Iskandar Abdullaev

Transformation of water management in Central Asia: from State-centric, hydraulic mission to socio-political control

This paper presents the analysis of historical transformation of water management in Central Asia with the specific focus on Uzbekistan. The time frame of the analysis is from the Middle Ages to contemporary times, with different political, social and economic settings in the framework of theory of transformative capacity of institutions. Empirical evidence suggests that the approach of the hydraulic mission has not changed dramatically over the years, but transformed into various forms of control on water management. In recent decades, integrated water resources management paradigms are gaining momentum, while the traditional, State-centric, hydraulic mission approach is losing its attractiveness in the arid Central Asian region. Nevertheless, the State-centric model of water management still persists in the region with clear signs that water management is still more under socio-political control.

Adoption of integrated water resources management principles and its impacts: lessons from Ferghana Valley

The Ferghana Valley Project, initiated in 2001, has promoted institutional change in the post-Soviet irrigation sector in this part of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. This paper presents the short-term (5-year) impacts of integrated water resources management project activities focused on water user participation in the South Ferghana Canal of Ferghana Province in Uzbekistan on irrigation water delivery and crop productivity. Irrigation performance assessment indicators indicate only slight improvements in water delivery and crop yields. Although water was important, larger changes in the agricultural sector of Uzbekistan dominated outcomes in this relatively short time span.

Setting up the agenda for water reforms in Central Asia: Does the nexus approach help?

Instead of re-orienting towards enhancing efficiency, the attention of political economies of the Central Asian States continues to be riveted on increasing resource extraction. Hydraulic mission (engineering water management) maintains its dominating status within water sector reforms of all countries. Forging mutually beneficial regimes for water–energy–agriculture–climate change systems as per the nexus concept requires robust governance and intersectorial coordination. It is historically evident that the Asian countries in question utilized a partial nexus system under the common Soviet centralized economic model. Within the nexus context, the current situation is outlined against the background of the boundary concept, security approach, and systems analyses as well as its holistic melding with the decade-long integrated water resources management efforts in Central Asia. The ability of existing institutional platforms, such as basin councils, to implement a nexus approach to local river catchments, regional watersheds or a national level is examined.

Improving water governance in Central Asia through application of data management tools

Contemporary water management decisions use many sources and forms of data. The paper discusses the implementation results of data management activities in the water sector carried out in five countries of the Central Asia region. Geoinformation systems, remote sensing tools and databases have been applied worldwide for improving water resources management with differing levels of success. Water management organisations, equipped with data management tools will have better capacities to adapt their decision-making in the changing availability and scarcity of water resources. Application of data management tools for improving collection, storage and processing of data and information are a first step towards improved water governance.

Water in Central Asia: an integrated assessment for science-based management

Central Asia contains one of the largest internal drainage basins in the world, and its continental location results in limited availability of both surface and groundwater. Since the twentieth century, water resources of the region have been exploited beyond sustainable levels. From small Mongolian headwater streams to the mighty Aral Sea, surface waters have been partially desiccated. Demands from the agricultural, energy and raw material sectors as well as population growth have not only increased water abstractions, but also left a diverse and strong pollution footprint on rivers, lakes and groundwater bodies. Such changes in water quantity and quality have not only led to a degradation of aquatic and riparian ecosystems, but also they have placed the region’s socioeconomic development at risk. Because of the complexity of Central Asia’s water problems, integrated assessment and management approaches are required. Despite some shortcomings in practical implementation, the widespread adoption of the Integrated Water Resources Management and water–food–energy nexus approaches may be keys to a more sustainable future. This thematic issue aims to provide documentation of the current state of scientific knowledge, ranging from hydrological research to water quality investigations, and offers an assessment of ecosystems and the services provided by them. Reviews and case studies on different management options conclude the thematic issue by providing insights into field-tested solutions for the region’s water challenges.

River basin management in Central Asia: evidence from Isfara Basin, Fergana Valley

AbstractAround the world, state water management organizations are the agents delegated to implement basin-level integrated water resources management strategies. In Central Asia, the hydrographic water management—deeming a river basin or a catchment area a proper water management unit—is a widely accepted concept. Yet, state water bureaucracies are incapable and/or reluctant to interact on water management with the “outsiders”, both domestically and internationally. To overcome this shortcoming, basin councils are promoted as formalized platforms to facilitate inter-sectoral dialogue, and likewise, to support local participatory processes within river basin planning and management. The approach offers a framework of integrating water sector planning and management with environmental, social and economic agendas of a given basin. State water management organizations are designated the role of technical secretariats of such basin councils which should be facilitating and helping to improve other stakeholders’ behavioral response in watersheds. The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the process of implementation of the river basin model through the theory of change based on issues, challenges and recommendations identified in the transboundary Central Asian Isfara River Basin shared by Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

Water-Energy-Food-Environmental Nexus in Central Asia: From Transition to Transformation

Central Asian states are undergoing social-political-economic transitions since early 1990s including natural resources management systems. Energy-water-food linkages play a critical role for economic development and shared prosperity. These three resources are tightly interconnected, forming a resource and policy nexus. The regional political economies are still based on increasing resource abstraction instead of its reorientation toward efficiency improvements.

Community water management in northern Afghanistan: social fabric and management performance

The management of irrigation water in Afghanistan is mostly a local matter, with no involvement of central government. It is important to understand the internal fabric of Afghan community water management for better designing and implementing both national water policies and international 15 support. The paper examines how community water management works in Afghanistan with illustrations from selected irrigation systems in north Afghanistan. The socio-technical analysis of local water management in selected irrigation canals in north Afghanistan has been crucial to understanding water management.