J.L. Geiger

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer☆

OBJECTIVE Nivolumab is the first drug to demonstrate a survival benefit for platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. We performed a cost-utility analysis to assess the economic value of nivolumab as compared to alternative standard agents in this context. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using data from the CheckMate 141 trial, we constructed a Markov simulation model from the US payers perspective to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab compared to physician choice of either cetuximab, methotrexate or docetaxel. Alternative strategies considered included: single-agent cetuximab, methotrexate or docetaxel, or first testing for PD-L1 to select for nivolumab. Costs were extracted from Medicare and utilities from the literature and CheckMate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was used to evaluate parameter uncertainty.

A matched comparison of human papillomavirus–induced squamous cancer of unknown primary with early oropharynx cancer

100,000/QALY was the primary threshold for cost-effectiveness. RESULTS When comparing nivolumab to the standard arm of CheckMate, nivolumab demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of

Definitive chemoradiation in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx: Long-term outcomes and toxicity

140,672/QALY. When comparing standard therapies, methotrexate was the most cost-effective with similar results for docetaxel. Nivolumab was cost-effective compared to single-agent cetuximab (ICER

Adjuvant Chemoradiation After Surgical Resection in Elderly Patients With High-Risk Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A National Cancer Database Analysis

89,786/QALY). Treatment selection by PD-L1 immunohistochemistry did not markedly improve the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab. Factors likely to positively impact the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab include better baseline quality-of-life, poor tolerability of standard treatments and/or a lower cost of nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab is preferred to single-agent cetuximab but requires a willingness-to-pay of at least

Supplanting the Conventional Risk Groups of Oral Cavity Cancers with Gene Expression-Based Signatures

150,000/QALY to be considered cost-effective when compared to docetaxel or methotrexate. Selection by PD-L1 does not markedly improve the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab. This informs patient selection and clinical care-path development.

Suboptimal Outcomes in Patients With Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck With Nodal Metastases Treated With Surgery and Radiation therapy

Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)–induced cancer of unknown primary (CUP) are generally excluded from clinical trials, despite surgical series reporting detection rates of occult oropharynx primaries of >80%. We performed a matched‐pair analysis to compare outcomes between T0N1‐3M0 HPV+ CUP and T1‐2N1‐3M0 HPV+ oropharynx known primary (OPX).

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Organ Transplant Recipients: A Single Institutional Experience

Background/Aim: Definitive chemoradiation (CRT) is a common approach for locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with the goal of organ preservation. Reports on long-term oncologic and functional outcomes have been limited. This study reports on outcomes utilizing this approach at a single institution over 30 years. Materials and Methods: Medical records for patients with stage III-IVB SCC of the hypopharynx were retrospectively reviewed. Patient and disease-related factors were identified and analyzed for impact on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival, distant failure, and locoregional failure. Results: A total of 54 patients were identified who were treated with definitive CRT to a mean dose of 72 Gy. With a median follow-up period of 49.8 months, 5- and 10-year OS was 62% and 43% respectively. Five and 10-year CSS were 74% and 72% respectively. Ten-year local control was 78%. Of the 37 patients with no treatment failure, 29% experienced a grade 3 or higher late toxicity, with the majority resolving during continued long-term follow-up. Conclusion: This study demonstrates good outcomes with long-term follow-up with acceptable rates of late toxicities. The findings here represent the longest published median follow-up in this population and validate the strategy of organ preservation.