J. Cooper Cutting

Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production☆

Abstract One of the classic puzzles of language is posed by the phenomenon of discontinous dependency, in which the form of an element at one point in an utterance depends on the form of a noncontiguous controlling element. How do speakers use the information carried by the controller to implement the correct form of the dependent element? We contrasted two accounts of this process that differ in their assumptions about the organization of language formulation. The serial account, patterned after an augmented-transition-network model of the parsing of discontinuous dependencies, suggests that the controller is held in working memory until the point in the string at which the dependent appears. A second hypothesis, derived from a hierarchical model of language production, predicts that controllers and dependents within the same clause are specified concurrently, even when they are eventually separated in the utterance. Using a procedure to elicit verb-agreement errors in speech, we found that agreement errors were more frequent after phrases than after clauses that separated the verb from its head noun, reversing the direction of a related effect in language comprehension. When length varied, longer phrases led to more errors; longer clauses did not. These results support the hierarchical hypothesis.

Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon.

When speakers produce words, lexical access proceeds through semantic and phonological levels of processing. If phonological processing begins based on partial semantic information, processing is cascaded; otherwise, it is discrete. In standard models of lexical access, semantically processed words exert phonological effects only if processing is cascaded. In 3 experiments, speakers named pictures of objects with homophone names (ball), while auditory distractor words were heard beginning 150 ms prior to picture onset. Distractors speeded picture naming (compared with controls) only when related to the nondepicted meaning of the picture (e.g., dance), exhibiting an early phonological effect, thereby supporting the cascaded prediction. Distractors slowed picture naming when categorically (e.g., frisbee) related to the depicted picture meaning, but not when associatively (e.g., game) related to it. An interactive activation model is presented.

Making Syntax of Sense: Number Agreement in Sentence Production.

Grammatical agreement flags the parts of sentences that belong together regardless of whether the parts appear together. In English, the major agreement controller is the sentence subject, the major agreement targets are verbs and pronouns, and the major agreement category is number. The authors expand an account of number agreement whose tenets are that pronouns acquire number lexically, whereas verbs acquire it syntactically but with similar contributions from number meaning and from the number morphology of agreement controllers. These tenets were instantiated in a model using existing verb agreement data. The model was then fit to a new, more extensive set of verb data and tested with a parallel set of pronoun data. The theory was supported by the models outcomes. The results have implications for the integration of words and structures, for the workings of agreement categories, and for the nature of the transition from thought to language.

That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blendsß

Idioms are sometimes viewed as unitized phrases with interpretations that are independent of the literal meanings of their individual words. In three experiments, the nature of idiom representation was explored with a speech-error elicitation task. In the task, speakers briefly viewed paired idioms. After a short delay they were probed to produce one of the two idioms, and their production latencies and blend errors were assessed. The first experiment showed greater interference between idioms with the same syntactic structure, demonstrating that idiom representations contain syntactic information. The second experiment indicated that the literal meaning of an idiom is active during production. These syntactic and literal-semantic effects on idiom errors argue against a representation of idioms as noncomponential lexicalized phrases. In the final experiment, no differences were found between decomposable and nondecomposable idioms, suggesting that the lexical representation of these two types of idioms is the same.

Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing

Abstract Relevance theorists and others have argued that what a speaker ‘says’ is determined by contextual factors to a greater extent than allowed for by Grice. This dispute has consequences for what Grice called generalized conversational implicatures. Contextualists have argued that the propositions that Grice thinks of as implicated in a generalized way should be treated as part of what is said. Griceans, on the other hand, by insisting that these are conversationally implicated, are committed to postulating more minimal propositions for the role of what is said. This paper examines whether such minimal propositions play a role in utterance understanding. Three pragmatic processing models, which embody some of the assumptions of the rival philosophical views, are postulated. The results of a series of experiments designed to test the predictions of these processing models are reported. Our results lend some initial support to a model in which minimal and contextually enriched interpretations are constructed in parallel, with a bias towards the enriched interpretations. However, the final section of the paper suggests a number of ways in which the issue of the role of minimal propositions still remains open for empirical exploration.

Ninety-three pictures and 108 questions for the elicitation of homophones

Homographs and homophones have interesting linguistic properties that make them useful in many experiments involving language. To assist researchers in the elicitation of homophones, this paper presents a set of 93 line-drawn pictures of objects with homophonic names and a set of 108 questions with homophonic answers. Statistics are also included for each picture and question: Picture statistics include name-agreement percentages, dominance, and frequency statistics of depicted referents, and picture-naming latencies both with and without study of the picture names. For questions, statistics include answer-agreement percentages, difficulty ratings, dominance, frequency statistics, and naming latencies for 60 of the most consistently answered questions.

Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations

The goal of the present study was to examine the contributions of associative strength and similarity in terms of shared features to the production of false memories in the Deese/Roediger–McDermott list-learning paradigm. Whereas the activation/monitoring account suggests that false memories are driven by automatic associative activation from list items to nonpresented lures, combined with errors in source monitoring, other accounts (e.g., fuzzy trace theory, global-matching models) emphasize the importance of semantic-level similarity, and thus predict that shared features between list and lure items will increase false memory. Participants studied lists of nine items related to a nonpresented lure. Half of the lists consisted of items that were associated but did not share features with the lure, and the other half included items that were equally associated but also shared features with the lure (in many cases, these were taxonomically related items). The two types of lists were carefully matched in terms of a variety of lexical and semantic factors, and the same lures were used across list types. In two experiments, false recognition of the critical lures was greater following the study of lists that shared features with the critical lure, suggesting that similarity at a categorical or taxonomic level contributes to false memory above and beyond associative strength. We refer to this phenomenon as a “feature boost” that reflects additive effects of shared meaning and association strength and is generally consistent with accounts of false memory that have emphasized thematic or feature-level similarity among studied and nonstudied representations.