J. Fleurot
Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. Fleurot.
Nuclear Technology | 2009
Patrick Drai; Olivier Marchand; P. Chatelard; Florian Fichot; J. Fleurot
Abstract In order to analyze the course of a hypothetical severe accident, the French “Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire” in the last decade has developed computer codes that have been extensively used for supporting the Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA2) and, in general, for the safety analysis of French pressurized water reactors (PWRs). In particular, the computer code ICARE/CATHARE V1 is a tool that has been widely validated and intensively used within the framework of the PSA2 of the 900-MW(electric) French PWR. This code has been tested on many accident scenarios, and the results obtained have been considered to be satisfactory and reliable up to the end of the early degradation phase. But, severe accidents in PWRs are characterized by a continuous evolution of the core geometry due to chemical reactions, melting, and mechanical failure of the rods and other structures. These local variations of the porosity and other parameters lead to multidimensional flows and heat transfers. So, the lack of a multidimensional two-phase thermal-hydraulic model appeared to be prejudicial to achieve best-estimate reactor studies with ICARE/CATHARE V1 in the case of large core blockages and/or in the case of large cavity appearance. In accordance, a full multidimensional modeling (covering both the fluid flow and the corium behavior) was developed and introduced in a new ICARE/CATHARE version referenced as V2, which includes two options for the thermal-hydraulic modeling: either one-dimensional (1D) or two-dimensional (2D). The first part of this paper demonstrates that without activating the new V2 models, ICARE/CATHARE V2(1D) is able to reproduce the results obtained with ICARE/CATHARE V1 on the basis of a 6-in.-break loss-of-coolant accident. Then, in order to illustrate some of the new V2 modeling improvements, the last part is focused on the results obtained with ICARE/CATHARE V2(2D), and a preliminary comparison is made with ICARE/CATHARE V2(1D). This 1D-2D comparison points out in particular the important role that could be played in the course of a severe accident by the multidimensional flow pattern.
Volume 5: Fusion Engineering; Student Paper Competition; Design Basis and Beyond Design Basis Events; Simple and Combined Cycles | 2012
A. Bachrata; Florian Fichot; Georges Repetto; Michel Quintard; J. Fleurot
The loss of coolant accidents with core degradation e.g. TMI-2 and Fukushima demonstrated that the nuclear safety analysis has to cover accident sequences involving a late reflood activation in order to develop appropriate and reliable mitigation strategies for both, existing and advanced reactors. The reflood (injection of water) is possible if one or several water sources become available during the accident. In a late phase of accident, no well-defined coolant paths would exist and a large part of the core would resemble to a debris bed e.g. particles with characteristic length-scale: 1 to 5 mm, as observed in TMI-2. The French “Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire” (IRSN) is developing experimental programs (PEARL and PRELUDE) and simulation tools (ICARE-CATHARE and ASTEC) to study and optimize the severe accident management strategy and to assess the probabilities to stop the progress of in-vessel core degradation at a late stage of an accident. The purpose of this paper is to propose a consistent thermo-hydraulic model of reflood of severely damaged reactor core for ICARE-CATHARE code. The comparison of the calculations with PRELUDE experimental results is presented. It is shown that the quench front exhibits either a 1D behavior or a 2D one, depending on injection rate or bed characteristics. The PRELUDE data cover a rather large range of variation of parameters for which the developed model appears to be quite predictive.Copyright
Nuclear Engineering and Technology | 2006
Florian Fichot; Olivier Marchand; Patrick Drai; P. Chatelard; M. Zabiego; J. Fleurot
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2014
L. Carénini; J. Fleurot; Florian Fichot
能源与动力工程:英文版 | 2013
Andrea Bachrata; Florian Fichot; Georges Repetto; Michel Quintard; J. Fleurot
Annals of Nuclear Energy | 2014
J. Fleurot; I. Lindholm; N. Kononen; S. Ederli; B. Jaeckel; A. Kaliatka; J. Duspiva; M. Steinbrueck; T. Hollands
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2013
Olivia Coindreau; Florian Fichot; J. Fleurot
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2010
Nicolas Tregoures; Marc Philippot; Laurent Foucher; G. Guillard; J. Fleurot
Journal of Power and Energy Systems | 2008
Nicolas Tregoures; Giacomino Bandini; Laurent Foucher; J. Fleurot; Paride Meloni
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2014
Laurent Foucher; F. Cousin; J. Fleurot; S. Brethes