Isabelle Bourdeix

Clozapine in drug induced psychosis in Parkinson’s disease: a randomised, placebo controlled study with open follow up

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of clozapine in drug induced psychosis in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: A four week, randomised, double blind, parallel comparison of clozapine and placebo, followed by a 12 week clozapine open period, plus a one month period after drug discontinuation, in 60 patients with PD. The primary efficacy outcome was the “clinical global impression scale” (CGI); the positive subscore of the “positive and negative syndrome scale” (PANSS) was used as the secondary efficacy parameter and the “unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale” (UPDRS) and the “mini mental test examination” (MMSE) as safety outcomes. Results: The mean (SD) dosage of clozapine was 35.8 (12.5–50) mg at the end of the double blind period. The mean (SD) scores on the CGI improved by 1.8 (1.5) for the clozapine group compared with 0.6 (1.1) for the placebo group (p  =  0.001). The mean (SD) positive subscore of PANSS improved by 5.6 (3.9) for the clozapine group (0.8 (2.8) for the placebo group; p < 0.0001). At the end of the open period, 25 patients had completely recovered from delusions and hallucinations, and 19 experienced a relapse within one month after the clozapine washout period. The UPDRS motor and MMSE mean scores did not change significantly in either group. Somnolence was more frequent with clozapine than with placebo. Conclusions: Clozapine at a mean dose lower than 50 mg/day improves drug induced psychosis in PD without significant worsening of motor function, and the effect wears off once the treatment stops.

A Proof-of-Concept, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Omalizumab in Patients With Severe, Difficult-to-Control, Nonatopic Asthma

BACKGROUND While up to 50% of patients with severe asthma have no evidence of allergy, IgE has been linked to asthma, irrespective of atopic status. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is reported to significantly benefit a subset of patients with severe, persistent, allergic asthma. Therefore, we investigated whether omalizumab has biologic and clinical effects in patients with refractory nonatopic asthma. METHODS Forty-one adult patients who, despite daily treatment with or without maintenance oral corticosteroids, had severe, nonatopic, refractory asthma according to GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) step 4, were randomized to receive omalizumab or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point was the change in expression of high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI) on blood basophils and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC2) after 16 weeks. The impact of omalizumab on lung function and clinical variables was also examined. RESULTS Compared with placebo, omalizumab resulted in a statistically significant reduction in FcεRI expression on basophils and pDC2 (P < .001). The omalizumab group also showed an overall increase in FEV1 compared with baseline (+250 mL, P = .032; +9.9%, P = .029). A trend toward improvement in global evaluation of treatment effectiveness and asthma exacerbation rate was also observed. CONCLUSIONS Omalizumab negatively regulates FcεRI expression in patients with severe nonatopic asthma, as it does in severe atopic asthma. Omalizumab may have a therapeutic role in severe nonatopic asthma. Nonetheless, our preliminary findings support further investigation to better assess the clinical efficacy of omalizumab. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01007149; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov and European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT; No.: 2009-010937-38; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu.

Omalizumab-induced decrease of FcɛRI expression in patients with severe allergic asthma

BACKGROUND It is documented that omalizumab treatment reduces the cell surface expression of immunoglobulin E high-affinity receptor (FcɛRI) on several cell types. This has not been investigated in patients with uncontrolled severe persistent allergic asthma. METHODS In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, patients with severe allergic asthma uncontrolled by high dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β(2)-agonist received either omalizumab (n = 20) or placebo (n = 11) over 16 weeks at appropriate doses and frequencies. Baseline and end of study (week 16) FcɛRI expression on basophils and plasmacytoid dendritic cells was determined by flow cytometry for the primary endpoint. Secondary efficacy endpoints included asthma control and lung function as part of an initial investigation into the use of FcɛRI expression as a marker of response. RESULTS In the omalizumab group, and with respect to placebo, FcɛRI expression was significantly reduced at end of study on basophils (-82.6%, p < 0.01) and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (-44.2%, p = 0.029). FcɛRI expression reduction was not found to be correlated with clinical response. CONCLUSIONS Long-term omalizumab treatment induced reduction of FcɛRI expression on circulating basophils and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. These changes were not associated with those of clinical features related to severe asthma, which does not support further investigation into its use as a predictive marker of response. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT00454051) and the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT (identifier: 2006-003591-35).

Efficacy and Tolerability of Entacapone as Adjunctive Therapy to Levodopa in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease and End-of-Dose Deterioration in Daily Medical Practice: An Open, Multicenter Study

Entacapone is a potent, reversible and orally active inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase. This open multicenter study evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of entacapone as adjunct therapy to levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (≧3 daily doses) in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The 8-week study included 489 patients under conditions of typical daily medical practice. Patients were treated with a 200-mg fixed dose of entacapone administered with each scheduled dose of levodopa to a maximum of 10 doses per day. Other antiparkinsonian medication should have been stable for at least 1 month. The primary efficacy criteria were: (1) Part II (activities of daily living, ADL) of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), (2) the reduction of ‘off’ time during the daily waking period as assessed by the percentage of patients improving by at least one category at Item 39 of Part IV of the UPDRS. Secondary outcome measures included: (1) the investigator’s global assessment of change, (2) quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Adverse events, vital signs and liver enzymes were monitored at weeks 2 and 8. The baseline mean score for ADL was 10.5 (±7.04), which decreased to 8.5 (±6.37) at the end of the study (p < 0.0001). Compared to baseline, 40.8% of patients experienced a reduction in ‘off’ time during the waking period; this improvement was highly significant (p < 0.0001). A reduction in the daily dose of levodopa was observed in 35.8% of patients (mean decrease 209 ± 149 mg). QoL was improved by a mean of 10% in all categories of the PDQ-39 (p < 0.001), except social support and cognition. This improvement was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The dyskinesia score (UPDRS Item 32) was decreased significantly from 2.3 to 2.1 from baseline to end of study (p < 0.001), although 52.7% of patients reported levodopa-induced dyskinesia as an adverse event. There was no case of increased liver enzymes. The study results confirm that the excellent risk/benefit ratio seen in phase III controlled studies can be seen in daily neurological practice. Moreover, the study suggests that the benefits of entacapone are associated with a significant improvement in QoL.

Parkinson's disease dementia can be easily detected in routine clinical practice.

Parkinsons disease (PD) is mainly characterized by its motor manifestations, but it is also frequently associated with dementia. Early diagnosis of PD dementia (PDD) is particularly important because effective cholinesterase inhibitor treatments are available. This study aimed at validating a short procedure for screening for PDD in routine clinical practice and which adopts recently published diagnostic criteria. One hundred eighty‐eight patients with PD participated in the study. The examination procedure comprised three steps: standard clinical examination, a short cognitive function assessment fulfilling the requirements of the Movement Disorders Society (Mini Mental State Examination, five‐word test, word generation task, and impact on daily life, including a questionnaire on compliance with medication) and an extensive evaluation of cognitive functions and behavior. After each step, the suspected presence or absence of dementia was recorded. After the short cognitive function assessment, PDD was suspected in 18.62% of the patients [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.32‐24.93%]. After the extensive assessment, 21.81% (95% CI: 16.13‐28.40%) met the criteria for probable PDD. The short batterys sensitivity and specificity were 65.85% (95% CI = 49.41‐79.92%) and 94.56% (95% CI = 89.56‐97.62%), respectively. A stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that use of a specific cut‐off considerably enhanced the short batterys sensitivity (85.37%, 95% CI = 70.83‐94.43%) without decreasing its specificity (83.67%, 95% CI = 76.69‐89.25%). With an easy‐to‐use, short battery of tests that are commonly used in routine clinical practice, it is possible to diagnose PDD in accordance with reference criteria and with the same sensitivity and specificity as in a more extensive evaluation.

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Oropharyngeal Side Effects in Users of Inhaled Corticosteroids in a Real-Life Setting

BACKGROUND Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are extensively used to treat asthma, and more recently, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Oropharyngeal disorders represent the most frequent side effect of these drugs, which may have a negative impact on adherence. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prevalence of oropharyngeal disorders in users of ICS in a real-life setting and investigate the factors associated with their occurrence. METHODS For this observational cross-sectional study, general practitioners and pulmonologists were contacted and asked to include patients suffering from asthma or COPD treated by ICS. Physicians collected data during a medical examination. A multivariate regression model for the occurrence of oropharyngeal disorders was constructed. RESULTS A total of 1778 physicians included 6740 patients. The mean (SD) age was 51.3 (18.5) years, 44.0% had no smoking history, and the ICS indication was asthma in 63.9% of subjects. Of the study subjects, 52.3% used beclometasone (43.4% without a long-acting ss(2)-agonist, LABA); 22.1% used budesonide (18.8% with a LABA), and 25.6% used fluticasone (19.3% with a LABA in a single inhaler). One-third (34.7%) of subjects suffered from at least one oropharyngeal disorder; the most frequently reported were hoarseness, tingling, mouth irritation, and reddening. Multivariate regression analysis found that the factors positively associated with oropharyngeal disorders were COPD indication [odds ratio (OR) 1.600; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 1.391, 1.839], nominal daily dose (OR = 1.388; 95% CI 1.227, 1.569), decreased adherence (OR = 1.318; 95% CI 1.104, 1.574) and the use of fluticasone (OR = 1.176; 95% CI 1.008, 1.372), whereas those negatively associated were the absence of smoking history (OR = 0.837; 95% CI 0.742, 0.945), increased adherence (OR = 0.663; 95% CI 0.581, 0.755), and beclometasone use (OR = 0.630; 95% CI 0.543, 0.732). CONCLUSIONS The high prevalence of oropharyngeal disorders and the association of adherence with these must be taken into account by prescribers, especially in patients suffering from COPD, a relatively new group of ICS users.

Formoterol 12 μg BID administered via single-dose dry powder inhaler in adults with asthma suboptimally controlled with salmeterol or on-demand salbutamol: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study

Abstract Background : Although salmeterol and formoterol are both long-acting beta 2 adrenergic receptor agonist bronchodilators, there are distinct differences between them that could translate into differences in clinical response in some patients. Objective : The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of formoterol in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma that was suboptimally controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) combined with on-demand salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) with or without salmeterol. Methods : This multicenter, 4-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study included adult patients (age ≥18 years) with suboptimally controlled asthma (mean salbutamol use, ≥2 puffs/d via pressurized metered-dose inhaler [100 μg/puff]). Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive formoterol 12 μg BID via single-dose dry powder inhaler plus on-demand salbutamol or to continue their existing treatment with either on-demand salbutamol alone or salmeterol 50 μg BID via multidose dry powder inhaler plus on-demand salbutamol. ICS regimens were unchanged during the trial. The primary efficacy variable was evening predose peak expiratory flow (PEF). Secondary variables included further measures of asthma symptom control. Results : A total of 6239 adult patients entered the study; data from 6155 patients were available for analysis. Patients who were switched from salmeterol to formoterol reported a significant increase in mean (SD) evening predose PEF compared with patients who continued their existing treatment (402.9 [112.1] vs 385.5 [107.5] Umin, respectively; P P Conclusion : In this study, formoterol significantly improved lung function and control of asthma symptoms and decreased use of rescue medication in patients whose asthma had been suboptimally controlled with an ICS in combination with on-demand salbutamol with or without salmeterol.

Is There a Difference between Levodopa/ Dopa-Decarboxylase Inhibitor and Entacapone and Levodopa/Dopa-Decarboxylase Inhibitor Dose Fractionation Strategies in Parkinson’s Disease Patients Experiencing Symptom Re-Emergence due to Wearing-Off?

Two strategies to manage symptom re-emergence due to wearing-off with conventional levodopa/dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) therapy were compared in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) in this randomized, open-label trial. PD patients receiving 3 daily doses of levodopa/DDCI were randomized to either levodopa/DDCI and entacapone or an increased dose frequency of levodopa/DDCI with or without an increased total daily dose (dose fractionation). After 1 month of treatment, patients were followed up for 1 year. A greater proportion of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone-treated patients had treatment success compared with dose-fractionated patients, according to investigator Clinical Global Impression of Change scores at 1 month (68 vs. 59%, respectively) and 1 year (60 vs. 51%, respectively). Mean ‘off’ time (time with symptoms) was improved in both groups at 1 month and 1 year, despite a reduction in the mean daily levodopa dose in the levodopa/DDCI and entacapone group at 1 month. The mean daily levodopa dose was increased in the dose fractionation group. At 1 month, there was a 4% reduction in patients experiencing dyskinesia with levodopa/DDCI and entacapone and a 3% increase with dose fractionation. These data suggest that levodopa/DDCI and entacapone reduces time with symptoms, the rate of motor complications and the daily levodopa dose compared with dose fractionation. However, as the observed differences were not statistically significant, further studies are required to confirm these results.

Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone is the preferred treatment for Parkinson’s disease patients with motor fluctuations in routine practice: a retrospective, observational analysis of a large French cohort

Levodopa is the gold standard drug for the symptomatic control of Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, long‐term treatment with conventional formulations [levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI)], is associated with re‐emergence of symptoms because of wearing‐off and dyskinesia. Treatment with levodopa/DDCI and entacapone extends the half‐life of levodopa, avoiding deep troughs in levodopa plasma levels and providing more continuous delivery of levodopa to the brain. In this open‐label, retrospective, observational study we investigated the effects of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone therapy in 800 PD patients with motor fluctuations. Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone treatment was assessed as good/very good in improving motor fluctuations (64%) and activities of daily living (ADL; 62%). The therapeutic utility was considered to be good/very good in 70% of cases. Moreover, there was a reduction in levodopa dose in 20% of patients. Neurologists preferred levodopa/DDCI and entacapone compared with increasing levodopa dosage, dose‐fractionation or addition of a dopamine agonist (63%, 29% and 23% of patients respectively). Reasons included achieving more continuous dopaminergic stimulation (40%), reducing motor fluctuations (54%) and improving ADL (41%). This analysis reveals the preference of neurologists for levodopa/DDCI and entacapone over conventional levodopa‐modification strategies for the effective treatment of PD motor fluctuations in clinical practice.

Impact of ELN recommendations in the management of first‐line treated chronic myeloid leukaemia patients: a French cross‐sectional study

The availability of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has extended therapeutic options for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. Monitoring recommendations and clinical response goals have recently been updated. The objective of this study was to describe the profile of CML patients in chronic phase currently receiving first‐line therapy, including treatment, monitoring and response kinetics. A multicentre, cross‐sectional, epidemiological survey in unselected chronic phase CML patients in France attending consultations during a one‐month period was performed. 438 of 697 (62·8%) reported patients were currently receiving first‐line treatment and were analysed. Imatinib was the most frequently received treatment (72·4% of patients). Retrospective cytogenetic and molecular assessments at 3, 6, 12 or 18 months were available in 88·4% of patients. At the 12‐month assessment, 32·2% were not in major molecular response (MMR). At last assessment, among 355 patients with duration of treatment ≥ 12 months, 91·5% had achieved MMR and 66·5% were in deep molecular response. This study, performed in everyday practice population of CML patients, suggests that monitoring of molecular responses in real‐life practice is aligned with European LeukaemiaNet recommendations. The majority of patients still receiving first‐line treatment are in optimal response, with a few being classified as in the warning area or responding to failure.