J.J. Cornelissen

An EBMT registry matched study of allogeneic stem cell transplants for lymphoma : allogeneic transplantation is associated with a lower relapse rate but a higher procedure-related mortality rate than autologous transplantation

Summary:The role of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in lymphoma remains uncertain. We have analyzed 1185 allogeneic transplants for lymphoma reported to the EBMT registry between 1982 and 1998 and compared the results with those of 14 687 autologous procedures performed over the same period. Patients receiving allogeneic transplants were subdivided according to histology: low-grade non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) 231 patients; intermediate-grade NHL 147 patients; high-grade NHL 255 patients; lymphoblastic NHL 314 patients; Burkitts lymphoma 71 patients; and Hodgkins disease 167 patients. These patients received allogeneic transplants as their first transplant procedure. Actuarial overall survival (OS) at 4 years from transplantation was: low-grade NHL 51.1%; intermediate-grade NHL 38.3%; high-grade NHL 41.2%; lymphoblastic lymphoma 42.0% years; Burkitts lymphoma 37.1%; and Hodgkins disease 24.7% years. These outcomes are relatively poor because of the high procedure-related mortality associated with these procedures, particularly in patients with Hodgkins disease (51.7% actuarial procedure-related mortality at 4 years). Multivariate analysis showed that for all lymphomas apart from Hodgkins disease, status at transplantation significantly affected outcome. A matched analysis was performed: for all categories of lymphoma, OS was better for autologous than for allogeneic transplantation. Relapse rate was better in the allogeneic group for low-, intermediate- and high-grade, and lymphoblastic NHL. It was equivalent for Burkitts lymphoma and worse in the allogeneic group for Hodgkins disease. Allogeneic transplantation appears to be superior to autologous procedures in terms of producing a lower relapse rate. The toxicity of allogeneic procedures must however be reduced before this translates into an improvement in OS.

Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma After Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Predictive Factors for Response and Long-Term Outcome

PURPOSE To determine the efficacy, toxicity, and long-term outcome and prognostic factors of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (AlloSCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-seven patients received 52 DLI courses at a median of 30 months after the previous AlloSCT. Reinduction therapy was administered to 13 patients before DLI. RESULTS Reinduction therapy was successful in eight of 13 patients. Fourteen patients (52%) responded to DLI, including six patients (22%) who achieved a complete remission (CR). Five patients responded after T-cell dose escalation in subsequent DLIs. Four patients experienced relapse or disease progression (three from partial response and one from CR). Five patients remain in remission more than 30 months after DLI. Major toxicity was acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which was present in 55% and 26% of patients, respectively. Two patients died from bone marrow aplasia. Median overall survival of all patients was 18 months. Overall survival was 11 months for DLI-resistant patients and has not been reached for the responding patients. In two patients, sustained molecular remission was observed. The factors that were correlated with response to DLI were a T-cell dose of more than 1.10(8) cells/kg, response to reinduction therapy, and chemotherapy-sensitive disease before AlloSCT. CONCLUSION These data confirm the potential and durable graft-versus-myeloma effect of DLI in patients with relapsed MM after AlloSCT. Future studies should be aimed at increasing response rates, especially in patients with chemoresistant disease, and reducing toxicity by limiting GVHD. Adjuvant DLI seems an attractive and promising approach for patients who do not achieve a molecular remission after AlloSCT.

Allogeneic and autologous transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe 2009

The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation regularly publishes special reports on the current practice of haematopoietic SCT for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders in Europe. Major changes have occurred since the first report was published. HSCT today includes grafting with allogeneic and autologous stem cells derived from BM, peripheral blood and cord blood. With reduced-intensity conditioning regimens in allogeneic transplantation, the age limit has increased, permitting the inclusion of older patients. New indications have emerged, such as autoimmune disorders and AL amyloidosis for autologous HSCT and solid tumours, myeloproliferative syndromes and specific subgroups of lymphomas for allogeneic transplants. The introduction of alternative therapies, such as imatinib for CML, has challenged well-established indications. An updated report with revised tables and operating definitions is presented.

Intense T cell depletion followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation for severe multiple sclerosis

Background: Certain stem cell transplantation procedures might slow down inflammatory pathology in multiple sclerosis (MS). Aims: To halt disease progression in aggressive MS by a bone marrow transplantation (BMT) protocol aimed at maximum T cell suppression. Methods: Autologous BMT was performed in 14 patients with rapid secondary progressive MS (median EDSS score at baseline, 6; median disease duration, five years). To accomplish rigorous T cell ablation, a strong conditioning protocol was chosen—cyclophosphamide, total body irradiation, and antithymocyte globulin. To minimise the possibility of reinfusing mature T cells in the graft, bone marrow, not peripheral blood, was used as the CD34+ stem cell source. Results: Median follow up was 36 months (range, 7–36). Post-transplant haemopoietic recovery was successful in all patients. Early toxicity included Epstein-Barr virus related post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. Longterm effects were development of antithyroid antibodies (three) and myelodysplastic syndrome (one). One patient died of progressive disease five years after transplantation. Treatment failure, defined by EDSS increase sustained for six months or more, was seen in nine patients and stabilisation or improvement in five. Other clinical parameters generally showed the same outcome. No gadolinium enhanced lesions were seen on post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging, in either cerebral or spinal cord scans. However, cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands remained positive in most cases. Conclusions: This strong immunosuppressive regimen did not prevent clinical progression in patients with aggressive secondary MS. The lack of efficacy, together with some serious side effects, does not favour the use of similar rigorous T cell depleting protocols in the future.

How to improve the search for an unrelated haematopoietic stem cell donor. Faster is better than more

Summary:Many patients do not reach haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Shortage of unrelated donors (UDs) is still seen as the main cause. However, with a worldwide UD pool containing more than 8 million donors, it is possible that other impediments are becoming more important. We analysed 549 UD searches for Dutch patients, performed between 1987 and 2000, in order to find the reasons for failure or success to reach transplantation. Between 1996 and 2000, 59% of the patients of Northwest European origin received a graft from an UD with a median time span of 4.4 months from the start of the search. In all, 11% of the patients lacked a compatible donor, while 30% became medically unfit for transplantation. This is in contrast to the patients of non-Northwest European origin for whom UD shortage is still the most important impediment; only 32% were transplanted while 50% lacked a compatible donor. We conclude that the shortage of donors is no longer the biggest constraint in unrelated stem cell transplantation for patients of Northwest European origin. It may be more effective to optimize the chance on transplantation by making the search process more efficient.

Problems and possible solutions in finding an unrelated bone marrow donor. Results of consecutive searches for 240 Dutch patients.

To evaluate the efficiency of our protocol for finding an HLA matched unrelated bone marrow donor, search results obtained between 1990 and 1995 for 240 Dutch patients were analyzed. The percentage of patients for whom, according to information given by the registries, a fully split-HLA antigen matched donor is available, increased from 24% in 1990 to over 70% in 1995. As a result the percentage of patients transplanted rose from about 24% in 1990–1991 to 44% in 1994–1995. The median time between the start of the search and transplantation was about 6 months. The systematic use of Bone Marrow Donors Worldwide (BMDW) which comprises the HLA groups of all volunteer bone marrow donors in Europe, Israel, South Africa, North America, Canada, India, Australia and New Zealand has been essential in this context. While searching for a suitable donor several problems were encountered such as unavailability of donors (12%) and discordant typing results (8%; range <1% to >25%). Thus it is advisable to select several donors for a patient. For 86% of patients with at least one HLA identical donor on the serological level for HLA-A,-B,-DR,-DQ, an HLA-DRB1/3/4/5, and -DQB1 identical donor could be identified. As expected, patients with two frequent haplotypes in strong linkage disequilibrium had the best chance of obtaining an HLA matched donor. Unexpectedly, patients with only one such haplotype had an almost similar chance. It could be calculated that HLA-DR typing of HLA-A,-B identical donors was rarely cost-effective after 1992. Only 12 of the 75 transplanted patients (16%) typeable at DNA level for class II, turned out to be completely matched for HLA-A,-B,-C,-DRB1/3/4/5,-DQB1,-DPB1 and had a negative MLC test. In the group of patients transplanted with a fully matched donor and for whom a CTLp test was performed, only 7% (4/54) of the tests were negative. Search results for patients of non-European origin were dismal, with only four of 26 patients referred being transplanted. In summary, of the 240 patients for whom the Europdonor office searched for a donor, about one-third were transplanted, one-third had a potential donor but did not reach transplantation, while for the remaining one-third of patients no suitable donor could be found.

Comparative therapeutic value of post-remission approaches in patients with acute myeloid leukemia aged 40–60 years

The preferred type of post-remission therapy (PRT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) is a subject of continued debate, especially in patients at higher risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM), including patients >40 years of age. We report results of a time-dependent multivariable analysis of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) (n=337) versus chemotherapy (n=271) or autologous HSCT (autoHSCT) (n=152) in 760 patients aged 40–60 years with AML in CR1. Patients receiving alloHSCT showed improved overall survival (OS) as compared with chemotherapy (respectively, 57±3% vs 40±3% at 5 years, P<0.001). Comparable OS was observed following alloHSCT and autoHSCT in patients with intermediate-risk AML (60±4 vs 54±5%). However, alloHSCT was associated with less relapse (hazard ratio (HR) 0.51, P<0.001) and better relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR 0.74, P=0.029) as compared with autoHSCT in intermediate-risk AMLs. AlloHSCT was applied following myeloablative conditioning (n=157) or reduced intensity conditioning (n=180), resulting in less NRM, but comparable outcome with respect to OS, RFS and relapse. Collectively, these results show that alloHSCT is to be preferred over chemotherapy as PRT in patients with intermediate- and poor-risk AML aged 40–60 years, whereas autoHSCT remains a treatment option to be considered in patients with intermediate-risk AML.

The impact of donor gender on outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: reduced relapse risk in female to male transplants

Summary:The impact of the donor gender on outcome in HLA-identical sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma was studied in a retrospective registry study of 1312 patients (476 male to male (M → M); 334 female to male (F → M); 258 male to female (M → F); 244 female to female (F → F) reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). The best overall survival (OS) from the time of transplantation was found in F → F (median 41 months) with no significant difference between other groups (median 25 months in M → M, 18 months in F → M, 19 months in M → F) despite a significantly higher nonrelapse mortality in F → M. This was due to a significantly lower relapse rate (REL) in F → M compared to all other groups. Before 1994, OS was poorer in F → M than in M → M, which improved to similarity from 1994 onwards (median 29 months in M → M and 25 months in F → M). The reduced REL contributed to this improvement in F → M indicting a gender-specific graft vs myeloma effect. Therefore, a female donor is as good as a male one for male patients, while for female patients gender disparity is a negative factor for outcome.

Induction therapy with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) and intermediate-dose melphalan (IDM) followed by autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

We performed a phase II study to test the efficacy and feasibility of induction therapy with vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) and intermediate-dose melphalan, 70 mg/m2 (IDM), to autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). A total of 77 patients received two cycles of VAD (n = 62) and/or two cycles of i.v. IDM 70 mg/m2 (n = 15) combined with G-CSF. PBSC were harvested after the first IDM, successfully in 87% of patients. Patients with a response to induction received myeloablative therapy with PBSCT (n = 50) followed by IFN maintenance or allo-BMT (n = 11). Seventy-two per cent of patients achieved a response after VAD which increased to 85% after IDM. Of patients who received PBSCT and allo-BMT, 24% and 45% achieved CR, respectively. Toxicity of induction consisted mainly of bone marrow suppression after IDM (median 8 days) with prolonged aplasia in 11% of patients after the second IDM. Only six infections WHO grade 3 occurred during induction. Treatment-related mortality of PBSCT and allo-BMT was 6% and 18%, respectively. Median time of follow-up is 44 months, and 50% of patients after PBSCT and 60% of patients after allo-BMT are still in remission. Survival rates of all patients were 82%, 75% and 63%, and for transplanted patients 86%, 79% and 68% after 12, 24 and 36 months. Well known prognostic factors, including α-IFN maintenance after PBSCT, were not significant for response or survival although patients in CR after allo-BMT had a strong tendency for better outcome. VAD/IDM is an effective and safe induction therapy for autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Based on these observations a phase III trial was started in October 1995 comparing IFN maintenance with PBSCT and allo-BMT after response to induction with VAD and IDM.

Genotypically nonidentical related donors for transplantation of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: comparison with unrelated donor transplantation and autologous stem cell transplantation

Transplantation with histocompatible identical siblings is a curative treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Alternative treatments, such as transplantation with other family donors, are an option for patients without HLA-identical siblings. This study evaluated transplantation with genotypically nonidentical family donors and compared the results to those obtained with unrelated donors and autologous stem cell transplantation. Overall 3-year survival was 35% for the 79 patients transplanted using genotypically nonidentical donors, DFS was 31%, relapse risk 16%, and the treatment-related mortality (TRM) 62%. Patients transplanted using phenotypically identical family donors had a significantly superior survival and a lower TRM than patients transplanted with mismatched family donors. Age had no influence on the outcome of transplantation. The DFS of patients transplanted in early stage of the disease was 42% compared to 28% in patients transplanted with more advanced disease (P = 0.03). The results of transplantation with mismatched family donors were comparable to those obtained with unrelated donor transplantation. This suggests that nonidentical family donors may be considered if a fully matched unrelated donor is not available. The TRM of patients transplanted with nonidentical family donors is significantly higher than the TRM of patients transplanted with autologous stem cells. The disease-free survival of ASCT is not inferior to allogeneic transplantation using nonidentical family donors, and the intensity of the treatment is much lower. The choice of ASCT or alternative donor transplantation must be influenced by the age of the patient and the risk of relapse. For patients under the age of 20 years the treatment of choice may indeed be an alternative donor transplantation.