J. F. W. Sprícigo
University of Brasília
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. F. W. Sprícigo.
Molecular Reproduction and Development | 2013
G. M. Machado; A.R. Ferreira; I. Pivato; A. Fidelis; J. F. W. Sprícigo; F. Paulini; Carolina Madeira Lucci; M. M. Franco; M. A. N. Dode
This study evaluates the post‐hatching development of in vitro‐produced (IVP) embryos until Day 14. On Day 7, IVP embryos were either transferred to recipient uteruses or placed in a post‐hatching development (PHD) system. As a control group, in vivo‐produced (IVV), Day‐7 embryos were also transferred to recipient uteruses. All groups were collected on Day 14 and were morphologically evaluated. Day‐7 and Day‐14 IVV and IVP embryos were used for quantification of eight genes (PLAC8, CD9, SLC2A1, SLC2A3, KRT8, SOD2, HSP1A1, and IFNT2) by reverse transcriptase qPCR. Day‐14 embryos from the PHD system were smaller (2.92 ± 0.45 mm) and had a lower embryonic disk diameter (0.14 ± 0.00 mm) than those produced by IVV (24.18 ± 3.71; 0.29 ± 0.03 mm, respectively) or IVP (19.06 ± 2.43; 0.28 ± 0.01 mm) culture and transferred to the uterus (P > 0.05). Day‐7 IVP embryos had a higher expression of the HSP1A1, SCL2A1, and SCL2A3 genes than IVV embryos. When these embryos were cultured in the uterus, no differences in gene expression were observed on Day 14. Conversely, Day‐14 IVP embryos cultured in the PHD system showed a higher expression of PLAC8, SOD2, and SLC2A3 genes. It is concluded that Day‐7 IVP embryos are different from IVV embryos in regards to gene expression, although exposure to the uterine environment during the elongation period allowed the IVP embryos to overcome this difference. In contrast, IVP embryos cultured in the PHD system were morphologically and molecularly different, being of poorer quality than those cultured in the uterus. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 80: 936–947, 2013.
Cryobiology | 2014
J. F. W. Sprícigo; K.S. Morais; A.R. Ferreira; G. M. Machado; A.C.M. Gomes; R. Rumpf; M. M. Franco; M. A. N. Dode
This study aimed to investigate the functional, morphological and molecular patterns of bovine oocytes vitrified at different times during in vitro maturation (IVM). Four groups of oocytes were used: non-vitrified control oocytes (CG), oocytes vitrified at 0 h (V0), oocytes vitrified after 8 h of IVM (V8) and oocytes vitrified after 22 h of IVM (V22). After vitrification, the oocytes were warmed and then returned to the incubator to complete a total of 24h of IVM. To evaluate the effect of vitrification, the nuclear maturation and fertilization rates were assessed by lacmoid staining and ultrastructural electron microscopy. The cleavage and blastocyst rates were evaluated at D2, D7 and D8. The expression levels of CASP3, TP53, HDAC2, SUV39H1 and DNMT1 were investigated by RT-qPCR. The nuclear maturation, oocyte fertilization, cleavage and blastocyst rates were higher (P < 0.05) in the CG group (80%; 81.3%; 88.5%; and 35.8%) than in the V0 (44%; 44.6%; 22.7%; and 2.6%), V8 (50%; 63%; 21.5%; and 2.2%) and V22 (55.5%; 66.9%; 24.1%; and 4.6%) groups. Ultrastructural analysis revealed significant damage within the cytoplasm of all vitrified groups, but more severe degeneration was observed in the V22 group. The gene expression profiles were not affected by vitrification (P > 0.05). In conclusion, cytoplasm degeneration seems to be the most severe form of damage caused by vitrification. The use of the Cryotop method for vitrification severely reduces bovine oocyte viability regardless of whether it is performed at GV, GVBD or MII stage.
PLOS ONE | 2015
J. F. W. Sprícigo; M. N. Diógenes; L. O. Leme; A. L. S. Guimarães; C. V. Muterlle; Bianca Damiani Marques Silva; D. Solà-Oriol; I. Pivato; Luciano P. Silva; M. A. N. Dode
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different maturation systems on oocyte resistance after vitrification and on the phospholipid profile of the oocyte plasma membrane (PM). Four different maturation systems were tested: 1) in vitro maturation using immature oocytes aspirated from slaughterhouse ovaries (CONT; n = 136); 2) in vitro maturation using immature oocytes obtained by ovum pick-up (OPU) from unstimulated heifers (IMA; n = 433); 3) in vitro maturation using immature oocytes obtained by OPU from stimulated heifers (FSH; n = 444); and 4) in vivo maturation using oocytes obtained from heifers stimulated 24 hours prior by an injection of GnRH (MII; n = 658). A sample of matured oocytes from each fresh group was analyzed by matrix associated laser desorption-ionization (MALDI-TOF) to determine their PM composition. Then, half of the matured oocytes from each group were vitrified/warmed (CONT VIT, IMA VIT, FSH VIT and MII VIT), while the other half were used as fresh controls. Afterwards, the eight groups underwent IVF and IVC, and blastocyst development was assessed at D2, D7 and D8. A chi-square test was used to compare embryo development between the groups. Corresponding phospholipid ion intensity was expressed in arbitrary units, and following principal components analyses (PCA) the data were distributed on a 3D graph. Oocytes obtained from superstimulated animals showed a greater rate of developmental (P<0.05) at D7 (MII = 62.4±17.5% and FSH = 58.8±16.1%) compared to those obtained from unstimulated animals (CONT = 37.9±8.5% and IMA = 50.6±14.4%). However, the maturation system did not affect the resistance of oocytes to vitrification because the blastocyst rate at D7 was similar (P>0.05) for all groups (CONT VIT = 2.8±3.5%, IMA VIT = 2.9±4.0%, FSH VIT = 4.3±7.2% and MII VIT = 3.6±7.2%). MALDI-TOF revealed that oocytes from all maturation groups had similar phospholipid contents, except for 760.6 ([PC (34:1) + H]+), which was more highly expressed in MII compared to FSH (P<0.05). The results suggest that although maturation systems improve embryonic development, they do not change the PM composition nor the resistance of bovine oocytes to vitrification.
Theriogenology | 2016
L. O. Leme; Isabelle Dufort; J. F. W. Sprícigo; Thiago Felipe Braga; Marc-André Sirard; M. M. Franco; M. A. N. Dode
The present study analyzed the changes in gene expression induced by the Cryotop vitrification technique in bovine blastocyst-stage embryos, using Agilent EmbryoGENE microarray slides. Bovine in vitro-produced embryos were vitrified and compared with nonvitrified (control) embryos. After vitrification, embryos were warmed and cultured for an additional 4 hours. Survived embryos were used for microarray analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) quantification. Survival rates were higher (P < 0.05) in the control embryos (100%) than in the vitrified embryos (87%). Global gene expression analysis revealed that only 43 out of 21,139 genes exhibited significantly altered expression in the vitrified embryos compared to the control embryos, with a very limited fold change (P < 0.05). A total of 10 genes were assessed by qPCR. Only the FOS-like antigen 1 (FOSL1) gene presented differential expression (P < 0.05) according to both the array and qPCR methods, and it was overexpressed in vitrified embryos. Although, the major consequence of vitrification seems to be the activation of the apoptosis pathway in some cells. Indeed, FOSL1 is part of the activating protein 1 transcription factor complex and is implicated in a variety of cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Therefore, our results suggest that a limited increase in the rate of apoptosis was the only detectable response of the embryos to vitrification stress.
Theriogenology | 2016
J. F. W. Sprícigo; Severino Bernardino Sena Netto; C. V. Muterlle; Sarah de Andrade Dias Rodrigues; L. O. Leme; A. L. S. Guimarães; Felippe Manoel Costa Caixeta; M. M. Franco; I. Pivato; M. A. N. Dode
Archive | 2018
F. M. C. Caixeta; R. V. de Sousa; J. F. W. Sprícigo; S. de A. D. Rodrigues; A. A. Fidelis; M. A. N. Dode
Reproduction, Fertility and Development | 2016
J. F. W. Sprícigo; S. B. Sena Netto; C. V. Muterlle; S. A. D. Rodrigues; L. O. Leme; A. L. S. Guimarães; F. Caixeta; I. Pivato; M. A. N. Dode
Animal reproduction | 2016
J. F. W. Sprícigo; S. B. Sena Netto; C. V. Muterlle; F. M. C. Caixeta; S. A. D. Rodrigues; I. Pivato; M. A. N. Dode
Animal reproduction | 2015
S. B. Sena Netto; J. F. W. Sprícigo; L. M. S. Simoes; L. O. Leme; M. A. N. Dode; I. Pivato
Animal reproduction | 2015
F. M. C. Caixeta; J. F. W. Sprícigo; R. V. Sousa; I. Pivato; M. A. N. Dode