J. DeVos

Donor-specific HLA-DQ antibodies may contribute to poor graft outcome after renal transplantation

Increasing evidence suggests a detrimental effect of donor-specific antibodies directed against the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, and -DR loci on renal allograft outcomes. Limited data exist on the impact of de novo HLA-DQ antibodies. Over a 3-year period, we prospectively monitored 347 renal transplant recipients without pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies for their development de novo. After 26 months of follow-up, 62 patients developed donor-specific antibodies, of which 48 had a HLA-DQ antibody either alone (33 patients) or in combination with an HLA-A, -B, or -DR antibody (15 patients). Only 14 patients developed a donor-specific HLA-A, -B, or -DR antibody without a HLA-DQ antibody present. Acute rejection occurred in 21% of the HLA-DQ-only patients, insignificant when compared with 11% of patients without donor-specific antibodies. At the last follow-up, the mean serum creatinine and the fraction of patients with proteinuria were significantly higher in those that developed only HLA-DQ than those without antibodies. The 3-year graft survival was significantly worse when HLA-DQ antibodies were combined with non-DQ antibodies (52%) compared with HLA-DQ alone, non-DQ antibodies alone, or no antibodies (92-94%). Thus, our prospective monitoring study found that donor-specific HLA-DQ antibodies were the most common type detected and these antibodies may contribute to inferior graft outcomes. Ongoing surveillance is necessary to determine the long-term outcome of patients developing HLA-DQ donor-specific antibodies.

Intermediate-Term Graft Loss After Renal Transplantation is Associated With Both Donor-Specific Antibody and Acute Rejection

Background Renal transplant recipients with de novo DSA (dDSA) experience higher rates of rejection and worse graft survival than dDSA-free recipients. This study presents a single-center review of dDSA monitoring in a large, multi-ethnic cohort of renal transplant recipients. Methods The authors performed a nested case-control study of adult kidney and kidney-pancreas recipients from July 2007 through July 2011. Cases were defined as dDSA-positive whereas controls were all DSA-negative transplant recipients. DSA were determined at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant, and every 6 months thereafter. Results Of 503 recipients in the analysis, 24% developed a dDSA, of whom 73% had dDSA against DQ antigen. Median time to dDSA was 6.1 months (range 0.2–44.6 months). After multivariate analysis, African American race, kidney-pancreas recipient, and increasing numbers of human leukocyte antigen mismatches were independent risk factors for dDSA. Recipients with dDSA were more likely to suffer an acute rejection (AR) (35% vs. 10%, P<0.001), an antibody-mediated AR (16% vs. 0.3%, P<0.001), an AR ascribed to noncompliance (8% vs. 2%, P=0.001), and a recurrent AR (6% vs. 1%, P=0.002) than dDSA-negative recipients. At a median follow-up of 31 months, the death-censored actuarial graft survival of dDSA recipients was worse than the DSA-free cohort (P=0.002). Yet, for AR-free recipients, there was no difference in graft survival between cohorts (P=0.66). Conclusions Development of dDSA was associated with an increased incidence of graft loss, yet the detrimental effect of dDSA was limited in the intermediate term to recipients with AR.

Screening for BK viremia reduces but does not eliminate the risk of BK nephropathy: A single-center retrospective analysis

Background This study reviewed the outcomes of a screening protocol for BK viremia to determine if early diagnosis, followed by immunosuppression minimization, would prevent progression to nephropathy and graft loss. Methods This review included 369 renal transplant recipients tested for BK virus at serial time points after transplantation. Management included immunosuppression minimization plus cidofovir treatment for BK nephropathy. Results Recipients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with 8% prednisone-free and 6% who received desensitization. With a mean follow-up of 22±10 months, 16% (n=57) of recipients became BK viremia positive. The median (range) time to diagnosis was 3 (1–17) months. Because renal biopsy was performed selectively, 59% of recipients underwent biopsy, with 47% showing BK nephropathy. Seventy-four percent of recipients cleared the virus at a median (range) time of 9 (3–33) months, with four grafts lost to BK nephropathy. Cidofovir-treated recipients displayed a higher viral load at diagnosis but showed equivalent renal function at last evaluation. In multivariate analysis, recipient age, Asian ethnicity, deceased donor, and prednisone use were factors independently associated with BK viremia. Actuarial survival of BK-positive grafts was worse than that of BK-negative grafts (P<0.01, log-rank test). At 9 and 12 months, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of the BK-positive group was lower than that of the BK-negative cohort (P=0.02). Conclusions Despite using a screening protocol combined with immunosuppression minimization, BK-positive recipients had a greater risk of graft loss and impaired function than recipients free of infection. Future investigations should focus on practices to prevent BK viremia.

Observations on the use of cidofovir for BK virus infection in renal transplantation

In renal transplantation, BK virus infection can result in significant graft nephropathy and loss. While reduction in immunosuppression (IS) is considered standard therapy, adjunct agents may be warranted. Data are suggestive of a possible role of cidofovir for the management of BK. This study aims to describe the course of BK viremia (BKV) in a large cohort of renal transplant patients receiving adjunct cidofovir.

Barriers to Preemptive Renal Transplantation: A Single Center Questionnaire Study

Background Preemptive transplantation results in excellent patient and graft survival yet most transplant candidates are referred for transplantation after initiation of dialysis. The goal of this study was to determine barriers to preemptive renal transplantation. Methods A nonvalidated questionnaire was administered to prospective kidney transplant recipients to determine factors that hindered or favored referral for transplantation before the initiation of dialysis. Results One hundred ninety-seven subjects referred for a primary renal transplant completed the questionnaire. Ninety-one subjects (46%) had been informed of preemptive transplantation before referral, and 80 (41%) were predialysis at the time of evaluation. The median time from diagnosis of renal disease to referral was 60 months (range, 2–444 months). In bivariate analysis, among other factors, knowledge of preemptive transplantation was highly associated (odds ratio=94.69) with referral before initiation of dialysis. Given the strong association between knowledge of preemptive transplantation and predialysis referral, this variable was not included in the multivariate analysis. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, white recipient race, referral by a transplant nephrologist, recipient employment, and the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease were significantly associated with presentation to the pretransplant clinic before initiation of dialysis. Conclusion The principle barrier to renal transplantation referral before dialysis was patient education regarding the option of preemptive transplantation. Factors significantly associated with referral before dialysis were the diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease, white recipient race, referral by a transplant nephrologist, and employed status. Greater effort should be applied to patient education regarding preemptive transplantation early after the diagnosis of end-stage renal disease.

Outcomes of living donor renal transplants with a negative cross-match and pretransplant donor-specific antibody

INTRODUCTION Management of renal transplant recipients with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity-antihuman globulin (CDC-AHG) cross-match and pretransplant donor-specific antibody (DSA) is controversial. We sought to compare outcomes of immunologically high-risk living donor (LD) renal transplant recipients with and without DSA. METHODS We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of all high immune-risk LD renal transplant recipients with a negative CDC-AHG cross-match performed between January 2008 and December 2010. Pretransplant desensitization for DSA was not utilized. Immunosuppression consisted of thymoglobulin induction, followed by tacrolimus, myeophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. DSA was assessed pretransplant and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS Between January 2008 and December 2010, 44 LD renal transplants were performed in high immune-risk recipients with a negative CDC-AHG cross-match. Outcomes of 14 recipients with pretransplant DSA were compared with 30 recipients with no DSA. After a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 12-40), overall death-censored graft survival was 100%, with no acute rejection episodes in the DSA group and 1 antibody-mediated rejection in the non-DSA cohort. Mean serum creatinines of the DSA and non-DSA groups at 1 year post-transplant were 1.0 ± 0.4 and 1.2 ± 0.6 mg/dL (P = NS), respectively. Among the pretransplant DSA cohort, 5 of the 14 (36%) developed persistent post-transplant DSA at a median of 9 months (range, 3-24) versus 2 of 30 (7%; P = .025) at a median of 12 months post-transplant in the non-DSA cohort. All recipients in the pretransplant DSA group underwent renal biopsy for persistent post-transplant DSA. Three of 5 biopsies showed C4D deposition in peritubular capillaries without glomerulopathy or arteriopathy. CONCLUSIONS Early post-transplant outcomes for LD recipients with a negative cross-match and pretransplant DSA were excellent. In recipients with good and stable renal function, the significance of persistent post-transplant DSA in combination with C4D deposition on biopsy is unclear at this time.

Effects of Rituximab on the Development of Viral and Fungal Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background. Rituximab is becoming increasingly utilized in renal transplant recipients; however, its association with infections remains unclear. Methods. We reviewed the incidence of viral and fungal infections in kidney transplant recipients treated with () or without () rituximab (RTX) in addition to standard immunosuppression. Results. Infections occurred in 134 (30%) patients, with a greater proportion in RTX versus no RTX patients (47% versus 28%; ). Viral infections occurred in 44% and 27% of RTX and no RTX patients, respectively (). This was largely driven by the frequency of BK viremia and noncytomegalovirus/non-BK viruses in RTX patients (27% versus 13% () and 15% versus 2% (), resp.). Fungal infections also occurred more often in RTX patients (11% versus 3 %; ). Multivariate analysis revealed deceased donor recipient (odds ratio = 2.5; ) and rituximab exposure (odds ratio = 2.2; ) as independent risk factors for infection. Older patients, deceased donor recipients, those on dialysis longer, and those with delayed graft function tended to be at a greater risk for infections following rituximab. Conclusions. Rituximab is associated with an increased incidence of viral and fungal infections in kidney transplantation. Additional preventative measures and/or monitoring infectious complications may be warranted in those receiving rituximab.

Screening for BK viremia reduces but does not eliminate the risk of BK nephropathy.

Risk of BK Nephropathy W e appreciate the interest of AlBugami and Kiberd in our recently published article entitled ‘‘Screening for BK viremia reduces but does not eliminate the risk of BK nephropathy: a single-center retrospective analysis’’ (1). The authors point out that screening ideally should pick up disease early when it is easier to treat, yet many cases are first diagnosed with relatively high viral loads and with evidence of BK nephropathy on biopsy. Such recipients could be considered screening failures Upon review of their own singlecenter data, they determined that all of the five recipients with high viral loads on initial screening occurred in damaged kidneys, all with delayed graft function and three from donors after circulatory death. They also noted that two cases with high initial viral loads had occurred in patients in whom screening was delayed. We would like to respond to their queries of our data. Fourteen of 57 (25%) recipients initially diagnosed on routine screening for BK viremia were found to have a high viral load (9100,000 viral copies/mL). None of these 14 recipients had missed an earlier screening visit and did not have lower viral loads on prior testing. Six of these 14 (43%) recipients suffered either slow or delayed graft function after transplantation, one recipient received an extended-criteria kidney, and another recipient was initially diagnosed with both BK viremia and acute rejection. None of the recipients received a kidney from a donation after circulatory death. Thus, in total, 8 of 14 (57%) recipients with an initial high BK viral titer had a ‘‘damaged’’ kidney. We therefore agree with the authors that this group of recipients may potentially be considered at higher risk for a more aggressive form of BK disease and would benefit from more frequent screening. In our publication, we describe screening at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months followed by every 6 months thereafter. We found that the median time to diagnosis BK viremia was 3 months. Based on these data, we have now added a month 2 screening time-point. In this way, we hope to pick up more cases at an earlier stage of disease.