Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J.G.B. Leenaars is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J.G.B. Leenaars.


PLOS ONE | 2014

SoilGrids1km — Global Soil Information Based on Automated Mapping

Tomislav Hengl; Jorge Mendes de Jesus; Robert A. MacMillan; N.H. Batjes; Gerard B. M. Heuvelink; Eloi Ribeiro; Alessandro Samuel-Rosa; B. Kempen; J.G.B. Leenaars; Markus G. Walsh; Maria Ruiperez Gonzalez

Background Soils are widely recognized as a non-renewable natural resource and as biophysical carbon sinks. As such, there is a growing requirement for global soil information. Although several global soil information systems already exist, these tend to suffer from inconsistencies and limited spatial detail. Methodology/Principal Findings We present SoilGrids1km — a global 3D soil information system at 1 km resolution — containing spatial predictions for a selection of soil properties (at six standard depths): soil organic carbon (g kg−1), soil pH, sand, silt and clay fractions (%), bulk density (kg m−3), cation-exchange capacity (cmol+/kg), coarse fragments (%), soil organic carbon stock (t ha−1), depth to bedrock (cm), World Reference Base soil groups, and USDA Soil Taxonomy suborders. Our predictions are based on global spatial prediction models which we fitted, per soil variable, using a compilation of major international soil profile databases (ca. 110,000 soil profiles), and a selection of ca. 75 global environmental covariates representing soil forming factors. Results of regression modeling indicate that the most useful covariates for modeling soils at the global scale are climatic and biomass indices (based on MODIS images), lithology, and taxonomic mapping units derived from conventional soil survey (Harmonized World Soil Database). Prediction accuracies assessed using 5–fold cross-validation were between 23–51%. Conclusions/Significance SoilGrids1km provide an initial set of examples of soil spatial data for input into global models at a resolution and consistency not previously available. Some of the main limitations of the current version of SoilGrids1km are: (1) weak relationships between soil properties/classes and explanatory variables due to scale mismatches, (2) difficulty to obtain covariates that capture soil forming factors, (3) low sampling density and spatial clustering of soil profile locations. However, as the SoilGrids system is highly automated and flexible, increasingly accurate predictions can be generated as new input data become available. SoilGrids1km are available for download via http://soilgrids.org under a Creative Commons Non Commercial license.


PLOS ONE | 2017

SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning

Tomislav Hengl; Jorge Mendes de Jesus; Gerard B. M. Heuvelink; Maria Ruiperez Gonzalez; Milan Kilibarda; Aleksandar Blagotić; Wei Shangguan; Marvin N Wright; Xiaoyuan Geng; Bernhard Bauer-Marschallinger; Mario Guevara; Rodrigo Vargas; Robert A. MacMillan; N.H. Batjes; J.G.B. Leenaars; Eloi Ribeiro; Ichsani Wheeler; Stephan Mantel; B. Kempen

This paper describes the technical development and accuracy assessment of the most recent and improved version of the SoilGrids system at 250m resolution (June 2016 update). SoilGrids provides global predictions for standard numeric soil properties (organic carbon, bulk density, Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), pH, soil texture fractions and coarse fragments) at seven standard depths (0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm), in addition to predictions of depth to bedrock and distribution of soil classes based on the World Reference Base (WRB) and USDA classification systems (ca. 280 raster layers in total). Predictions were based on ca. 150,000 soil profiles used for training and a stack of 158 remote sensing-based soil covariates (primarily derived from MODIS land products, SRTM DEM derivatives, climatic images and global landform and lithology maps), which were used to fit an ensemble of machine learning methods—random forest and gradient boosting and/or multinomial logistic regression—as implemented in the R packages ranger, xgboost, nnet and caret. The results of 10–fold cross-validation show that the ensemble models explain between 56% (coarse fragments) and 83% (pH) of variation with an overall average of 61%. Improvements in the relative accuracy considering the amount of variation explained, in comparison to the previous version of SoilGrids at 1 km spatial resolution, range from 60 to 230%. Improvements can be attributed to: (1) the use of machine learning instead of linear regression, (2) to considerable investments in preparing finer resolution covariate layers and (3) to insertion of additional soil profiles. Further development of SoilGrids could include refinement of methods to incorporate input uncertainties and derivation of posterior probability distributions (per pixel), and further automation of spatial modeling so that soil maps can be generated for potentially hundreds of soil variables. Another area of future research is the development of methods for multiscale merging of SoilGrids predictions with local and/or national gridded soil products (e.g. up to 50 m spatial resolution) so that increasingly more accurate, complete and consistent global soil information can be produced. SoilGrids are available under the Open Data Base License.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Mapping Soil Properties of Africa at 250 m Resolution: Random Forests Significantly Improve Current Predictions

Tomislav Hengl; Gerard B. M. Heuvelink; B. Kempen; J.G.B. Leenaars; Markus G. Walsh; Keith D. Shepherd; Andrew Sila; Robert A. MacMillan; Jorge Mendes de Jesus; Lulseged Tamene; Jérôme E. Tondoh

80% of arable land in Africa has low soil fertility and suffers from physical soil problems. Additionally, significant amounts of nutrients are lost every year due to unsustainable soil management practices. This is partially the result of insufficient use of soil management knowledge. To help bridge the soil information gap in Africa, the Africa Soil Information Service (AfSIS) project was established in 2008. Over the period 2008–2014, the AfSIS project compiled two point data sets: the Africa Soil Profiles (legacy) database and the AfSIS Sentinel Site database. These data sets contain over 28 thousand sampling locations and represent the most comprehensive soil sample data sets of the African continent to date. Utilizing these point data sets in combination with a large number of covariates, we have generated a series of spatial predictions of soil properties relevant to the agricultural management—organic carbon, pH, sand, silt and clay fractions, bulk density, cation-exchange capacity, total nitrogen, exchangeable acidity, Al content and exchangeable bases (Ca, K, Mg, Na). We specifically investigate differences between two predictive approaches: random forests and linear regression. Results of 5-fold cross-validation demonstrate that the random forests algorithm consistently outperforms the linear regression algorithm, with average decreases of 15–75% in Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) across soil properties and depths. Fitting and running random forests models takes an order of magnitude more time and the modelling success is sensitive to artifacts in the input data, but as long as quality-controlled point data are provided, an increase in soil mapping accuracy can be expected. Results also indicate that globally predicted soil classes (USDA Soil Taxonomy, especially Alfisols and Mollisols) help improve continental scale soil property mapping, and are among the most important predictors. This indicates a promising potential for transferring pedological knowledge from data rich countries to countries with limited soil data.


Geoderma | 2018

Mapping rootable depth and root zone plant-available water holding capacity of the soil of sub-Saharan Africa

J.G.B. Leenaars; L. Claessens; Gerard B. M. Heuvelink; T. Hengl; Maria Ruiperez Gonzalez; Lenny G.J. van Bussel; Nicolas Guilpart; Haishun Yang; Kenneth G. Cassman

In rainfed crop production, root zone plant-available water holding capacity (RZ-PAWHC) of the soil has a large influence on crop growth and the yield response to management inputs such as improved seeds and fertilisers. However, data are lacking for this parameter in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study produced the first spatially explicit, coherent and complete maps of the rootable depth and RZ-PAWHC of soil in SSA. We compiled geo-referenced data from 28,000 soil profiles from SSA, which were used as input for digital soil mapping (DSM) techniques to produce soil property maps of SSA. Based on these soil properties, we developed and parameterised (pedotransfer) functions, rules and criteria to evaluate soil water retention at field capacity and wilting point, the soil fine earth fraction from coarse fragments content and, for maize, the soil rootability (relative to threshold values) and rootable depth. Maps of these secondary soil properties were derived using the primary soil property maps as input for the evaluation rules and the results were aggregated over the rootable depth to obtain a map of RZ-PAWHC, with a spatial resolution of 1 km2. The mean RZ-PAWHC for SSA is 74 mm and the associated average root zone depth is 96 cm. Pearson correlation between the two is 0.95. RZ-PAWHC proves most limited by the rootable depth but is also highly sensitive to the definition of field capacity. The total soil volume of SSA potentially rootable by maize is reduced by one third (over 10,500 km3) due to soil conditions restricting root zone depth. Of these, 4800 km3 are due to limited depth of aeration, which is the factor most severely limiting in terms of extent (km2), and 2500 km3 due to sodicity which is most severely limiting in terms of degree (depth in cm). Depth of soil to bedrock reduces the rootable soil volume by 2500 km3, aluminium toxicity by 600 km3, porosity by 120 km3 and alkalinity by 20 km3. The accuracy of the map of rootable depth and thus of RZ-PAWHC could not be validated quantitatively due to absent data on rootability and rootable depth but is limited by the accuracy of the primary soil property maps. The methodological framework is robust and has been operationalised such that the maps can easily be updated as additional data become available.


GeoResJ | 2017

Soil legacy data rescue via GlobalSoilMap and other international and national initiatives

Dominique Arrouays; J.G.B. Leenaars; Anne C. Richer-de-Forges; Kabindra Adhikari; Cristiano Ballabio; Mogens Humlekrog Greve; Mike Grundy; Eliseo Guerrero; Jon Hempel; Tomislav Hengl; Gerard B. M. Heuvelink; N.H. Batjes; Eloi Carvalho; Alfred E. Hartemink; Alan Hewitt; Suk-Young Hong; Pavel Krasilnikov; Philippe Lagacherie; Glen Lelyk; Zamir Libohova; Allan Lilly; Alex B. McBratney; Neil McKenzie; Gustavo M. Vasquez; V.L. Mulder; Budiman Minasny; Luca Montanarella; Inakwu Odeh; José Padarian; Laura Poggio

Legacy soil data have been produced over 70 years in nearly all countries of the world. Unfortunately, data, information and knowledge are still currently fragmented and at risk of getting lost if they remain in a paper format. To process this legacy data into consistent, spatially explicit and continuous global soil information, data are being rescued and compiled into databases. Thousands of soil survey reports and maps have been scanned and made available online. The soil profile data reported by these data sources have been captured and compiled into databases. The total number of soil profiles rescued in the selected countries is about 800,000. Currently, data for 117, 000 profiles are compiled and harmonized according to GlobalSoilMap specifications in a world level database (WoSIS). The results presented at the country level are likely to be an underestimate. The majority of soil data is still not rescued and this effort should be pursued. The data have been used to produce soil property maps. We discuss the pro and cons of top-down and bottom-up approaches to produce such maps and we stress their complementarity. We give examples of success stories. The first global soil property maps using rescued data were produced by a top-down approach and were released at a limited resolution of 1km in 2014, followed by an update at a resolution of 250m in 2017. By the end of 2020, we aim to deliver the first worldwide product that fully meets the GlobalSoilMap specifications.


Data Science Journal | 2013

Development of global soil information facilities

N.H. Batjes; Hannes Isaak Reuter; Piet Tempel; Tomislav Hengl; J.G.B. Leenaars; P.S. Bindraban

ISRIC - World Soil Information has a mandate to serve the international community as custodian of global soil information and to increase awareness and understanding of the role of soils in major global issues. To adapt to the current demand for soil information, ISRIC is updating its enterprise data management system, including procedures for registering acquired data, such as lineage, versioning, quality assessment, and control. Data can be submitted, queried, and analysed using a growing range of web-based services - ultimately aiming at full and open exchange of data, metadata, and products - through the ICSU-accredited World Data Centre for Soils.


Anthrozoos | 2012

Africa Soil Profiles Database, version 1.0 : a compilation of georeferenced and standardised legacy soil profile data for Sub-Saharan Africa (with dataset)

J.G.B. Leenaars; A.J.M. van Oostrum; M. Ruiperez Gonzalez


Earth System Science Data | 2016

WoSIS: providing standardised soil profile data for the world

N.H. Batjes; Eloi Ribeiro; Ad van Oostrum; J.G.B. Leenaars; T. Hengl; Jorge Mendes de Jesus


Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems | 2017

Soil nutrient maps of Sub-Saharan Africa: assessment of soil nutrient content at 250 m spatial resolution using machine learning

Tomislav Hengl; J.G.B. Leenaars; Keith D. Shepherd; Markus G. Walsh; Gerard B. M. Heuvelink; Tekalign Mamo; Helina Tilahun; Ezra Berkhout; Matthew Cooper; Eric H. Fegraus; Ichsani Wheeler; Nketia A. Kwabena


Digital Soil Assessments and Beyond : Proceedings of the 5th Global Workshop on Digital Soil Mapping, Sydney, Australia | 2012

The challenges of collating legacy data for digital mapping of Nigerian soils

Inakwu Odeh; J.G.B. Leenaars; Alfred E. Hartemink; Ishaku Y. Amapu

Collaboration


Dive into the J.G.B. Leenaars's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerard B. M. Heuvelink

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N.H. Batjes

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. Kempen

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Wolf

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth G. Cassman

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L.G.J. van Bussel

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. Claessens

International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Huijun Yang

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge