Ivan Favero
University of Paris
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ivan Favero.
Nonlinear Optics: Materials, Fundamentals and Applications | 2009
Xavier Caillet; Aristide Lemaître; I. Sagnes; Ivan Favero; Giuseppe Leo; Sara Ducci
We demonstrate twin photon emission in a AlGaAs ridge microcavity at room temperature. The pump beam resonance leads to an important efficiency enhancement of the nonlinear process generating counter-propagating twin photons at 1.55 micron.
Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM) 2017 (2017), paper QF6C.2 | 2017
Simone Felicetti; Sergueï Fedortchenko; R. Rossi Jr.; Sara Ducci; Ivan Favero; Thomas Coudreau; Perola Milman
We introduce a cavity-optomechanical system where the temporal envelope of input/output pulses is controlled by an independent classical drive. We design protocols for quantum communication between distant mechanical resonators.
european quantum electronics conference | 2011
Christophe Baker; Lu Ding; P. Senellart; A. Lemaître; Sara Ducci; Giuseppe Leo; Ivan Favero
At the nanoscale, the optomechanical coupling increases thanks to a reduced optical/mechanical interaction volume and reduced mass of the mechanical oscillator [1,2]. In the context of nano-optomechanics, semiconductors like GaAs offer many assets. First their large refractive index allows confining optical energy in sub-wavelentgh sized high-Q cavities. Second, nanoscale mechanical oscillators are easily coupled to such on-chip cavities using top-down fabrication techniques.
Archive | 2010
Xavier Caillet; Adeline Orieux; Ivan Favero; Giuseppe Leo; Sara Ducci
In the last 25 years entangled photon pairs have been used first to test the foundations of quantum mechanics and then as building blocks in quantum information protocols : from the demonstration of the violation of Bell inequalities (Aspect et al., 1982; Tittel et al., 1998; Weihs et al., 1998) to the recent experiments in the domain of quantum-key distribution (Gisin et al., 2002), quantum computing (Deutch & Ekert, 1998; Wahther et al., 2005), teleportation (Bouwmeester et al., 1997) and absolute metrology (Migdall, 1999; Sergienko & Jaeger, 2003). The first process used to produce entangled two-photon states have been atomic radiative cascades (Aspect et al., 1982) and parametric fluorescence in birefringent dielectric materials (Kwiat et al., 1985). In order to achieve a good source, high collection efficiency is a key element because it affects the number of available photon pairs per unit time, and also because the presence of single photons having lost their twin is a source of noise in the detection. In this context we can mention several demonstrations of twin-photon generation based on either parametric down-conversion in periodically poled dielectric waveguides (Tanzilli et al., 2001; Banaszek et al., 2001) or four-wave mixing in optical fibers (Wang et al., 2001; Rarity et al. 2005; Fan & Migdall, 2007). An attractive alternative is provided by semiconductor materials, which exhibit a huge potential in terms of integration of novel optoelectronic devices. The first semiconductor source of entangled photons was based on the bi-exciton cascade of a quantum dot (Stevenson et al., 2006). With respect to this technique, parametric generation in semiconductor waveguides allows room-temperature operation and a high directionality of the emission, which dramatically enhances the collection efficiency. Several phase-matching schemes have been demonstrated in these systems (Ducci et al., 2005): form birefringence, modal phase matching, counterpropagating phase matching. In particular, the last one has attracted a deal of attention because of its unusual flexibility in the control of the quantum properties of the emitted photons (Walton et al., 2003; Walton et al., 2004; Perina, 2008). Here we present a semiconductor ridge microcavity emitting counterpropagating entangled photons; in Section 2 we explain the working principle of this device giving the details of the phase matching scheme and the effects of the microcavity. Section 3 is devoted to the
Quantum Sensing and Nano Electronics and Photonics XV | 2018
Michele Celebrano; Luca Carletti; Valerio F. Gili; Davide Rocco; Giovanni Pellegrini; Lavinia Ghirardini; L. Duò; Marco Finazzi; Andrea Locatelli; Ivan Favero; Giuseppe Leo; Aristide Lemaître; Costantino De Angelis
High-Brightness Sources and Light-driven Interactions | 2018
Alice Bernard; M. Ravaro; Ivan Favero; M. Krakowski; O. Parillaud; Bruno Gerard; Jean-Michel Gerard; Giuseppe Leo
Advanced Photonics 2018 (BGPP, IPR, NP, NOMA, Sensors, Networks, SPPCom, SOF) | 2018
Davide Rocco; Valerio F. Gili; Lavinia Ghirardini; Luca Carletti; Ivan Favero; Andrea Locatelli; Giuseppe Marino; Dragomir N. Neshev; Michele Celebrano; Marco Finazzi; Giuseppe Leo; Costantino De Angelis
Advanced Photonics 2018 (BGPP, IPR, NP, NOMA, Sensors, Networks, SPPCom, SOF) | 2018
Lavinia Ghirardini; Luca Carletti; Valerio F. Gili; Giovanni Pellegrini; L. Duò; Marco Finazzi; Davide Rocco; A. Locatelli; C. De Angelis; Ivan Favero; Iännis Roland; Giuseppe Leo; Aristide Lemaître; Michele Celebrano
The 7th International Multidisciplinary Conference on Optofluidics 2017 | 2017
Eduardo Gil-Santos; Christopher Baker; Matthieu Labousse; Arthur Goetschy; William Hease; Carmen Gomez; Aristide Lemaître; Giuseppe Leo; Cristiano Ciuti; Ivan Favero
Archive | 2017
Alice Bernard; M. Ravaro; Jean-Michel Gerard; MichelKrakowski; O. Parillaud; Bruno Gérard; Ivan Favero; Giuseppe Leo