J. Buxeda i Garrigós
University of Barcelona
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. Buxeda i Garrigós.
Analyst | 2002
Anno Hein; A. Tsolakidou; I. Iliopoulos; H. Mommsen; J. Buxeda i Garrigós; G. Montana; V. Kilikoglou
Chemical analysis is a well-established procedure for the provenancing of archaeological ceramics. Various analytical techniques are routinely used and large amounts of data have been accumulated so far in data banks. However, in order to exchange results obtained by different laboratories, the respective analytical procedures need to be tested in terms of their inter-comparability. In this study, the schemes of analysis used in four laboratories that are involved in archaeological pottery studies on a routine basis were compared. The techniques investigated were neutron activation analysis (NAA), X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). For this comparison series of measurements on different geological standard reference materials (SRM) were carried out and the results were statistically evaluated. An attempt was also made towards the establishment of calibration factors between pairs of analytical setups in order to smooth the systematic differences among the results.
Archaeometry | 2001
J. Buxeda i Garrigós; V. Kilikoglou; Peter M. Day
The formation of reference groups comprises an important procedure in chemical provenance studies of archaeological pottery. Material from ancient kilns is thought to be especially suitable for reference groups, as it comprises a definite unit of past production. Pottery from the Late Minoan IA kiln excavated at Kommos, Crete was analysed in order to produce a reference group in this important area of Minoan ceramic production. The samples were characterized by a combination of techniques providing information on the chemistry, mineralogy and microstructure of the ceramic body. Initially, the study was unable to establish, in a straightforward manner, a chemical reference group. Different ceramic pastes and a range of selective alterations and contaminations, affected by variable firing temperatures and burial environment, were shown to be responsible for the compositional variability. Procedures are described to compensate for such alterations and the perturbations in the data that they produce.
Archaeometry | 2003
J. Buxeda i Garrigós; M. A. Cau Ontiveros; V. Kilikoglou
This paper explores analytically the contemporary pottery-making community of Pereruela (north-west Spain) that produces cooking pots from a mixture of red clay and kaolin. Analyses by different techniques (XRF, NAA, XRD, SEM and petrography) showed an extremely high variability for cooking ware pottery produced in a single production centre, by the same technology and using local clays. The main source of chemical variation is related to the use of different red clays and the presence of non-normally distributed inclusions of monazite. These two factors induce a high chemical variability, not only in the output of a single production centre, but even in the paste of a single pot, to an extent to which chemical compositions from one ‘workshop’, or even one ‘pot’, could be classified as having different provenances. The implications for the chemical characterization and for provenance studies of archaeological ceramics are addressed.
Archaeometry | 2003
J. Buxeda i Garrigós; R.E. Jones; V. Kilikoglou; Sara Tiziana Levi; Y. Maniatis; J. Mitchell; L. Vagnetti; K. A. Wardle; Stelios Andreou
The study of technology transfer in pottery production to the periphery of the Mycenaean world has been addressed by considering two different areas, southern Italy and central Macedonia. Technological features such as ceramic paste, decoration and firing have been determined for different ceramic groups established according to provenance criteria. The studies of technology and provenance have been performed following an archaeometric approach, using neutron activation analysis, petrographic analysis, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The results have revealed the existence of two different models. On the one hand, southern Italy seems to exhibit a more organized pottery production, which follows a Mycenaean-like technology, while in central Macedonia production is probably more varied, being based in part on the technology of the local tradition.
Journal of Archaeological Science | 1999
J. Buxeda i Garrigós
Analyst | 2002
Anno Hein; A. Tsolakidou; I. Iliopoulos; H. Mommsen; J. Buxeda i Garrigós; G. Montana; V. Kilikoglou
Archaeometry | 2002
J. Buxeda i Garrigós; H. Mommsen; A. Tsolakidou
Archaeometry | 2006
A. Schwedt; H. Mommsen; N. Zacharias; J. Buxeda i Garrigós
Journal of Archaeological Science | 2005
N. Zacharias; J. Buxeda i Garrigós; H. Mommsen; A. Schwedt; V. Kilikoglou
Archaeometry | 2009
Javier Garcia Iñañez; Robert J. Speakman; J. Buxeda i Garrigós; Michael D. Glascock