J.J. Perry

Stratified, Urgent Care for Transient Ischemic Attack Results in Low Stroke Rates

Background and Purpose— Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a marker for early risk of stroke. No previous studies have assessed the use of urgent stroke prevention clinics for emergency department (ED) patients with TIA. We hypothesized that an ABCD2-based ED triaging tool for TIA with outpatient management would be associated with lower 90-day stroke rate than that predicted by ABCD2. Methods— A cohort of prospectively identified patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of TIA seen in 2 tertiary-care EDs. These patients were divided into 3 strata based on their ACBD2 score, and triage targets were set for each stratum. All patients received the same standard of care in the Stroke Clinic regardless of their risk score. Primary outcome was stroke by 90 days of index TIA. Secondary outcomes were subsequent TIA, myocardial infarction, or death. Results— One-thousand ninety-three patients met the inclusion criteria; 982 patients completed 90-day follow-up and comprised the final cohort. After stratification, 32%, 49%, and 19% of patients were categorized as low-, moderate-, or high-risk, respectively. The overall 90-day risk of stroke in all patients was 3.2%, compared with the ABCD2-predicted risk of 9.2%. Only 1.6% of patients with TIA/minor stroke were admitted from the ED. The risk of subsequent TIA, myocardial infarction, or death by 90 days was 5.5%, 0.1%, and 1.7%, respectively. Conclusion— Outpatient care in a rapid-access stroke prevention clinic using the ABCD2 score for triage resulted in a low 90-day stroke rate for patients in the ED with TIA. Benefit occurred without requiring admission for most patients.

Do β-blockers reduce short-term mortality following acute myocardial infarction? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a major cause of death and β-blockers are known to reduce long-term mortality in post-AMI patients. We sought to determine whether patients receiving β-blockers acutely (within 72 h) following AMI had a lower mortality rate at 6 weeks than patients receiving placebo. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials that assessed 6-week mortality and compared β-blockers with placebo in patients randomized within the first 72 hours following AMI. We searched these databases: MEDLINE (1966‐2006), EMBASE (1980‐2007), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health Star (1966‐2007), Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, ACP Journal Club (1991‐2007), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect (< 1st quarter 2007) and Conference Papers Index (1984‐2007). Two blinded reviewers extracted the data and rated study quality using the Jadad score and the adequacy of allocation concealment score, which was adopted by the Cochrane group. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) using a random effect model and performed sensitivity analyses to explore the stability of the overall treatment effect. Results: We included 18 studies (13 were rated high-quality) with 74 643 enrolled participants and had 5095 deaths. Compared with placebo, adding β-blockers to other interventions within 72 hours after AMI did not result in a statistically significant reduction in 6-week mortality (OR 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90‐1.01). When restricted to high quality studies, the OR for 6-week mortality reduction was 0.96 (95% CI 0.91‐1.02). We found similar results including studies that enrolled patients within 24 hours after AMI. However, a subgroup analysis that excluded high-risk patients with Killip class III and above showed that β-blockers resulted in a significant reduction in short-term mortality (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88‐0.99). Conclusion: Acute intervention with β-blockers does not result in a statistically significant shortterm survival benefit following AMI but may be beneficial for low-risk (Killip class I) patients.

The effect of early in-hospital medication review on health outcomes: a systematic review

AIMSnAdverse drug events are an important cause of emergency department visits, unplanned admissions and prolonged hospital stays. Our objective was to synthesize the evidence on the effect of early in-hospital pharmacist-led medication review on patient-oriented outcomes based on observed data.nnnMETHODSnWe systematically searched eight bibliographic reference databases, electronic grey literature, medical journals, conference proceedings, trial registries and bibliographies of relevant papers. We included studies that employed random or quasi-random methods to allocate subjects to pharmacist-led medication review or control. Medication review had to include, at a minimum, obtaining a best possible medication history and reviewing medications for appropriateness and adverse drug events. The intervention had to be initiated within 24 h of emergency department presentation or 72 h of admission. We extracted data in duplicate and pooled outcomes from clinically homogeneous studies of the same design using random effects meta-analysis.nnnRESULTSnWe retrieved 4549 titles of which seven were included, reporting the outcomes of 3292 patients. We pooled data from studies of the same design, and found no significant differences in length of hospital admission (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.04 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.63, 1.55), mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI 0.69, 1.72), readmissions (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.81, 1.63) or emergency department revisits at 3 months (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.27, 1.32). Two large studies reporting reductions in readmissions could not be included in our pooled estimates due to differences in study design.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWide confidence intervals suggest that additional research is likely to influence the effect size estimates and clarify the effect of medication review on patient-oriented outcomes. This systematic review failed to identify an effect of pharmacist-led medication review on health outcomes.