J Donck

Inferior outcome of cadaveric kidneys preserved for more than 24 hr in histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution. Leuven Collaborative Group for Transplantation.

BACKGROUND During recent years, an increasing number of transplant centers within the Eurotransplant organization have used histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution instead of University of Wisconsin (UW) solution as their preferred cold storage solution for abdominal organ preservation. We report on our single-center experience on the outcome of imported kidneys preserved with either HTK or UW solution in relation to the duration of cold ischemia time (CIT). METHODS Between July 1989 and July 1997, 323 cadaveric kidneys preserved with UW or HTK and imported as a result of an exchange within the Eurotransplant organization were transplanted at our institution. CIT was <24 hr in 216 kidneys (UW: n=174, HTK: n=42) and > or =24 hr in 107 kidneys (UW: n=67, HTK: n=40). Renal functional outcome was evaluated by comparing delayed graft function and initial non-function rates, daily urinary output, the evolution of serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, and graft survival at 1 year after transplantation in relation to the type of cold storage solution and CIT < or > or =24 hr. RESULTS Whereas the incidence of delayed graft function did not differ significantly between kidneys preserved for less than 24 hr in UW (18.6%) or HTK (26.2%), this rate increased to 50% in HTK kidneys compared to 23.9% in UW kidneys when CIT exceeded 24 hr (P=0.006). Mean serum creatinine and creatinine clearance values were better at 1 and 5 days postoperatively in kidneys preserved <24 hr with UW as compared to HTK (P<0.05). After 24 hr of CIT, HTK-preserved kidneys showed an impaired renal function, not only in the immediate postoperative phase but also at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation (P<0.05). Graft survival at 1 year was 92.9% in UW vs. 87.5% in HTK kidneys preserved for <24 hr (NS), and 91% vs. 77.4% when CIT exceeded 24 hr (P=0.059). CONCLUSIONS From these single-center findings, it can be concluded that UW is superior to HTK in kidney preservation, particularly when CIT exceeds 24 hr.

Tacrolimus and cyclosporine efficacy in high-risk kidney transplantation

The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens were compared in a prospectively defined subgroup of kidney transplant recipients from the European, open, multicentre, 2 : 1 randomised, parallel group study. Patients were stratified as high risk for immunological events if they had a panel-reactive antibodies grade greater than 80 % and/or a previous transplant functional for less than 1 year. The primary efficacy variables evaluated were the incidence of acute rejection, steroid usage and patient and graft survival. Safety was assessed based on adverse events and laboratory evaluations. At 1 year, the tacrolimus group (n = 22) had a lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (31.8 %) and a higher graft survival (86.0 %) than the 11 patients in the cyclosporine group (54.5 % and 72.0 %, respectively). The frequencies of adverse events were similar between the two groups. The tacrolimus regimen appears more beneficial for high risk patients than cyclosporine.Abstract The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens were compared in a prospectively defined subgroup of kidney transplant recipients from the European, open, multicentre, 2 : 1 randomised, parallel group study. Patients were stratified as high risk for immunological events if they had a panel-reactive antibodies grade greater than 80 % and/or a previous transplant functional for less than 1 year. The primary efficacy variables evaluated were the incidence of acute rejection, steroid usage and patient and graft survival. Safety was assessed based on adverse events and laboratory evaluations. At 1 year, the tacrolimus group (n = 22) had a lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (31.8 %) and a higher graft survival (86.0 %) than the 11 patients in the cyclosporine group (54.5 % and 72.0 %, respectively). The frequencies of adverse events were similar between the two groups. The tacrolimus regimen appears more beneficial for high risk patients than cyclosporine.