumour with low ER levels as a weak positive control and should audit the percentage positive tumours in their laboratory against the accepted norms annually. The Quick score method of receptor assessment may also have too many categories for good concordance, and grouping of these into fewer categories may remove some of the variation among laboratories.
Pathology & Oncology Research | 2007
Gábor Cserni; Simonetta Bianchi; Vania Vezzosi; Riccardo Arisio; Rita Bori; Johannes L. Peterse; Anna Sapino; Isabella Castellano; Maria Drijkoningen; Janina Kulka; Vincenzo Eusebi; Maria P. Foschini; Jean Pierre Bellocq; Cristi Marin; Sten Thorstenson; Isabel Amendoeira; Angelika Reiner-Concin; Thomas Decker; Manuela Lacerda; Paulo Figueiredo; Gábor Fejes
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the preferred method for the nodal staging of early breast cancer, but controversy exists regarding its universal use and consequences in small tumors. 2929 cases of breast carcinomas not larger than 15 mm and staged with SLN biopsy with or without axillary dissection were collected from the authors′ institutions. The pathology of the SLNs included multilevel hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was commonly used for cases negative with HE staining. Variables influencing SLN involvement and non-SLN involvement were studied with logistic regression. Factors that influenced SLN involvement included tumor size, multifocality, grade and age. Small tumors up to 4 mm (including in situ and microinvasive carcinomas) seem to have SLN involvement in less than 10%. Non-SLN metastases were associated with tumor grade, the ratio of involved SLNs and SLN involvement type. Isolated tumor cells were not likely to be associated with further nodal load, whereas micrometastases had some subsets with low risk of non-SLN involvement and subsets with higher proportion of further nodal spread. In situ and microinvasive carcinomas have a very low risk of SLN involvement, therefore, these tumors might not need SLN biopsy for staging, and this may be the approach used for very small invasive carcinomas. If an SLN is involved, isolated tumor cells are rarely if ever associated with non-SLN metastases, and subsets of micrometastatic SLN involvement may be approached similarly. With macrometastases the risk of non-SLN involvement increases, and further axillary treatment should be generally indicated.