Ivan R. Prince
Philips
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ivan R. Prince.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery | 2010
John Denyer; Alex Black; Kurt Nikander; Tony Dyche; Ivan R. Prince
BACKGROUND The time requirements for multiple daily nebulizer treatments are important impediments to the quality of life for most patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The I-neb Adaptive Aerosol Delivery (AAD) System can be used with a new mode of breathing during inhalation of aerosol, the Target Inhalation Mode (TIM). As a function of the TIM algorithm, the patient is guided to a slow and deep inhalation, which can result in shorter treatment times. METHODS This study was conducted as a 3-month patient handling study of the I-neb AAD System in 42 patients with CF aged 12-57 years. The I-neb AAD System was supplied in both the standard Tidal Breathing Mode (TBM), and in TIM. Patients were trained to use the I-neb AAD System in TIM for the delivery of all their inhaled medications, but if they were not comfortable with the TIM maneuver they could change to the TBM maneuver. The primary variables were compliance with the correct use of the I-neb AAD System, and treatment times. The secondary variables were based on study questionnaires at the end of the study and covered ease of use, patient confidence, and patient satisfaction with the I-neb AAD System. RESULTS There were a total of 10,240 complete treatments and of these, 8979 (88%) were in TIM. Compliance with the correct use of the I-neb AAD System was 97.6%. The mean treatment time for complete treatments in TIM was 4.20 min, compared with 6.83 min when using the I-neb AAD System in TBM. The responses to the questionnaires indicated that over 77% of the patients found the I-neb AAD System in TIM to be either: very easy, easy, or acceptable to use. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrated that by using the I-neb AAD System in TIM, a 40-50% reduction of nebulizer treatment times, and a high level of compliance could be achieved. The results also showed that the patients found the I-neb AAD System easy to use.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery | 2010
John Denyer; Ivan R. Prince; Emma Dixon; Penny Agent; Jennifer A. Pryor; Margaret E. Hodson
BACKGROUND Adaptive Aerosol Delivery (AAD) systems provide efficient drug delivery and improved lung deposition over conventional nebulizers by combining real-time analyses of patient breathing patterns and precisely timed aerosol delivery. Delivery and deposition are further enhanced by breathing techniques involving slow, deep inhalations. METHODS This exploratory study assessed the acceptability of slow, deep inhalations in 20 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) during up to eight simulated nebulizer treatments with the I-neb AAD System. The breathing maneuver, Target Inhalation Mode (TIM) breathing, involved the lengthening of the patients inhalation time over successive breaths with guidance from auditory and tactile (vibratory) feedback from the device. RESULTS At the end of the first treatment, most patients felt that the instructions were easy to understand (90%) and that the vibratory feedback was pleasant (65%). Half of the patients found the procedure to be comfortable. At the end of the final treatment, most patients felt that the breathing maneuver was easy to understand (90%) and use (80%), but that the duration of the breath was too long (100%). Logged data revealed that 90% of patients were able to comply with the breathing maneuver. The two patients unable to comply had a forced vital capacity of <1.75 L. The average treatment time decreased from 288.4 to 141.6 sec during the first and final treatments, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study provides preliminary evidence of the acceptability of the TIM breathing maneuver in patients with CF and their ability to perform repeated TIM breathing during simulated nebulizer therapy with the I-neb AAD System.
Archive | 2003
Jonathan Stanley Harold Denyer; Ivan R. Prince
Archive | 2008
Jonathan Stanley Harold Denyer; Ivan R. Prince; Anthony Dyche
Archive | 2003
Jonathan Stanley Harold Denyer; Ivan R. Prince; Anthony Dyche
Archive | 2008
Jonathan Stanley Harold Denyer; Ivan R. Prince
Archive | 2003
Jonathan Stanley Harold Denyer; Ivan R. Prince
Archive | 1999
Jonathan Stanley Harold Denyer; Anthony Dyche; Ivan R. Prince
Archive | 2008
Jonathan Stanley Harold Denyer; Ivan R. Prince
Archive | 2004
Ivan R. Prince; D. Seamark; M. Pinnuck; S. Hinch; John Denyer; Joy Conway