J.I. Moon

Safety of small-for-size grafts in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe.

The problem of graft size is one of the critical factors limiting the expansion of adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We compared the outcome of LDLT recipients who received grafts with a graft‐to‐recipient weight ratio (GRWR) < 0.8% or a GRWR ≥ 0.8%, and we analyzed the risk factors affecting graft survival after small‐for‐size grafts (SFSGs) were used. Between June 1997 and April 2008, 427 patients underwent LDLT with right lobe grafts at the Department of Surgery of Samsung Medical Center. Recipients were divided into 2 groups: group A with a GRWR < 0.8% (n = 35) and group B with a GRWR ≥ 0.8% (n = 392). We retrospectively evaluated the recipient factors, donor factors, and operative factors through the medical records. Small‐for‐size dysfunction (SFSD) occurred in 2 of 35 patients (5.7%) in group A and in 14 of 392 patients (3.6%) in group B (P = 0.368). Graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were not different between the 2 groups (87.8%, 83.4%, and 74.1% versus 90.7%, 84.5%, and 79.4%, P = 0.852). However, when we analyzed risk factors within group A, donor age and middle hepatic vein tributary drainage were significant risk factors for graft survival according to univariate analysis (P = 0.042 and P = 0.038, respectively). Donor age was the only significant risk factor for poor graft survival according to multivariate analysis. The graft survival rates of recipients without SFSD tended to be higher than those of recipients with SFSD (85.3% versus 50.0%, P = 0.074). The graft survival rates of recipients with grafts from donors < 44 years old were significantly higher than those of recipients with grafts from donors ≥ 44 years old (92.2% versus 53.6%, P = 0.005). In conclusion, an SFSG (GRWR < 0.8%) can be used safely in adult‐to‐adult right lobe LDLT when a recipient is receiving the graft from a donor younger than 44 years. Liver Transpl 16:864–869, 2010.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), which is characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction due to occlusion of the major hepatic vein and/or the inferior vena cava (IVC), is rare. Traditionally, a caval resection is advocated for these patients; however, such a maneuver renders living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) impossible. We encountered BCS in 4/377 LDLT patients during a 5-year period (January 2003 to December 2007). This report examine the various surgical modifications in these 4 patients, who underwent to LDLT for BCS. Resection of right hepatic vein (RHV) with an adjacent fibrotic part of the IVC with direct anastomosis of the graft RHV to the IVC was performed in 2 patients. One patient underwent retrohepatic IVC excision and reconstruction with a cryopreserved autologous IVC graft. The fourth patient, with a preexisting mesoatrial shunt for BCS, underwent conversion of this to a RHV atrial shunt. Graft and patient survivals were 100%. There were few complications in either donors or recipients. LDLT for BCS can be performed safely with adequate venous drainage techniques and with anticoagulant therapy and good follow-up for early diagnosis and treatment of recurrence leading to excellent long-term results.

Is cytomegalovirus infection dangerous in cytomegalovirus-seropositive recipients after liver transplantation?

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections contracted after liver transplantation put patients at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. We analyzed the effects of CMV infection by time of onset, mortality, and graft failure risk factors in liver recipients who were CMV donor‐positive/recipient‐positive (D+/R+). We reviewed 618 medical records for consecutive adult liver transplant cases. CMV pp65 antigenemia assays to determine patient CMV status were administered monthly. The incidences of CMV infection and disease were 55.7% (344 of 618 records) and 5.5% (34 of 618 records), respectively. The differences in patient survival and graft failure rates for CMV‐infected and CMV‐uninfected patients were not significant (P = 0.707 and P = 0.973), but the rates were lower in patients with CMV disease than in CMV‐uninfected patients (P = 0.005 and P = 0.030, respectively). The recurrence of hepatitis B virus and hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic dysfunction, infection, numerous pp65‐staining cells, and CMV disease were found to be the risk factors for mortality and graft failure in CMV D+/R+ adult liver transplant patients. In conclusion, the occurrence of CMV disease, and not asymptomatic CMV infection, was a risk factor for mortality and graft failure in adult liver transplant recipients with CMV D+/R+. Liver Transpl, 2011.

Effect of intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion with the Pringle maneuver during donor hepatectomy in adult living donor liver transplantation with right hemiliver grafts: A prospective, randomized controlled study

To evaluate the effects of intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion (IHIO) during donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in recipients and donors, we performed a single‐center, open‐label, prospective, parallel, randomized controlled study. Adult donor‐recipient pairs undergoing LDLT with right hemiliver grafts were randomized into IHIO and control groups (1:1). In the IHIO group, IHIO was performed during donor hepatectomy. The primary endpoint was the peak serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentration in the recipients within 5 days after the operation. Blood samples for measurements of interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), IL‐8, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF‐α), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) were taken from the donors and the recipients during the operation and postoperatively. Biopsy samples for measurements of caspase‐3 and malondialdehyde (MDA) were taken from the donors and the recipients. In all, 50 donor‐recipient pairs (ie, 25 pairs in each group) completed this study. The mean peak serum ALT levels within 5 days after the operation did not differ in the recipients between the 2 groups (P = 0.32) but were higher in the donors of the IHIO group (P = 0.002). There were no differences in the prothrombin times or total bilirubin levels in the recipients or donors between the 2 groups. The amount of blood loss during donor hepatectomy was significantly lower in the IHIO group versus the control group (P = 0.02). The mean hospital stay for donors was 19.3 ± 7.2 days in the control group and 15.8 ± 4.6 days in the IHIO group (P = 0.046). There were no in‐hospital deaths within 1 month and no cases of primary nonfunction or initially poor function in the 2 groups. The concentrations of IL‐6, IL‐8, TNF‐α, and HGF did not differ between the 2 groups, nor did the concentrations of caspase‐3 and MDA. In conclusion, although we found differences in postoperative peak serum ALT levels in donors, donor hepatectomy with IHIO for LDLT using a right hemiliver graft with a graft‐to‐recipient body weight ratio > 0.9% and <30% steatosis can be a tolerable procedure for donors and recipients. Liver Transpl 18:130–138, 2012.

The Risk Factors of Delayed Graft Function and Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Study

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) after deceased donor kidney transplantation and to compare the clinical outcomes of non-DGF versus DGF recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2004 to June 2008, 75/154 kidneys were transplanted into 74 recipients. We classified the recipients into two groups: group 1 (n=61) without DGF and group 2 (n=13) with DGF. RESULTS On univariate analysis, recipient age (P=.048) cause of brain death (traumatic brain injury vs disease, P=.016), blood urea nitrogen (P=.002), serum creatinine (P=.001), arterial pH (P=.019), and serum sodium level (P=.012) just before organ procurement showed significant differences. On multivariate analysis, the cause of brain death (P=.015, hazard ratio [HR]: 7.086), the terminal serum creatinine>or=1.5 mg/dL before organ procurement (P=.007, HR: 10.132), and recipient age over >or=50 years (P=.021, HR: 7.767) were independent risk factors for the development of DGF. Graft failures occurred among 5/74 recipients with 5-year graft survivals between group 1 and group 2 of 91.7% and 84.6%, respectively. Patient death occurred in five cases, most by due to infection. The 5-year patient survival between groups 1 and 2 were 93.9% and 84.6%, respectively (P = .106). CONCLUSION The independent risk factors for DGF were the cause of brain death, the terminal creatinine level, and the recipient age. In deceased donor kidney transplantation, DGF may have less effect on long-term patient and graft survivals.

Can Preemptive Kidney Transplantation Guarantee Longer Graft Survival in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation? Single-Center Study

INTRODUCTION The benefit of preemptive kidney transplantation (KTx) for graft survival compared with nonpreemptive KTx is controversial. OBJECTIVE To analyze the influence of preemptive KTx on graft survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study included 476 of 531 patients who had undergone living-donor KTx between January 2000 and June 2007. Pediatric patients and those who had previously undergone KTx were excluded. Recipients were divided into 2 groups; group 1 included 413 patients (86.8%) who received grafts after institution of maintenance dialysis, and group 2 included 63 patients (13.2%) who underwent preemptive KTx. RESULTS Donor type and HLA mismatch demonstrated significant differences between the 2 groups. Group 1 had more living donors and fewer HLA mismatches. Warm ischemia time in group 2 was significantly shorter than in group 1. The serum creatinine concentration in group 1 on postoperative day 7 was significantly higher than in group 2. Five- and 10-year graft survival in groups 1 and 2, respectively, were 95.3% and 81.3% vs 92.9% and 92.9%. Graft survival was not significant insofar as duration and method of dialysis. At our institution, independent risk factors for graft survival in living-donor KTx are primary end-stage renal disease, acute cellular rejection episodes, and recipient age. CONCLUSION We observed no benefit on graft survival in recipients of living-donor KTx insofar as whether they had undergone previous dialysis.

Risk factors for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric liver transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus antigenemia.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections, associated with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are known to develop in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-infected transplant recipients due to the indirect effects of CMV. This study evaluated risk factors for PTLD among pediatric liver transplant recipients with CMV infections. We reviewed the medical records of 119 patients<or=18 years old who underwent liver transplantation between September 1996 and April 2009. Sixty-six subjects (55.5%) displayed CMV antigenemia during the study period; 15 (12.6%) developed PTLD. Of these, 10 developed PTLD after CMV antigenemia. The other patients (n=5) were excluded due to negative CMV antigenemia. The incidence of PTLD influenced by CMV infection was not significantly different from the incidence of PTLD without underlying CMV (P=.258). There were no differences in age, gender, antiviral prophylaxis, type of liver transplantation, or acute rejection episodes in the incidence of between patients with versus without PTLD. EBV but not CMV high-risk groups were a predictor for the development of PTLD (P=.035). CMV syndrome, tissue-invasive CMV disease, and CMV peak titer were not associated with an increased risk of PTLD. The primary risk factor for PTLD was EBV high-risk patients (donor positive/recipient negative). CMV disease was not associated with PTLD in pediatric liver transplant recipients with CMV infections.

Comparison of Outcomes of Living and Deceased Donor Kidney Grafts Surviving Longer Than 5 Years in Korea

BACKGROUND It is generally recognized that living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) grafts are superior to deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) grafts. We compared survival and functional outcomes of LDKT and DDKT grafts. METHODS Among 1000 kidneys transplanted from 1995 to 2008, we selected grafts surviving >5 years, excluding pediatric, multi-organ transplantation, and retransplantations (n=454). RESULTS There were 179 kidneys from deceased donors and 275 from living donors. Recipients showed no difference in age, gender, or cause of renal failure. Donors were younger in the DDKT group (30.6 vs 38.5 years; P<.05). There were more male donors in the DDKT group (73.2% vs 54.5%; P<.05). Deceased donors showed a greater mean number of HLA mismatches (4.2 vs 2.7; P<.05). Death-censored graft survival at 10 years showed no difference (DDKT 88.9% vs LDKT 88.9%; P=.99). Mean serum creatinine at 5 years was 1.41 mg/dL for DDKT and 1.44 mg/dL for LDKT (P=.75). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 5 years was 67.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 for DDKT and 62.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 for LDKT (P=.23). Twenty-three DDKT grafts (12.8%) and 47 LDKT grafts (17.1%) experienced acute rejection episodes (P=.22). DDKT recipients showed more cases of viral and bacterial infections compared with LDKT recipients (viral, 11.7% vs 2.2% [P<.05]; bacterial, 21.8% vs 7.3% [P<.05]). CONCLUSION Among kidney grafts surviving >5 years, there was no difference in survival or serum creatinine levels at 5 and 10 years between DDKT and LDKT grafts.

Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria: Should We Perform Transarterial Chemoembolization or Liver Transplantation?

Patients with unresectable, beyond Milan criteria, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) invariably undergo palliative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of conventional TACE versus liver transplantation (LT) in unresectable (beyond Milan criteria) HCC. Twelve patients underwent LT and 86 TACE for unresectable, beyond Milan criteria HCC. The inclusion criteria were a single tumor<or=6.5 cm or <or=5 tumors and all tumors<or=5 cm based on initial radiologic findings. We excluded patients with double primary cancers, age>60 years, vascular invasion, or extrahepatic spread. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis showed that TACE was a prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio, 16.66, P=.000). The LT group showed significantly better survival than the TACE cohort. Two cases (16.7%) in the LT group recurred at a median time of 13.5 months. Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 100%, 88.9%, and 76.2% in the LT group, and 85.6%, 45.6%, and 21.4% in the TACE group, respectively. Patients with unresectable, beyond Milan criteria HCC should be given the option to receive LDLT, because LT offers a significantly better likelihood of survival than TACE.

Early and Delayed Onset Cytomegalovirus Infection of Liver Transplant Recipients in Endemic Areas

BACKGROUND The delayed onset of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after liver transplantation can place patients at risk for graft failure and mortality. METHODS We compared early versus delayed onset of CMV infection to identify risk factors for mortality among liver transplant recipients in an endemic area. RESULTS Among 710 consecutive adult liver transplant recipients, incidence of CMV infection was 47.5% (337/710). Male gender, biliary complications, acute rejection episodes, antilymphocyte antibodies high hemoglobin, and high total bilirubin were significantly different among patients with delayed versus early onset CMV infections. The overall incidence of early versus delayed CMV infections was 43.1% (306/710) versus 4.4% (31/710). Among them, 11.1% (34/306) and 25.8% (8/31) of patients developed CMV disease. CONCLUSION These results showed that a higher proportion of patients developed disease among delayed CMV infected patients (P=.039). The overall and graft survival curves for patients with early onset CMV infections were better than those of patients who had delayed onset CMV infections (P=.026 and P=.014). Recurrence of hepatitis B virus, hepatic dysfunction, and retransplantation were associated with increased mortality among patients who had a delayed CMV infection.