Ivy Lynn Bourgeault

The financial cost of doctors emigrating from sub-Saharan Africa: human capital analysis

Objective To estimate the lost investment of domestically educated doctors migrating from sub-Saharan African countries to Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Design Human capital cost analysis using publicly accessible data. Settings Sub-Saharan African countries. Participants Nine sub-Saharan African countries with an HIV prevalence of 5% or greater or with more than one million people with HIV/AIDS and with at least one medical school (Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe), and data available on the number of doctors practising in destination countries. Main outcome measures The financial cost of educating a doctor (through primary, secondary, and medical school), assuming that migration occurred after graduation, using current country specific interest rates for savings converted to US dollars; cost according to the number of source country doctors currently working in the destination countries; and savings to destination countries of receiving trained doctors. Results In the nine source countries the estimated government subsidised cost of a doctor’s education ranged from

Acculturation and Nutritional Health of Immigrants in Canada: A Scoping Review

21 000 (£13 000; €15 000) in Uganda to

Collaborative health care teams in Canada and the USA: Confronting the structural embeddedness of medical dominance

58 700 in South Africa. The overall estimated loss of returns from investment for all doctors currently working in the destination countries was

Role construction and boundaries in interprofessional primary health care teams: a qualitative study

2.17bn (95% confidence interval 2.13bn to 2.21bn), with costs for each country ranging from

The implications of the feminization of the primary care physician workforce on service supply: a systematic review

2.16m (1.55m to 2.78m) for Malawi to

Accessing Maternity Care in Rural Canada: There's More to the Story Than Distance to a Doctor

1.41bn (1.38bn to 1.44bn) for South Africa. The ratio of the estimated compounded lost investment over gross domestic product showed that Zimbabwe and South Africa had the largest losses. The benefit to destination countries of recruiting trained doctors was largest for the United Kingdom (

Gender, professions and public policy: new directions

2.7bn) and United States (

Encountering Globalization: Professional Groups in an International Context

846m). Conclusions Among sub-Saharan African countries most affected by HIV/AIDS, lost investment from the emigration of doctors is considerable. Destination countries should consider investing in measurable training for source countries and strengthening of their health systems.

Structural constraints and opportunities for CAM use and referral by physicians, nurses, and midwives:

Although recent immigrants to Canada are healthier than Canadian born (i.e., the Healthy Immigrant Effect), they experience a deterioration in their health status which is partly due to transitions in dietary habits. Since pathways to these transitions are under-documented, this scoping review aims to identify knowledge gaps and research priorities related to immigrant nutritional health. A total of 49 articles were retrieved and reviewed using electronic databases and a stakeholder consultation was undertaken to consolidate findings. Overall, research tends to confirm the Healthy Immigrant Effect and suggests that significant knowledge gaps in nutritional health persist, thereby creating a barrier to the advancement of health promotion and the achievement of maximum health equity. Five research priorities were identified including (1) risks and benefits associated with traditional/ethnic foods; (2) access and outreach to immigrants; (3) mechanisms and coping strategies for food security; (4) mechanisms of food choice in immigrant families; and (5) health promotion strategies that work for immigrant populations.

Linking integrative medicine with interprofessional education and care initiatives: challenges and opportunities for interprofessional collaboration.

Abstract There has been a renewed interest in collaborative models of health care delivered by ‘interdisciplinary teams’ of providers across several health care systems. This growing phenomenon raises a host of issues related to the management of professional boundaries and the contemporary state of medical dominance. In this paper, we undertake a critical analysis of the factors both promoting and impeding collaborative care models of primary and mental health care in Canada and the USA. The data our arguments are based upon include a combination of documentary and interview data from key stakeholders influential in various collaborative care initiatives. Based on these data, we develop a conceptual model of the various levels of influence, focusing in particular on the macro (regulatory/funding) and meso (institutional) factors. Our comparative policy and institutional analysis reveals the similarities and differences in the influences of the broader contexts in Canada and the USA, and by extension the different ways that the structural embeddedness of medical dominance impinges upon and reacts to recent policy changes regarding collaborative health care teams.