J. K.T. Lee

Renal Cysts and Urinomas

Renal cysts are a common imaging finding. Although most cysts never have symptoms, some cause pain, collecting system compression, hematuria, hypertension, and secondary infection. The mere presence of a cyst is not an indication for intervention, but treatment may be indicated in symptomatic patients or those with secondary obstruction. Urinomas generally are a contained collection of urine outside of the normal pathways where urine travels. As such, urinomas can arise anywhere from the upper abdomen down into the low pelvis and have a variety of etiologies. Ureteral obstruction with forniceal rupture and trauma (blunt, penetrating, or iatrogenic) are the most common causes of urinomas. When urinomas arise spontaneously, the likely cause varies with the patients age. Blunt or penetrating trauma can cause perinephric urinomas by two mechanisms-direct disruption of the pelvis or collecting system or by degeneration of nonviable tissue. These urinomas are often perinephric, but can also occur in a subcapsular location. This review will discuss diagnosis, classification, and treatment of renal cysts and urinomas.

Endovascular Treatment of Superior Mesenteric Artery Pseudoaneurysms Using Covered Stents in Six Patients

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to evaluate our experience with the use of endovascular treatments for superior mesenteric artery (SMA) pseudoaneurysms using covered stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2002 and 2011, six patients (mean age, 41.7 years; range, 23-65 years) with SMA pseudoaneurysms were treated percutaneously with the placement of covered stents at our institution. The causes of SMA pseudoaneurysms were penetrating trauma (n = 2), blunt trauma (n = 1), and previous surgical procedures (n = 3). The mean diameter of the SMA pseudoaneurysms was 16 mm (range, 4-24 mm). Technical success and clinical success were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Immediate technical success, defined as exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm and lack of active extravasation, was achieved in all six patients. Secondary balloon angioplasty was needed in one patient with residual narrowing. There was a small dissection of the proximal SMA necessitating placement of a second bare stent across the dissection. A second covered stent (Fluency stent, 8 mm) was placed in the same patient because of recurrent bleeding due to a type II endoleak 5 days after the first covered stent had been placed. This patient had no subsequent episodes of bleeding or bowel ischemia. Follow-up CT in the remaining five patients (mean, 21 months; range, 1-58 months) confirmed stent patency and preserved distal arterial flow to the bowel without episodes of bleeding or bowel ischemia during follow-up (mean, 27 months; range, 11-58 months). CONCLUSION Percutaneous endovascular treatment using a covered stent may be a safe and feasible tool for SMA pseudoaneurysms.