J. Dosta

Codigestion of solid wastes: a review of its uses and perspectives including modeling.

The last two years have witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of papers published on the subject of codigestion, highlighting the relevance of this topic within anaerobic digestion research. Consequently, it seems appropriate to undertake a review of codigestion practices starting from the late 1970s, when the first papers related to this concept were published, and continuing to the present day, demonstrating the exponential growth in the interest shown in this approach in recent years. Following a general analysis of the situation, state-of-the-art codigestion is described, focusing on the two most important areas as regards publication: codigestion involving sewage sludge and the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (including a review of the secondary advantages for wastewater treatment plant related to biological nutrient removal), and codigestion in the agricultural sector, that is, including agricultural – farm wastes, and energy crops. Within these areas, a large number of oversized digesters appear which can be used to codigest other substrates, resulting in economic and environmental advantages. Although the situation may be changing, there is still a need for good examples on an industrial scale, particularly with regard to wastewater treatment plants, in order to extend this beneficial practice. In the last section, a detailed analysis of papers addressing the important aspect of modelisation is included. This analysis includes the first codigestion models to be developed as well as recent applications of the standardised anaerobic digestion model ADM1 to codigestion. (This review includes studies ranging from laboratory to industrial scale.)

Start-up of an aerobic granular sequencing batch reactor for the treatment of winery wastewater

Aerobic granular sludge was cultivated in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) in order to remove the organic matter present in winery wastewater. The formation of granules was performed using a synthetic substrate. The selection parameter was the settling time, as well as the alternation of feast-famine periods, the air velocity and the height/diameter ratio of the reactor. After 10 days of operation under these conditions, the first aggregates could be observed. Filamentous bacteria were still present in the reactor but they disappeared progressively. During the start-up, COD loading was increased from 2.7 to 22.5 kg COD/(m(3) day) in order to obtain a feast period between 30 and 60 minutes. At this point, granules were quite round, with a particle diameter between 3.0 and 4.0 mm and an average density of 6 g L(-1). After 120 days of operation, synthetic media was replaced by real winery wastewater, with a COD loading of 6 kg COD/(m(3) day). The decrease of the organic load implied a reduction of the aggregate diameter and a density increase up to 13.2 g L(-1). The effluent was free of organic matter and the solids concentration in the reactor reached 6 g VSS L(-1).

SBR technology for high ammonium loading rates

This paper focuses on the study of high ammonium concentrated wastewater with SBR reactors. Four type of wastewaters, landfill leachates (T=20 degrees C) and the reject water (T=35 degrees C) coming from mesophilic anaerobic digesters of sewage sludge, pig slurry and organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), were studied in four SBR during 6 months. The removal of nitrogen was done in all the cases with nitrification/denitrification via nitrite obtaining high removal nitrogen conversions for the three types of reject water (0.75-0.85 kg N day(-1) m(-3)) and lower for landfill leachates due to temperature requirements (0.3 kg N day(-1) m(-3)).

Two-step partial nitritation/Anammox process in granulation reactors: Start-up operation and microbial characterization

A two-stage Partial Nitritation (PN)/Anammox process was carried out at lab-scale conditions to treat reject water from a municipal WWTP. PN was achieved in a granular SBR obtaining an effluent with a NH4(+)-N/NO2(-)-N molar ratio around 1.0. The microbial characterization of this reactor revealed a predominance of Betaproteobacteria, with a member of Nitrosomonas as the main autotrophic ammonium oxidizing bacterium (AOB). Nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) were under the detection limit of 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing, indicating their effective inhibition. The effluent of the PN reactor was fed to an Anammox SBR where stable operation was achieved with a NH4(+)-N:NO2(-)-N:NO3(-)-N stoichiometry of 1:1.25:0.14. The deviation to the theoretical stoichiometry could be attributed to the presence of heterotrophic biomass in the Anammox reactor (mainly members of Chlorobi and Chloroflexi). Planctomycetes accounted for 7% of the global community, being members of Brocadia (1.4% of the total abundance) the main anaerobic ammonium oxidizer detected.

Optimisation of nitrification-denitrification process in a sbr for the treatment of reject water via nitrite

An optimal sequencing batch reactor (SBR) strategy is proposed for Biological Nitrogen Removal (BNR) via nitrite of reject water (800-900 NH4 +-N mg 1−1) from mesophilic (35 °C) anaerobic sludge digester of a Spanish Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Two lab-scale SBR with control of temperature were studied with external COD addition for denitrification which was necessary due to the lack of readily biodegradable carbon source. Process kinetics were compared through the specific Ammonium Uptake Rate (sAUR) finding the appropriate operational sequences when working at 32°C and 8 hour cycle length. Every operating cycle was carried out with a sludge retention time of 11 days, hydraulic retention time around 1 day and 2500±250 mg VSS 1−1. In order to avoid nitrate formation and thus save costs, the oxygen concentration was maintained below 1 mg 1−1 during aerobic periods and pH remained within an optimal range (7.5-9) alternating different aerobic-anoxic subcycles inside the operational cycle. With this strategy, the range of alkalinity could be controlled avoiding the addition of external additives and nitrite accumulation was prevented. Therefore, the reached sAUR was 22 mg NH4 +-N g−1 VSS h−1 and the total nitrogen removal was 0.8 kg N(d m3)−1.

Comparison of aerobic granulation and anaerobic membrane bioreactor technologies for winery wastewater treatment

An anaerobic membrane bioreactor and aerobic granulation technologies were tested at laboratory scale to treat winery wastewater, which is characterised by a high and variable biodegradable organic load. Both technologies have already been tested for alcohol fermentation wastewaters, but there is a lack of data relating to their application to winery wastewater treatment. The anaerobic membrane bioreactor, with an external microfiltration module, was started up for 230 days, achieving a biogas production of up to 0.35 L CH4L(-1)d(-1) when 1.5 kg COD m(-3)d(-1) was applied. Average flux was 10.5 L m(-2) h(-1) (LMH), obtaining a treated effluent free of suspended solids and a chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration lower than 100 mg COD L(-1). In contrast, the aerobic granular sequencing batch reactor coped with 15 kg COD m(-3)d(-1), but effluent quality was slightly worse. Aerobic granulation was identified as a suitable technique to treat this kind of wastewater due to excellent settleability, high biomass retention and a good ability to handle high organic loads and seasonal fluctuations. However, energy generation from anaerobic digestion plays an important role, favouring anaerobic membrane bioreactor application, although it was observed to be sensitive to sudden load fluctuations, which led to a thorough pH control and alkali addition.

Comparison of reject water treatment with nitrification/denitrification via nitrite in sbr and sharon chemostat process

A comparison between three feasible ways of developing Biological Nitrogen Removal (BNR) via nitrite to treat real reject water of 800-900 mg NH4 +-N l−1 is proposed. A Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) and a chemostat SHARON (Single reactor High activity Ammonium Removal Over Nitrite) continuous reactor were operated. In the SBR operation 0.8 kg N (d m3)−1 was achieved, whereas in SHARON/denitrification the removal reached was 0.4 kg N (d m3)−1. SHARON was also developed with partial nitrification of ammonium in order to obtain a stream ready for Anammox (Anaerobic Ammonia Oxidation) process obtaining an effluent with an average composition of 400 mg NO2 −N l−1 and 350 mg NH4 +-N l−1

Partial nitrification of sludge reject water by means of aerobic granulation.

Granular sludge formation was performed in a laboratory scale Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) fed with supernatant of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. This effluent was concentrated progressively in order to enhance biomass capacity without inhibiting it. During the first part of the study, ammonium nitrogen was converted to nitrate, so conventional nitrification took place. When a nitrogen load of 0.8 g N L(-1) d(-1) was treated, the effluent concentration of nitrite started to increase while the nitrate concentration decreased until it disappeared. So, partial nitrification was achieved. At the end of this study, a nitrogen load of 1.1 g N L(-1) d(-1) was treated obtaining an effluent with 50% ammonium and 50% nitrite. The volatile suspended solids concentration in the reactor reached 10 g VSS L(-1). At this point the granule morphology was quite round and no filamentous bacteria was observed. The Ferets diameter was in the range between 1 and 6 mm with an average value of 4.5 mm. Roundness value was all the time higher than 0.7. Granule density increased during the experimental period, obtaining a final value of 7.0 g L(-1).

Impact of paper and cardboard suppression on OFMSW anaerobic digestion

Mechanical-biological treatment plants treat municipal solid waste to recover recyclable materials, nutrients and energy. Waste paper and cardboard (WP), the second main compound in municipal solid waste (∼30% in weight basis), is typically used for biogas generation. However, its recovery is gaining attention as it can be used to produce add-value products like bioethanol and residual derived fuel. Nevertheless, WP suppression or replacement will impact anaerobic digestion in terms of biogas production, process stability and digestate management. Two lab-scale reactors were used to assess the impact of WP in anaerobic digestion performance. A control reactor was only fed with biowaste (BioW), while a second reactor was fed with two different mixtures of BioW and WP, i.e. 85/15% and 70/30% (weight basis). Results indicate that either replacing half of the WP by BioW or removing half of the WP has little impact on the methane production. When removing half of the WP, methane production could be sustained by a larger waste biodegradability. The replacement of all WP by BioW increased the reactor methane production (∼37%), while removing all WP would have reduced the methane production about 15%. Finally, replacing WP loading rate by BioW led to a system less tolerant to instability periods and with poorer digestate quality.

A critical review of future trends and perspectives for the implementation of partial nitritation/anammox in the main line of municipal WWTPs

AbstractThe use of technologies based on partial nitritation (PN) and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) is a cost-efficient and sustainable alternative for nitrogen removal from wastewaters with low COD/N ratios. These technologies allow savings in biodegradable organic matter consumption; oxygen requirements (about 40% lower compared to the conventional process of nitrification/denitrification); and sludge treatment costs. Despite the advantages of the PN/Anammox process, it also has some limitations which led to a full-scale application relatively restricted to some wastewaters, especially the reject water line of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, the PN/Anammox process also opens the interesting possibility of transforming most of the biodegradable organic matter arriving at the WWTP into biogas, because that biodegradable COD is not necessary anymore to denitrify. This can lead to an energetically self-sufficient WWTP, which means important cost savings. The main aspects arising from ...