Israel Abellán

Randomized Prospective Study to Compare Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Umbilical Single-incision Appendectomy

Introduction: The use of single-incision laparoscopic surgery may represent an improvement over conventional laparoscopic surgery. In recent years, more and more articles have been published demonstrating the feasibility of this approach. Hence, for this reason, we present this randomized prospective study to compare the 2 techniques. Methods: Between September 2009 and December 2010, a total of 184 patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis and indicated for surgery were included in the study, of whom, 91 received an appendectomy via a single umbilical incision and 93 via conventional laparoscopy. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital (Murcia). The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with inscription number NCT0151529. All the operations were performed by the same team of surgeons. Results: As far as the demographical results of the study population are concerned, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups for age, weight, sex, body mass index, and removed appendix type. Operating time was longer with the single-port approach: 38.13 ± 13.49 versus 32.12 ± 12.44 minutes (P = 0.02). Significant differences were observed for postoperative pain, which was measured on the visual analog scale, with less pain reported in the single-incision group: 2.76 ± 1.64 versus 3.78 ± 1.76 (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for early and late complications and lengths of hospital stay measured in postoperative hours. Conclusions: The transumbilical single-port approach is seen as a feasible technique for performing appendectomy. It does not increase the rate of complications and represents a possible alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

The influence of the percentage of the common limb in weight loss and nutritional alterations after laparoscopic gastric bypass

BACKGROUND Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity. There is no consensus over ideal limb length when the bypass is created and published studies do not take into account the influence of the common limb (CL) on weight loss. The objective was to study the influence of the common limb after RYGB. The setting was the Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital in Murcia, Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective study includes 151 patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB surgery for morbid obesity. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their body mass index. The small intestine (SI) was measured using micro forceps so that the percentage of common limb (%CL) could then be compared against the total SI in each patient. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) in relation to the %CL was calculated at 3, 12, and 24 months. A series of tests was conducted simultaneously to analyze nutritional deficiencies and their relation to the %CL. RESULTS The total jejunoileal segment and the %CL in the groups of both obese and super-obese patients had no influence on the %EWL in either group for any of the periods studied. The patients with a %CL<50% had greater nutritional deficiencies in the follow-up period and required supplements and more frequent laboratory tests. CONCLUSIONS The %CL has no effect on weight loss in RYGB patients. A lower %CL is related to greater nutritional deficiencies.

Aprendizaje de la cirugía del cáncer de recto por laparoscopia sin aumento de la morbimortalidad

INTRODUCTION The treatment of rectal cancer via laparoscopy is controversial due to its technical complexity. Several randomized prospective studies have demonstrated clear advantages for the patient with similar oncological results to those of open surgery, although during the learning of this surgical technique there may be an increase in complications and a worse prognosis. OBJECTIVE Our aim is to analyze how the learning curve for rectal cancer via laparoscopy influences intra- and postoperative results and oncological markers. A retrospective review was conducted of the first 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal neoplasia. The operations were performed by the same surgical team with a wide experience in the treatment of open colorectal cancer and qualified to perform advanced laparoscopic surgery. We analyzed sex, ASA, tumour location, neoadjuvant treatment, surgical technique, operating time, conversion, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, number of lymph nodes, stage and involvement of margins. RESULTS Significant differences were observed with regard to surgical time (224 min in the first group, 204 min in the second group), with a higher rate of conversion in the first group (22.5%) than in the second (11.3%). No significant differences were noted for rate of conservative sphincter surgery, length of hospital stay, post-surgical complications, number of affected/isolated lymph nodes or affected circumferential and distal margins. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to learn this complex surgical technique without compromising the patients safety and oncological outcome.

Stimulation of the efferent limb before ileostomy closure: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND:Postoperative ileus is the most common complication after ileostomy closure with an increase in morbidity, hospital stay, and health care costs. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study is to assess the utility of a new technique for reducing postoperative ileus after protective ileostomy closure. DESIGN:This is a prospective randomized study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01881594). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either stimulation through the efferent limb of the ileostomy before surgery or nonstimulation before surgery. SETTING:This study was conducted at the Department of Surgery of the Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinical University Hospital (Murcia). PATIENTS:Seventy patients underwent surgery for ileostomy closure. In 35 patients, during the 2 weeks before surgery, daily stimulation of the defunctionalized stomal segment was performed by using a thick solution (500 mL of physiological saline associated with 30 g of thickening agent, Nestle Resource, Vevey, Switzerland). In the other 35 patients, stimulation was not performed before surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The primary outcome was postoperative ileus. The secondary outcomes included time to tolerating a diet and postoperative stay. RESULTS:Both groups of patients were homogenous for demographic data, characteristics of the first rectal cancer operation, and intersurgery periods. After ileostomy closure, the stimulated group of patients had an earlier return to oral tolerance (1.06 vs 2.57 days; p = 0.007) and passage of flatus or stool (1.14 vs 2.85 days; p <0.001) than the nonstimulated group of patients. The incidence of postoperative ileus (2.85% vs 20%; p = 0.024) and hospital stay (2.49 vs 4.61 days; p = 0.002) was also lower in the stimulated patients. LIMITATIONS:Small numbers of patients means that no definitive statements can be made regarding the effectiveness of this technique. CONCLUSIONS:Stimulation of the efferent limb of the ileostomy before closure is a safe technique that reduces postoperative ileus and fosters early intestinal transit and oral tolerance with a shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Estimulación del asa eferente previa al cierre de ileostomía

There is a 17% complications rate after ileostomy closure, with paralytic ileus being the most common. With the aim of reducing this complication, stimulation via the afferent loop was performed daily for the 2 weeks prior to the stoma.

Colecistitis aguda enfisematosa de curso fulminante tras cirugía cardiaca

1. Reddy RH, Kumar B, Shah R, Mirsadraee S, Papagiannopoulos K, Lodge P, et al. Staged pulmonary and hepatic metastasectomy in colorectal cancer—is it worth it? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:151–4. 2. Ambiru S, Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K, Shimizu H, Kato A, et al. Resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;82:274–8. 3. Robinson BJ, Rice TW, Strong SA, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH. Is resection of pulmonary and hepatic metastases warranted in patients with colorectal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:66–75. discussion 75–6. 4. Parrilla Paricio P, Landa Garcı́a JI. Cirugı́a AEC. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana S.A.; 2010. 5. Cameron JL, Cameron MA. Current surgical therapy, 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2011. 6. Avital I, DeMatteo R. Combined resection of liver and lung metastases for colorectal cancer. Thorac Surg Clin. 2006;16:145–55. vi. 7. Dionigi G, Dionigi R, Boni L, Rovera F. Transdiaphragmatic approach to the thorax using mini-invasive devices. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16: 423–6. 8. Delis SG, Bakoyiannis A, Madariaga J, Tassopoulos N, Dervenis C. Transthoracic approach (TTA) for subdiaphragmatic liver metastasectomy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008;17:39–42.