Isabelle Hoorens

Primary focal hyperhidrosis: current treatment options and a step-by-step approach

Primary focal hyperhidrosis is a common disorder for which treatment is often a therapeutic challenge. A systematic review of current literature on the various treatment modalities for primary focal hyperhidrosis was performed and a step‐by‐step approach for the different types of primary focal hyperhidrosis (axillary, palmar, plantar and craniofacial) was established. Non‐surgical treatments (aluminium salts, local and systemic anticholinergics, botulinum toxin A (BTX‐A) injections and iontophoresis) are adequately supported by the current literature. More invasive surgical procedures (suction curettage and sympathetic denervation) have also been extensively investigated, and can offer a more definitive solution for cases of hyperhidrosis that are unresponsive to non‐surgical treatments. There is no consensus on specific techniques for sympathetic denervation, and this issue should be further examined by meta‐analysis. There are numerous treatment options available to improve the quality of life (QOL) of the hyperhidrosis patient. In practice, however, the challenge for the dermatologist remains to evaluate the severity of hyperhidrosis to achieve the best therapeutic outcome, this can be done most effectively using the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS).

Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma: evaluation of the indication criteria and predictive factors for extensive subclinical spread

The incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is rising and BCC treatment has an important impact on healthcare budget. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has the highest 5‐year cure rate but is an expensive technique.

Total-Body Examination vs Lesion-Directed Skin Cancer Screening.

IMPORTANCE Skin cancer is the most frequent cancer type. It remains unknown if and how screening programs can be organized in a cost-effective manner. OBJECTIVE To compare the 2 screening strategies of systematic total-body examination (TBE) and lesion-directed screening (LDS), with a focus on the participation rate, detection rate, anxiety, and cost. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based cross-sectional screenings by a team of 6 dermatologists were organized in 2 sociodemographically similar regions. The TBE was organized in a community of 9325 inhabitants 18 years and older (Wichelen, East Flanders, Belgium) during a 5-day screening (March 14-18, 2014). The LDS was organized in a sociodemographically comparable community (Nevele, East Flanders, Belgium) of 9484 adult inhabitants during a 4-day screening (April 22 and 25-27, 2014). The first population received a personal invitation for a standard TBE. In the second population, individuals were invited for an LDS if they had a lesion meeting 1 or more of the following criteria: ABCD rule (A, asymmetry; B, borders; C, colors; and D, differential structures), ugly duckling sign, new lesion lasting longer than 4 weeks, or red nonhealing lesions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES In total, 1982 individuals were screened, and 47 skin cancers (2.4%) were histologically confirmed, including 9 melanomas (0.5%), 37 basal cell carcinomas (1.9%), and 1 squamous cell carcinoma or Bowen disease (0.1%). RESULTS The positive predictive value for all suspicious lesions was 56.6% (47 of 83). The participation rate was 17.9% (1668 of 9325) in the TBE group vs 3.3% (314 of 9484) in the LDS group (P < .01). The skin cancer detection rate per 100 participants did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, with rates of 2.3% (39 of 1668) in the TBE group vs 3.2% (8 of 248) in the LDS group (P = .40). The operational effectiveness per 100 invitees was 0.4% (39 of 9325) in the TBE group vs 0.1% (8 of 9484) in the LDS group (P < .01). In addition, LDS was 5.6 times less time consuming than TBE. Participants in the LDS group had significantly higher baseline anxiety levels compared with participants in the TBE group (3.7 vs 3.3 points on a visual analog scale, P < .01). In screenees without a suspicious lesion, anxiety levels significantly dropped after screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Total-body examination yielded a higher absolute number of skin cancers. Lesion-directed screening had a similar detection rate of 3.2% (8 of 248) but was 5.6 times less time consuming. When performed by dermatologists, LDS is an acceptable alternative screening method in health care systems with limited budgets or long waiting lists.

Is early detection of basal cell carcinoma worthwhile? Systematic review based on the WHO criteria for screening.

The incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has risen three‐ to fourfold over the last 30 years and is expected to continue to increase with ageing of the population. Although BCC has a good prognosis, it causes significant morbidity and has an important impact on the public health budget due to direct treatment costs. Based on the existing evidence, a systematic evaluation of the World Health Organization criteria was performed to determine whether earlier detection of BCC could reduce morbidity and cost. BCC slowly increases in size, with a median increase in diameter of 0·5 mm over 10 weeks. There is an important delay in diagnosis ranging from 19 to 25 months. In several studies BCC size was the main determinant of treatment cost, surgical complexity, reconstruction technique and the specific surgical procedure performed, such as Mohs micrographic surgery or surgical excision. One study showed that size also seems to affect the cost per treatment for other nonsurgical options. The use of vismodegib, an inhibitor of the hedgehog pathway, is confined to locally advanced or metastatic BCC. Delays in diagnosis and appropriate treatment are the most important underlying causes in the occurrence of giant BCC and/or BCC with metastasis. Although the latter represent only a very small fraction of all BCCs, the majority of them are located in the facial region. The available data point to a slow increase in the size of BCCs over time. Size is one of the major determinants in choice of treatment and the associated cost, especially for facial BCC. Therefore we conclude that current data support early detection and adequate management of BCCs on the face.

Systemic immune changes associated with adjuvant interferon-α2b-therapy in stage III melanoma patients: failure at the effector phase?

Interferon-&agr; (IFN-&agr;) is the only approved adjuvant treatment for high-risk melanoma patients in Europe, but the impact on overall survival is low. Although it is believed that IFN-&agr; exerts its effects through immunomodulation, data on its impact on circulating immune cells are scarce. Flow cytometry was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells of eight IFN-&agr;2b-treated stage III melanoma patients and 26 untreated stage III melanoma patients as controls to enumerate myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (mDC and pDC), monocytic and polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (mMDSC and pmnMDSC) and cytotoxic and regulatory T-cells (Tregs). The expression of several immunosuppressive markers [indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), programmed-death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4)] was explored. IDO activity in the blood was confirmed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography. Compared with controls, IFN-&agr;2b treatment was associated with increased IDO expression by pDCs (P=0.021) and an increased kynurenine/tryptophan ratio in the serum (P=0.004), compatible with IDO enzyme activity. Furthermore, IFN-&agr;2b-treated patients had a decreased mDC/DC ratio (P=0.002), decreased CD3+ lymphocytes (P=0.034) and increased circulating Treg (P<0.001) and PD-L1+cytotoxic T-cell (P=0.001) frequencies. IDO expression is upregulated in circulating pDCs of high-risk melanoma patients treated with adjuvant IFN-&agr;2b. This is associated with tryptophan consumption in the patients’ serum and higher Treg and PD-L1+cytotoxic T-cell frequencies. We hypothesize that in IFN-&agr;2b-treated patients, IDO activity acts as a negative feedback mechanism and might limit the clinical efficacy of IFN-&agr;2b therapy. The underlying mechanism should be explored as this could lead to more efficient immunotherapies.

Burden of skin cancer in Belgium and cost-effectiveness of primary prevention by reducing ultraviolet exposure

Skin cancer (melanoma- and non-melanoma skin cancer) is one of the most rapidly increasing cancers worldwide. This study analysed the current and future economic burden of skin cancer in Belgium and the cost-effectiveness of primary prevention of skin cancer. A retrospective bottom-up cost-of-illness study was performed, together with a Markov model in order to analyse the cost-effectiveness and the budget impact analysis of primary prevention of skin cancer in Belgium. Total prevalence of skin cancer in Belgium was estimated to triple in the next 20years. The total economic burden of skin cancer in 2014 in Belgium was estimated at €106 million, with a cumulative cost of €3 billion in 2034. The majority of this total cost was due to melanoma (65%). Over a period of 50years, both a sensitisation campaign and a total ban on sunbed use would lead to a gain in quality-adjusted life-years and cost-savings. For every euro invested in the campaign, €3.6 would be saved on the long-term for the healthcare payer. Policy makers and clinicians should promote UV protection strategies, as they were estimated to be dominant strategies.

A short dermoscopy training increases diagnostic performance in both inexperienced and experienced dermatologists

Dermoscopy is a clinical tool known to improve the early detection of melanoma and other malignancies of the skin, but only for experienced users. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of short (3‐hour) dermoscopy training sessions in both residents and practicing dermatologists. The training improved diagnostic accuracy for both melanocytic and nonmelanocytic neoplasms of the skin and the observed effect was the highest for residents but was also significant for more experienced practicing dermatologists.

Cost-effectiveness and Budget Effect Analysis of a Population-Based Skin Cancer Screening

Importance Several epidemiological studies show an alarming global increase in incidence of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Objectives To examine the cost-effectiveness of 2 population-based skin cancer screening methods and to assess their budget effect and the influence on skin cancer epidemiological findings. Design, Setting, and Participants A Markov model with a latent period of 20 years and a time horizon of 50 years was used to analyze the cost-effectiveness (societal perspective) and budget effect (public health care payer perspective) of 2 population-based skin cancer screening programs in Belgium compared with the absence of a screening program. A health economic analysis was based on a clinical trial performed in 2014 in Belgium. In the economic model, the total Belgian population 18 years or older was assumed to have been invited for the screening program. Main Outcomes and Measures The influence of the screening program on skin cancer epidemiological findings and the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, as well as the budget effect, expressed as the net costs for the health care payer over 50 years. Results All participants (1668 total-body skin examination [TBSE] and 248 lesion-directed screening [LDS]) were screened by a team of 6 dermatologists from March 14 to 18, 2014, for TSBE and April 22 and 25 to 27, 2014, for LDS. Both screening strategies produced a gain in QALYs, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of &OV0556;33 072 (US

Comparison of Ex Vivo and In Vivo Dermoscopy in Dermatopathologic Evaluation of Skin Tumors.

35 475) per QALY in men and &OV0556;18 687 (US

Pathologic evaluation of skin tumors with ex vivo dermoscopy with derm dotting

20 044) per QALY in women for TBSE and &OV0556;34 836 (US