Izaskun Valduvieco

Does gender matter in glioblastoma

BackgroundThe clinical outcome of glioblastoma (GBM) patients who receive radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy is well established. However, little is known about how many patients do not receive this treatment. We consider it is important to investigate why a proportion of operated patients do not receive further treatment after surgery.MethodsWe reviewed all consecutive GBM patients operated on in our hospital between January 2000 and December 2008.ResultsA total of 216 patients with GBM were identified. Fifty-five (25%) did not receive any treatment after surgery. Univariate analysis showed that factors associated with no further treatment after surgery were older than 60 years (p=0.002), of female gender (p=0.03), had a KPS<70 (p<0.001) and had had a biopsy (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥60 years and KPS <70 were independent predictors of no further treatment after surgery. Gender was not an independent variable. However, women in the whole series were older than 60 years (p=0.01), and they had a worse KPS (p=0.02) and more biopsies (p=0.04) than men. In the whole group, median survival time was 10.4 months for men (n=125) vs. 7.2 months for women (n=91), log rank p<0.04. This difference was not observed in the group that was treated after surgery.ConclusionsOne out of four patients could not be treated after surgery. Independent predictors were older age and low KPS. These poor risk variables were more frequent in women and their survival was therefore lower than men in our series.

Increased signal intensity in FLAIR sequences in the resection cavity can predict progression and progression-free survival in gliomas

OBJECTIVE To determine if hyperintense fluid in the postsurgical cavity on follow-up fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences can predict progression in gliomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS Observational study of magnetic resonance imaging signal of fluid within the post-surgical cavity in patients with glioma (grade II-IV), with surgery and follow-up between 2007 and 2012. Qualitative comparison between the signal of fluid in the cavity and of the ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was performed on FLAIR sequences. Fluid in the cavity was classified as isointense or hyperintense compared to CSF. Double-blind reading was performed. The signal intensity was correlated with tumour progression, assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. RESULTS A total of 107 patients were included, of whom 90 had high-grade gliomas. Inter-rater agreement was excellent, and intra-rater complete (k=0.94 and 1, p<.001). Hyperintense fluid in the resection cavity occurred more commonly (58.9% versus 29.4%, p=.025) and earlier (mean 4.5 versus 9.9 months, p<.001) in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas. Hyperintense fluid was associated with progression in high-grade gliomas, with a sensitivity of 65.7% (95%CI, 54.3-75.6%) and a specificity of 70.6% (95%CI, 46.6-87%), and in low-grade gliomas with a sensitivity of 50% (95%CI, 18.7-81.2%), and a specificity of 81.8% (95%CI, 51.1-96%). The positive predictive value of this sign was 90.6% (95%CI, 79.3-96.3%) for high-grade gliomas, and was higher for grade IV (93.2%, 95%CI, 87.3-99.1%) and lower for grade III (77.8%, 95%CI, 59.6-96%), and low-grade gliomas (60%, 95%CI, 22.9-88.4%). False-positives were identified in 7 patients, due to bleeding or infection. Hyperintense fluid in high-grade gliomas preceded progression in 22 patients (30.1%), with a mean of 4.1 months (SD 2.1, 95% CI, 3.2-5), and associated with poorer progression-free survival (mean 6.8 versus 11.7 months, p=.004). CONCLUSIONS Hyperintense fluid in the resection cavity on follow-up FLAIR sequences occurs more frequently and earlier in high-grade gliomas, and is associated with poorer progression-free survival. Hyperintense fluid is associated with disease progression, and can predict the progression of resected gliomas. False-positives due to bleeding and infection can be observed, and are easily recognizable.

Is anti-inflammatory radiotherapy an effective treatment in trochanteritis?

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of low-dose radiotherapy in refractory cases of trochanteritis. METHODS We evaluated a total of 60 consecutive patients who received low-dose radiotherapy to achieve an anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect for recurrent trochanteritis following scarce response to conventional therapy. All patients were evaluated at baseline (prior to radiotherapy) and at 1 and 4 months after radiotherapy and then yearly thereafter for pain assessment using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and to determine the administration of analgesic treatment. RESULTS An improvement in the symptomatology was observed in 62% of the patients with a significant reduction in the VAS (8 ± 2 vs 4 ± 2; p < 0.0001), which was largely maintained until the second evaluation at 4 months. In the cases responding to radiotherapy, the probability of maintaining improvement beyond 24 months was 70%. CONCLUSION Low-dose anti-inflammatory radiation may be used in the treatment of the recurrent cases of relapse or no response of trochanteritis to conventional treatments, with a high probability of remission of pain. These preliminary results indicate the need for evaluating the use of radiotherapy in patients with trochanteritis refractory to conventional treatment in a long-term controlled study. Advances in knowledge: Radiotherapy provides effective analgesic treatment for patients refractory to standard treatment for trochanteritis.