J.A. van Noord

Improved health outcomes in patients with COPD during 1 yr's treatment with tiotropium

Tiotropium, a novel once-daily inhaled anticholinergic, has been shown to improve lung function over a 24-h period. In order to extend these findings, health-outcomes were evaluated over 1 yr in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Spirometric results, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), salbutamol use and effects on dyspnoea, health-related quality of life and COPD exacerbations were assessed in two identical 1-yr randomized double-blind double-dummy studies of tiotropium 18µg once daily (n=356) compared with ipratropium 40µg q.i.d. (n=179). Screening forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were 1.25±0.43 L (41.9±12.7% of the predicted value) (tiotropium) and 1.18±0.37 L (39.4±10.7% pred) (ipratropium). Trough FEV1 at 1 yr improved by 0.12±0.01 L with tiotropium and declined by 0.03±0.02 L with ipratropium (p<0.001). Significant improvement in PEFR, salbutamol use, Transition Dyspnea Index focal score, and the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total and impact scores were seen with tiotropium (p<0.01). Tiotropium reduced the number of exacerbations (by 24%, p<0.01), and increased time to first exacerbation (p<0.01) and time to first hospitalization for a COPD exacerbation (p<0.05) compared with ipratropium. Apart from an increased incidence of dry mouth in the tiotropium group, adverse events were similar between treatments. Tiotropium was effective in improving dyspnoea, exacerbations, health-related quality of life and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and exceeds the benefits seen with ipratropium. The data support the use of tiotropium once-daily as first-line maintenance treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Comparison of tiotropium once daily, formoterol twice daily and both combined once daily in patients with COPD

This study compared the bronchodilator effects of tiotropium, formoterol and both combined in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 71 COPD patients (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 37% predicted) participated in a randomised, double-blind, three-way, crossover study and received tiotropium 18 μg q.d., formoterol 12 μg b.i.d. or both combined q.d. for three 6-week periods. The end-points were 24-h spirometry (FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC)) at the end of each treatment, rescue salbutamol and safety. Compared with baseline (FEV1 prior to the first dose in the first period), tiotropium produced a significantly greater improvement in average daytime FEV1 (0–12 h) than formoterol (127 versus 86 mL), while average night-time FEV1 (12–24 h) was not different (tiotropium 43 mL, formoterol 38 mL). The most pronounced effects were provided by combination therapy (daytime 234 mL, night-time 86 mL); both differed significantly from single-agent therapies. Changes in FVC mirrored the FEV1 results. Compared with both single agents, daytime salbutamol use was significantly lower during combination therapy (tiotropium plus formoterol 1.81 puffs·day−1, tiotropium 2.41 puffs·day−1, formoterol 2.37 puffs·day−1). All treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, tiotropium q.d. achieved a greater improvement in daytime and comparable improvement in night-time lung function compared with formoterol b.i.d. A combination of both drugs q.d. was most effective and provided an additive effect throughout the 24-h dosing interval.

A randomised controlled comparison of tiotropium and ipratropium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND A study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tiotropium and ipratropium during long term treatment in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS 288 patients of mean (SD) age 65 (8) years and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 41 (12)% predicted participated in a 14 centre, double blind, double dummy, parallel group study and were randomised after a run in period of two weeks to receive either tiotropium 18 μg once daily from a dry powder inhaler (HandiHaler; two thirds of patients) or ipratropium 40 μg four times daily from a metered dose inhaler (one third of patients) for a period of 13 weeks. Outcome measures were lung function, daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), and the use of concomitant salbutamol. FEV1and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured one hour before and immediately before inhalation (mean value of the two measurements on test day 1 was the baseline value while on all other test days it was known as the trough FEV1 and FVC), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after inhalation of the study drug on days 1, 8, 50, and 92. RESULTS During treatment tiotropium achieved a significantly greater improvement than ipratropium (p<0.05) in trough, average, and peak FEV1levels and in trough and average FVC levels. The trough FEV1 response on days 8, 50, and 92 ranged between 0.15 l (95% CI 0.11 to 0.19) and 0.16 l (95% CI 0.12 to 0.20) for tiotropium and between 0.01 l (95% CI –0.03 to 0.05) and 0.03 l (95% CI 0.01 to 0.07) for ipratropium. The trough FVC response on days 8, 50, and 92 ranged between 0.34 l (95% CI 0.28 to 0.40) and 0.39 l (95% CI 0.31 to 0.47) for tiotropium and between 0.08 l (95% CI 0.00 to 0.16) and 0.18 l (95% CI 0.08 to 0.28) for ipratropium. On all test days tiotropium produced a greater improvement in FEV1than ipratropium starting three hours after inhalation (p<0.05). During treatment weekly mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) was consistently better in the tiotropium group than in the ipratropium group, the difference in morning PEF being significant up through week 10 and in evening PEF up through week 7 of treatment (p<0.05). The use of concomitant salbutamol was also lower in the tiotropium group (p<0.05). The only drug related adverse event was dry mouth (tiotropium 14.7%, ipratropium 10.3% of patients). CONCLUSIONS Tiotropium in a dose of 18 μg inhaled once daily using the HandiHaler was significantly more effective than 40 μg ipratropium four times daily in improving trough, average, and peak lung function over the 13 week period. The safety profile of tiotropium was similar to ipratropium. These data support the use of tiotropium as first line treatment for the long term maintenance treatment of patients with airflow obstruction due to COPD.

Salmeterol versus formoterol in patients with moderately severe asthma: onset and duration of action

We evaluated the profile of the bronchodilatory effect of three inhaled beta2-agonists, 24 microg formoterol, 50 microg salmeterol and 200 microg salbutamol, in patients with stable, moderately severe asthma. Thirty asthmatics (mean+/-SD age 54+/-8 yrs; forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 58+/-12% predicted; reversibility of FEV1 21+/-8% from baseline) participated in a single-centre, double-blind, randomized, single-dose, cross-over study. FEV1 was obtained in baseline condition and 10, 20, 30, 60 min, and every hour up to 12 h after inhalation of the trial drug. Specific airway conductance (sGaw) was measured at baseline condition and 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 20, 30, 60 min, and every hour up to 12 h after inhalation. Formoterol produced a mean increase in sGaw (as % of baseline) of 44% after 1 min, maximal (135%) after 2 h, and 56% after 12 h. The mean increase in FEV1 was maximal (27%) after 2h, and 10% after 12 h. After salmeterol, mean increase in sGaw amounted to 16% after 3 min, maximal (111%) after 2-4 h, and 58% after 12 h. The mean increase in FEV1 was maximally 25% after 3h, being 11% after 12 h. After salbutamol, mean increase in sGaw was 44% after 1 min and maximal (100%) after 30 min. The peak increase in FEV1 was 25%. We conclude that formoterol (24 microg) and salmeterol (50 microg) had an equal bronchodilatory capacity, which was similar to that of 200 microg salbutamol and lasted for at least 12 h in patients with asthma. However, formoterol had a more rapid onset of action than salmeterol, equal to that of salbutamol.

Effect of tiotropium bromide on circadian variation in airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the degree of circadian variation in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and the influence of anticholinergic blockade is not known. Tiotropium is a long acting inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator that increases daytime FEV1 in COPD. We hypothesised that tiotropium would modify the overnight change in FEV1, and this would be unaffected by the timing of drug administration. Methods: A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial was conducted with tiotropium 18 mg once daily in the morning (09.00 hours), evening (21.00 hours), or an identical placebo. Patients with stable COPD (n=121, FEV1=41% predicted) underwent spirometric tests every 3 hours for 24 hours at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment. Results: There were no significant differences at baseline between the groups. Tiotropium improved mean (SE) FEV1 (over 24 hours) in the morning (1.11 (0.03) l) and evening (1.06 (0.03) l) groups compared with placebo (0.90 (0.03) l), and nocturnal FEV1 (mean of 03.00 and 06.00 hours) in the morning (1.03 (0.03) l) and evening (1.04 (0.03) l) groups compared with placebo (0.82 (0.03) l) at the 6 week visit (p<0.01). FEV1 before morning or evening dosing was similar, while the peak FEV1 moved later in the day with active treatment. The mean percentage change in FEV1 from 09.00 hours to 03.00 hours (the nocturnal decline in FEV1) was −2.8% in the morning group, −1.0% in the evening group, and −12.8% in the placebo group. The magnitude of the peak to trough change in FEV1 was not statistically different. Conclusions: Tiotropium produced sustained bronchodilation throughout the 24 hour day without necessarily abolishing circadian variation in airway calibre.

One-year cost-effectiveness of tiotropium versus ipratropium to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The aim of this paper is to assess the health economic consequences of substituting ipratropium with the new, once-daily bronchodilator tiotropium in patients with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This prospective cost-effectiveness analysis was performed alongside two 1‐yr randomised, double-blind clinical trials in the Netherlands and Belgium. Patients had a diagnosis of COPD and a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ≤65% predicted normal. Patients were randomised to tiotropium (18 µg once daily) or ipratropium (2 puffs of 20 µg administered four times daily) in a ratio of 2:1. The mean number of exacerbations was reduced from 1.01 in the ipratropium group (n=175) to 0.74 in the tiotropium group (n=344). The percentages of patients with a relevant improvement on the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were 34.6% and 51.2% respectively. Compared to ipratropium, the number of hospital admissions, hospital days and unscheduled visits to healthcare providers was reduced by 46%, 42% and 36% respectively. Mean annual healthcare costs including the acquisition cost of the study drugs were 1721 (sem 160) in the tiotropium group and 1,541 (SEM 163) in the ipratropium group (difference 180). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 667 per exacerbation avoided and 1084 per patient with a relevant improvement on the SGRQ. Substituting tiotropium for ipratropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients offers improved health outcomes and is associated with increased costs of 180 per patient per year.

Pharmacodynamic steady state of tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Tiotropium (Spiriva®) is a new once-daily inhaled anticholinergic that has its effect through prolonged muscarinic (M)3 receptor antagonism. It has a clinically documented, long duration of action with once-daily dosing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A single-centre, double-blind, ipratropium-controlled study was conducted in order to characterize the onset of pharmacodynamic steady state of tiotropium in patients with COPD. Thirty-one patients (25 male, six female) with a mean age of 62 yrs and a mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 1.13 L (38% of predicted) were randomly assigned to receive either tiotropium 18 µg once-daily from a dry-powder inhaler (HandiHaler®, 20 patients), or ipratropium 40 µg four-times daily from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (11 patients) for a period of 1 week. FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured 1 h prior to, and just before inhalation (mean value of the two measurements on test-day 1 was the baseline value, while on all other test days it was the trough value), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h after inhalation of the morning dose of the study drug (one capsule and two puffs) on days 1, 2, 3, and 8. Trough FEV1 following 8 days of tiotropium was 0.19 L (18%) above baseline. Approximately 90% of this increase was achieved within 24 h of the first dose (0.17 L, 16%). Trough FVC increased 0.67 L (27%) on test-day 8. Approximately 70% of the improvement was observed after two tiotropium doses (0.47 L, 19%). Achievement of FVC steady state was delayed compared to FEV1. Ipratropium performed typically with an onset of action within 30 min, a peak response between 1–2 h postdosing and a duration of action of ∼4 h. It was concluded that forced expiratory volume in one second steady state with tiotropium is reached within 48 h, while continued improvements in forced vital capacity can be expected over or beyond the first week of therapy. The continued increases in forced vital capacity beyond 48 h suggests that maintenance bronchodilator therapy is required to achieve maximal changes in hyperinflation.

P252 Once-daily NVA237 improves symptoms, and reduces COPD exacerbations and associated hospitalisations: the GLOW1 trial

Introduction Symptoms profoundly impact daily life of COPD patients. We assessed the influence of the once-daily (qd) long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) NVA237 (glycopyrronium bromide) on symptoms and exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Methods Patients were randomised (2:1) to 26 weeks double-blind treatment with NVA237 50 μg qd or placebo (PBO) via a single-dose dry powder inhaler (Breezhaler® device). Efficacy was assessed by bronchodilation (trough FEV1 at Week 12), breathlessness on the transition dyspnoea index (TDI), HRQoL via the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and rescue medication use. The effect on COPD exacerbations and related hospitalisations was also assessed. Results 822 patients were randomised; 80.5% completed. NVA237 significantly increased total TDI focal score vs PBO at Week 26 (difference 1.04, 95% CI 0.583 to 1.504; p<0.0001); exceeding the minimum clinically important difference ([MCID] =1 point). Significantly more patients achieved MCID in TDI score with NVA237 (61.3% vs 48.3%; OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.249 to 2.415; p=0.001). SGRQ total score was significantly reduced with NVA237 (−2.81; p=0.004); % of patients achieving a clinically meaningful improvement in SGRQ (=4 point reduction) was significantly higher with NVA237 (56.8% vs 46.3%; OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.138 to 2.196; p=0.006). NVA237 significantly reduced rescue medication use at Week 26 (−0.46 puffs/day, p=0.005). NVA237 significantly prolonged time to first moderate/severe COPD exacerbation by 31% (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.949; p=0.023) and time to first severe COPD exacerbation necessitating hospitalisation (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.141 to 0.857; p=0.022). NVA237 significantly reduced hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbation (OR 0.34; p=0.024). Conclusion Once-daily NVA237 provided significant improvements in dyspnoea and SGRQ total score, with lower rescue medication use, and reduced risk of exacerbation and associated hospitalisations vs PBO.