Ivan Grbavac
University of Zagreb
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ivan Grbavac.
Reproductive Biomedicine Online | 2016
Dejan Ljiljak; Rea Bjelić; Romina Rakoš Justament; Ivan Bolanča; Ivan Grbavac; Jozo Tomić; Krunoslav Kuna
The in vitro fertilization (IVF) legislation can directly affect the success of IVF treatment. The illustration and support for these statements can be found in the Italian restrictive law (Law 40/2004) and the effect of its implementation. The aim of this study was to compare data on assisted reproduction treatment and outcome before and after the introduction of this new legislation and give answer to a question on the possible negative effects of restrictive IVF regulation using data from Croatia. Data were analysed retrospectively: the first group consisted of data from patients which underwent IVF/ICSI procedure during period of restrictions (group I) and the second one of data from patients which underwent IVF/ICSI procedure after the new law was enforced (group II).In both groups there were more antagonist cycles (71.9%) than agonist cycles (28.1%) ; but after the new law was enforced there were more antagonist cycles (81.4% for group II compared to 59.5% for group I). Regarding ICSI and IVF procedure ; for ICSI 68.7% in group I vs. 67.4% in group II, and for IVF cycles 31.3% in group I vs. 32.6% in group II. Ratio of ICSI and IVF was similar (χ²=0.598, df=1, p >.01) although we expected more ICSI cycles in group I. During restrictions (in group I, 49.2%) usually three embryos were implemented but after the enforcement of the new law (group II, 63.4%) mostly two embryos were implemented (χ²=77.70, df=2, p .01) leaving us with a conclusion that the pregnancy rate around 30% was achieved during enforcement of both laws. These results show that IVF regulation affects the treatment and outcomes in ART, and that for some issues in ART restrictive regulations has negative effects. Our findings represent clinical contribution for countries still debating the enforcement of restrictions in ART legislation.
Advances in Embryo Transfer | 2012
Ivan Grbavac; Dejan Ljiljak; Krunoslav Kuna
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a clinical symptom complex associated with ovarian enlargement resulting from exogenous gonadotropin therapy. In severe cases, a critical condition develops with massive ascites, marked ovarian enlargement, pleural effusion, electrolyte imbalance, hypovolemia with hypotension, oliguria, hemoconcentration, and thromboembolism (Madill JJ et al., 2008). Moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) has been calculated to occur in 0.2% to 2% of all ovarian stimulation cycles (Binder H et al., 2007).
Collegium Antropologicum | 2013
Zdenko Kraljević; Klaudija Višković; Mario Ledinsky; Dijana Zadravec; Ivan Grbavac; Marijana Bilandžija; Hrvojka Soljačić-Vraneš; Krunoslav Kuna; Ksenija Klasnić; Ivan Krolo
Collegium Antropologicum | 2009
Goran Grubišić; Petar Klarić; Ljubomir Jokanović; Vranes Hs; Ivan Grbavac; Ivan Bolanča
Collegium Antropologicum | 2010
Goran Grubišić; Biserka Vukosavić-Cimić; Zdenko Kraljević; Ahmed Pirkić; Ivan Grbavac; Ivan Bolanča
Acta Clinica Croatica | 2012
Damir Eljuga; Petar Klarić; Ivan Bolanča; Ivan Grbavac; Krunoslav Kuna
Archive | 2018
Klaudija Višković; Slaven Jurković; Ana Diklić; Doris Šegota; Milivoje Todić; Ivan Grbavac
Acta Clinica Croatica | 2015
Krunoslav Kuna; Ivan Grbavac; Ante Vuković; Nada Bilić; Zdenko Kraljević; Dražan Butorac
Acta Clinica Croatica | 2015
Krunoslav Kuna; Ivan Grbavac; Ante Vuković; Nada Bilić; Zdenko Kraljević; Dražan Butorac
Acta Clinica Croatica | 2012
Damir Eljuga; Petar Klarić; Ivan Bolanča; Ivan Grbavac; Krunoslav Kuna