J. Castañeda
University of Barcelona
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. Castañeda.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2016
Lennart Lindegren; Uwe Lammers; U. Bastian; Jonay I. González Hernández; Sergei A. Klioner; David Hobbs; A. Bombrun; Daniel Michalik; M. Ramos-Lerate; A. G. Butkevich; G. Comoretto; E. Joliet; B. Holl; A. Hutton; P. Parsons; H. Steidelmüller; U. Abbas; M. Altmann; A. H. Andrei; S. Anton; N. Bach; C. Barache; Ugo Becciani; Jerome Berthier; Luciana Bianchi; M. Biermann; S. Bouquillon; G. Bourda; T. Brüsemeister; Beatrice Bucciarelli
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1 billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond (mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to ~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than 0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03 mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical definition of the optical reference frame.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2018
Lennart Lindegren; Jonay I. González Hernández; A. Bombrun; Sergei A. Klioner; U. Bastian; M. Ramos-Lerate; A. De Torres; H. Steidelmüller; C. Stephenson; David Hobbs; Uwe Lammers; M. Biermann; R. Geyer; T. Hilger; Daniel Michalik; U. Stampa; Paul J. McMillan; J. Castañeda; M. Clotet; G. Comoretto; M. Davidson; C. Fabricius; G. Gracia; Nigel Hambly; A. Hutton; André Mora; J. Portell; F. van Leeuwen; U. Abbas; A. Abreu
Context. Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational phase. Aims. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these resultsperformed within the astrometry task. Methods. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332 million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. These data were calculated in two steps. First, the satellite attitude and the astrometric calibration parameters of the CCDs were obtained in an astrometric global iterative solution for 16 million selected sources, using about 1% of the input data. This primary solution was tied to the extragalactic International Celestial Reference System (ICRS) by means of quasars. The resulting attitude and calibration were then used to calculate the astrometric parameters of all the sources. Special validation solutions were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and proper motion. Results. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is about 0.04 mas for bright (G < 14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G = 17 mag, and 0.7 masat G = 20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas yr−1, respectively.The optical reference frame defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to the quasars to within 0.15 mas yr−1. From the quasars and validation solutions we estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude, and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in parallax and 0.07 mas yr−1 in proper motion are seen on small (< 1 deg) and intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
Archive | 2018
F. van Leeuwen; J. H. J. de Bruijne; F. Arenou; Julie Bakker; R. Blomme; G. Busso; C. Cacciari; J. Castañeda; A. Cellino; M. Clotet; G. Comoretto; Laurent Eyer; J. González-Núñez; L. P. Guy; Nigel Hambly; David Hobbs; M. Van Leeuwen; X. Luri; Minia Manteiga; Dimitri Pourbaix; T. Roegiers; J. Salgado; P. Sartoretti; P. Tanga; A. Ulla; E. Utrilla Molina; A. Abreu; M. Altmann; R. Andrae; T. Antoja
Archive | 2017
F. van Leeuwen; J. H. J. de Bruijne; F. Arenou; G. Comoretto; Laurent Eyer; M. Farràs Casas; Nigel Hambly; David Hobbs; J. Salgado; E. Utrilla Molina; S. Vogt; M. Van Leeuwen; A. Abreu; M. Altmann; A. H. Andrei; C. Babusiaux; Ulrich Bastian; M. Biermann; S. Blanco-Cuaresma; A. Bombrun; R. Borrachero; A. G. A. Brown; D. Busonero; G. Busso; A. G. Butkevich; T. Cantat Gaudin; J. M. Carrasco; J. Castañeda; Jonathan Charnas; N. Cheek