J. A. Byrd
United States Department of Agriculture
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. A. Byrd.
Journal of Applied Microbiology | 2009
Robin C. Anderson; Nathan A. Krueger; J. A. Byrd; Roger B. Harvey; Todd R. Callaway; Tom S. Edrington; David J. Nisbet
Aims:u2002 To determine if the purported deaminase inhibitors diphenyliodonium chloride (DIC) and thymol reduce the growth and survivability of Campylobacter.
Poultry Science | 2008
J. A. Byrd; M. R. Burnham; J. L. McReynolds; Robin C. Anderson; Kenneth J. Genovese; Todd R. Callaway; L. F. Kubena; David J. Nisbet
A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of experimental chlorate product (ECP) feed supplementation on Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) in the crop and ceca of market-age broilers. In trial 1, 160 market-age broilers were randomly assigned to 8 treatment groups and replicated twice, with 20 broilers per pen for 1 wk. Trial 2 used the same design, but used 80 market-age broilers with 10 broilers per pen. Treatments were as follows: 1) control feed + double-distilled drinking water (dd H(2)O); 2) control + 18.5% experimental zeolite carrier with dd H(2)O; 3 to 7) control feed supplemented with 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, or 18.5% of a feed grade ECP + dd H(2)O; 8) control feed + 1x ECP (0.16% w/v; containing 15 mM chlorate ion equivalent) added to dd H(2)O. Seven-week-old broilers were provided experimental treatments for 7 d, killed, and then ceca and crops were removed and evaluated for ST. Broilers fed 5 to 18.5% ECP or water ECP had a significantly lower (P < 0.05) incidence of ST in the crop (36 to 38% and 14%, respectively) when compared with the control (60%). Broilers fed 10% ECP or water ECP had significantly lower ST crop concentrations (1.03 log(10) and 0.38 log(10) ST/g, respectively) when compared with broilers fed a control diet (1.54 log(10) ST/g). Crop and ceca ST incidence (32 to 48%) and concentration (1.00 to 1.82 log(10) ST/g) were significantly lower in broilers fed 5 to 18.5% ECP as compared with the control (78%; 2.84 log(10) ST/g). Broilers fed 5% or greater ECP had significantly higher water consumption (380 to 580 mL water/d) and litter moisture (31 to 56%) when compared with the control (370 mL water/d; 23% moisture). Only broilers fed 18.5% ECP had significantly lower 7-wk BW (2.77 kg of BW) when compared with the controls (3.09 kg of BW). Average daily gains were significantly depressed in broilers fed 10 or 18.5% ECP compared with the controls. These results indicate broilers supplemented with feed </= 5% ECP or water ECP 7 d before slaughter reduced ST without affecting growth parameters.
Poultry Science | 2016
Christina L. Swaggerty; J. L. McReynolds; J. A. Byrd; Igal Y. Pevzner; S. E. Duke; Kenneth J. Genovese; Haiqi He; Michael H. Kogut
We developed a novel selection method based on an inherently high and low phenotype of pro-inflammatory mediators and produced high and low line chickens. We have shown high line birds are more resistant to Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Eimeria tenella compared to the low line. Clostridium perfringens is the fourth leading cause of bacterial-induced foodborne illness, and is also an economically important poultry pathogen and known etiologic agent of necrotic enteritis (NE). The objective of this study was to determine if high line birds were also more resistant to NE than low line birds using an established model. Birds were reared in floor pens and challenges were conducted twice (high line = 25/trial, 50 birds total; low line = 26/trial, 52 birds total). Day-old chicks were provided a 55% wheat-corn-based un-medicated starter diet. A bursal disease vaccine was administered at 10× the recommended dose via the ocular route at 14-d-of-age. Birds were challenged daily for 3 d beginning at 16-d-of-age by oral gavage (3 mL) with 10(7) colony forming units (cfu) of C. perfringens/mL then necropsied at 21-d-of-age. All birds had sections of the intestine examined and scored for lesions while the first 10 necropsied also had gut content collected for C. perfringens enumeration. Chickens from the high line were more resistant to C. perfringens-induced NE pathology compared to the low line, as indicated by reduced lesion scores. Ninety percent of the high line birds had lesions of zero or one compared to 67% of the low line birds. Wilcoxon rank sum test showed significantly higher lesion scores in the low line birds compared to the high line (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the C. perfringens recovered (P = 0.83). These data provide additional validation and support selection based on elevated levels of pro-inflammatory mediators produces chickens with increased resistance against foodborne and poultry pathogens.
Protective Cultures, Antimicrobial Metabolites and Bacteriophages for Food and Beverage Biopreservation | 2011
Todd R. Callaway; Tom S. Edrington; Robin C. Anderson; J. A. Byrd; Michael H. Kogut; Roger B. Harvey; David J. Nisbet; C.W. Aiello
Abstract The intestinal microbial ecosystem is a dense and diverse population that can be utilized to reduce pathogenic bacterial populations that affect animal production efficiency and the safety of food products. Strategies to capture and utilize this complex natural resource have been developed that reduce the populations of foodborne pathogenic bacteria and eliminate pathogens that negatively impact animal production or food safety on the farm. Products used in animals to reduce pathogens in the food supply include probiotics, prebiotics and competitive exclusion cultures, as well as bacteriocins and bacteriophage (bacterial viruses). The individual efficacy of any of these compounds is due to specific microbial ecological factors within the gut of the food animal and its native microflora that alter the competitive pressures of the gut. This review explores the ecology behind the efficacy of these products against foodborne pathogens that inhabit food animals.
Poultry Science | 2001
J. A. Byrd; Billy M. Hargis; D. J. Caldwell; R. H. Bailey; K. L. Herron; J. L. McReynolds; R. L. Brewer; Robin C. Anderson; Kenneth M. Bischoff; Todd R. Callaway; L. F. Kubena
Poultry Science | 2004
J. L. McReynolds; J. A. Byrd; Robin C. Anderson; R. W. Moore; Tom S. Edrington; Kenneth J. Genovese; Toni L. Poole; L. F. Kubena; David J. Nisbet
Poultry Science | 2006
J. L. McReynolds; R. W. Moore; L. F. Kubena; J. A. Byrd; C. L. Woodward; David J. Nisbet; Steven C. Ricke
Poultry Science | 2002
J. A. Byrd; B. M. Hargis; D. E. Corrier; R. L. Brewer; D. J. Caldwell; R. H. Bailey; J. L. McReynolds; K. L. Herron; Larry H. Stanker
Poultry Science | 2005
Robin C. Anderson; Roger B. Harvey; J. A. Byrd; Todd R. Callaway; Kenneth J. Genovese; Tom S. Edrington; Yong Soo Jung; J. L. McReynolds; David J. Nisbet
Poultry Science | 2006
R. W. Moore; J. A. Byrd; K. D. Knape; Robin C. Anderson; Todd R. Callaway; Tom S. Edrington; L. F. Kubena; David J. Nisbet