J.-E. Gottenberg

FRI0298 The Impact of DMARD Co-Therapy on Abatacept Effectiveness in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. A Pan-European Analysis of RA Registries

Background Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bioDMARDs) are generally used in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Anti-TNF agents are more effective in combination with csDMARDs (COMBO) than as monotherapy (MONO), while this is debated with some of the newer bioDMARDs.(1) In particular, no difference was found in patients (pts) with insufficient response to TNF-inhibitors taking abatacept (ABA) in MONO vs. COMBO.(2) Objectives To compare the effectiveness of ABA started as MONO or in COMBO in RA pts treated in routine care. Methods This is a pooled observational database analysis of 9 prospective cohorts of RA pts (Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland). We included all RA pts treated with ABA with information on concomitant csDMARDs use at initiation of ABA treatment. Primary endpoint was drug retention of ABA, defined as the time between drug initiation and last administration plus one dispensation interval, and analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. A secondary endpoint was EULAR good or moderate response rate at one year, estimated by longitudinal interpolation and corrected for drug retention (Lundex (3)). All analyses were adjusted for potential confounders, e.g. calendar year, demographics, country and disease characteristics. Results We identified 3461 pts initiating ABA with 5475 pt-years of follow-up. Of these, 2314 pts (67%) received ABA in COMBO (53% - methotrexate, 8% - leflunomide, 6% - other csDMARDs) and 1147 pts (33%) in MONO. Pts on MONO were older (mean 59 vs. 57 years, p<0.001) and had longer disease duration (mean 11 vs. 12 years, p=0.005). Other demographic and disease characteristics were balanced. The median retention time of ABA in MONO was 2.02 years (IQR: 1.76 – 2.27) compared to 2.05 years (IQR: 1.90 – 2.22) in COMBO (p=0.76). No significant difference in ABA retention rates was found with or without sDMARD cotherapy (Hazard Ratio (HR) MONO vs COMBO: 1.02 (95%CI: 0.92 – 1.13)). Furthermore, ABA drug retention did not differ between the various sDMARDs cotherapy combinations. Results remained similar when examining only ABA treatment discontinuations for ineffectiveness (HR MONO vs COMBO: 0.97 (95%CI: 0.84 – 1.13)). Furthermore, both the EULAR response rates and the Lundex based on EULAR response rates at one year were similar with or without sDMARD cotherapy (81% EULAR good or moderate responses on ABA MONO vs. 80% on COMBO, p=0.55. Lundex responders 55% on ABA MONO vs. 55% on COMBO, p=0.91). We found no effect modification by country. Conclusions The results of this large pooled RA population of mostly inadequate responders to anti-TNFs, suggest that ABA retention and response to ABA treatment are not influenced by csDMARDs cotherapy. References Emery P. et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Dec;72(12):1897-904. Schiff M et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1708–14. Kristensen LE. et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Feb;54(2):600-6. Disclosure of Interest A. Finckh Grant/research support: Unrestricted Research grant from BMS, D. Neto Grant/research support: Unrestricted Research grant from BMS, J. Gomez-Reino: None declared, F. Iannone: None declared, E. Lie: None declared, H. Canhão: None declared, K. Pavelka: None declared, C. Turesson: None declared, X. Mariette: None declared, J.-E. Gottenberg: None declared, M. Hetland: None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.3004

Tolerance and efficacy of rituximab and changes in serum B cell biomarkers in patients with systemic complications of primary Sjögren’s syndrome

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of rituximab (RTX) for systemic symptoms in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS), and changes in B cell biomarkers. Patients and methods: The records of 16 patients with pSS according to the American European consensus group criteria were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Patients, all women, had a median age of 58.5 (range 41–71) years and a disease duration of 9.5 (range 0–25) years. RTX was prescribed for lymphoma (n = 5), refractory pulmonary disease with polysynovitis (n = 2), severe polysynovitis (n = 2), mixed cryoglobulinaemia (n = 5), thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and mononeuritis multiplex (n = 1). The median follow-up duration was 14.5 (range 2–48) months. Three patients experienced adverse events, including one mild serum sickness-like reaction with the presence of human antichimeric antibodies. Efficacy of treatment was observed in 4 of 5 patients with lymphomas and in 9 of 11 patients with systemic involvement. Dryness was improved in only a minority of patients. Corticosteroid dose was reduced in 11 patients. RTX induced decreased rheumatoid factor, γ-globulin and β2-microglobulin levels, and the level of B cell activating factor of the tumour necrosis factor family (BAFF) increased concomitantly with B cell depletion. Five patients were re-treated, with good efficacy and tolerance, except for one with probable serum sickness-like reaction. Conclusion: This study shows good efficacy and fair tolerance of RTX for systemic features. In addition, RTX allows for a marked reduction in corticosteroid use. Except for BAFF, the level of which increases, serum B cell biomarker levels decrease after taking RTX. Controlled trials should be performed to confirm the efficacy of RTX in pSS.

Updated consensus statement on the use of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background Since initial approval for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), rituximab has been evaluated in clinical trials involving various populations with RA. Information has also been gathered from registries. This report therefore updates the 2007 consensus document on the use of rituximab in the treatment of RA. Methods Preparation of this new document involved many international experts experienced in the treatment of RA. Following a meeting to agree upon the core agenda, a systematic literature review was undertaken to identify all relevant data. Data were then interrogated by a drafting committee, with subsequent review and discussion by a wider expert committee leading to the formulation of an updated consensus statement. These committees also included patients with RA. Results The new statement covers wide-ranging issues including the use of rituximab in earlier RA and impact on structural progression, and aspects particularly pertinent to rituximab such as co-medication, optimal dosage regimens, repeat treatment cycles and how to manage non-response. Biological therapy following rituximab usage is also addressed, and safety concerns including appropriate screening for hepatitis, immunoglobulin levels and infection risk. This consensus statement will support clinicians and inform patients when using B-cell depletion in the management of RA, providing up-to-date information and highlighting areas for further research. Conclusion New therapeutic strategies and treatment options for RA, a chronic destructive and disabling disease, have expanded over recent years. These have been summarised in general strategic suggestions and specific management recommendations, emphasising the importance of expedient disease-modifying antirheumatic drug implementation and tight disease control. This consensus statement is in line with these fundamental principles of management.

Risk factors for severe infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab in the autoimmunity and rituximab registry

OBJECTIVE The risk of severe infection is a crucial factor in the assessment of the short-term risk:benefit ratio of biologic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There is no increase in severe infections in RA patients treated with rituximab (RTX) in controlled trials, but this has not yet been assessed in daily practice. We undertook this study to investigate the occurrence of and risk factors for severe infections in off-trial patients using data from the AutoImmunity and Rituximab (AIR) registry. METHODS The AIR registry was set up by the French Society of Rheumatology. The charts of patients with severe infections were reviewed. RESULTS Of the enrolled patients, 1,303 had at least 1 followup visit at 3 months or later, with a mean ± SD followup period of 1.2 ± 0.8 years (1,629 patient-years). Eighty-two severe infections occurred in 78 patients (5.0 severe infections per 100 patient-years), half of them in the 3 months following the last RTX infusion. Multivariate analysis showed that chronic lung disease and/or cardiac insufficiency (odds ratio 3.0 [95% confidence interval 1.3-7.3], P = 0.01), extraarticular involvement (odds ratio 2.9 [95% confidence interval 1.3-6.7], P = 0.009), and low IgG level (<6 gm/liter) before initiation of RTX treatment (odds ratio 4.9 [95% confidence interval 1.6-15.2], P = 0.005) were significantly associated with increased risk of a severe infection. CONCLUSION The rate of severe infections in current practice is similar to that reported in clinical trials. The risk factors for severe infections include chronic lung and/or cardiac disease, extraarticular involvement, and low IgG before RTX treatment. This suggests that serum IgG should be checked and the risk:benefit ratio of RTX discussed for patients found to have low levels of IgG.

Positivity for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide is associated with a better response to abatacept: data from the ‘Orencia and Rheumatoid Arthritis’ registry

Objectives Very limited data are available regarding the efficacy of abatacept (ABA) in real life. The aims of this study were to determine the efficacy of ABA in rheumatoid arthritis and predicting factors of efficacy in common practice. Methods The Orencia and Rheumatoid Arthritis” (ORA) prospective registry, promoted by the French Society of Rheumatology, has included 1003 patients with RA. Results 773 patients had already fulfilled the 6-month follow-up visit. Only 21.3% of patients would have fulfilled inclusion criteria used in pivotal controlled trials. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, was observed in 330 (59.1%) of the 558 assessed patients (good response: 20.4%, moderate response: 38.7%) and was similar in patients who did and in patients who did not fulfill inclusion criteria of controlled trials. Among EULAR responders, initial 28-joint disease activity score (5.4 (4.7-6.5) in responders vs 4.9 (4.0-6.0) in non responders, p< 0.0001), the proportion of rheumatoid factor (75.6% vs 66.7%, p= 0.03) and the proportion of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP)-positivity (75.9% vs 62.2%, p= 0.001) were significantly higher. In multivariate analysis adjusted on initial 28-joint disease activity score and CRP, anti-CCP positivity was associated with EULAR response (OR=1.9;95% CI=1.2 to 2.9, p=0.007), but not rheumatoid factor (OR=1.0;95% CI=0.6 to 1.6, p=0.9). Anti-CCP positivity was also significantly associated with a higher ABA retention rate at 6 months. Conclusions Real life efficacy of ABA in the ORA registry was similar as that reported in clinical trials. Anti-CCP positivity was associated with a better response to ABA, independently from disease activity.

Safety and efficacy of rituximab in nonviral cryoglobulinemia vasculitis: Data from the French Autoimmunity and Rituximab registry

Management of nonviral cryoglobulinemia vasculitis has yet to be defined. Rituximab has emerged as a novel and promising therapeutic alternative, but data are scarce. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rituximab in nonviral cryoglobulinemia vasculitis in off‐trial real‐life patients.

Efficacy of rituximab in primary Sjögren's syndrome with peripheral nervous system involvement: results from the AIR registry

Objective To evaluate rituximab (RTX) in primary Sjögrens syndrome (pSS) with peripheral nervous system (PNS) involvement. Methods Patients with pSS and PNS involvement who were included in the French AIR registry were analysed. Results 17 patients (age 60 years (44–78 years); 14 were female) were analysed. Neurological improvement was noted in 11 patients (65%) at 3 months. Rankin scale decreased from 3 (1–5) to 2 (1–5), 2 (1–5) and 2 (1–6) after 3, 6 and 9 months (p=0.02). European Sjögrens Syndrome Disease Activity Index decreased from 18 (10–44) to 11 (5–20), 11 (5–29) and 12 (5–30) after 3, 6 and 9 months (p<0.05). RTX was effective in neurological involvement in 9/10 patients with vasculitis or cryoglobulinaemia (90%) (group 1) at 3 months and in 2/7 cases (29%) without cryoglobulinaemia and vasculitis (p=0.03). Rankin and European Sjögrens Syndrome Disease Activity Index scales decreased significantly in group 1. Conclusion RTX seems effective in cryoglobulinaemia or vasculitis-related PNS involvement in pSS.

Rituximab versus an alternative TNF inhibitor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who failed to respond to a single previous TNF inhibitor: SWITCH-RA, a global, observational, comparative effectiveness study

Objectives To compare the effectiveness of rituximab versus an alternative tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to one previous TNFi. Methods SWITCH-RA was a prospective, global, observational, real-life study. Patients non-responsive or intolerant to a single TNFi were enrolled ≤4 weeks after starting rituximab or a second TNFi. Primary end point: change in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints excluding patients global health component (DAS28-3)–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) over 6 months. Results 604 patients received rituximab, and 507 an alternative TNFi as second biological therapy. Reasons for discontinuing the first TNFi were inefficacy (n=827), intolerance (n=263) and other (n=21). A total of 728 patients were available for primary end point analysis (rituximab n=405; TNFi n=323). Baseline mean (SD) DAS28-3–ESR was higher in the rituximab than the TNFi group: 5.2 (1.2) vs 4.8 (1.3); p<0.0001. Least squares mean (SE) change in DAS28-3–ESR at 6 months was significantly greater in rituximab than TNFi patients: −1.5 (0.2) vs −1.1 (0.2); p=0.007. The difference remained significant among patients discontinuing the initial TNFi because of inefficacy (−1.7 vs −1.3; p=0.017) but not intolerance (−0.7 vs −0.7; p=0.894). Seropositive patients showed significantly greater improvements in DAS28-3–ESR with rituximab than with TNFi (−1.6 (0.3) vs −1.2 (0.3); p=0.011), particularly those switching because of inefficacy (−1.9 (0.3) vs −1.5 (0.4); p=0.021). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between the rituximab and TNFi groups. Conclusions These real-life data indicate that, after discontinuation of an initial TNFi, switching to rituximab is associated with significantly improved clinical effectiveness compared with switching to a second TNFi. This difference was particularly evident in seropositive patients and in those switched because of inefficacy.

Rheumatoid factor and disease activity are independent predictors of lymphoma in primary Sjögren's Syndrome

To define parameters predictive of lymphoma development in patients with primary Sjögrens syndrome (SS).

Quantitative assessment of antibodies to ribonucleoproteins in primary Sjögren syndrome: correlation with B-cell biomarkers and disease activity

OBJECTIVES To assess the added value of using a radioligand assay (RLA) compared with ELISA to detect antibodies to SSA, SSB and RNP, and to analyse the correlation between autoantibody levels, B-cell biomarkers and disease activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Antibodies to SSA, SSB and RNP were assessed in 127 patients with primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) using an RLA and ELISA. In parallel, measures of B-cell activation were determined including serum levels of B-cell-activating factor of the tumour necrosis factor family or BLyS (BAFF). RESULTS RLA was more sensitive than ELISA for the detection of antibodies to SSB (54% of positive samples versus 37%, respectively) and antibodies to RNP (9% vs 3%). No difference was seen for the sensitivity of detection of antibodies to SSA. Anti-SSA and anti-SSB levels were correlated with both techniques. Mean levels of antibodies to SSA were significantly higher in patients presenting antibodies to both SSA and SSB than in those exhibiting antibodies to SSA only (RLA: mean (SEM) anti-SSA levels 2343 (158) cpm vs 1348 (286) cpm, respectively, p = 0.02; ELISA: 6.8 (0.8) vs 3.8 (0.4), respectively, p = 0.003). Levels of antibodies to SSA and SSB significantly correlated with those of circulating BAFF (r = 0.4, p = 0.004 and r = 0.6, p<0.001, respectively) and with B-cell biomarkers, including levels of gammaglobulins, beta(2) microglobulin and rheumatoid factor. CONCLUSION RLA allowed a quantitative and more sensitive detection of antibodies to SSB and RNP in pSS. Quantitative assessment of autoantibodies might disclose a biomarker of disease activity and enable further insight into the pathogenesis of the spreading of the autoantibody response.