Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J.-C. Lambert is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J.-C. Lambert.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008

Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument nitrogen dioxide columns

Edward Celarier; Ellen Brinksma; James F. Gleason; J. P. Veefkind; A. Cede; Jay R. Herman; Dimitri V. Ionov; Florence Goutail; Jean-Pierre Pommereau; J.-C. Lambert; M. Van Roozendael; Gaia Pinardi; F. Wittrock; A. Schönhardt; Andreas Richter; Ow Ibrahim; Thomas Wagner; Bojan Bojkov; George H. Mount; E. Spinei; C.M. Chen; Thomas J. Pongetti; Stanley P. Sander; E. J. Bucsela; Mark Wenig; Daan P. J. Swart; H. Volten; M. Kroon; Pieternel F. Levelt

[1] We review the standard nitrogen dioxide (NO2) data product (Version 1.0.), which is based on measurements made in the spectral region 415–465 nm by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on the NASA Earth Observing System-Aura satellite. A number of ground- and aircraft-based measurements have been used to validate the data product’s three principal quantities: stratospheric, tropospheric, and total NO2 column densities under nearly or completely cloud-free conditions. The validation of OMI NO2 is complicated by a number of factors, the greatest of which is that the OMI observations effectively average the NO2 over its field of view (minimum 340 km 2 ), while a ground-based instrument samples at a single point. The tropospheric NO2 field is often very inhomogeneous, varying significantly over tens to hundreds of meters, and ranges from 10 16 cm � 2 over urban and industrial areas. Because of OMI’s areal averaging, when validation measurements are made near NO2 sources the OMI measurements are expected to underestimate the ground-based, and this is indeed seen. Further, we use several different instruments, both new and mature, which might give inconsistent NO2 amounts; the correlations between nearby instruments is 0.8–0.9. Finally, many of the validation data sets are quite small and span a very short length of time; this limits the statistical conclusions that can be drawn from them. Despite these factors, good agreement is generally seen between the OMI and ground-based measurements, with OMI stratospheric NO2 underestimated by about 14% and total and tropospheric columns underestimated by 15–30%. Typical correlations between OMI NO2 and ground-based measurements are generally >0.6.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2006

Ten years of GOME/ERS-2 total ozone data- : The new GOME data processor (GDP) version 4: 1. Algorithm description

M. Van Roozendael; Diego Loyola; Robert Spurr; Dimitris Balis; J.-C. Lambert; Yakov Livschitz; Pieter Valks; Thomas Ruppert; P. Kenter; C. Fayt; Claus Zehner

The Global Ozone Monitoring Instrument (GOME) was launched on European Space Agencys ERS-2 platform in April 1995. The GOME data processor (GDP) operational retrieval algorithm has generated total ozone columns since July 1995. In 2004 the GDP system was given a major upgrade to version 4.0, a new validation was performed, and the 10-year GOME level 1 data record was reprocessed. In two papers, we describe the GDP 4.0 retrieval algorithm and present an error budget and sensitivity analysis (paper 1) and validation of the GDP total ozone product and the overall accuracy of the entire GOME ozone record (paper 2). GDP 4.0 uses an optimized differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) algorithm, with air mass factor (AMF) conversions calculated using the radiative transfer code linearized discrete ordinate radiative transfer (LIDORT). AMF computation is based on the TOMS version 8 ozone profile climatology, classified by total column, and AMFs are adjusted iteratively to reflect the DOAS slant column result. GDP 4.0 has improved wavelength calibration and reference spectra and includes a new molecular Ring correction to deal with distortion of ozone absorption features due to inelastic rotational Raman scattering effects. Preprocessing for cloud parameter estimation in GDP 4.0 is done using two new cloud correction algorithms: OCRA and ROCINN. For clear and cloudy scenes the precision of the ozone column product is better than 2.4 and 3.3%, respectively, for solar zenith angles up to 80°. Comparisons with ground-based data are generally at the 1-1.5% level or better for all regions outside the poles.


Advances in Space Research | 2002

Intercomparison of BrO measurements from ERS-2 GOME, ground-based and balloon platforms

M. Van Roozendael; Thomas Wagner; Andreas Richter; Irene Pundt; D. W. Arlander; J. P. Burrows; M. P. Chipperfield; C. Fayt; P. V. Johnston; J.-C. Lambert; K. Kreher; K. Pfeilsticker; U. Platt; J.-P. Pommereau; Björn-Martin Sinnhuber; K. K. Tørnkvist; F. Wittrock

The consistency of BrO column amounts derived from GOME spectra and from correlative ground-based and balloon measurements performed in 1998-1999 during the Third European Stratospheric Experiment on Ozone (THESEO) has been investigated. The study relies on W-visible observations at several mid- and high latitude ground-based stations in both hemispheres, complemented by balloon-borne solar occultation profile measurements and 3D chemical transport model simulations. Previous investigations have reported GOME BrO columns systematically larger than those deduced from balloon, suggesting BrO being present, possibly ubiquitously, in the free troposphere. The robustness of this hypothesis has been further tested based on the presently available correlative data set. It is shown that when accounting for the BrO diurnal variation and the solar zenith angle dependency of the sensitivity of correlative data to the troposphere, measurements from all platforms are consistent with the presence of a tropospheric BrO background of 1-3 ~10’~ mole&m’ extending over mid- and high


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011

The GOME‐2 total column ozone product: Retrieval algorithm and ground‐based validation

Diego Loyola; M. E. Koukouli; Pieter Valks; Dimitris Balis; Nan Hao; M. Van Roozendael; Robert Spurr; Walter Zimmer; Stephan Kiemle; Christophe Lerot; J.-C. Lambert

The Global Ozone Monitoring Instrument (GOME-2) was launched on EUMESATs MetOp-A satellite in October 2006. This paper is concerned with the retrieval algorithm GOME Data Processor (GDP) version 4.4 used by the EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Ozone and Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring (O3M-SAF) for the operational generation of GOME-2 total ozone products. GDP 4.4 is the latest version of the GDP 4.0 algorithm, which is employed for the generation of official Level 2 total ozone and other trace gas products from GOME and SCIAMACHY. Here we focus on enhancements introduced in GDP 4.4: improved cloud retrieval algorithms including detection of Sun glint effects, a correction for intracloud ozone, better treatment of snow and ice conditions, accurate radiative transfer modeling for large viewing angles, and elimination of scan angle dependencies inherited from Level 1 radiances. Furthermore, the first global validation results for 3 years (2007–2009) of GOME-2/MetOp-A total ozone measurements using Brewer and Dobson measurements as references are presented. The GOME-2/MetOp-A total ozone data obtained with GDP 4.4 slightly underestimates ground-based ozone by about 0.5% to 1% over the middle latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere and slightly overestimates by around 0.5% over the middle latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere. Over high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere, GOME-2 total ozone has almost no offset relative to Dobson readings, while over high latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere GOME-2 exhibits a small negative bias below 1%. For tropical latitudes, GOME-2 measures on average lower ozone by 0% to 2% compared to Dobson measurements.


Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 1999

Investigation of Pole-to-Pole Performances of Spaceborne Atmospheric Chemistry Sensors with the NDSC

J.-C. Lambert; Michel Van Roozendael; Martine De Mazière; Paul C. Simon; Jean-Pierre Pommereau; Florence Goutail; Alain Sarkissian; James F. Gleason

Abstract Spaceborne atmospheric chemistry sensors provide unique access to the distribution and variation of the concentration of many trace species on the global scale. However, since the measurements and the retrieval algorithms are sensitive to a variety of instrumental as well as atmospheric sources of error, they need to be validated carefully by correlative measurements. The quality control and validation of satellite measurements on the global scale, as well as in the long term, is one of the goals of the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change (NDSC). Started in 1991, at the present time the NDSC includes five primary and two dozen complementary stations distributed from the Arctic to the Antarctic, comprising a variety of instruments such as UV–visible spectrometers, Fourier transform infrared spectrometers, lidars, and millimeter-wave radiometers. After an overview of the main sources of uncertainty which could perturb the measurements from space, and of the ground-based data provided ...


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2006

Evaluation of Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) ozone profiles from nine different algorithms

Y. J. Meijer; D. P. J. Swart; F. Baier; Pawan K. Bhartia; G. E. Bodeker; S. Casadio; Kelly Chance; F. Del Frate; T. Erbertseder; M. D. Felder; Lawrence E. Flynn; S. Godin-Beekmann; Georg Hansen; Otto P. Hasekamp; Anton K. Kaifel; H. Kelder; Brian J. Kerridge; J.-C. Lambert; J. Landgraf; B. Latter; X. Liu; I. S. McDermid; Yakov A. Pachepsky; Vladimir V. Rozanov; Richard Siddans; Silvia Tellmann; R. F. van Oss; M. Weber; Claus Zehner

An evaluation is made of ozone profiles retrieved from measurements of the nadir-viewing Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) instrument. Currently four different approaches are used to retrieve ozone profile information from GOME measurements, which differ in the use of external information and a priori constraints. In total nine different algorithms will be evaluated exploiting the Optimal Estimation (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, University of Bremen, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory), Phillips-Tikhonov Regularization (Space Research Organization Netherlands), Neural Network (Center for Solar Energy and Hydrogen Research, Tor Vergata University), and Data Assimilation (German Aerospace Center) approaches. Analysis tools are used to interpret data sets that provide averaging kernels. In the interpretation of these data, the focus is on the vertical resolution, the indicative altitude of the retrieved value, and the fraction of a priori information. The evaluation is completed with a comparison of the results to lidar data from the NDSC (Network for Detection of Stratospheric Change) stations in Andoya (Norway), Observatoire Haute Provence (France), Mauna Loa (USA), Lauder (New Zealand) and Dumont d’Urville (Antarctic) for the years 1997–1999. In total the comparison involves nearly 1000 ozone profiles, and allows the analysis of GOME data measured in different global regions and hence observational circumstances. The main conclusion of this paper is that unambiguous information on the ozone profile can at best be retrieved in the altitude range 15–48 km with a vertical resolution of 10 to 15 km, precision of 5–10%, and a bias up to 5% or 20% depending on the success of recalibration of the input spectra. The sensitivity of retrievals to ozone at lower altitudes varies from scheme to scheme and includes significant influence from a priori assumptions.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Homogenized total ozone data records from the European sensors GOME/ERS-2, SCIAMACHY/Envisat, and GOME-2/MetOp-A

Christophe Lerot; M. Van Roozendael; Robert Spurr; Diego Loyola; Melanie Coldewey-Egbers; S. Kochenova; J. van Gent; M. E. Koukouli; D. Balis; J.-C. Lambert; J. Granville; Claus Zehner

Within the European Space Agencys Climate Change Initiative, total ozone column records from GOME (Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment), SCIAMACHY (SCanning Imaging Absorption SpectroMeter for Atmospheric CartograpHY), and GOME-2 have been reprocessed with GODFIT version 3 (GOME-type Direct FITting). This algorithm is based on the direct fitting of reflectances simulated in the Huggins bands to the observations. We report on new developments in the algorithm from the version implemented in the operational GOME Data Processor v5. The a priori ozone profile database TOMSv8 is now combined with a recently compiled OMI/MLS tropospheric ozone climatology to improve the representativeness of a priori information. The Ring procedure that corrects simulated radiances for the rotational Raman inelastic scattering signature has been improved using a revised semi-empirical expression. Correction factors are also applied to the simulated spectra to account for atmospheric polarization. In addition, the computational performance has been significantly enhanced through the implementation of new radiative transfer tools based on principal component analysis of the optical properties. Furthermore, a soft-calibration scheme for measured reflectances and based on selected Brewer measurements has been developed in order to reduce the impact of level-1 errors. This soft-calibration corrects not only for possible biases in backscattered reflectances, but also for artificial spectral features interfering with the ozone signature. Intersensor comparisons and ground-based validation indicate that these ozone data sets are of unprecedented quality, with stability better than 1% per decade, a precision of 1.7%, and systematic uncertainties less than 3.6% over a wide range of atmospheric states.


Advances in Space Research | 2000

Combined characterisation of GOME and TOMS total ozone measurements from space using ground-based observations from the NDSC

J.-C. Lambert; M. Van Roozendael; Paul C. Simon; J.-P. Pommereau; Florence Goutail; James F. Gleason; S. B. Andersen; D.W. Arlander; N.A. Bui Van; H. Claude; J. De La Noë; M. De Mazière; V. Dorokhov; P. Eriksen; A.C. Green; K. K. Tørnkvist; B. A. Kastad Hoiskar; E. Kyrö; Jean Leveau; M.-F. Merienne; G. Milinevsky; Howard K. Roscoe; Alain Sarkissian; Jonathan D. Shanklin; J. Stähelin; C. Wahlstrøm Tellefsen; G. Vaughan

Several years of total ozone measured from space by the ERS-2 GOME, the Earth Probe TOMS, and the ADEOS TOMS, are compared with high-quality ground-based observations associated with the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change (NDSC), over an extended latitude range and a variety of geophysical conditions. The comparisons with each spaceborne sensor are combined altogether for investigating their respective solar zenith angle (SZA) dependence, dispersion, and difference of sensitivity. The space- and ground-based data are found to agree within a few percent on average. However, the analysis highlights for both GOME and TOMS several sources of discrepancies: (i) a SZA dependence with TOMS beyond 80° SZA; (ii) a seasonal SZA dependence with GOME beyond 70° SZA; (iii) a difference of sensitivity with GOME at high latitudes; (iv) a difference of sensitivity to low ozone values between satellite and SAOZ sensors around the southern tropics; (v) a north/south difference of TOMS with the ground-based observations; and (vi) internal inconsistencies in GOME total ozone.


Applied Optics | 2005

GOME level 1-to-2 data processor version 3.0: a major upgrade of the GOME/ERS-2 total ozone retrieval algorithm

Robert Spurr; Diego Loyola; Werner Thomas; Wolfgang Balzer; Eberhard Mikusch; Bernd Aberle; Sander Slijkhuis; Thomas Ruppert; Michel Van Roozendael; J.-C. Lambert; Trisnanto Soebijanta

The global ozone monitoring experiment (GOME) was launched in April 1995, and the GOME data processor (GDP) retrieval algorithm has processed operational total ozone amounts since July 1995. GDP level 1-to-2 is based on the two-step differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) approach, involving slant column fitting followed by air mass factor (AMF) conversions to vertical column amounts. We present a major upgrade of this algorithm to version 3.0. GDP 3.0 was implemented in July 2002, and the 9-year GOME data record from July 1995 to December 2004 has been processed using this algorithm. The key component in GDP 3.0 is an iterative approach to AMF calculation, in which AMFs and corresponding vertical column densities are adjusted to reflect the true ozone distribution as represented by the fitted DOAS effective slant column. A neural network ensemble is used to optimize the fast and accurate parametrization of AMFs. We describe results of a recent validation exercise for the operational version of the total ozone algorithm; in particular, seasonal and meridian errors are reduced by a factor of 2. On a global basis, GDP 3.0 ozone total column results lie between -2% and +4% of ground-based values for moderate solar zenith angles lower than 70 degrees. A larger variability of about +5% and -8% is observed for higher solar zenith angles up to 90 degrees.


Journal of remote sensing | 2010

The GODFIT algorithm: a direct fitting approach to improve the accuracy of total ozone measurements from GOME

Christophe Lerot; M. Van Roozendael; J.-C. Lambert; J. Granville; J. van Gent; Diego Loyola; Robert Spurr

We present the total ozone retrieval algorithm GODFIT (GOME Direct-FITting). Applied to nadir backscattered measurements from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME), it is based on a direct-fitting approach by which spectral radiances simulated using the radiative transfer model LIDORT v3.3 (Linearized Discrete Ordinate Radiative Transfer) are adjusted to measurements in the 325–335 nm interval. Total O3 columns retrieved from GOME spectra have been compared not only to columns retrieved from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) measurements using the TOMS v8.5 algorithm, but also to correlative ground-based measurements from the GAW/NDACC networks (Global Atmosphere Watch/Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change). We show that GODFIT produces a significant reduction of the GOME ground-based differences and some of the associated dependencies, compared with the GOME Data Processor (GDP) 4.1 product. Version 5 of GDP, based on the GODFIT algorithm, will be released in spring 2010.

Collaboration


Dive into the J.-C. Lambert's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Van Roozendael

Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Diego Loyola

German Aerospace Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Granville

Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Florence Goutail

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michel Van Roozendael

Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pieter Valks

German Aerospace Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christophe Lerot

Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gaia Pinardi

Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daan Hubert

Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge