J Everly
University of Cincinnati
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J Everly.
Transplantation | 2008
Matthew J. Everly; J Everly; Brian Susskind; Paul Brailey; Lois J. Arend; Rita R. Alloway; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; A. Govil; G. Mogilishetty; A. H. Rike; M. Cardi; George Wadih; Amit D. Tevar; E. Steve Woodle
Background. Current antihumoral therapies in transplantation and autoimmune disease do not target the mature antibody-producing plasma cell. Bortezomib is a first in class proteosomal inhibitor, that is Food and Drug Administration approved, for the treatment of plasma cell-derived tumors that is multiple myeloma. We report the first clinical experience with plasma cell-targeted therapy (bortezomib) as an antirejection strategy. Methods. Eight episodes of mixed antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) in six transplant recipients were treated with bortezomib at labeled dosing. Monitoring included serial donor-specific antihuman leukocyte antigen antibody (DSA) levels and repeated allograft biopsies. Results. Six kidney transplant patients received bortezomib for AMR and concomitant ACR. In each case, bortezomib therapy provided (1) prompt rejection reversal, (2) marked and prolonged reductions in DSA levels, (3) improved renal allograft function, and (4) suppression of recurrent rejection for at least 5 months. Moreover, immunodominant DSA (iDSA) (i.e., the antidonor human leukocyte antigen antibody with the highest levels) levels were decreased by more than 50% within 14 days and remained substantially suppressed for up to 5 months. One or more additional DSA were present at lower concentrations (non-iDSA) in each patient and were also reduced to nondetectable levels. Bortezomib-related toxicities (gastrointestinal toxicity, thrombocytopenia, and paresthesias) were all transient. Conclusions. Bortezomib therapy: (1) provides effective treatment of AMR and ACR with minimal toxicity and (2) provides sustained reduction in iDSA and non-iDSA levels. Bortezomib represents the first effective antihumoral therapy with activity in humans that targets plasma cells.
Transplantation | 2010
R. Carlin Walsh; J Everly; Paul Brailey; A. H. Rike; Lois J. Arend; G. Mogilishetty; A. Govil; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; Rita R. Alloway; E. Steve Woodle
Background. Rapid and complete elimination of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) during antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is rarely achieved with traditional antihumoral therapies. Proteasome inhibitor-based therapy has been shown to effectively treat refractory AMR, but its use as a primary therapy for AMR has not been presented. Our initial experience with proteasome inhibition as a first-line therapy for AMR is presented. Methods. Adult kidney transplant recipients with AMR, diagnosed by Banff criteria, received a bortezomib-based regimen as the primary therapy. Bortezomib therapy was administered per package insert with plasmapheresis performed immediately before each bortezomib dose, and a single rituximab dose (375 mg/m2) given with the first bortezomib dose. DSA were quantitated using single-antigen beads on a Luminex platform. Results. Two patients underwent bortezomib-based therapy for acute AMR occurring within the first 2 weeks after transplantation. High DSA levels and positive C4d staining of peritubular or glomerular capillaries were present at the time of diagnosis. Both patients experienced prompt AMR reversal and elimination of detectable DSA within 14 days of bortezomib-based therapy. Renal function remains excellent with normal urinary protein excretion at 5 and 6 months after AMR diagnosis. One patient experienced a repeated elevation of DSA (including two new human leukocyte antigen specificities) 2 months after initial bortezomib therapy, but without C4d deposition or histologic evidence of AMR. Retreatment with bortezomib provided prompt, complete, and durable DSA elimination. Conclusions. Proteasome inhibitor-based combination therapy provides a potential means for rapid DSA elimination in early acute AMR in renal transplant recipients.
Transplantation | 2009
Yun Miao; J Everly; Thomas G. Gross; Amit D. Tevar; M. Roy First; Rita R. Alloway; E. Steve Woodle
Background. Transplant recipients are at increased risk of malignancy; however, the influence of transplantation on cancer outcomes has not been rigorously defined. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of transplantation on the outcomes of individual cancers. Methods. De novo nonsmall cell lung cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, renal cell cancer (RCC), and malignant melanoma data in 635 adult (>18 years of age) transplant recipients (from the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry) were compared with data from 1,282,984 adults in the general population (from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database). Results. Compared with the general population, transplant patients were more likely to have early stage (AJCC stage 0–II) RCC, but more advanced (AJCC stage >II) colon cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, and malignant melanoma. Compared with the general population, disease-specific survival was worse in the transplant population for colon cancer (all stages), nonsmall cell lung cancer (stage II), breast cancer (stage III), prostate cancer (stage II, III, and IV), bladder cancer (stage III), and RCC (stage IV). Multivariate analyses demonstrated transplantation to be a negative risk factor for survival for each cancer studied, and transplantation and cancer stage at diagnosis to be the most profound negative survival predictors. Conclusions. These analyses indicate that, for several common cancers, transplant patients experience worse outcomes than the general population. The data also suggest that cancers in transplant recipients are more aggressive biologically at the time of diagnosis.
Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation | 2009
J Everly; R. Carlin Walsh; Rita R. Alloway; E. Steve Woodle
Purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to describe the biochemistry and physiology of proteasome inhibition and to discuss recent studies with proteasome inhibitor therapy in organ transplantation. Recent findingsTraditional antihumoral therapies do not deplete plasma cells, the source of antibody production. Proteasome inhibition depletes both transformed and nontransformed plasma cells in animal models and human transplant recipients. Bortezomib is a first in a class proteasome inhibitor that has been shown to effectively treat antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients. In this experience, bortezomib provided reversal of histologic changes and also induced a reduction in donor-specific anti-HLA antibody levels. Recent experiences have also shown that bortezomib reduces donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody in the absence of rejection. Finally, evidence has been presented that bortezomib therapy depletes human leukocyte antigen-specific antibody producing plasma cells. SummaryProteasome inhibition induces a complex series of biochemical events that results in pleiotropic effects on multiple cell populations, and plasma cells in particular. Initial clinical results have provided evidence that bortezomib effectively treats antibody-mediated rejection and acute cellular rejection and reduces or eliminates donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody. Carefully designed clinical trials are needed to accurately define the role of proteasome inhibition in transplant recipients.
Transplantation | 2010
A. R. Shields; Rita R. Alloway; G. Mogilishetty; M. Cardi; Shaoming Huang; Lois J. Arend; Paul Brailey; Rino Munda; J Everly; E S. Woodle
A.R. Shields1, R.R. Alloway2, G. Mogilishetty2, M. Cardi3, S. Huang3, L. Arend4, P. Brailey5, R. Munda6, J. Everly7, E.S. Woodle6 1Transplant Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati/Ohio/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2Nephrology, University of Cincinnati, cincinnati/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3Nephrology, The Christ Hospital, cincinnati/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 4Pathology, University of Cincinnati, cincinnati/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5Hoxworth Immunology, University of Cincinnati, cincinnati/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 6Transplant Surgery, University of Cincinnati, cincinnati/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 7, Oncology Hematology, Inc, cincinnati/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Transplantation | 2008
Matthew J. Everly; J Everly; Paul Brailey; Brian Susskind; Lois J. Arend; Rita R. Alloway; A. Govil; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; G. Mogilishetty; E S. Woodle
Clinical Transplantation | 2007
E.S. Woodle; Rita R. Alloway; A. H. Rike; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; Amit D. Tevar; Brian Susskind; J Everly; G. Mogilishetty; Brailey P; A. Govil; S.M. Rudich; First Mr; Alexander Jw; Rino Munda; M. Cardi; Lois J. Arend
Transplantation | 2010
A. R. Shields; Rita R. Alloway; A. Govil; M. Cardi; S. Safdar; Amit D. Tevar; Lois J. Arend; Alin Girnita; J Everly; E S. Woodle
Transplantation | 2010
A. R. Shields; Rita R. Alloway; J Everly; M. Cardi; G. Mogilishetty; A. Govil; E S. Woodle
Transplantation | 2008
E S. Woodle; R. A. M. Lee; A. H. Rike; Rita R. Alloway; J Everly; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; A. Govil; Marketa Clippard