J. Alex Elliott
Natural Environment Research Council
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. Alex Elliott.
Aquatic Ecology | 2010
Wolf M. Mooij; Dennis Trolle; Erik Jeppesen; George B. Arhonditsis; Pavel V. Belolipetsky; Deonatus B. R. Chitamwebwa; A. G. Degermendzhy; Donald L. DeAngelis; Lisette N. de Senerpont Domis; Andrea S. Downing; J. Alex Elliott; Carlos Ruberto Fragoso; Ursula Gaedke; Svetlana N. Genova; R. D. Gulati; Lars Håkanson; David P. Hamilton; Matthew R. Hipsey; Jochem 't Hoen; Stephan Hülsmann; F. Hans Los; Vardit Makler-Pick; Thomas Petzoldt; Igor G. Prokopkin; Karsten Rinke; Sebastiaan A. Schep; Koji Tominaga; Anne A. van Dam; Egbert H. van Nes; Scott A. Wells
A large number and wide variety of lake ecosystem models have been developed and published during the past four decades. We identify two challenges for making further progress in this field. One such challenge is to avoid developing more models largely following the concept of others (‘reinventing the wheel’). The other challenge is to avoid focusing on only one type of model, while ignoring new and diverse approaches that have become available (‘having tunnel vision’). In this paper, we aim at improving the awareness of existing models and knowledge of concurrent approaches in lake ecosystem modelling, without covering all possible model tools and avenues. First, we present a broad variety of modelling approaches. To illustrate these approaches, we give brief descriptions of rather arbitrarily selected sets of specific models. We deal with static models (steady state and regression models), complex dynamic models (CAEDYM, CE-QUAL-W2, Delft 3D-ECO, LakeMab, LakeWeb, MyLake, PCLake, PROTECH, SALMO), structurally dynamic models and minimal dynamic models. We also discuss a group of approaches that could all be classified as individual based: super-individual models (Piscator, Charisma), physiologically structured models, stage-structured models and trait-based models. We briefly mention genetic algorithms, neural networks, Kalman filters and fuzzy logic. Thereafter, we zoom in, as an in-depth example, on the multi-decadal development and application of the lake ecosystem model PCLake and related models (PCLake Metamodel, Lake Shira Model, IPH-TRIM3D-PCLake). In the discussion, we argue that while the historical development of each approach and model is understandable given its ‘leading principle’, there are many opportunities for combining approaches. We take the point of view that a single ‘right’ approach does not exist and should not be strived for. Instead, multiple modelling approaches, applied concurrently to a given problem, can help develop an integrative view on the functioning of lake ecosystems. We end with a set of specific recommendations that may be of help in the further development of lake ecosystem models.
Water Research | 2012
J. Alex Elliott
There is increasing evidence that recent changes in climate have had an effect on lake phytoplankton communities and it has been suggested that it is likely that Cyanobacteria will increase in relative abundance under the predicted future climate. However, testing such a qualitative prediction is challenging and usually requires some form of numerical computer model. Therefore, the lake modelling literature was reviewed for studies that examined the impact of climate change upon Cyanobacteria. These studies, taken collectively, generally show an increase in relative Cyanobacteria abundance with increasing water temperature, decreased flushing rate and increased nutrient loads. Furthermore, they suggest that whilst the direct effects of climate change on the lakes can change the timing of bloom events and Cyanobacteria abundance, the amount of phytoplankton biomass produced over a year is not enhanced directly by these changes. Also, warmer waters in the spring increased nutrient consumption by the phytoplankton community which in some lakes caused nitrogen limitation later in the year to the advantage of some nitrogen-fixing Cyanobacteria. Finally, it is also possible that an increase in Cyanobacteria dominance of the phytoplankton biomass will lead to poorer energy flow to higher trophic levels due to their relatively poor edibility for zooplankton.
Progress in Physical Geography | 2015
Glen Watts; Richard W. Battarbee; John P. Bloomfield; J. Crossman; A. Daccache; Isabelle Durance; J. Alex Elliott; Grace Garner; Jamie Hannaford; David M. Hannah; Tim Hess; Christopher R. Jackson; Alison L. Kay; Martin Kernan; Jerry W. Knox; Jonathan Mackay; Dt Monteith; S.J. Ormerod; Jemima Rance; Marianne E. Stuart; Andrew J. Wade; Steven Wade; Paul Whitehead; Robert L. Wilby
Climate change is expected to modify rainfall, temperature and catchment hydrological responses across the world, and adapting to these water-related changes is a pressing challenge. This paper reviews the impact of anthropogenic climate change on water in the UK and looks at projections of future change. The natural variability of the UK climate makes change hard to detect; only historical increases in air temperature can be attributed to anthropogenic climate forcing, but over the last 50 years more winter rainfall has been falling in intense events. Future changes in rainfall and evapotranspiration could lead to changed flow regimes and impacts on water quality, aquatic ecosystems and water availability. Summer flows may decrease on average, but floods may become larger and more frequent. River and lake water quality may decline as a result of higher water temperatures, lower river flows and increased algal blooms in summer, and because of higher flows in the winter. In communicating this important work, researchers should pay particular attention to explaining confidence and uncertainty clearly. Much of the relevant research is either global or highly localized: decision-makers would benefit from more studies that address water and climate change at a spatial and temporal scale appropriate for the decisions they make.
Hydrobiologia | 2012
Dennis Trolle; David P. Hamilton; Matthew R. Hipsey; Karsten Bolding; Jorn Bruggeman; Wolf M. Mooij; Jan H. Janse; Anders Lade Nielsen; Erik Jeppesen; J. Alex Elliott; Vardit Makler-Pick; Thomas Petzoldt; Karsten Rinke; Mogens Flindt; George B. Arhonditsis; Gideon Gal; Rikke Bjerring; Koji Tominaga; Jochem 't Hoen; Andrea S. Downing; David Manuel Lelinho da Motta Marques; Carlos Ruberto Fragoso; Martin Søndergaard; Paul C. Hanson
Here, we communicate a point of departure in the development of aquatic ecosystem models, namely a new community-based framework, which supports an enhanced and transparent union between the collective expertise that exists in the communities of traditional ecologists and model developers. Through a literature survey, we document the growing importance of numerical aquatic ecosystem models while also noting the difficulties, up until now, of the aquatic scientific community to make significant advances in these models during the past two decades. Through a common forum for aquatic ecosystem modellers we aim to (i) advance collaboration within the aquatic ecosystem modelling community, (ii) enable increased use of models for research, policy and ecosystem-based management, (iii) facilitate a collective framework using common (standardised) code to ensure that model development is incremental, (iv) increase the transparency of model structure, assumptions and techniques, (v) achieve a greater understanding of aquatic ecosystem functioning, (vi) increase the reliability of predictions by aquatic ecosystem models, (vii) stimulate model inter-comparisons including differing model approaches, and (viii) avoid ‘re-inventing the wheel’, thus accelerating improvements to aquatic ecosystem models. We intend to achieve this as a community that fosters interactions amongst ecologists and model developers. Further, we outline scientific topics recently articulated by the scientific community, which lend themselves well to being addressed by integrative modelling approaches and serve to motivate the progress and implementation of an open source model framework.
Freshwater Reviews | 2010
J. Alex Elliott; Anthony E. Irish; Colin S. Reynolds
Abstract Twenty years after model equations describing the in situ growth rates of phytoplankton were first devised and eight since their successful incorporation into a computer simulation was first published, we set out to affirm the general validity and utility of PROTECH (Phytoplankton RespOnses To Environmental Change). Elaborated originally for commercial purposes, PROTECH has been shown to be capable of simulating simultaneous seasonal fluctuations in the standing crops of several contrasting species of alga, making it attractive for testing the impacts of various simulated regimes for managing the growth conditions. These have been sufficiently convincing to persuade us to use PROTECH as a research tool; over a number of years, it has been used to simulate such ‘traditional’ problems of ecology as succession, competitive exclusion and species diversity, in the context of intermediate disturbance. In this paper, we review critically the workings of the model, especially how complex but consistent outcomes emerge in compliance with simple trait-based rules of community assembly. We affirm that temperature-specific growth rates of algae are strongly influenced by algal morphology, that slender species are tolerant of low average light exposure and that periodicity is related to species-specific characteristics of motility and buoyant behaviour. The results of some applications of PROTECH are presented, simulating responses of the phytoplankton community to adjustments in nutrient loading, light penetration and hydrological flushing rates; an explicit investigation of the sensitivity of population responses of Cyanobacteria to eutrophication is also reported, in the context of varying availabilities of combined inorganic nitrogen. Considering future developments of PROTECH, we affirm the virtues of its central growth equations; we anticipate that future applications will mostly depend upon improved representation of the physical environments it seeks to simulate and that these may more frequently relate to aquatic systems other than the lakes and reservoirs for which it was originally devised.
Environmental Modelling and Software | 2014
Dennis Trolle; J. Alex Elliott; Wolf M. Mooij; Jan H. Janse; Karsten Bolding; David P. Hamilton; Erik Jeppesen
A global trend of increasing health hazards associated with proliferation of toxin-producing cyanobacteria makes the ability to project phytoplankton dynamics of paramount importance. Whilst ensemble (multi-)modelling approaches have been used for a number of years to improve the robustness of weather forecasts this approach has until now never been adopted for ecosystem modelling. We show that the average simulated phytoplankton biomass derived from three different aquatic ecosystem models is generally superior to any of the three individual models in describing observed phytoplankton biomass in a typical temperate lake ecosystem, and we simulate a series of climate change projections. While this is the first multi-model ensemble approach applied for some of the most complex aquatic ecosystem models available, we consider it sets a precedent for what will become commonplace methodology in the future, as it enables increased robustness of model projections, and scenario uncertainty estimation due to differences in model structures.
Environmental Health | 2009
Andrew N. Tyler; Peter D. Hunter; Laurence Carvalho; Geoffrey A. Codd; J. Alex Elliott; C. Ferguson; Nick Hanley; David W. Hopkins; Stephen C. Maberly; Kathryn Mearns; E. Marion Scott
Mass populations of toxin-producing cyanobacteria commonly develop in fresh-, brackish- and marine waters and effective strategies for monitoring and managing cyanobacterial health risks are required to safeguard animal and human health. A multi-interdisciplinary study, including two UK freshwaters with a history of toxic cyanobacterial blooms, was undertaken to explore different approaches for the identification, monitoring and management of potentially-toxic cyanobacteria and their associated risks. The results demonstrate that (i) cyanobacterial bloom occurrence can be predicted at a local- and national-scale using process-based and statistical models; (ii) cyanobacterial concentration and distribution in waterbodies can be monitored using remote sensing, but minimum detection limits need to be evaluated; (iii) cyanotoxins may be transferred to spray-irrigated root crops; and (iv) attitudes and perceptions towards risks influence the publics preferences and willingness-to-pay for cyanobacterial health risk reductions in recreational waters.
Environmental Modelling and Software | 2015
Paul Whitehead; Gianbattista Bussi; Michael J. Bowes; Daniel S. Read; Mike Hutchins; J. Alex Elliott; Simon Dadson
A process-based phytoplankton model developed to simulate the movement and growth of phytoplankton in river systems is presented in this paper. The model is based on mass-balance, and takes into account water temperature, light, self-shading, dissolved phosphorus and silicon concentrations. It was implemented in five reaches of the River Thames (UK), and the results compared to a novel dataset of cytometric data which includes concentrations of chlorophytes, diatoms, cyanobacteria and picoalgae. A Multi-Objective General Sensitivity Analysis was carried out in order to test the model robustness and to quantify the sensitivity to its parameters. The results show a good agreement between the simulations and the measured phytoplankton abundance. The most influential parameters were phytoplankton growth and death rates, while phosphorus concentration showed little influence, due to the high concentration of phosphorus in the Thames. The model is an important step forward towards understanding and predicting algal dynamics in river systems. A new phytoplankton model is presented and tested on the River Thames (UK).It takes into account temperature, light, phosphorus, silica and self-shading.The parameter uncertainty is assessed through a general sensitivity analysis.Growth and death rates are the most influent model parameters.Phosphorus concentration is not a limiting factor in the River Thames.
Diatom Research | 2014
Rosemary J. Law; J. Alex Elliott; Stephen J. Thackeray
There are many useful metrics currently available to explain ecological variation within phytobenthic communities. However, most metrics are challenging to use (requiring specialist taxonomic skills and knowledge), limiting their widespread applicability. Furthermore, because most metrics have been developed to represent ecological responses to single pressures, no single metric in isolation can effectively describe complex changes in the state of communities responding to multiple environmental pressures. Understanding of such changes therefore requires the use of multiple metrics to account for the impacts of many environmental pressures. This study explores the potential of functional and morphological classifications to explain phytobenthic community responses to differences in nutrient concentration, current velocity, simulated high flow disturbances and invertebrate grazers. Three previously used phytobenthic classifications and a new metric developed from a phytoplankton classification were tested using two datasets from streams in the north west of England in 2010. A combination of the newly applied morphological classification (using maximum linear dimension, surface area and volume) and a functional classification (using life-forms) showed great potential for aiding the understanding of phytobenthic community responses to environmental pressures. Furthermore, it is suggested that, with further testing, this new classification, which requires less specialist knowledge, could be widely implemented and would potentially give great insight into the ecology of the entire phytobenthic community.
Hydrobiologia | 2015
J. Alex Elliott; Peter A. Henrys; Maliko Tanguy; Jonathan Cooper; Stephen C. Maberly
The roach is influential ecologically and has a preference for water temperatures >12°C. In this study, we attempted to predict its habitat expansion in response to global warming, hypothesing its increase in Great Britain. Historical data for air temperature over different time scales (annual, seasonal, monthly and daily) and for the presence of roach in Great Britain were used to create four Ecological Niche Models. Mean seasonal air temperature (EncRoach-S) was the best predictor. Using EncRoach-S, two future climate scenarios were tested: a sensitivity test (i.e. incrementally increasing temperature values by 1°C), and using air temperature data from UKCIP 11-member ensemble of climate change projections for 2031–2040, 2061–2070 and 2091–2100. Both approaches predicted an increase in habitat suitability in Great Britain with rising air temperatures but the extent of change differed for England, Wales and Scotland. In England, the rate of expansion was initially slow but rapidly increased mid-century leading to 88% coverage by the century end. In Wales, there was a greater increase by the century end and a similar trend in Scotland. This study supports the conjecture that a rise in air temperature over the next few decades will lead to an increase in potential roach habitat.