J. Bohannon Mason

Early failures in total knee arthroplasty.

Total knee arthroplasty is a predictable operation. Unfortunately, there is a subset of patients who do not do well and require revision surgery within the first 5 years. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the mechanisms of failure in patients who had revision surgery within 5 years of their index arthroplasty. Between 1986 and 1999, 440 patients with total knee arthroplasties were referred for revision surgery. An analysis of patients in whom the arthroplasties failed within 5 years of the index arthroplasty and the reasons for early failure were documented. Of the 440 patients who had revision surgery, 279 (63%) had revision surgery within 5 years of their index arthroplasty: 105 of the 279 patients with early failures (38%) had revision surgery because of infection; 74 (27%) had revision surgery because of instability; 37 (13%) had revision surgery because of failure of ingrowth of a porous-coated implant; 22 (8%) had revision surgery because of patellofemoral problems; and 21 (7%) had revision surgery because of wear or osteolysis. Only eight of the 279 patients with early failures (3%) had revision surgery because of aseptic loosening of a cemented implant. The remaining 12 patients had revision surgery because of miscellaneous problems. Host factors may prevent infection from ever being eradicated totally. The two other major patterns of failure in this series were failure of cementless fixation and instability. If all of the arthroplasties in the patients in this early failure group would have been cemented routinely and balanced carefully, the total number of early revisions would have decreased by approximately 40%, and the overall failures would have been reduced by 25%.

Articulating Versus Static Spacers in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Sepsis

Antibiotic laden spacer blocks frequently are used to treat an infected total knee arthroplasty. Static spacer blocks make exposure at reimplantation difficult secondary to quadriceps shortening. Unexpected bone loss attributable to migration of the spacer block also has been reported. To avoid these problems, a temporary articulating molded implant made of antibiotic cement was used in a consecutive series. The authors sought to determine whether its use would affect the reinfection rate, improve functional results, or prevent bone loss compared with static spacers. Twenty-five patients were treated with static nonarticulating spacers. Since 1996, 30 patients have been treated with tobramycin-laden articulating spacers. The knee arthroplasties in three patients treated with a static spacer became reinfected (12%). The knee arthroplasty in one patient with an articulating spacer became reinfected (7%). Fifteen of the 25 patients with static spacers had unexpected bone loss between stages. No appreciable bone loss could be measured in the patients who received articulating spacers. The average Hospital for Special Surgery score was 83 points in the patients with static spacers and 84 points for the patients with articulating spacers. Range of motion at final followup averaged 98° in the patients who received static spacers and 105° in the patients who received articulating spacers. Articulating spacers seem to facilitate reimplantation of infected total knee arthroplasty without additional risk of infection. Unexpected bone loss is no longer a concern with this two-stage technique. Articulating spacers offered no functional advantage over static spacers in this study group.

The Value of White Blood Cell Counts Before Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

A white blood cell count (WBC) of >50000 cell/mm(3) from a knee aspirate with >or=80% polymorphonuclear cells (PMNCs) is suggestive of infection. This study sought to determine if these same criteria were applicable when interpreting aspirates from a total knee. Of 440 revision total knee arthroplasties, 86 patients had preoperative aspirations of the knee before revision. Fifty-five aspirates were from aseptic failures; 31 aspirates were from patients determined to have septic failure. The mean white blood cell (WBC) count in aspirates from the aseptic group was 645 cells/mm(3) (SD = 878). The mean WBC count in the septic group was 25951 cells/mm(3) (SD = 34994; P=<.001). The mean percentage of PMNCs was statistically higher in the septic group compared with the aseptic group (72.8% vs 27.3%; P=<.001). The synovial fluid WBC count differential analysis is a statistically relevant indicator of the presence or absence of infection in revision knee arthroplasty. Aspirates with a WBC count of 2500 per milliliter and 60% PMNCs are highly suggestive of infection.

Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Analysis

Methods of stem fixation are a controversial aspect of revision TKA. We sought to determine which technique was superior by reviewing 475 revision TKAs done between 1986 and 2000. Of these 475 revisions, 286 major component revisions were done using 484 extended stems for fixation. Patients who died, patients who had less than 2 years followupm, or patients who had diaphyseal engaging stems were excluded from the study. The final data set included 113 revision TKAs with 202 metaphyseal engaging stems. Of the 202 stems, 107 were cemented whereas 95 were press-fit metaphyseal engaging stems. One hundred one of these were femoral stems and 101 were tibial stems. Using a modified Knee Society radiographic scoring system, 100 (93%) of the 107 implants with cemented stems were considered stable, seven (7%) were categorized as possibly loose requiring close followup, and none were loose. Of the 95 implants placed with cementless stems, only 67 (71%) were categorized as stable. Eighteen (19%) were possibly loose requiring close followup and 10 (10%) were loose (two tibial and eight femoral implants). We currently would urge caution in using cementless metaphyseal engaging stems for fixation in revision TKA.

Catastrophic Complications of Minimally Invasive Hip Surgery: A Series of Three Cases

M inimally invasive hip surgery techniques have been advocated as an alternative to total hip arthroplasty performed with conventional soft-tissue exposure. Purported advantages of the minimally invasive technique have included faster functional recovery, a shorter stay in the hospital, less blood loss, and an improved cosmetic result1. Any new surgical technique involves a learning curve. The steepness of this curve and the true complication rates cannot be established until these procedures have been performed by surgeons other than those who champion the technique. Ideally, before any new procedure is adopted for widespread use, prospective, controlled, multicenter studies should prove the procedures safety and efficacy. Recently, three patients with catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip replacement were referred to our tertiary total joint revision center. Each arthroplasty had been performed by a different orthopaedic surgeon who stated, in his operative note, that a minimally invasive approach had been used. Two of the patients consented to have data concerning the case submitted for publication, whereas the third patient died in the recovery room after being directly transferred from an outside clinic to our hospital. Thus, she did not sign the release form at the clinic. C ase 1. A sixty-seven-year-old woman underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty that was performed with use of minimally invasive techniques at another institution. The patient was 5 ft and 6 in (167.6 cm) tall and weighed 180 lb (81.6 kg). The procedure was performed through a 9-cm incision. During the operation, difficulty with reaming of the acetabulum was encountered and a segmental defect in the superior dome of the acetabulum was created. The defect was recognized intraoperatively, but no suitable revision components were available and the surgeon called our institution requesting transfer of the patient to our care. Two days after admission to our …

Why Do Revision Knee Arthroplasties Fail

This study identified the mechanisms of failure and the variables associated with failure after revision knee arthroplasty. Five hundred sixty-six index revision knee arthroplasties were studied. Of index revisions, 12.0% failed at an average of 40.1 months. Predominant revision failure modes included infection (46%), aseptic loosening (19%), and instability (13%). Only 4.3% of knees revised for aseptic loosening required rerevision as compared to 21% of knees revised for infection. Revision knee arthroplasty was more likely to fail in younger patients and in those who underwent polyethylene exchanges. Mechanisms of failure for revision arthroplasties are different than for primary knee arthroplasties. Revisions for infection are 4 times more likely to fail than revisions for aseptic loosening. The survivorship for the entire cohort, with revision for any reason as an end point, was 82% at 12 years.

Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing.

The study purpose was to analyze current results of modern cementless femoral components in young patients having total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hip resurfacing. Twenty-two studies (n = 5907; hips = 6408) evaluating modern cementless THA in young patients and 15 studies evaluating hip resurfacing (n = 3002; hips = 3269) were included. Meta-analysis techniques were used to pool failure rates. The pooled failure rate for THA using femoral revision for mechanical failure as an end point was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0%-1.7%) at a mean 8.4 years of follow-up. At a mean of 3.9 years of follow-up, the pooled mechanical failure rate of the femoral component for hip resurfacing was 2.6% (95% CI, 2.0-3.4). In conclusion, the enthusiasm for hip resurfacing should be tempered by these data. Longer follow-up and direct comparison trials are required to confirm these findings.

When computer-assisted knee replacement is the best alternative.

We studied whether computer-assisted surgery could properly align total knee arthroplasty when traditional instrumentation was not possible or appropriate. We identified 16 patients (18 knees) who we believed could not be treated using traditional instrumentation because of posttraumatic femoral deformity, retained femoral hardware, a history of osteomyelitis, or severe cardiopulmonary disease. Computer- assisted surgery was successfully used in 17 knees; we were unable to accurately register the hip in one morbidly obese patient. We judged the overall mechanical axis of the limb using computer-assisted surgery acceptable in 16 of 17 knees. One patient with a major posttraumatic biplane deformity had an overall mechanical axis in 4° of varus. Computer- assisted navigation seemed helpful in difficult situations where accurate alignment remains crucial, yet traditional instrumentation is not applicable. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Yields More Rapid Voluntary Cessation of All Walking Aids: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

This study sought to prospectively examine the clinical and radiographic differences between direct anterior (DA-THA) and mini-posterior approach total hip arthroplasty (MPA-THA). Fifty-four patients were prospectively randomized to either MPA or DA-THA. Patient recorded diaries were collected. Radiographs were reviewed. SF-36, WOMAC and HHS scores were tabulated. Time to ambulation without any assistive device favored DA-THA (22 vs. 28 days, P=0.04). Three week SF mental scores favored MPA-THA (60.66 vs. 58.43, P=0.01). In a randomized prospective trial, patients undergoing DA-THA voluntarily quit use of all walking aids on average 6 days earlier than patients with a MPA-THA. Little additional clinical or radiographic benefit was seen between the cohorts.

In-Vivo Alignment Comparing Patient Specific Instrumentation with both Conventional and Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed to increase total knee arthroplasty (TKA) accuracy and efficiency. The study purpose was to compare immediate post-operative mechanical alignment, achieved using PSI, with conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instruments in high volume TKA practices. This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study accrued 66 TKA patients using PSI. A computed tomography (CT) based algorithm was used to develop the surgical plan. Sixty-two percent were females, 99% were diagnosed with osteoarthritis, average age at surgery was 66 years, and 33 was the average body mass index. A historical control group was utilized that underwent TKA using conventional instruments (n=86) or CAS (n=81), by the same set of surgeons. Postoperative mechanical alignment was comparable across the groups. Operative time mean and variance were significant.