J. Ender

Transapical aortic valve implantation in 100 consecutive patients: comparison to propensity- matched conventional aortic valve replacement

AIMS To evaluate the outcome of transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) in comparison to conventional surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred consecutive high-risk patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis received TA-AVI using the Edwards SAPIEN pericardial xenograft between February 2006 and January 2008. Patient age was 82.7 +/- 5 years, 77 were females, logistic EuroSCORE predicted risk of mortality was 29.4 +/- 13% and Society Thoracic Surgeons score risk for mortality was 15.2 +/- 8.3%. Propensity score analysis was used to identify a control group of patients that underwent conventional aortic valve replacement (C-AVR). Transapical aortic valve implantation was performed successfully in 97 patients, whereas three patients required early conversion. There were no new onset neurological events in the TA-AVI group and early extubation was performed in 82 patients. Echocardiography revealed good valve function with low transvalvular gradients in all patients. Thirty-day survival was 90 +/- 3 vs. 85 +/- 4% for TA-AVI vs. C-AVR, and 1-year survival was 73 +/- 4 vs. 69 +/- 5% (P = 0.55). CONCLUSION Transapical aortic valve implantation is a safe, minimally invasive, and off-pump technique to treat high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Results of the initial 100 patients are good and compare favourably to conventional surgery.

Transapical Off-Pump Valve-in-Valve Implantation in Patients With Degenerated Aortic Xenografts

BACKGROUND The reoperative risk for degenerated aortic valve xenografts may be increased in elderly patients with comorbidities. We evaluated the off-pump beating heart concept of transapical aortic valve implantation using the valve-in-valve (VinV) concept. METHODS Since March 2007, 11 patients with degenerated xenografts received transapical aortic valve implantation using the Edwards Sapien transcatheter heart valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). After informed consent, all procedures were performed as an off-label use. Mean patient age was 78 +/- 6 years (range, 72 to 89), mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 32% +/- 16% (range, 16% to 62%) and mean Society for Thoracic Surgeons score was 7% +/- 3% (range, 3% to 10%). RESULTS All patients were treated off pump. The transapical aortic valve implantation was successful in all patients, and apical access was uncomplicated in all of them. Total operating room time was 71 +/- 14 minutes. On postoperative echocardiography, there was no paravalvular incompetence in any and mild (first degree) central incompetence in 2 of 11 patients. Sufficient flaring of the inflow and outflow parts of the Sapien prosthesis was observed in all patients, suggesting a stable position and an almost absent risk of late embolization. Maximal transvalvular pressure gradients were 21 +/- 8 mm Hg, and mean echocardiographic pressure gradients were 11 +/- 4 mm Hg. Follow-up extends to 330 +/- 293 days (range, 15 to 1,007), and all patients are well and alive. CONCLUSIONS Valve-in-valve implantation is a truly minimally invasive procedure for redo treatment of failed aortic valve xenografts in high-risk elderly patients. The Edwards Sapien valve is well suited for VinV implantation, and this technique may become a routine procedure to treat degenerated xenografts in the future.

Transapical aortic valve implantation at 3 years

OBJECTIVE Our objective was to analyze the results of transapical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis at up to 3 years after the procedure. METHODS A total of 299 patients underwent transapical aortic valve implantation from February 2006 until January 2010 using the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter xenograft. Mean patient age was 82 ± 6 years and 70% were female. Logistic EuroSCORE and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score predicted risks for mortality were 31% ± 16% and 12% ± 8%, respectively. All patients were treated in a hybrid operative theater by a team of anesthetists, cardiologists and cardiac surgeons. RESULTS Successful valve implantation was performed in all patients. Transapical aortic valve implantation was uneventful in 267 patients (89.3%), whereas 32 patients (10.7%) required additional interventions. Such interventions included cardiopulmonary bypass support in 18, implantation of a second SAPIEN valve in 15, coronary intervention in 9, conversion to conventional surgery in 6, and annulus perforation in 3 patients (not mutually exclusive). Intraprocedural stroke was not observed in any patient, although 2 (0.7%) patients had a delayed stroke during their hospital stay. Overall survival was 91% at 30 days, 73% at 1 year, 68% at 2 years, and 58% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Transapical aortic valve implantation can be performed with good outcomes in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Perioperative complications occur in approximately 10% of patients, and a variety of interventions are required for these events. We believe a team approach is therefore essential for the success of transapical aortic valve implantation.

Valve-in-Valve Implantation of Medtronic CoreValve Prosthesis in Patients with Failing Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves

Background—Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) system might represent an alternative to conventional redo surgery in older high-risk patients with a failing aortic valve bioprosthesis. Methods and Results—Symptomatic patients with failing aortic valve bioprosthesis, aged ≥65 years with a logistic EuroSCORE ≥10 % were considered for treatment. Local anesthesia was used to retrogradely implant the MCV system into the failing bioprosthetic valve. Clinical events were recorded and a transthoracic echocardiography was performed to evaluate the impact of MCV on hemodynamics after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A total of 27 patients (aged 74.8±8 years, logistic EuroSCORE of 31±17%) were treated. In those with AS and AS and AR (n=25), the mean gradient declined from 42±16 mm Hg before to 18±8 mm Hg after MCV implantation (P<0.001), in those with AR the level declined by 2. There was no intraprocedural death and no procedural myocardial infarction. On the basis of the definitions of the Valvular Academic Research Consortium, the rate of major stroke was 7.4 %, of life-threatening bleeding 7.4%, of kidney failure stage III 7.4%, and of major access site complication 11.1 %, respectively. Within 30 days after the procedure, 2 patients died; 1 from stroke and 1 from cardiac failure (30-day mortality: 7.4%). Conclusions—These results suggest that transfemoral MCV implantation into a wide range of degenerated aortic bioprosthetic valves—irrespective of the failure mode—is feasible, safe, and improves hemodynamics in older patients with higher risk for conventional aortic valve redo surgery.

Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients requiring redo surgery

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the results of minimally invasive transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) in patients requiring redo surgery. METHODS Twenty-five high risk patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis and previous cardiac surgical interventions received TA-AVI using a pericardial xenograft fixed within a stainless steel, balloon-expandable stent (Edwards SAPIEN) since February 2006. All valves were implanted in a hybrid operative theater. Patient age was 78 years, 60% were female, logistic EuroSCORE and STS score risk for mortality were 39% and 17%, respectively. Previous cardiac surgery was CABG in 17, valve surgery in 5 and other in 3 patients. RESULTS TA-AVI was performed successfully in 24 (96%) of the patients. One patient required early conversion to sternotomy and one patient required temporary ECMO support. A total of 21 patients (84%) were treated completely off-pump, one early patient was treated on-pump by intention and three patients required secondary cardiopulmonary bypass support. Echocardiography revealed good valve function in all but the converted patient, with trivial to mild (1 degrees) paravalvular incompetence in 40%. Three patients died within 30 days of the procedure and during follow-up four patients died, all with good valve function at most recent echo. Thirty-day survival was 88% and one-year survival was 72%. There were no new-onset neurological events. CONCLUSIONS TA-AVI can be performed with excellent results and minimal stroke risk in high risk patients requiring redo cardiac surgery. TA-AVI represents an important alternative to conventional surgery in elderly high risk patients requiring reoperative procedures.

Prediction of the annuloplasty ring size in patients undergoing mitral valve repair using real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography

Aims We sought to investigate the additional value of real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (RT 3D TOE)-guided sizing for predicting annuloplasty ring size during mitral valve repair. Methods and results In 53 patients undergoing elective mitral valve repair, an RT 3D TOE was performed pre- and post-operatively. The digitally stored loops were imported into a software for mitral valve assessment. The annuloplasty ring size was predicted by superimposing computer-aided design (CAD) models of annuloplasty rings onto Live 3D zoom loops, measurement of the intercommissural distance, or the height of the anterior mitral leaflet. The surgeon implanted the annuloplasty ring according to the usual surgical technique and was blinded to the echocardiographic measurement results. Pre-operative correlation between the selected ring size with mitral valve assessment and the actual implanted annuloplasty ring size was 0.91. The correlation for measurement of the intercommissural distance was 0.55 and for measurement of the height of the anterior mitral leaflet 0.75. The post-operative correlation with the actual implanted ring size was 0.96 for mitral valve assessment, 0.92 for intercommissural distance, and 0.79 for the anterior mitral leaflet height. Conclusion Superimposition of annuloplasty ring CAD models on the Live 3D zoom loops of the mitral valve using mitral valve assessment is superior to two-dimensional measurements of the intercommissural distance or the height of the anterior mitral leaflet in predicting correct annuloplasty ring size.

Ingrowths of a Percutaneously Implanted Aortic Valve Prosthesis (CoreValve) in a Patient With Severe Aortic Stenosis

An 80-year-old woman was admitted to our institution because of shortness of breath (New York Heart Association grade III) and stable angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] grade II). Two years ago, the patient had a posterior wall infarction successfully treated by percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation. A low-gradient aortic stenosis with an aortic valve area of 1.1 cm2 was also diagnosed but was considered to be clinically insignificant at the time. Because of the progression of symptoms within the last 2 years, a re-evaluation of coronary and aortic valve disease was performed. Coronary angiography revealed a 1-vessel coronary disease with a patent stent in the right coronary artery without any evidence of restenosis. The left ventricular ejection fraction was only moderately impaired (55%). However, the aortic valve area, as determined invasively, had decreased to 0.5 cm2. This was confirmed by echocardiography; the cusps of the aortic valve were calcified and their motion was impaired (Supplemental Data Movie 1). On the basis of these findings, the necessity of an aortic valve replacement was discussed. However, because the patient was anxious and refused conventional aortic valve …

Leipziger „Fast-track“-Protokoll in der Kardioanästhesie

BACKGROUND In November 2005 a complex, multimodal anesthesia fast-track protocol (FTP) was introduced for elective cardiac surgery patients in the Cardiac Center of the University of Leipzig which included changing from an opioid regime to remifentanil and postoperative treatment in a special post-anesthesia recovery and care unit. The goal was to speed up recovery times while maintaining safety and improving costs. METHOD A total of 421 patients who underwent the FTP and were treated in the special recovery room were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were compared with patients who had been treated by a standard protocol (SP) prior to instituting the FTP. Primary outcomes were time to extubation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and treatment costs. RESULTS The times to extubation were significantly shorter in the FTP group with 75 min (range 45-110 min) compared to 900 min (range 600-1140 min) in the SP group. Intensive care unit stay and hospital length of stay were also significantly shorter in the FTP group (p<0.01). The reduction of treatment costs of intensive care for FTP patients was 53.5% corresponding to savings of EUR 738 per patient in the FTP group compared with the SP group. CONCLUSIONS The Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia including the central elements of switching opiate therapy to remifentanil and switching patient recovery to a special post-anesthesia recovery and care unit, shortened therapy times, is safe and economically effective.

[Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia. Effective, safe and economical].

BACKGROUND In November 2005 a complex, multimodal anesthesia fast-track protocol (FTP) was introduced for elective cardiac surgery patients in the Cardiac Center of the University of Leipzig which included changing from an opioid regime to remifentanil and postoperative treatment in a special post-anesthesia recovery and care unit. The goal was to speed up recovery times while maintaining safety and improving costs. METHOD A total of 421 patients who underwent the FTP and were treated in the special recovery room were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were compared with patients who had been treated by a standard protocol (SP) prior to instituting the FTP. Primary outcomes were time to extubation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and treatment costs. RESULTS The times to extubation were significantly shorter in the FTP group with 75 min (range 45-110 min) compared to 900 min (range 600-1140 min) in the SP group. Intensive care unit stay and hospital length of stay were also significantly shorter in the FTP group (p<0.01). The reduction of treatment costs of intensive care for FTP patients was 53.5% corresponding to savings of EUR 738 per patient in the FTP group compared with the SP group. CONCLUSIONS The Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia including the central elements of switching opiate therapy to remifentanil and switching patient recovery to a special post-anesthesia recovery and care unit, shortened therapy times, is safe and economically effective.

Assessment of acute changes in ventricular volumes, function, and strain after interventional edge-to-edge repair of mitral regurgitation using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

AIMS Whereas haemodynamic and echocardiographic studies suggest benefits for left ventricular (LV) function and cardiac output following reduction in LV preload by interventional edge-to-edge repair for mitral regurgitation (MR), there is limited data on volumetric and functional LV and right ventricular (RV) changes using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with moderate to severe MR and high surgical risk underwent MitraClip-implantation and CMR imaging before and within 7 days after the procedure. In addition to volumetric and flow studies, myocardial feature tracking (FT) technology for quantification of myocardial strain was applied. Twenty patients (age: 76 ± 8 years) with functional (n = 15) or degenerative MR (n = 5) with a mean logistic Euroscore I of 33 ± 16 underwent both successful MitraClip implantation and CMR imaging. MR fraction (36 ± 10 vs. 19 ± 12%; P < 0.001) and LV end-diastolic volume (115 ± 36 vs. 105 ± 41 mL/m2; P = 0.002) decreased significantly, whereas LV ejection fraction (42 ± 15 vs. 41 ± 16%, P = 0.8) and cardiac index (1.7 ± 0.5 vs. 1.8 ± 0.4 L/min/m2, P = 0.4) remained unchanged. MitraClip implantation resulted in a significant impairment of circumferential (-12.8 ± 4.8 vs. -8.2 ± 3.3; P = 0.002) and radial strain (15.4 ± 7.7 vs. 9.6 ± 5.3; P = 0.02) on basal short-axis view. On RV level, there were no significant changes in end-diastolic volume (83 ± 19 vs. 84 ± 18 mL/m2, P = 0.8), ejection fraction (42 ± 9 vs. 43 ± 11%, P = 0.8), or tricuspid regurgitation fraction (24 ± 17 vs. 25 ± 19%, P = 0.7). MitraClip implantation led to a significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class (patients in functional class III-IV pre 100% vs. post 45%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION In severely compromised patients, marked reduction in MR by MitraClip implantation might not result in immediate improved cardiac output and effective biventricular forward flow.