J.D. Gordon
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J.D. Gordon.
Fertility and Sterility | 1994
J.D. Gordon; Katharine L. Hopkins; R. Brooke Jeffrey; Linda C. Giudice
The present case documents normalization of ovarian perfusion after conservative laparoscopic treatment of adnexal torsion. At our institution, Doppler flow assessment in cases of suspected torsion represents an important element of diagnosis and, in this case, allowed for early diagnosis with conservative laparoscopic treatment with documented normalization of ovarian flow postoperatively.
Fertility and Sterility | 2010
J.D. Gordon; M. DiMattina; Andrea Reh; Awie Botes; M. Payson
OBJECTIVE To examine the utilization and outcomes of natural cycle (unstimulated) IVF as reported to the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in 2006 and 2007. DESIGN Retrospective analysis. SETTING Dataset analysis from the SART Clinical Outcome Reporting System national database. PATIENT(S) All patients undergoing IVF as reported to SART in 2006 and 2007. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Utilization of unstimulated IVF; description of patient demographics; and comparison of implantation and pregnancy rates between unstimulated and stimulated IVF cycles. RESULT(S) During 2006 and 2007 a total of 795 unstimulated IVF cycles were initiated. Success rates were age dependent, with patients <35 years of age demonstrating clinical pregnancy rates per cycle start, retrieval, and transfer of 19.2%, 26.8%, and 35.9%, respectively. Implantation rates were statistically higher for unstimulated compared with stimulated IVF in patients who were 35 to 42 years old. CONCLUSION(S) Unstimulated IVF represents <1% of the total IVF cycles initiated in the United States. The pregnancy and live birth rates per initiated cycle were 19.2% and 15.2%, respectively, in patients <35 years old. The implantation rates in unstimulated IVF cycles compared favorably to stimulated IVF. Natural cycle IVF may be considered in a wide range of patients as an alternative therapy for the infertile couple.
IVF Lite | 2014
M. DiMattina; J.D. Gordon; Andrea Reh; Crystal Rosado; M. Payson
Objective: The objective of this study is to compare implantation and singleton live birth rates between natural cycle in vitro fertilization (NCIVF) and stimulated IVF. Stratify the results by age and antimullerian hormone (AMH). Design: Retrospective cohort trial of patients who underwent unstimulated IVF between 2007 and 2011. Stimulated patient data from the 2010 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) report. Setting: Private practice. Patients: Infertility patients Intervention: None. Main Outcome Measures: (1) Implantation rates stratified by age and AMH (2) singleton pregnancy rates. Results: A total of 1288 cycles of NCIVF were compared to 94,976 cycles from CDC. In patients Conclusions: Implantation rates were superior in patients 35-40 undergoing NCIVF compared with stimulated IVF. In NCIVF implantation rate was independent of AMH. The live singleton birth rates per embryo transfer for NCIVF and stimulated IVF are similar.
Fertility and Sterility | 2010
J.D. Gordon; M. DiMattina; A. Botes
Fertility and Sterility | 2010
A. Botes; J.D. Gordon; M. DiMattina
Archive | 2007
J.D. Gordon; M. DiMattina
Fertility and Sterility | 2017
C. Potts; J.D. Gordon; M. DiMattina; A. Fiorentino
Fertility and Sterility | 2017
A.B. Shah; L. Stadtmauer; J.D. Gordon; M. DiMattina
Fertility and Sterility | 2015
E. Li; B.M. Hanson; J.D. Gordon; M. DiMattina; M. Payson
Fertility and Sterility | 2014
Winifred Mak; Laxmi A. Kondapalli; M. DiMattina; J.D. Gordon; M. Payson