Ivana Jurjević

The influence of body position on cerebrospinal fluid pressure gradient and movement in cats with normal and impaired craniospinal communication

Intracranial hypertension is a severe therapeutic problem, as there is insufficient knowledge about the physiology of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. In this paper a new CSF pressure regulation hypothesis is proposed. According to this hypothesis, the CSF pressure depends on the laws of fluid mechanics and on the anatomical characteristics inside the cranial and spinal space, and not, as is today generally believed, on CSF secretion, circulation and absorption. The volume and pressure changes in the newly developed CSF model, which by its anatomical dimensions and basic biophysical features imitates the craniospinal system in cats, are compared to those obtained on cats with and without the blockade of craniospinal communication in different body positions. During verticalization, a long-lasting occurrence of negative CSF pressure inside the cranium in animals with normal cranio-spinal communication was observed. CSF pressure gradients change depending on the body position, but those gradients do not enable unidirectional CSF circulation from the hypothetical site of secretion to the site of absorption in any of them. Thus, our results indicate the existence of new physiological/pathophysiological correlations between intracranial fluids, which opens up the possibility of new therapeutic approaches to intracranial hypertension.

Effect of osmolarity on CSF volume during ventriculo-aqueductal and ventriculo-cisternal perfusions in cats.

The effect of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) osmolarity on the CSF volume has been studied on different CSF/brain tissue contact areas. It has been shown, on anesthetized cats under normal CSF pressure, that the perfusion of CSF system (12.96 μl/min) by hyperosmolar CSF (400 mOsml/l) leads to significantly higher outflow volume (μl/min) during ventriculo-cisternal perfusion (29.36 ± 1.17 and 33.50 ± 2.78) than the ventriculo-aqueductal perfusion (19.58 ± 1.57 and 22.10 ± 2.31) in experimental period of 30 or 60 min. Both of these hyperosmolar perfusions resulted in significantly higher outflow volume than the perfusions by isoosmolar artificial CSF (12.86 ± 0.96 and 13.58 ± 1.64). These results suggest that the volume of the CSF depends on both the CSF osmolarity and the size of the contact area between CSF system and surrounding tissue exposed to hyperosmolar CSF. However, all of these facts imply that the control of the CSF volume is not in accordance with the classical hypothesis of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamic. According to this hypothesis, the CSF volume should be regulated by active formation of CSF (secretion) inside the brain ventricles and passive CSF absorption outside of the brain. Obtained results correspond to the new hypothesis which claims that the volume of CSF depends on the gradients of hydrostatic and osmotic forces between the blood on one side and extracellular fluid and CSF on the other. The CSF exchange between the entire CSF system and the surrounding tissue should, therefore, be determined by (patho)physiological conditions that predominate within those compartments.

The Effect of Body Position on Intraocular and CSF Pressures in the Lateral Ventricle, and in Cortical and Lumbar Subarachnoid Spaces in Cats

BACKGROUND Correlation between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and intraocular pressure (IOP) is still unclear. We compared CSF pressure from different parts of the CSF system and IOP measured by the same invasive technique in a new experimental model in cats during changes of body position. METHODS Pressure changes were recorded on anesthetized cats (n = 7) in the lateral ventricle (LV), in the cortical (CSS) and lumbar (LSS) subarachnoid spaces, and in the anterior ocular chamber. Animals and measuring instruments were both fixed on a board at an adequate hydrostatic level. RESULTS In a horizontal position, IOP (18.5 ± 0.6 cm H(2)O) and CSF pressures (LV = 17.4 ± 0.9; CSS = 17.2 ± 0.7; LSS = 17.8 ± 1.2 cm H(2)O) were similar. In a vertical position, pressure in the LSS increased (33.5 ± 2.3 cm H(2)O), pressures inside the cranial cavity dropped (LV = -4.1 ± 0.9 cm H(2)O; CSS = -4.8 ± 0.5 cm H(2)O), while IOP slightly decreased (14.3 ± 0.1 cm H(2)O). CONCLUSION Change in body position from horizontal to upright causes drastic changes in CSF pressure and relatively small changes in IOP, which indicates that the IOP does not reflect CSF pressure. In an upright position, CSF pressures were equal at the same hydrostatic level in LV and CSS, which suggests that CSF pressure inside the cranium depends on its anatomical and biophysical features, and not on CSF secretion and absorption.

Dependence of cerebrospinal fluid pressure and volume on the changes in serum osmolarity in cats.

OBJECTIVES To study the effect of blood osmolarity on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume and CSF pressure in cats. METHODS Three types of methods were used on anesthetized cats. The first, ventriculo-cisternal perfusion (12.96 μL/min) before and after i.v. application of 20% mannitol; the second, measuring the outflow of CSF by cisternal free drainage; and the third, measuring CSF pressure in the ventricles of an intact CSF system, with the second and third method being performed before and after the i.p. application of a hypo-osmolar substance (distilled water). RESULTS In the first group, the application of 20% mannitol led to a significantly reduced (p < 0.005) outflow volume (from 12.60 ± 0.29 to 0.94 ± 0.09 μL/min). In the second group, the outflow CSF volume significantly increased (p < 0.001) after the application of distilled water (from 18.8 ± 0.3 to 28.2 ± 0.7 μL/min). In the third group, after the application of distilled water, the CSF pressure also significantly increased (p < 0.05; from 8.3 ± 0.8 to 16.1 ± 0.14 cm H(2)O). CONCLUSION We conclude that changes in serum osmolarity change the CSF volume because of the osmotic gradient between the blood and all of the CSF compartments, and also that the change in CSF pressure is closely associated with changes in CSF volume.

Long lasting near-obstruction stenosis of mesencephalic aqueduct without development of hydrocephalus--case report.

The aim of this study is to present the five-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow up of a patient with incidental finding of near-obstruction stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius due to a large pineal cyst. The patient was scanned 3 times on a 3T MR device using a set of standard structural sequences supplemented with high-resolution constructive interference of steady state (CISS) T2 sequence for precise delineation of the aqueduct of Sylvius and cardiac-gated phase-contrast sequences for the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) movement. On all MR scans, the size of the pineal cyst and severity of near-obstruction aqueductal stenosis did not show any morphological changes. There was no significant ventricular enlargement although structural CISS sequence showed a near-obstruction stenosis and cardiac-gated phase-contrast sequences did not detect CSF movement through the aqueduct of Sylvius. Our findings are contradictory to the classic hypothesis of CSF physiology based on secretion, circulation, and absorption of CSF, which states that the impairment of CSF circulation through the aqueduct of Sylvius inevitably leads to a hypertensive hydrocephalus development involving the third and the lateral ventricle. Our research group previously proposed a new hypothesis of CSF physiology, which offers more suitable explanation for such clinical cases.

New Insight into the Mechanism of Mannitol Effects on Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Decrease and Craniospinal Fluid Redistribution

Intracranial hypertension, which often follows a severe brain injury, is usually treated with intravenous (i.v.) application of hyperosmolar solutions. The mechanism of intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure decrease after such a treatment is still unclear. The aim of this article was to try to explain the mechanism of CSF pressure reduction after i.v. hyperosmolar mannitol bolus in regard to the changes in CSF volume. Two types of experiments were done on anesthetized cats before and after hyperosmolar mannitol application: ventriculo-cisternal perfusion at different perfusion rates, simultaneously measuring the perfusate outflow volume, and CSF pressure recording in the lateral ventricle before and during artificial CSF infusion. Mannitol application in the first group of cats significantly reduced collected prefusate volume during ventriculo-cisternal perfusion, and in the second group it prevented CSF pressure increase caused by artificial CSF infusion. Our results strongly suggest that the mechanism of hyperosmolar mannitol action after its i.v. application is based on osmotic fluid retrieval from interstitial and cerebrospinal compartments into the microvessels. This shift, without significant volume change inside the cranium, causes a predominant decrease of CSF volume in the spinal part of the system, which in turn leads to lowering of the CSF pressure. Spinal CSF volume decrease is enabled by the extensibility of the spinal dura, this way providing the possibility for CSF volume redistribution inside the CSF system, together with CSF pressure decrease. This mechanism of mannitol action is in accordance with the new hypothesis of CSF physiology.

The Effect of Body Position on Intraocular and Intracranial Pressure in Rabbits

BACKGROUND The correlation between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and intraocular pressure (IOP) is still unclear. We compared CSF and IOP measured by the same invasive technique using a new experimental model in rabbits during changes of body position. METHODS Pressure changes were recorded in the lateral ventricle (LV), the cortical subarachnoid space (CSS), and the anterior ocular chamber of anesthetized rabbits (n = 12). Animals and measuring instruments were both fixed on a board at an adequate hydrostatic level. RESULTS In a horizontal position, control IOP (15.1 ± 1.6 cmH2O) and CSF pressure in the LV (12.4 ± 0.6 cmH2O) and CSS (12.2 ± 0.9 cmH2O) were similar during the 60-min period. When changing the body position from horizontal to vertical (upright), CSF pressures decreased drastically (LV = -5.5 ± 2.6 cmH2O and CSS = -7.7 ± 2.3 cmH2O), while the IOP decreased moderately (IOP = 13.3 ± 0.5 cmH2O). CONCLUSION Change in body position from horizontal to vertical causes drastic changes in CSF pressure and moderate changes in IOP. Thus, IOP is not reflected by the CSF pressure. In an upright position, the values of CSF pressure were equal to the hydrostatic distance between measuring points and the foramen magnum, which suggests that CSF pressure inside the cranium depends on its anatomical and biophysical features, and not on CSF secretion and absorption.