J.K. Bhama

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients

Increasing use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has been accompanied by rising incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Objectives of this study were to determine the yearly incidence of GIB in LVAD recipients, compare outcomes of continuous-flow (CF) and pulsatile-flow LVAD eras, and investigate for risk factors. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2005 to 2010 was analyzed. Primary outcome of interest was incidence of GIB in LVAD recipients. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to examine independent associations of GIB with risk factors and outcomes. An estimated 8,879 LVAD index admissions and 8,722 readmissions in LVAD recipients over 6 years were analyzed. The yearly incidence of GIB after LVAD implantation increased from 5% in 2005 to 10% in 2010. On multivariate regression analysis, the odds of GIB was 3.24 times greater (95% confidence interval 1.53 to 6.89) in the era of CF LVADs than in the era of pulsatile-flow LVADs. Compared to their younger counterparts, in LVAD recipients aged >65 years, the adjusted odds of GIB was 20.5 times greater (95% confidence interval 2.24 to 188). GIB did not significantly increase the inhospital mortality but increased the inpatient length of stay. In conclusion, the incidence of GIB in LVAD recipients has increased since the use of CF LVADs has increased, leading to greater inpatient lengths of stay and hospital charges. Older recipients of CF LVADs appear to be at a greater risk of GIB.

Clinical experience with temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support

Objectives This study sought to determine if indication for support affects the outcomes after temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support after postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, cardiac transplant, or left ventricular assist device placement. Methods A retrospective review was performed on 80 patients receiving a right ventricular assist device. Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to compare survival between groups. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for failure to wean from support. Results The indication for support was postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 13 patients (16%), cardiac transplant in 25 patients (31%), and left ventricular assist device in 42 patients (53%). Median support time was 6 days. Device was successfully weaned in 6 postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock cases (46%), 21 cardiac transplant cases (84%), and 35 left ventricular assist device cases (83%). Survival was worse for patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock compared with patients with a left ventricular assist device. Survival up to 3 months was better for patients who received immediate (n = 43) versus delayed (n = 37) support (79% vs 46%, P = .003). Weaning and survival remained static across implant era. Risk factor analysis identified postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock indication (odds ratio, 0.161; P = .007; confidence interval, 0.043‐0.600) as an independent negative predictor of weaning from mechanical support. Conclusions Temporary right ventricular mechanical support remains an effective treatment strategy after left ventricular assist device placement with immediate support resulting in superior short‐term survival. Caution should be applied in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock when weaning and survival are poor. Overall survival outcomes have remained relatively static over time.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Inflow Cannula Position May Contribute to the Development of HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Pump Thrombosis

Background: Pump thrombosis (PT) is a dreaded complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Problems with inflow cannula (IC) position may precipitate thrombus development. We sought to determine if IC position contributes to the development of PT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 76 HeartMate II LVAD implants. The angle of the IC (AIC) to the horizontal plane was measured on chest x-rays. Patients who developed PT (PT group) were compared to the remaining patients (control group). Results: The mean age at implantation was 56 ± 14 years, and 82% of the patients were male. Ten patients (13%) developed PT. Six (60%) required device exchange, and 4 (40%) were managed with anticoagulation and/or thrombolysis. The median AIC for all patients at implantation was 59° (range, 38°-98°; 25th-75th interquartile range, 50°-75°). In the PT group, the median AIC was larger at the time of PT diagnosis compared to implantation (70° vs 60°, P = 0.005). In the control group, the median AIC was also larger at follow-up compared to implantation (61° vs 58°, P < 0.001) although to a lesser degree than in the PT group. No difference was seen in the median AIC between the PT group and the control group at implantation (60° vs 58°, respectively; P = 0.668) or at follow-up (70° vs 61°, respectively; P = 0.309). However, the median AIC at follow-up in the PT group was significantly larger than the median AIC at implantation in the control group (70° vs 58°, respectively; P = 0.014). Conclusion: The HeartMate II LVAD IC position contributes to the development of PT. Regular monitoring of cannula position may help identify patients at risk for this problem.

Postoperative Swallowing Assessment After Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUNDnDysphagia, aspiration, and potential pneumonia represent a major source of morbidity in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Conditions that potentiate dysphagia and aspiration include frailty and prolonged intubation. Our group of speech-language pathologists has been actively involved in performance of a bedside evaluation of swallowing, and instrumental evaluation of swallowing with modified barium swallow, and postoperative management in patients undergoing lung transplantation.nnnMETHODSnAll lung transplant patients from April 2009 to September 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. A clinical bedside examination was performed by the speech-language pathology team, followed by a modified barium swallow or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.nnnRESULTSnA total of 321 patients were referred for evaluation. Twenty-four patients were unable to complete the evaluation. Clinical signs of aspiration were apparent in 160 patients (54%). Deep laryngeal penetration or aspiration were identified in 198 (67%) patients during instrumental testing. A group of 81 patients (27%) had an entirely normal clinical examination, but were found to have either deep penetration or aspiration.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe majority of patients aspirate after lung transplantation. Clinical bedside examination is not sensitive enough and will fail to identify patients with silent aspiration. A standard of practice following lung transplantation has been established that helpsxa0avoid postoperative aspiration associated with complications.