J.E. Kendrick

Sentinel lymph node mapping with staging lymphadenectomy for patients with endometrial cancer increases the detection of metastasis

OBJECTIVES To compare the performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping with staging lymphadenectomy versus staging lymphadenectomy alone for the detection of metastasis and the use of adjuvant therapies in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS All patients with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer (n=780) who underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy with pelvic±aortic lymphadenectomy from July-2006 to June-2013 were compared [pelvic±aortic lymphadenectomy (n=661) versus SLN-mapped cases with pelvic±aortic lymphadenectomy (n=119)]. Isosulfan-blue and indocyanine-green with near-infrared imaging were used for SLN mapping. Clinico-pathological data, FIGO stage, GOG risk category, and adjuvant therapies were compared. RESULTS Non-mapped and mapped cases were comparable with respect to BMI, histology, depth-of-invasion, and lympho-vascular space invasion. The mapped group had more pelvic lymph node (LN) harvested compared to non-mapped group (26.4±10.5 vs. 18.8±8.5, p<0.001). Aortic LN yields were identical for both groups (9.0±5.6 vs. 9.0±6.0). The mapped group had more LN metastasis detected (30.3% vs. 14.7%, p<0.001), more stage IIIC (30.2% vs. 14.5%, p<0.001), more GOG high-risk cases (32.8% vs. 21.8%, p=0.013), and received more chemotherapy+radiation (28.6% vs. 16.3%, p<0.003). The SLN was the only metastasis in 18 (50%) mapped cases with positive nodes. The SLN false negative rate was 1/36 (2.8%). Micrometastases or isolated tumor cells were identified in 22/35 (62.9%) SLN metastases. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SLN mapping imparted a significant effect on the detection of metastatic disease [adjusted OR=3.29, p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS The performance of SLN mapping with staging lymphadenectomy increased the detection of lymph node metastasis and was associated with more use of adjuvant therapies.

The role of bevacizumab in recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

The majority of women with ovarian cancer will experience a recurrence of their disease despite aggressive primary cytoreduction and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy. Notwithstanding the high rate of recurrence, targeted and biologic agents have helped to decrease the dependence on cytotoxic chemotherapy. Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor, has been shown to cause regression in tumor vasculature, inhibition of angiogenesis and prevention of progenitor cell recruitment. Phase III clinical trials of bevacizumab in patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer and in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer have shown an improvement in progression free survival without an appreciable difference in overall survival. The addition of bevacizumab to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens has demonstrated improved response rates, and improved progression free survival. These results have stimulated research in additional angiogenesis inhibitors and trials to further incorporate bevacizumab into the treatment schema for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Prognostic Significance of the Standardized Uptake Value of Pretherapeutic 18F-Labeled 2-Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Objectives To determine the prognostic significance of the pretreatment and posttreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 18F-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography imaging in patients with stage IB2–IVA cervical cancer. Methods This was a retrospective review of cervical cancer patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2–IVA, from March 2008 to April 2014. All patients had pretreatment and posttreatment PET imaging and received primary whole pelvic radiation therapy with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy, followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. Of the 58 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 31 patients (group A) showed no evidence of disease at last follow-up, and 27 patients (group B) presented with recurrence/persistence of disease. Results The mean pretreatment SUVmax in group A was 17.65 ± 7.82 versus 18.8 ± 7.77 in group B (P = 0.577). The mean posttreatment SUVmax between the groups was 0.85 ± 1.83 versus 6.05 ± 3.01 (P < 0.001), respectively. The mean difference between pretreatment and posttreatment SUVmax was 17.73 ± 7.50 in group A versus 13.29 ± 7.15 in group B (P = 0.045). In group A, 80.7% of patients demonstrated no posttreatment hypermetabolic activity on PET imaging versus 11.1% in group B. Of the patients who experienced treatment failure, the site of failure was pelvic in 25.9%, distant in 44.4%, and both pelvic and distant in 29.6%. Conclusions No threshold was identified for the pretreatment SUVmax relative to the risk of recurrence. However, distinct correlations were found between the risk of recurrence, percent reduction in SUVmax, and the observation of residual hypermetabolic activity. This finding may help identify candidates for sequential chemotherapy.