J. Hammann
French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. Hammann.
Physical Review Letters | 1998
K. Jonason; E. Vincent; J. Hammann; Jean-Philippe Bouchaud; Per Nordblad
New low frequency ac susceptibility measurements on two different spin glasses show that cooling/heating the sample at a constant rate yields an essentially reversible (but rate dependent)
Physical Review Letters | 1999
Y. G. Joh; R. Orbach; G. G. Wood; J. Hammann; E. Vincent
\ensuremath{\chi}(T)
Physical Review Letters | 2004
Fabrice Bert; Vincent Dupuis; E. Vincent; J. Hammann; Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
curve; a downward relaxation of
Philosophical Magazine Part B | 1995
E. Vincent; Jean-Philippe Bouchaud; J. Hammann; F. Lefloch
\ensuremath{\chi}
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials | 1996
E. Vincent; Y. Yuan; J. Hammann; H. Hurdequint; F. Guevara
occurs during a temporary stop at constant temperature (aging). Two main features of our results are (i) when cooling is resumed after such a stop,
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials | 1981
P. Radhakrishna; J. Hammann; P. Pari
\ensuremath{\chi}
EPL | 1997
R. Sappey; E. Vincent; Miguel Ocio; J. Hammann; F. Chaput; J. P. Boilot; D. Zins
goes back to the reversible curve (chaos), and (ii) upon reheating,
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials | 1992
J. Hammann; M. Ocio; E. Vincent; M. Lederman; R. Orbach
\ensuremath{\chi}
Solid State Communications | 1981
P. Radhakrishna; J. Hammann; M. Ocio; P. Pari; Y. Allain
perfectly traces the previous aging history (memory). We discuss implications of our results for a real space (as opposed to phase space) picture of spin glasses.
Philosophical Magazine Part B | 1998
Y. G. Joh; R. Orbach; J. Hammann
A change in magnetic field H quenches the barriers in a spin glass for heights less than an associated change in Zeeman energy, E_z. The shift of the peak of S(t)=-dM_{TRM}(t,t_w)/H/{d lnt} with H generates E_z={N_s}{X_fc}{H^2}, with X_fc the field cooled magnetic susceptibility per spin, and N_s the number of spins participating in barrier quenching (and barrier hopping). Experiments on Cu:Mn 6at.% and CdCr_{1.7}In_{0.3}S_4 for ranges of H, T, and waiting times t_w generate the correlation length, Ksi(t_w,T) ~ {N_s}^{1/3}, fitted by both the hierarchical model, Ksi(t_w,T)=0.635(t_w}/tau_0)^{0.169T/T_g}, in numerical accord with simulations, or the droplet model, Ksi(t_w,T)={10^{-5}}{{[(T/T_g)Ln(t_w/tau_0)]}^{1/0.21}}, with too small a prefactor for simulation time scales, and exponent 1/psi at the lower limit for psi.