J. Briest

Mental disorders in adults with congenital heart disease: Unmet needs and impact on quality of life

OBJECTIVE In adult congenital heart disease (ACHD), mental health status and quality of life become important issues due to improved life expectancy. Current literature provides conflicting data regarding mental health status in ACHD. Furthermore, none of the studies so far compared prevalence rates with a matched control group. METHODS The prevalence of mental disorders was assessed in 150 ACHD using a structured interview, and compared to 12-months estimates of the general German population. Quality of life (QoL) was measured with World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument. Furthermore, we related the diagnostic results of widely used screening instruments for depression (Beck Depression Inventory-2; BDI-2; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS) with clinical diagnoses, to receive optimal sensitivity and specificity values. RESULTS The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was significantly higher in ACHD than in the general population (48.0%; CI: 44.7-60.0 vs. 35.7%; CI: 33.5-37.9). Mood (30.7%; CI: 24.0-38.0 vs. 10.7%;CI:9.4-12.0) and anxiety disorders (28.0%; CI:22.0-36.7 vs. 16.8%; CI: 15.0-18.6) were the leading causes of psychiatric illness. Sixteen of 150 ACHD patients (10.7%) received specific treatment for psychiatric disorders before entering the study. Overall quality of life was independently and negatively associated with a diagnosis of major depression (p<0.001), alcohol dependency (p=0.004), nicotine dependency (p=0.036), and NYHA class (p=0.007). Accuracy of the HADS-D and BDI-2 as screening instruments was moderate (AUC 0.60-0.81), depending on the cut-off score used. CONCLUSIONS Psychiatric disorders, particularly mood and anxiety disorders are significantly more frequent in ACHD compared to the general population. However, these disorders are rarely diagnosed resulting in under treatment and loss of quality of life. Quality of life is independently associated with the existence of mood, anxiety and substance use disorders. When self-rating instruments (BDI-2, HADS) are used as screening instruments in ACHD care, lower cut-off values are recommended.

Work-related rehabilitation aftercare for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: results of a randomized-controlled multicenter trial.

There is evidence that rehabilitation with a multidisciplinary focus on work-related demands effectively improves work ability and quickens return to work in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. There could be benefits to the transfer of work-related components into rehabilitation aftercare. We examined the effectiveness of an intensified work-related rehabilitation aftercare program compared with standard intensified rehabilitation aftercare in Germany on work ability. We randomly assigned 307 patients with musculoskeletal disorders from 11 rehabilitation centers to an aftercare program with work-related functional capacity training, work-related psychosocial groups, social counseling, relaxation training and exercise therapy (intervention group), or the usual aftercare program consisting of only exercise therapy (control group). The 6-month follow-up questionnaire was completed by 78.5% of patients. There was no statistically relevant between-group difference in follow-up primary (work ability) and secondary outcomes (e.g. health-related quality of life, sick leave duration). Significant improvements were observed within both the intervention and the control groups. Severely disabled participants in the intervention group had better physical functioning and shorter sick leave duration after 6 months compared with severely disabled patients in the control group. A partial replacement of standard exercise therapy by a more work-related therapy does not seem to improve work ability superiorly. Improved aftercare treatment may require a focus on employer participation and involvement within the actual work environment.

Intensivierte medizinisch-beruflich orientierte Rehabilitationsnachsorge: Langfristige Ergebnisse der randomisiert-kontrollierten Multicenter-Studie

OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensified work-related rehabilitation aftercare (IWORAC) in comparison to the conventional intensified rehabilitation aftercare (IRAC). METHODS Patients with severe limitations of work-related functioning were recruited in 11 outpatient rehabilitation centres at the beginning of their orthopaedic rehabilitation aftercare and randomly assigned to the interventions. The control group (n=150) received the IRAC while the intervention group (n=157) received the IWORAC which amended the IRAC by work-related functional capacity training, work-related psychosocial groups, social counselling and relaxation training. The primary outcome was work ability. Treatment effects were analyzed by generalized linear regression models. RESULTS There was no statistically relevant between-group difference in follow-up primary or secondary (e. g., duration of sick leave, quality of life) outcomes. Both groups improved their quality of life and work ability considerably. CONCLUSION RESULTS were not in favour of the IWORAC. The improvement of existing aftercare treatments might require a stronger involvement of the employer.