J. Chammas

Clinical strategies and outcomes in advanced heart failure patients older than 70 years of age receiving the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: a community hospital experience.

OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this study was to determine outcomes in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients older than age 70 years. BACKGROUND Food and Drug Administration approval of the HeartMate II (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, California) LVAD for destination therapy has provided an attractive option for older patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS Fifty-five patients received the HeartMate II LVAD between October 5, 2005, and January 1, 2010, as part of either the bridge to transplantation or destination therapy trials at a community hospital. Patients were divided into 2 age groups: ≥ 70 years of age (n = 30) and < 70 years of age (n = 25). Outcome measures including survival, length of hospital stay, adverse events, and quality of life were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Pre-operatively, all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class IV refractory to maximal medical therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival for patients ≥ 70 years of age (97% at 1 month, 75% at 1 year, and 70% at 2 years) was not statistically different from patients <7 0 years of age (96% 1 month, 72% at 1 year, and 65% at 2 years, p = 0.806). Average length of hospital stay for the ≥ 70-year age group was 24 ± 15 days, similar to that of the < 70-year age group (23 ± 14 days, p = 0.805). There were no differences in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups. Quality of life and functional status improved significantly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The LVAD patients ≥ 70 years of age have good functional recovery, survival, and quality of life at 2 years. Advanced age should not be used as an independent contraindication when selecting a patient for LVAD therapy at experienced centers.

Aortic valve closure associated with HeartMate left ventricular device support: Technical considerations and long-term results

BACKGROUND Aortic valve integrity is crucial for optimal left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Pre-existing native aortic insufficiency, aortic valve incompetence acquired during support, as well as previously placed prosthetic aortic valves present unique problems for these patients. METHODS We reviewed and analyzed data for 28 patients who underwent left ventricular outflow tract closure associated with HeartMate I (n =12) and HeartMate II (n = 16) LVAD insertion or exchange. Indications for valve closure, surgical technique, LVAD function, survival rates and complications were retrospectively analyzed. Survival rates were compared with those of HeartMate LVAD patients (n = 104) who did not undergo aortic valve closure. RESULTS Indications for closure included native aortic valve insufficiency (10 patients), aortic valve deterioration after prolonged LVAD support (8 patients) and previously placed mechanical (9 patients) or bioprosthetic aortic prostheses (1 patient). There were 2 operative and 5 late deaths (mean 227 days post-operatively). Of the deaths, none were due to aortic valve closure. Actuarial survival was 78% at 1 year and 53% at 3 years, which was statistically better than for our patients with an intact aortic outflow (61% at 1 year, 45% at 3 years; p < 0.05). Five patients had transplants, 1 patient was successfully bridged to recovery, and 15 patients remain on LVAD support. No patient with outflow closure developed regurgitation, embolization or compromised LVAD support. CONCLUSION Outflow tract closure in LVAD-supported patients is safe, often necessary and well tolerated.

Emergency Bedside Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Rescue of Acute Tracheal Obstruction

A 39-year-old man experienced total obstruction of a distal tracheal plastic stent by a tumor mass, preventing effective ventilation and resulting in cardiac arrest. Resuscitation by emergency bedside venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) permitted time to physically remove the obstructing tumor and reestablish successful ventilation and liberation from ventilatory support. We review several other reported cases of emergency ECMO to resuscitate patients with acute airway obstruction.

HeartMate left ventricular assist system exchange: results and technical considerations.

The duration times of left ventricular assist system (LVAS) support have increased because of prolonged wait times for transplant and the more frequent use of devices for destination therapy. The HeartMate LVAS, the only device approved for bridge to transplant and destination therapy, has limited durability, making replacement increasingly necessary. Since 1996, we have exchanged 19 left ventricular assist devices in 15 patients (11 men: mean age, 57.1 years; range, 33–77 years). Most of the devices (14) were replaced with the HeartMate vented electric/extended-lead vented electric pump; five devices were exchanged for a HeartMate II LVAS. Bearing failure was the most frequent reason for exchange (15 of 19 pumps); four of the 19 pumps also had active device-related infections at the time of exchange. There were no early deaths (30 days). Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 85% at 1 year, 67% at 2 years, and 56% at 3 years. Three patients had transplants (mean, 518 days); six patients died during support (mean, 934 days), and six patients remain on LVAS support (mean, 1,219 days). One patient has been on device for over 6 years. Left ventricular assist devices exchange is becoming increasingly likely and can be associated with acceptably low-operative mortality rates and good intermediate-term survival.