Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J. Dinny Graham is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J. Dinny Graham.


Breast Cancer Research | 2002

Progesterone receptors - animal models and cell signaling in breast cancer Expression and transcriptional activity of progesterone receptor A and progesterone receptor B in mammalian cells

J. Dinny Graham; Christine L. Clarke

Progesterone is an essential regulator of normal female reproductive function. Its effects are mediated by two nuclear progesterone receptor (PR) proteins, PRA and PRB, which are identical except for an additional 164 amino acids at the N-terminal end of PRB. Transcriptional analyses of the two receptor forms have assigned strikingly distinct functional signatures to the two PRs, despite their apparent physical similarity. The basis of these differences is yet to be fully understood. Furthermore, these differences are strongly influenced by the cell type and the promoter used. We review the mammalian transcriptional studies of PRA and PRB, and compare them with what is known about their expression and function in target tissues.


Nuclear Receptor Signaling | 2009

Progesterone action in human tissues: regulation by progesterone receptor (PR) isoform expression, nuclear positioning and coregulator expression.

Katherine M. Scarpin; J. Dinny Graham; Patricia A. Mote; Christine L. Clarke

Progesterone is a critical regulator of normal female reproductive function, with diverse tissue-specific effects in the human. The effects of progesterone are mediated by its nuclear receptor (PR) that is expressed as two isoforms, PRA and PRB, which are virtually identical except that PRA lacks 164 amino acids that are present at the N-terminus of PRB. Considerable in vitro evidence suggests that the two PRs are functionally distinct and in animals, tissue-specific distribution patterns of PRA and PRB may account for some of the diversity of progesterone effects. In the human, PRA and PRB are equivalently expressed in most target cells, suggesting that alternative mechanisms control the diversity of progesterone actions. PR mediates the effects of progesterone by association with a range of coregulatory proteins and binding to specific target sequences in progesterone-regulated gene promoters. Ligand activation of PR results in redistribution into discrete subnuclear foci that are detectable by immunofluorescence, probably representing aggregates of multiple transcriptionally active PR-coregulator complexes. PR foci are aberrant in cancers, suggesting that the coregulator composition and number of complexes is altered. A large family of coregulators is now described and the range of proteins known to bind PR exceeds the complement required for transcriptional activation, suggesting that in the human, tissue-specific coregulator expression may modulate progesterone response. In this review, we examine the role of nuclear localization of PR, coregulator association and tissue-specific expression in modulating progesterone action in the human.


The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology | 1996

Progesterone receptor A and B protein expression in human breast cancer

J. Dinny Graham; Christine Yeates; Rosemary L. Balleine; Suzanna S. Harvey; Jane S. Milliken; A. Michael Bilous; Christine L. Clarke

The human progesterone receptor (PR) is a ligand-activated nuclear transcription factor which mediates progesterone action in target tissues. Two PR proteins, PR A (81-83 kDa) and PR B (116-120 kDa), have been described and different physiological activities ascribed to each on the basis of in vitro studies, suggesting that their ratio of expression may control progesterone responsiveness in target cells. Presence of PR in breast tumors is an important indicator of likely responsiveness to endocrine agents. However, the relative expression of PR A and B in breast cancer has not been described and its clinical significance has not been addressed. We have examined the expression of PR A and B in PR-positive breast tumors and found that while in most tumors PR A and B were expressed in similar amounts there was a broad overall distribution of PR A:B ratio which deviated significantly from a normal log distribution with tumors containing a PR A:B ration greater than 4 being over-represented in the group. Linear regression analysis revealed that high PR A:B ratios, in general, derived from a low concentration of PR B rather than high expression of PR A. PR A:B protein ratios were not correlated with the age of the patient or with total PR concentration. A third PR protein band (PR 78 kDa) was detected which comprised greater than 20% of total PR protein in a quarter of the tumor samples examined. The characteristics of tumors containing PR 78 kDa were not different from the overall group. In summary, in PR-positive breast tumors the ratio of expression of PR A and B proteins is close to unity as is seen in a number of other progestin target tissues. However, a significant proportion of tumors expressed very low levels of PR B and a consequently high PR A:B ration. Although the clinical consequence of this observation is not known, the in vitro findings that PR A may act as a repressor for PR B suggests that tumors containing primarily PR A may identify a subset of patients with low or aberrant response to endocrine agents.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Non-overlapping progesterone receptor cistromes contribute to cell-specific transcriptional outcomes.

Christine L. Clarke; J. Dinny Graham

The transcriptional effects of the ovarian hormone progesterone are pleiotropic, and binding to DNA of the nuclear progesterone receptor (PR), a ligand-activated transcription factor, results in diverse outcomes in a range of target tissues. To determine whether distinct patterns of genomic interaction of PR contribute to the cell specificity of the PR transcriptome, we have compared the genomic binding sites for PR in breast cancer cells and immortalized normal breast cells. PR binding was correlated with transcriptional outcome in both cell lines, with 60% of progestin-regulated genes associated with one or more PR binding regions. There was a remarkably low overlap between the PR cistromes of the two cell lines, and a similarly low overlap in transcriptional targets. A conserved PR binding element was identified in PR binding regions from both cell lines, but there were distinct patterns of enrichment of known cofactor binding motifs, with FOXA1 sites over-represented in breast cancer cell binding regions and NF1 and AP-1 motifs uniquely enriched in the immortalized normal line. Downstream analyses suggested that differential cofactor availability may generate these distinct PR cistromes, indicating that cofactor levels may modulate PR specificity. Taken together these data suggest that cell-specificity of PR binding is determined by the coordinated effects of key binding cofactors.


Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia | 2009

Hormone-Responsive Model of Primary Human Breast Epithelium

J. Dinny Graham; Patricia A. Mote; Usha Salagame; Rosemary L. Balleine; Lily I. Huschtscha; Christine L. Clarke

Retention of hormone responsiveness in primary culture models of human breast is essential for studies aimed at understanding the mechanisms of action of the ovarian hormones in the human breast. In this chapter we describe the development of a culture model of primary human breast that retains critical features of the tissue in vivo. We find that primary normal human breast tissue in embedded culture recapitulates the morphology, cell lineages, functional gene expression characteristics and estrogen and progesterone receptor responsiveness of the breast in vivo. The ratio of luminal to myoepithelial cells after culture recapitulates that observed in the uncultured tissue, highlighting the fact that progenitor cells capable of giving rise to both epithelial cell lineages are retained in this model system. By contrast, primary cells placed into monolayer culture, even for a single passage, lose bipotent progenitors, and the myoepithelial lineage predominates, demonstrating the rapidity with which phenotypic changes and selection occur in normal breast cells, unless cultured under conditions that prevent this outcome. Primary matrix-embedded culture of normal human breast cells provides researchers with a new opportunity to understand ovarian hormone action in the human breast.


The FASEB Journal | 2009

Nuclear matrix binding is critical for progesterone receptor movement into nuclear foci

J. Dinny Graham; Adrienne R. Hanson; Amanda J. Croft; Archa H. Fox; Christine L. Clarke

The ovarian hormone progesterone is essential for normal breast development, and progesterone analogues are implicated in increasing breast cancer risk. The progesterone receptor (PR) is a transcription factor that, when ligand activated, moves rapidly into nuclear foci associated with transcriptional activity. However, the role of intranuclear trafficking signals in the focal location of PR is unknown. We have identified a mutation in PR that ablates its binding to the nuclear matrix and prevents PR movement into nuclear foci. Nuclear matrix binding mutants lack transcriptional activity and inhibit dimerization, demonstrating the critical role of matrix binding for PR dynamics and activity. DNA binding of PR is required for fidelity of location in foci, as DNA binding domain (DBD) mutants form aberrant foci with reduced mobility and altered tethering to the nucleus. Mutations in either the nuclear matrix targeting sequence or DBD domains were dominant in preventing wild‐type receptor from moving to appropriate nuclear locations, demonstrating that both partner proteins in a PR dimer must have intact intranuclear trafficking signals for correct receptor positioning within the nucleus. This study has demonstrated that positioning of PR in foci within the nucleus is critically regulated by intranuclear trafficking signals, which play a key role in transcriptional activity and are relevant to its action in normal and malignant breast cells.—Graham, J. D., Hanson, A R, Croft, A C, Fox, A H., Clarke, C. L. Nuclear matrix binding is critical for progesterone receptor movement into nuclear foci. FASEB J. 23, 546–556 (2009)


EBioMedicine | 2016

The Nuclear Receptor, RORγ, Regulates Pathways Necessary for Breast Cancer Metastasis

Tae Gyu Oh; Shu-Ching M. Wang; Bipul R. Acharya; Joel M. Goode; J. Dinny Graham; Christine L. Clarke; Alpha S. Yap; George E. O. Muscat

We have previously reported that RORγ expression was decreased in ER − ve breast cancer, and increased expression improves clinical outcomes. However, the underlying RORγ dependent mechanisms that repress breast carcinogenesis have not been elucidated. Here we report that RORγ negatively regulates the oncogenic TGF-β/EMT and mammary stem cell (MaSC) pathways, whereas RORγ positively regulates DNA-repair. We demonstrate that RORγ expression is: (i) decreased in basal-like subtype cancers, and (ii) inversely correlated with histological grade and drivers of carcinogenesis in breast cancer cohorts. Furthermore, integration of RNA-seq and ChIP-chip data reveals that RORγ regulates the expression of many genes involved in TGF-β/EMT-signaling, DNA-repair and MaSC pathways (including the non-coding RNA, LINC00511). In accordance, pharmacological studies demonstrate that an RORγ agonist suppresses breast cancer cell viability, migration, the EMT transition (microsphere outgrowth) and mammosphere-growth. In contrast, RNA-seq demonstrates an RORγ inverse agonist induces TGF-β/EMT-signaling. These findings suggest pharmacological modulation of RORγ activity may have utility in breast cancer.


BMC Cancer | 2015

The unique transcriptional response produced by concurrent estrogen and progesterone treatment in breast cancer cells results in upregulation of growth factor pathways and switching from a Luminal A to a Basal-like subtype

Eleanor F. Need; Luke A. Selth; Andrew P. Trotta; Damien A. Leach; Lauren Giorgio; Melissa A. O’Loughlin; Eric Smith; P. G. Gill; Wendy V. Ingman; J. Dinny Graham; Grant Buchanan

BackgroundIn breast cancer, progesterone receptor (PR) positivity or abundance is positively associated with survival and treatment response. It was initially believed that PR was a useful diagnostic marker of estrogen receptor activity, but increasingly PR has been recognised to play an important biological role in breast homeostasis, carcinogenesis and metastasis. Although PR expression is almost exclusively observed in estrogen receptor positive tumors, few studies have investigated the cellular mechanisms of PR action in the context of ongoing estrogen signalling.MethodsIn this study, we contrast PR function in estrogen pretreated ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells with vehicle treated ZR-75-1 and T-47D breast cancer cells using expression microarrays and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing.ResultsEstrogen cotreatment caused a dramatic increase in the number of genes regulated by progesterone in ZR-75-1 cells. In T-47D cells that have naturally high levels of PR, estrogen and progesterone cotreatment resulted in a reduction in the number of regulated genes in comparison to treatment with either hormone alone. At a genome level, estrogen pretreatment of ZR-75-1 cells led to a 10-fold increase in the number of PR DNA binding sites detected using ChIP-sequencing. Time course assessment of progesterone regulated genes in the context of estrogen pretreatment highlighted a series of important regulatory pathways, including those driven by epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR). Importantly, progesterone applied to cells pretreated with estradiol resulted in switching of the PAM50-determined intrinsic breast cancer subtype from Luminal A to Basal-like, and increased the Oncotype DX® Unscaled Recurrence Score.ConclusionEstrogen pretreatment of breast cancer cells increases PR steady state levels, resulting in an unequivocal progesterone response that upregulates key members of growth factor pathways. The transformative changes progesterone exerts on the breast cancer subtype suggest that these subtyping tools should be used with caution in premenopausal women.


Diagnostic Pathology | 2013

Open source tools for management and archiving of digital microscopy data to allow integration with patient pathology and treatment information

Matloob Khushi; Georgina Edwards; Diego Alonso de Marcos; Jane Carpenter; J. Dinny Graham; Christine L. Clarke

BackgroundVirtual microscopy includes digitisation of histology slides and the use of computer technologies for complex investigation of diseases such as cancer. However, automated image analysis, or website publishing of such digital images, is hampered by their large file sizes.ResultsWe have developed two Java based open source tools: Snapshot Creator and NDPI-Splitter. Snapshot Creator converts a portion of a large digital slide into a desired quality JPEG image. The image is linked to the patient’s clinical and treatment information in a customised open source cancer data management software (Caisis) in use at the Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB) and then published on the ABCTB website (http://www.abctb.org.au) using Deep Zoom open source technology. Using the ABCTB online search engine, digital images can be searched by defining various criteria such as cancer type, or biomarkers expressed. NDPI-Splitter splits a large image file into smaller sections of TIFF images so that they can be easily analysed by image analysis software such as Metamorph or Matlab. NDPI-Splitter also has the capacity to filter out empty images.ConclusionsSnapshot Creator and NDPI-Splitter are novel open source Java tools. They convert digital slides into files of smaller size for further processing. In conjunction with other open source tools such as Deep Zoom and Caisis, this suite of tools is used for the management and archiving of digital microscopy images, enabling digitised images to be explored and zoomed online. Our online image repository also has the capacity to be used as a teaching resource. These tools also enable large files to be sectioned for image analysis.Virtual SlidesThe virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here:http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/5330903258483934


Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology | 2017

Estrogen and progesterone signalling in the normal breast and its implications for cancer development

Heidi N. Hilton; Christine L. Clarke; J. Dinny Graham

The ovarian hormones estrogen and progesterone are master regulators of the development and function of a broad spectrum of human tissues, including the breast, reproductive and cardiovascular systems, brain and bone. Acting through the nuclear estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR), both play complex and essential coordinated roles in the extensive development of the lobular alveolar epithelial structures of the normal breast during puberty, the normal menstrual cycle and pregnancy. The past decade has seen major advances in understanding the mechanisms of action of estrogen and progesterone in the normal breast and in the delineation of the complex hierarchy of cell types regulated by ovarian hormones in this tissue. There is evidence for a role for both ER and PR in driving breast cancer, and both are favourable prognostic markers with respect to outcome. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of the mechanisms of action of ER and PR in the normal breast, and implications for the development and management of breast cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the J. Dinny Graham's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lily I. Huschtscha

Children's Medical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Evan R. Simpson

Hudson Institute of Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge