Isabel Spriet

Reduced Cortisol Metabolism during Critical Illness

BACKGROUND Critical illness is often accompanied by hypercortisolemia, which has been attributed to stress-induced activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, low corticotropin levels have also been reported in critically ill patients, which may be due to reduced cortisol metabolism. METHODS In a total of 158 patients in the intensive care unit and 64 matched controls, we tested five aspects of cortisol metabolism: daily levels of corticotropin and cortisol; plasma cortisol clearance, metabolism, and production during infusion of deuterium-labeled steroid hormones as tracers; plasma clearance of 100 mg of hydrocortisone; levels of urinary cortisol metabolites; and levels of messenger RNA and protein in liver and adipose tissue, to assess major cortisol-metabolizing enzymes. RESULTS Total and free circulating cortisol levels were consistently higher in the patients than in controls, whereas corticotropin levels were lower (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Cortisol production was 83% higher in the patients (P=0.02). There was a reduction of more than 50% in cortisol clearance during tracer infusion and after the administration of 100 mg of hydrocortisone in the patients (P≤0.03 for both comparisons). All these factors accounted for an increase by a factor of 3.5 in plasma cortisol levels in the patients, as compared with controls (P<0.001). Impaired cortisol clearance also correlated with a lower cortisol response to corticotropin stimulation. Reduced cortisol metabolism was associated with reduced inactivation of cortisol in the liver and kidney, as suggested by urinary steroid ratios, tracer kinetics, and assessment of liver-biopsy samples (P≤0.004 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS During critical illness, reduced cortisol breakdown, related to suppressed expression and activity of cortisol-metabolizing enzymes, contributed to hypercortisolemia and hence corticotropin suppression. The diagnostic and therapeutic implications for critically ill patients are unknown. (Funded by the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00512122 and NCT00115479; and Current Controlled Trials numbers, ISRCTN49433936, ISRCTN49306926, and ISRCTN08083905.).

Pharmacist- versus physician-acquired medication history: a prospective study at the emergency department

Background Recent literature revealed that medication histories obtained by physicians and nurses are often incomplete. However, the number of patients included was often low. Study objective In this study, the authors compare medication histories obtained in the Emergency Department (ED) by pharmacists versus physicians and identify characteristics contributing to discrepancies. Methods Medication histories were acquired by the pharmacist from patients admitted to the ED, planned to be hospitalised. A structured form was used to guide the pharmacist or technician to ensure a standardised approach. Discrepancies, defined as any difference between the pharmacist-acquired medication history and that obtained by the physician, were analysed. Results 3594 medication histories were acquired by pharmacy staff. 59% (95% CI 58.2% to 59.8%) of medication histories recorded by physicians were different from those obtained by the pharmacy staff. Within these inaccurate medication histories, 5963 discrepancies were identified. The most common type of error was omission of a drug (61%; 95% CI 60.4% to 61.6%), followed by omission of dose (18%; 95% CI 17.6% to 18.4%). Drugs belonging to the class of psycholeptics, acid suppressors and beta blocking agents were related to the highest discrepancy rate. Acetylsalicylic acid, omeprazole and zolpidem were most commonly forgotten. Conclusion This large prospective study demonstrates that medication history acquisition is very often incomplete in the ED. A structured form and a standardised method is necessary. Pharmacists are especially suited to acquire and supervise accurate medication histories, as they are educated and familiar with commonly used drugs.

Epidemiology of catheter-related infections in adult patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Catheter-related infection (CRI) is the most common and serious complication for adult patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Our aim is to provide epidemiological data on infection incidence, infecting pathogens and contributing risk factors. METHODS Four electronic databases (Embase, Medline, IPA, CINAHL) were screened for eligible studies published between 1970 and March 2012. Methodological quality was evaluated and terminology/definitions were re-categorized. RESULTS Thirty-nine studies were included. Extensive variability was observed in terminology/definitions as well as in expression of CRI rate. After correct interpretation of definitions, overall catheter-related bloodstream infection rate (CRBSI) ranged between 0.38 and 4.58 episodes/1000 catheter days (median 1.31). Gram-positive bacteria of human skin flora caused more than half of infections. An analysis of the reported risk factors showed that the origin of a CRBSI is often multifactorial. The risk factors were related to the patient, the venous access device, the education, HPN therapy and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This review on CRI in adult HPN patients revealed that included studies are of low quality and used poorly described risk factors and different definitions. The human skin flora caused most of infections; therefore, hand hygiene and training remain essential.

Effect of pH and comedication on gastrointestinal absorption of posaconazole: monitoring of intraluminal and plasma drug concentrations.

Background and Objective: Posaconazole (Noxafil®) is an extended-spectrum triazole antifungal agent for prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infections. An inadequate dietary intake and abnormal gastric pH levels are common in critically ill patients receiving antifungal treatment with posaconazole, resulting in unpredictable bioavailability and sub-therapeutic plasma concentrations. This study was carried out to elucidate the impact of pH on posaconazole absorption and to explore the underlying mechanisms of enhanced intestinal absorption when coadministering an acidic carbonated beverage. In contrast to previously published studies, in which only plasma concentrations were determined, we also explored the gastric and intestinal behaviour of posaconazole after a single oral dose.Methods: A crossover study was performed in five healthy subjects. A single dose (10 mL) of posaconazole suspension (40 mg/mL) was administered orally in four different conditions: with 330 mL of water (condition 1); with 330 mL of a cola beverage [Coca-Cola®] (condition 2); with 330 mL of water following intake of the proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole 40 mg once daily for 3 days (condition 3); or with 330 mL of Coca-Cola® following intake of esomeprazole 40 mg once daily for 3 days (condition 4). After administration, gastrointestinal fluid and plasma samples were collected at regular time points, and posaconazole concentrations were determined.Results: Compared with administration with water, coadministration of Coca-Cola® did not alter the pH of the intraluminal environment but did significantly increase posaconazole gastric concentrations (+102%; p < 0.001) and systemic exposure (+70%; p<0.05). This enhancement could be attributed to improved posaconazole solubility in Coca-Cola® and prolonged gastric residence. Coadministration of esomeprazole led to an increased gastric pH, which was accompanied by decreased posaconazole absorption; the mean plasma and gastric area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values decreased by 37% and 84%, respectively. Simultaneous intake of Coca-Cola® could not completely compensate for the increase in pH induced by esomeprazole; compared with the reference condition, the mean plasma and gastric AUC values were still decreased by 19% and 73%, respectively. A good correlation between plasma and gastric posaconazole concentrations was observed (r=0.8165; p<0.0001), indicating that dissolution in the stomach dictates absorption of posaconazole.Conclusions: These results demonstrate that coadministration of Coca-Cola® has a positive effect on posaconazole bioavailability in the fasted state. However, it can only be considered a partially efficient strategy to increase absorption in patients with inadequate food intake who exhibit abnormal gastric pH levels due to coadministration of acid-suppressive agents.

Pharmacokinetics of caspofungin and voriconazole in critically ill patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVES During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), drug disposition changes significantly. Plasma concentrations are altered due to an expanded circulating volume leading to a decreased elimination. In addition, adsorption and sequestration of drugs by the ECMO circuit components may further alter pharmacokinetics. Treating patients during the ECMO period with antifungals is difficult. Loss in the ECMO circuit can potentially result in sub-therapeutic levels. METHODS Two cases are presented in which caspofungin and voriconazole levels and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined during the ECMO period. RESULTS Mean caspofungin trough and peak levels were 3.73 and 11.95 microg/mL. These are comparable to previously reported ones. Also pharmacokinetic parameters were identical to those reported in the literature. It seems that caspofungin is not sequestrated by the ECMO circuit, which is expected based on its low log P value. During the first days of ECMO therapy, voriconazole trough and peak levels did not differ much from those determined prior to ECMO therapy. However, at the start of ECMO therapy, the voriconazole dose was increased from 280 to 400 mg twice daily as loss due to binding to the circuit was expected. This increase was not immediately reflected in higher voriconazole levels, which may be due to drug sequestration by the circuit. However, the voriconazole half-life was extended up to 20 h in our patient. Two days after the dose increase, levels reached troughs >10 microg/mL and peaks of around 15 microg/mL, exceeding the therapeutic interval for voriconazole. This can possibly be explained by the saturation of binding sites on the ECMO circuit. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that adequate caspofungin plasma levels are maintained during ECMO. In the case of voriconazole, it is recommended to monitor plasma levels to ensure efficacy and avoid toxicity.

Interaction Between Valproate and Meropenem: A Retrospective Study:

Background: Valproate and meropenem are frequently used in the intensive care unit to treat seizures and serious infections, respectively. Several case reports have described a remarkable interaction between the drugs when administered concurrently. The interaction leads to a significant drop in plasma concentrations of valproate within 24 hours and relapse of seizures in some patients. Objective: To evaluate a consecutive population of hospitalized patients who were simultaneously treated with meropenem and valproate and assess the effect on epileptic activity. Methods: A retrospective study of an 18 month period was performed to assess the extent and clinical impact of this interaction. To assess the relevance of the interaction, the time-relationship between the drop in plasma concentrations and relapse in seizure activity and/or deterioration of electroencephalogram recordings was determined. We investigated other contributing preconvulsive cofactors and concomitant antiepileptic treatment. Drug interaction probability scale (DIPS) scores were calculated. Results: Thirty-nine patients were treated simultaneously with valproate and meropenem. The pharmacokinetic interaction was observed in all 39 patients, with an average drop in valproate plasma concentrations of 66%, The decrease occurred within 24 hours, as shown in 19 patients who had daily plasma concentration monitoring, The clinical impact of the interaction could not be assessed in 19 (49%) patients due to death (n = 13) or incomplete charts (n = 6). In the remaining 20 (51%) patients, DIPS scores were calculated and clinical relevance was assessed. The interaction was considered to be probable in 16 patients and possible in 4, as calculated by the DIPS. The interaction contributed to electroclinical deterioration in 11 patients. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic interaction between valproate and meropenem was present in all patients and led to a drop of valproate concentrations with an average of 66% within 24 hours. This interaction was clinically relevant with electroclinical deterioration in 55% of patients. To avoid patients’ possible neurologic deterioration, meropenem and valproate should not be administered together.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Phenytoin in Critically Ill Patients

Therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin is necessary to ensure therapeutic and nontoxic levels. Hypoalbuminemia, renal failure, and interactions with other highly protein‐bound drugs (e.g., valproic acid) alter protein binding of phenytoin. When these conditions are present, free serum concentrations, which represent the pharmacologically active entity, cannot be predicted from total serum concentrations. Besides general alterations in drug distribution and elimination, protein binding is often altered in critically ill patients. Case reports describe phenytoin toxicity secondary to inappropriate dosage adjustments based solely on total serum concentrations in patients with hypoalbuminemia. Free drug measurements and theoretical equations to facilitate the interpretation of total phenytoin serum levels have been introduced. However, they are not widely implemented in clinical practice because evidence of improvements in patient outcomes is limited. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of phenytoin is indispensable for correct interpretation of total serum concentrations when protein binding is altered. Free serum concentrations should be measured, or theoretically calculated if measurements are unavailable, to avoid misinterpretation of total serum levels and consequent inappropriate adjustments in the dosage of phenytoin in critically ill patients.

Mini-series: II. Clinical aspects. Clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug interactions in the ICU

BackgroundIn the critically ill, multiple drug therapies for acute and chronic conditions are often used at the same time and adverse drug events occur frequently. Many pharmacological and disease-related factors, e.g. altered renal and hepatic function, catecholamine-related circulatory changes, altered drug volume of distribution, enteral versus parenteral feeding and morbid obesity, along with concomitant multiple drug regimens may account for the wide inter-individual variability in drug exposure and response in critically ill patients and for the high risk for drug–drug interactions to occur. The practicing intensivist must remain aware of the major mechanisms for drug–drug interactions, among which the drug-metabolizing enzyme inhibitory or induction potential of associated chemical entities are paramount. Metabolism-based drug–drug interactions are largely due to changes in levels of drug-metabolizing enzymes caused by one drug, leading to changes in the systemic exposure clearance of another. Among the numerous drug-metabolizing enzymes identified to date, the activity of cytochrome P450s (CYP450) is a critical determinant of drug clearance and appears to be involved in the mechanism of numerous clinically relevant drug–drug interactions observed in critically ill patients.DiscussionThis manuscript will cover a practical overview of clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug–drug interactions. Medications frequently used in the intensive care unit such as benzodiazepines, immunosuppressive agents, opioid analgesics, certain anticonvulsants, the azoles and macrolides have the potential to interact with CYP450-mediated metabolism and may lead to toxicity or therapeutic failure.

Increasing Incidence of Mucormycosis in University Hospital, Belgium

To determine why incidence of mucormycosis infections was increasing in a large university hospital in Belgium, we examined case data from 2000–2009. We found the increase was not related to voriconazole use but most probably to an increase in high-risk patients, particularly those with underlying hematologic malignancies.

Augmented Renal Clearance in the Critically Ill: How to Assess Kidney Function

BACKGROUND: Augmented renal clearance in critically ill patients can result in underdosing of life-saving drugs, potentially leading to therapeutic failure. To detect this phenomenon, correct assessment of the kidney function is essential. Currently, little is known about the validity of mathematical formulas to estimate renal function in this subset of patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of different methods to estimate kidney function in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance by comparing measured renal clearance with estimated clearance using different formulas. METHODS: An observational, retrospective, single-center study was conducted in a 34-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of the University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Adults admitted to the SICU in 2010 with a measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 120 mL/min or more (based on 24-hour urinary collection) were included. The measured clearance values were compared with estimated clearance values as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault (CrClCG) method and the re-expressed 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) formula. Spearman rank order correlation was performed to determine the relationship between measured and estimated clearances. Bland-Altman plots were evaluated to assess bias and limits of agreement between the 2 methods. RESULTS: Records on 1317 patients were screened. Augmented renal clearance was present in 390 patients. Spearman correlation showed fair correlation between measured and estimated clearances (rs = 0.343; p < 0.001 [CrClCG] and rs = 0.290; p < 0.001 [eGFR]). Bias was −11.2 mL/min with limits of agreement (–131.7; 109.3 mL/min [CrClCG]) and −19.9 mL/min with limits of agreement (–170.4; 130.7 mL/min [eGFR]). CONCLUSIONS: Estimated renal clearances, such as the eGFR estimated by the MDRD formula or CrCl estimated by CG, showed poor agreement with measured CrCl values in our critically ill population displaying augmented renal clearance. Clinicians should be cautious when interpreting kidney function based on estimating equations in this subset of patients. Instead, measured CrCl using urinary collection is recommended in patients suspected of displaying augmented renal clearance.