Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J.H. Faber is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J.H. Faber.


Science of The Total Environment | 2010

Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment — A review and perspectives

H.J. de Lange; Serenella Sala; Marco Vighi; J.H. Faber

This paper reviews the application of ecological vulnerability analysis in risk assessment and describes new developments in methodology. For generic non-site-specific assessments (e.g. for the requirements of most European directives on dangerous chemicals) risk is characterised just on the basis of the ratio between an effect indicator and an exposure indicator. However, when the actual risk for a specific ecosystem is desired, the concept of ecological vulnerability may be more appropriate. This calls for a change in thinking, from sensitivity at the organism level to vulnerability at higher organization levels, and thus forms the link from laboratory toxicology to field effects at population, community or ecosystem level. To do so, biological and ecological characteristics of the ecosystems under concern are needed to estimate the ecological vulnerability. In this review we describe different vulnerability analysis methods developed for populations (of a single species), communities (consisting of different populations of species) and ecosystems (community and habitat combined). We also give some examples of methods developed for socio-ecological systems. Aspects that all methods share are the use of expert judgment, the input of stakeholders, ranking and mapping of the results, and the qualitative nature of the results. A new general framework is presented to guide future ecological vulnerability analysis. This framework can be used as part of ecological risk assessment, but also in risk management. We conclude that the further quantification of ecological vulnerability is a valuable contribution to vulnerability assessment.


Nature Communications | 2017

Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses

Elly Morriën; S. Emilia Hannula; L. Basten Snoek; Nico R. Helmsing; Hans Zweers; Mattias de Hollander; Raquel Luján Soto; Marie-Lara Bouffaud; Marc Buée; W.J. Dimmers; Henk Duyts; Stefan Geisen; Mariangela Girlanda; Robert I. Griffiths; Helene Bracht Jørgensen; John Jensen; Pierre Plassart; Dirk Redecker; Rüdiger M. Schmelz; Olaf Schmidt; Bruce C. Thomson; Emilie Tisserant; Stéphane Uroz; Anne Winding; Mark J. Bailey; Michael Bonkowski; J.H. Faber; Francis Martin; Philippe Lemanceau; Wietse de Boer

Soil organisms have an important role in aboveground community dynamics and ecosystem functioning in terrestrial ecosystems. However, most studies have considered soil biota as a black box or focussed on specific groups, whereas little is known about entire soil networks. Here we show that during the course of nature restoration on abandoned arable land a compositional shift in soil biota, preceded by tightening of the belowground networks, corresponds with enhanced efficiency of carbon uptake. In mid- and long-term abandoned field soil, carbon uptake by fungi increases without an increase in fungal biomass or shift in bacterial-to-fungal ratio. The implication of our findings is that during nature restoration the efficiency of nutrient cycling and carbon uptake can increase by a shift in fungal composition and/or fungal activity. Therefore, we propose that relationships between soil food web structure and carbon cycling in soils need to be reconsidered.


Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | 2003

Tenax extraction mimics benthic and terrestrial bioavailability of organic compounds

Theodora E. M. ten Hulscher; J.F. Postma; Pieter J. den Besten; Gerard J. Stroomberg; A.C. Belfroid; J.W.M. Wegener; J.H. Faber; Joost J.C. Van der Pol; A. Jan Hendriks; Paul C.M. van Noort

Biota to sediment accumulation factors (BSAFs) are widely used to describe the potential accumulation of organic contaminants in organisms. From field studies it is known that these BSAFs can vary dramatically between sediments of different origin, which is possibly explained by the variation in bioavailability of organic contaminants in sediments. In the present study it is shown that the variability in BSAF values for different sediment samples obtained at two Dutch freshwater sites could largely be explained by the variation in Tenax-extractable concentrations in these sediments. Variations of a factor of about 50 could be explained. The ratio between concentrations in biota and Tenax-extractable concentrations in sediment varied slightly between sediments and contaminant class, but was close to the theoretically expected value of 2. This is a strong indication that Tenax-extractable concentrations of contaminants in sediments are an excellent indicator of available concentrations.


Oecologia | 2005

Within-trophic group interactions of bacterivorous nematode species and their effects on the bacterial community and nitrogen mineralization

Maria B. Postma-Blaauw; F. de Vries; R.G.M. de Goede; J. Bloem; J.H. Faber; L. Brussaard

Knowledge of the interactions between organisms within trophic groups is important for an understanding of the role of biodiversity in ecosystem functioning. We hypothesised that interactions between bacterivorous nematodes of different life history strategies would affect nematode population development, bacterial community composition and activity, resulting in increased N mineralization. A microcosm experiment was conducted using three nematode species (Bursilla monhystera, Acrobeloides nanus and Plectus parvus). All the nematode species interacted with each other, but the nature and effects of these interactions depended on the specific species combination. The interaction between B. monhystera and A. nanus was asymmetrically competitive (0,−), whereas that between B. monhystera and P. parvus, and also A. nanus and P. parvus was contramensal (+, −). The interaction that affected microcosm properties the most was the interaction between B. monhystera and P. parvus. This interaction affected the bacterial community composition, increased the bacterial biomass and increased soil N mineralization. B. monhystera and P. parvus have the most different life history strategies, whereas A. nanus has a life history strategy intermediate to those of B. monhystera and P. parvus. We suggest that the difference in life history strategies between species of the same trophic group is of importance for their communal effect on soil ecosystem processes. Our results support the idiosyncrasy hypothesis on the role of biodiversity in ecosystem functioning.


Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | 2009

Ecological vulnerability in wildlife: An expert judgment and multicriteria analysis tool using ecological traits to assess relative impact of pollutants

Hendrika J. De Lange; J. Lahr; Joost J.C. Van der Pol; Yolanda Wessels; J.H. Faber

Nature development in The Netherlands often is planned on contaminated soils and sediments of former agricultural land and in floodplain areas; however, this contamination may present a risk to wildlife species desired at those nature development sites. Specific risk assessment methods are needed, because toxicological information is lacking for most wildlife species. The vulnerability of a species is a combination of its potential exposure, sensitivity to the type of pollutant, and recovery capacity. We developed a new method to predict ecological vulnerability in wildlife using autecological information. The analysis results in an ordinal ranking of vulnerable species. The method was applied to six representative contaminants: copper and zinc (essential metals, low to medium toxicity), cadmium (nonessential metal, high toxicity), DDT (persistent organic pesticide, high toxicity), chlorpyrifos (persistent organophosphate insecticide, high toxicity), and ivermectin (persistent veterinary pharmaceutical, low to medium toxicity). High vulnerability to the essential metals copper and zinc was correlated with soil and sediment habitat preference of a species and with r-strategy (opportunistic strategy suited for unstable environments). Increased vulnerability to the bioaccumulating substances cadmium and DDT was correlated with higher position of a species in the food web and with life span and K-strategy (equilibrium strategy suited for stable environments). Vulnerability to chlorpyrifos and ivermectin was high for species with a preference for soil habitats. The ecological vulnerability analysis has potential to further our abilities in risk assessment.


Science of The Total Environment | 2012

Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessment for soils

J.H. Faber; J. van Wensem

This paper describes scientific developments that have raised awareness that changes in ecological risk assessment (ERA) methods are necessary. These changes have also been triggered by developments in environmental policies. This is illustrated by examples for The Netherlands and Europe. The ecosystem services concept seems to gain a central role in developments of new ERA methods. Main reasons for this are the integrative character of the concept, making it possible to integrate over environmental compartments or over environmental assessment methods, the concepts strength as communication tool and the possibility to value ecosystem services in economic terms. A method using ecosystem services in ERA is presented here in more detail, as an example. In this method assessment endpoints are derived from structures and processes in the ecosystem that are considered indispensable for the provision of particular ecosystem services. The approach facilitates fine-tuning ERA to specific land use demands.


BMC Ecology | 2013

Land-use and land-management change: relationships with earthworm and fungi communities and soil structural properties

David J. Spurgeon; Aidan M. Keith; Olaf Schmidt; D.R. Lammertsma; J.H. Faber

BackgroundChange in land use and management can impact massively on soil ecosystems. Ecosystem engineers and other functional biodiversity in soils can be influenced directly by such change and this in turn can affect key soil functions. Here, we employ meta-analysis to provide a quantitative assessment of the effects of changes in land use and land management across a range of successional/extensification transitions (conventional arable → no or reduced tillage → grassland → wooded land) on community metrics for two functionally important soil taxa, earthworms and fungi. An analysis of the relationships between community change and soil structural properties was also included.ResultsMeta-analysis highlighted a consistent trend of increased earthworm and fungal community abundances and complexity following transitions to lower intensity and later successional land uses. The greatest changes were seen for early stage transitions, such as introduction of reduced tillage regimes and conversion to grassland from arable land. Not all changes, however, result in positive effects on the assessed community metrics. For example, whether woodland conversion positively or negatively affects community size and complexity depends on woodland type and, potentially, the changes in soil properties, such as pH, that may occur during conversion. Alterations in soil communities tended to facilitate subsequent changes in soil structure and hydrology. For example, increasing earthworm abundances and functional group composition were shown to be positively correlated with water infiltration rate (dependent on tillage regime and habitat characteristics); while positive changes in fungal biomass measures were positively associated with soil microaggregate stability.ConclusionsThese findings raise the potential to manage landscapes to increase ecosystem service provision from soil biota in relation to regulation of soil structure and water flow.


Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management | 2013

The practicalities and pitfalls of establishing a policy‐relevant and cost‐effective soil biological monitoring scheme

J.H. Faber; Rachel E. Creamer; Christian Mulder; Jörg Römbke; M. Rutgers; J. Paulo Sousa; D. Stone; Bryan S. Griffiths

A large number of biological indicators have been proposed over the years for assessing soil quality. Although many of those have been applied in monitoring schemes across Europe, no consensus exists on the extent to which these indicators might perform best and how monitoring schemes can be further optimized in terms of scientific and policy relevance. Over the past decade, developments in environmental monitoring and risk assessment converged toward the use of indicators and endpoints that are related to soil functioning and ecosystem services. In view of the proposed European Union (EU) Soil Framework Directive, there is an urgent need to identify and evaluate indicators for soil biodiversity and ecosystem services. The recently started integrated project, Ecological Function and Biodiversity Indicators in European Soils (EcoFINDERS), aims to address this specific issue within the EU Framework Program FP7. Here, we 1) discuss how to use the concept of ecosystem services in soil monitoring, 2) review former and ongoing monitoring schemes, and 3) present an analysis of metadata on biological indicators in some EU member states. Finally, we discuss our experiences in establishing a logical sieve approach to devise a monitoring scheme for a standardized and harmonized application at European scale.


Human and Ecological Risk Assessment | 2006

European Experience on Application of Site-Specific Ecological Risk Assessment in Terrestrial Ecosystems

J.H. Faber

ABSTRACT This article describes the current state of the development toward a common European framework for site-specific ecological risk assessment (SS-ERA) Although common progression has been slow in the past two years, earlier activities were very promising. Results are presented of a 2001 workshop to discuss the scientific development and policy needs in preparation of such a common framework. The framework was recommended to follow a tiered approach. Other important elements for a common European framework for SS-ERA were identified to be the use of generic values in the first tier and bioassays in later tiers, to address bioavailability in the assessment, to differentiate for land use. Also, the framework should allow for negotiation between stakeholders specific to the site. These aspects are present in the Dutch approach to SS-ERA, and this article further presents some experience with the application of this framework in a large case of SS-ERA in The Netherlands. The derivation of suitable ecological parameters and assessment criteria in view of land use in a tiered approach risk assessment is focused on, and the interactive process between stakeholders and ongoing discussions concerning references and criteria for assessment are illustrated.


SOIL Discussions | 2016

Soil fauna: key to new carbon models

Juliane Filser; J.H. Faber; Alexei V. Tiunov; L. Brussaard; Jan Frouz; Gerlinde B. De Deyn; Alexei V. Uvarov; Matty P. Berg; Patrick Lavelle; Michel Loreau; Diana H. Wall; Pascal Querner; Herman Eijsackers; Juan J. Jiménez

Soil organic matter (SOM) is key to maintaining soil fertility, mitigating climate change, combatting land degradation, and conserving above- and below-ground biodiversity and associated soil processes and ecosystem services. In order to derive management options for maintaining these essential services provided by soils, policy makers depend on robust, predictive models identifying key drivers of SOM dynamics. Existing SOM models and suggested guidelines for future SOM modelling are defined mostly in terms of plant residue quality and input and microbial decomposition, overlooking the significant regulation provided by soil fauna. The fauna controls almost any aspect of organic matter turnover, foremost by regulating the activity and functional composition of soil microorganisms and their physical-chemical connectivity with soil organic matter. We demonstrate a very strong impact of soil animals on carbon turnover, increasing or decreasing it by several dozen percent, sometimes even turning C sinks into C sources or vice versa. This is demonstrated not only for earthworms and other larger invertebrates but also for smaller fauna such as Collembola. We suggest that inclusion of soil animal activities (plant residue consumption and bioturbation altering the formation, depth, hydraulic properties and physical heterogeneity of soils) can fundamentally affect the predictive outcome of SOM models. Understanding direct and indirect impacts of soil fauna on nutrient availability, carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions and plant growth is key to the understanding of SOM dynamics in the context of global carbon cycling models. We argue that explicit consideration of soil fauna is essential to make realistic modelling predictions on SOM dynamics and to detect expected non-linear responses of SOM dynamics to global change. We present a decision framework, to be further developed through the activities of KEYSOM, a European COST Action, for when mechanistic SOM models include soil fauna. The research activities of KEYSOM, such as field experiments and literature reviews, together with dialogue between empiricists and modellers, will inform how this is to be done.

Collaboration


Dive into the J.H. Faber's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Bloem

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Lahr

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. Brussaard

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H.A. Verhoef

VU University Amsterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H.J. de Lange

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Olaf Schmidt

University College Dublin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Rutgers

University of Amsterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W.J. Dimmers

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge