J. Galliford

De novo DQ donor-specific antibodies are associated with a significant risk of antibody-mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy.

Background The importance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching in renal transplantation is well recognized, with HLA-DR compatibility having the greatest influence. De novo DQ donor-specific antibodies (DSAbs) are the predominant HLA class II DSAb after transplantation. The aim of this study was to establish the incidence and outcomes after the development of DQ DSAbs along with the impact of class II HLA mismatch on their development. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 505 patients who received a renal-alone transplant between 2005 and 2010. We excluded patients who received an ABO- and HLA-incompatible allograft, which we defined as those with a positive crossmatch or preformed DSAbs detected by single-antigen beads only. Results Of 505 patients, 92 (18.2%) developed DSAbs, with 50 (54.3%) of these 92 patients having DQ DSAbs. Patients who developed DQ DSAbs were at significant risk for antibody-mediated rejection, transplant glomerulopathy, and allograft loss (P<0.0001). Of 505 patients, 108 (21.4%) were matched at both the DR and DQ loci, 284 (56.2%) were mismatched at both loci, 38 (7.5%) were matched at DR alone, and 75 (14.9%) were matched at DQ alone. Patients mismatched at both DR and DQ were at risk for developing class II DSAbs when compared with those mismatched at either DR or DQ alone, P=0.001, and were at risk for antibody-mediated rejection, P=0.001. Conclusions DQ DSAbs are associated with inferior allograft outcomes. This study shows the importance of establishing the DQ match before transplantation to define immunologic risk.

Microcirculation Inflammation Associates With Outcome in Renal Transplant Patients With De Novo Donor‐Specific Antibodies

In renal transplant patients with de novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSA) we studied the value of microcirculation inflammation (MI; defined by the addition of glomerulitis (g) and peritubular capillaritis (ptc) scores) to assess long‐term graft survival in a retrospective cohort study. Out of all transplant patients with standard immunological risk (n = 638), 79 (12.4%) developed dnDSA and 58/79 (73%) had an indication biopsy at or after dnDSA development. Based on the MI score on that indication biopsy patients were categorized, MI0 (n = 26), MI1 + 2 (n = 21) and MI ≥ 3 (n = 11). The MI groups did not differ significantly pretransplantation, whereas posttransplantation higher MI scores developed more anti‐HLA class I + II DSA (p = 0.011), showed more TCMR (p < 0.001) and showed a trend to C4d‐positive staining (p = 0.059). Four‐year graft survival estimates from time of indication biopsy were MI0 96.1%, MI1 + 2 76.1% and MI ≥ 3 17.1%; resulting in a 24‐fold increased risk of graft failure in the MI ≥ 3 compared to the MI0 group (p = 0.003; 95% CI [3.0–196.0]). When adjusted for C4d, MI ≥ 3 still had a 21‐fold increased risk of graft failure (p = 0.005; 95% CI [2.5–180.0]), while C4d positivity on indication biopsy lost significance. In renal transplant patients with de novo DSA, microcirculation inflammation, defined by g + ptc, associates with graft survival.

Kidney Transplantation With Minimized Maintenance: Alemtuzumab Induction With Tacrolimus Monotherapy—an Open Label, Randomized Trial

Background. Immunosuppressive regimens for kidney transplantation which reduce the long-term burden of immunosuppression are attractive, but little data are available to judge the safety and efficacy of the different strategies used. We tested the hypothesis that the simple, cheap, regimen of alemtuzumab induction combined with tacrolimus monotherapy maintenance provided equivalent outcomes to the more commonly used combination of interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody induction with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil combination maintenance, both regimens using steroid withdrawal after 7 days. Methods. One hundred twenty-three live or deceased donor renal transplant recipients were randomized 2:1 to receive alemtuzumab/tacrolimus or daclizumab/tacrolimus/mycophenolate. The primary endpoint was survival with a functioning graft at 1 year. Results. Both regimens produced equivalent, excellent outcomes with the primary outcome measure of 97.6% in the alemtuzumab arm and 95.1% in the daclizumab arm at 1 year (95% confidence interval of difference 6.9% to −1.7%) and at 2 years 92.6% and 95.1%. Rejection was less frequent in the alemtuzumab arm with 1- and 2-year rejection-free survival of 91.2% and 89.9% compared with 82.3% and 82.3% in the daclizumab arm. There were no significant differences in terms of the occurrence of opportunistic infections. Conclusion. Alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus maintenance monotherapy and short-course steroid use provides a simple, safe, and effective immunosuppressive regimen for renal transplantation.

Outcome of patients with preformed donor-specific antibodies following alemtuzumab induction and tacrolimus monotherapy.

It has been shown that low‐level preformed donor‐specific antibodies (DSAbs) detected by luminex beads in the setting of a negative CDC and flow cytometry crossmatch (CDC/FCXM) are associated with inferior allograft outcomes. The relevance of preformed DSAbs in patients receiving alemtuzumab induction and tacrolimus monotherapy has not been studied. Four hundred and eighty renal transplant recipients with a negative CDC/FCXM had their pretransplant sera retrospectively screened for DSAbs. 45/480 (9.4%) of patients were found to have preformed DSAbs. Females and patients receiving regrafts were more likely to have a DSAb (p = 0.008 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Patients with DSAbs had inferior allograft survival (p = 0.047), increased incidence of antibody‐mediated rejection (p < 0.0001) and inferior allograft function at 6 months posttransplant (p = 0.017). Patients with HLA class I DSAb (alone or in combination with a Class II DSAb) with high mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) were at highest risk. We conclude that patients with preformed DSAb are at high risk of adverse outcomes when receiving a minimal immunosuppressive regime incorporating alemtuzumab induction. Patients found to have a preformed DSAb despite a negative crossmatch might benefit from augmented immunosuppression.

Antibody-mediated rejection after alemtuzumab induction: incidence, risk factors, and predictors of poor outcome.

Background. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is associated with allograft loss. Identification of factors associated with poor outcome has not been extensively studied. Methods. We retrospectively studied 469 patients who received a negative crossmatch renal transplant with alemtuzumab induction. Forty-eight of 469 (10.2%) patients were treated for AMR. Thirty of 48 (62.5%) of the cases fulfilled the Banff criteria for definite AMR, whereas 18 of 48 (37.5%) were categorized as suspicious for AMR (tissue injury with C4d staining or donor-specific antibodies [DSAbs]). Sensitization, high human leukocyte antigen, and -DR mismatch were risk factors for the development of AMR (P=0.0016, 0.001, and 0.012, respectively). Results. Allograft survival was inferior in the AMR group (70.2%) compared with the nonrejector group (97.0%) (P<0.001). Forty-two of 48 (87.5%) of patients with acute AMR had DSAbs. Patients with CII DSAbs at the time of AMR, whether alone or in combination with CI DSAbs had the worst allograft survival (P=0.014). Both the mean cumulative and immunodominant mean fluorescence index were higher in those patients who subsequently lost their grafts (P<0.001). Patients with diffuse C4d staining had inferior allograft survival than those with focal C4d or no staining (P=0.02). There was no significant difference in survival by histological grade but a trend to inferior outcomes in those with vascular involvement (P=0.06). Those patients who met the full Banff criteria had worse survival than those with suspicion for AMR only (P=0.04). Conclusion. This study identifies patients at risk of graft failure from AMR. These patients may benefit from newer therapeutic strategies including the use of eculizumab or bortezomib.

ABO incompatible living renal transplantation with a steroid sparing protocol.

Background. ABO incompatible (ABOi) live-donor renal transplantation is a successful and accepted form of treatment for patients with renal failure. Although there is significant controversy as to how antiblood group antibodies should be removed and their resynthesis prevented, subsequent immunosuppressive regimes have all involved steroids. We and other groups have successfully used steroid sparing regimes for conventional ABO compatible transplantation and this study describes the use of our steroid sparing protocol in ABOi transplantation. Methods. We have transplanted 10 ABOi patients using 1 week of steroids (prednisolone 1 mg/kg for 4 days, 0.5 mg/kg for 3 days and then stopped), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Steroids were reintroduced in the event of rejection. Results. Patient- and allograft-survival 1 year posttransplantation is 100%. Three patients experienced antibody-mediated rejection within 2 weeks of transplantation, which was successfully reversed. There has been no late rejection. Allograft function was similar to our live-donor ABO compatible transplant patients receiving a similar steroid sparing regime (12-month mean creatinine 131±15 &mgr;mol/L vs. 138±48 &mgr;mol/L; mean CrCl 63.2±22 mL/min vs. 56.7±20 mL/min). Conclusions. This study shows that ABOi live-donor transplantation can be successfully accomplished using a steroid-sparing protocol.

Recurrence of complement factor H-related protein 5 nephropathy in a renal transplant.

Complement factor H‐related protein 5 (CFHR5) nephropathy is a familial renal disease endemic in Cyprus. It is characterized by persistent microscopic hematuria, synpharyngitic macroscopic hematuria and progressive renal impairment. Isolated glomerular accumulation of complement component 3 (C3) is typical with variable degrees of glomerular inflammation. Affected individuals have a heterozygous internal duplication in the CFHR5 gene, although the mechanism through which this mutation results in renal disease is not understood. Notably, the risk of progressive renal failure in this condition is higher in males than females. We report the first documented case of recurrence of CFHR5 nephropathy in a renal transplant in a 53‐year‐old Cypriot male. Strikingly, histological changes of CFHR5 nephropathy were evident in the donor kidney 46 days post‐transplantation. This unique case demonstrates that renal‐derived CFHR5 protein cannot prevent the development of CFHR5 nephropathy.

Antibody removal before ABO-incompatible renal transplantation: how much plasma exchange is therapeutic?

Background. ABOi transplantation is an accepted method of expanding the kidney donor pool but there is little analysis of the protocols used. We established an ABOi programme utilising leukocyte depletion, tacrolimus, TPE and IvIg. There are few reports in the literature on the success rates of antibody removal protocols or relating to patients in whom antibody removal fails. The purpose of this study was to define the likelihood of achieving transplantation depending on ABO antibody titers. Methods. 56 patients entered our ABOi program. Data were analysed to determine the likelihood of achieving transplantation, ABO antibody titre prior to antibody removal and amount of TPE required to achieve transplantation. The median antibody titer was 1:64 (Range 0–1:1024). Transplantation proceeded when the ABO titer reached ≤1:4. Results. 51/56 (91%) patients achieved transplantation after 8.3±5 TPE. Five patients with high ABO titers were not transplanted despite extensive TPE. The number of TPE required to reach an ABO titer of ≤1:4 correlates best with pre-treatment IgG titers. Conclusions. This is the first study to demonstrate a cut off titer for entry in to the ABO incompatible program using the relationship between ABO titer and amount of TPE required to reach transplantation. We now tailor the antibody removal protocol prior to transplantation and have introduced a cut-off entry titer to the program (≤1:256), because of the unacceptable risk of exposing patients with higher titers to long-lasting immunosuppression and costly, prolonged, courses of TPE without the guarantee of successful transplantation. Patients whose ABO titer exceeds the cut-off are counselled and offered alternative routes to transplantation.

Acute cellular rejection: impact of donor-specific antibodies and C4d.

Background Mixed rejection in kidney transplantation consists of histologic and/or serological evidence of both cellular and humoral components. As it is not confined to a distinct category in the Banff classification, how to best manage these patients is not clear. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and outcome of morphological T-cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) with a humoral component, defined as the presence of either DSA or C4d, compared with the outcome of pure TCMR. Methods We retrospectively studied 922 consecutive renal transplant recipients and analyzed patients with TCMR according to the evidence of a humoral component. Results A total of 147 cases of morphological TCMR were analyzed. Of these, 92 (62.6%) had “pure” TCMR and 55 (37.4%) had “mixed” TCMR on the index biopsy. On univariant analysis, diffuse C4d (odds ratio [OR]=10.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.8–66.9, P=0.01) and DSA positivity at the time of index biopsy (OR=2.8, 95% CI=1.2–6.6, P=0.02) were associated with allograft loss, whereas arteritis (OR=0.5, 95% CI=0.2–1.2, P=0.11) and glomerulitis (OR=0.9, 95% CI=0.4–2.1, P=0.8) were not. Arteritis was associated with subsequent antibody-mediated rejection (OR=4.9, 95% CI=1.1–20.8, P=0.03), and glomerulitis was associated with the development of transplant glomerulopathy (OR=10.7, 95% CI=3.1–37.1, P<0.01). On the multivariate analysis, only patients with C4d and DSA were at risk of graft failure (OR=4.9, 95% CI=2.0–12.0, P<0.01) in the medium term. Conclusion TCMR with a humoral component has a worse prognosis when compared with pure TCMR. As such, it is important to test for alloantibody in cases of morphological TCMR to optimize patient management. Such cases might benefit from more aggressive immunotherapy.

Retrospective Analysis of a Novel Regimen for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in 7%-40% of nephrotic patients. The risk of VTE depends on the severity and underlying cause of nephrotic syndrome. This study investigated the use of low-dose prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent VTE in patients with nephrotic syndrome caused by primary glomerulonephritis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Since 2006, all patients presenting with nephrotic syndrome to Imperial College Kidney and Transplant Centre have been considered for treatment with a novel anticoagulation prophylaxis regimen. All cases of nephrotic syndrome secondary to primary membranous nephropathy, minimal-change disease, and FSGS over a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with serum albumin<2.0 g/dl received prophylactic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin or low-dose warfarin; patients with albumin levels of 2.0-3.0 g/dl received aspirin, 75 mg once daily. All thrombotic events and bleeding complications were recorded. RESULTS A total of 143 patients received the prophylactic anticoagulation regimen. Median follow-up was 154 weeks (range, 30-298 weeks). The cohort had features associated with a high risk of developing VTE; 40% of the cohort had an underlying diagnosis of membranous nephropathy, and the initial median serum albumin was 1.5 g/dl (range, 0.5-2.9 g/dl). No VTE occurred in patients established on prophylaxis for at least 1 week. VTE was diagnosed in 2 of 143 patients (1.39%) within the first week after presentation and starting prophylaxis. In both cases, it is unclear whether the thrombus had developed before or after the start of prophylaxis. One of 143 (0.69%) patients receiving prophylaxis was admitted urgently with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Two of 143 patients (1.40%) had elective blood transfusions and procedures to manage occult gastrointestinal bleeding. No other bleeding events occurred in patients receiving prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS This regimen of prophylactic antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy appears effective in preventing VTE in nephrotic syndrome, with relatively few hemorrhagic complications.