J. L. Van Laethem

Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

M. Ducreux1,2, A. Sa. Cuhna2,3, C. Caramella4, A. Hollebecque1,5, P. Burtin1, D. Goéré6, T. Seufferlein7, K. Haustermans8, J. L. Van Laethem9, T. Conroy10 & D. Arnold11, on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Committee* Département de médecine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Sud, le Kremlin Bicêtre; Département de Chirugie Hépato-biliaire, Hopital Paul Brousse, Villejuif; Département d’imagerie; Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique; Département de Chirurgie Générale, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital Medical Center, Ulm, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Kankerinstitute, Leuven; Departement of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Erasme, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Département de médecine, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre lés Nancy, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Tumor Biology Center, Freiburg, Germany

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II study

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) are active as first-line therapy against advanced pancreatic cancer. This study aims to evaluate the activity and tolerability of this combination in patients refractory to standard gemcitabine (GEM). A total of 33 patients (median age of 57) were included with locally advanced and metastatic evaluable diseases, who had progressed during or following GEM therapy. The GEMOX regimen consisted of 1000 mg m−2 of GEM at a 100-min infusion on day 1, followed on day 2 by 100 mg m−2 of oxaliplatin at a 2-h infusion; a cycle that was given every 2 weeks. All patients received at least one cycle of GEMOX (median 5; range 1–29). Response by 31 evaluable patients was as follows: PR: 7/31(22.6%), s.d. ⩾8 weeks: 11/31(35.5%), s.d. <8 weeks: 1/31(3.2%), PD: 12/31(38.7%). Median duration of response and TTP were 4.5 and 4.2 months, respectively. Median survival was 6 months (range 0.5–21). Clinical benefit response was observed in 17/31 patients (54.8%). Grade III/IV non-neurologic toxicities occurred in 12/33 patients (36.3%), and grade I, II, and III neuropathy in 17(51%), 3(9%), and 4(12%) patients, respectively. GEMOX is a well-tolerated, active regimen that may provide a benefit to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after progression following standard gemcitabine treatment.

Short course chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized multicentric phase II study

BACKGROUND Induction chemotherapy has been suggested to impact on preoperative chemoradiation efficacy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). To evaluate in LARC patients, the feasibility and efficacy of a short intense course of induction oxaliplatin before preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with T2-T4/N+ rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to arm A-preoperative CRT with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion followed by surgery-or arm B-induction oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-FU followed by CRT and surgery. The primary end point was the rate of ypT0-1N0 stage achievement. RESULTS Fifty seven patients were randomly assigned (arm A/B: 29/28) and evaluated for planned interim analysis. On an intention-to-treat basis, the ypT0-1N0 rate for arms A and B were 34.5% (95% CI: 17.2% to 51.8%) and 32.1% (95% CI: 14.8% to 49.4%), respectively, and the study therefore was closed prematurely for futility. There were no statistically significant differences in other end points including pathological complete response, tumor regression and sphincter preservation. Completion of the preoperative CRT sequence was similar in both groups. Grade 3/4 toxicity was significantly higher in arm B. CONCLUSIONS Short intense induction oxaliplatin is feasible in LARC patients without compromising the preoperative CRT completion, although the current analysis does not indicate increased locoregional impact on standard therapy.

A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ganitumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: the GAMMA trial

BACKGROUND This double-blind, phase 3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ganitumab combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned 2 : 2 : 1 to receive intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) plus placebo, ganitumab 12 mg/kg, or ganitumab 20 mg/kg (days 1 and 15 of each cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and efficacy by levels of circulating biomarkers. RESULTS Overall, 322 patients were randomly assigned to placebo, 318 to ganitumab 12 mg/kg, and 160 to ganitumab 20 mg/kg. The study was stopped based on results from a preplanned futility analysis; the final results are reported. Median OS was 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.3-8.2] in the placebo arm, 7.0 months (95% CI, 6.2-8.5) in the ganitumab 12-mg/kg arm [hazard ratio (HR), 1.00; 95% CI, 0.82-1.21; P = 0.494], and 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.4-8.5) in the ganitumab 20-mg/kg arm (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.76-1.23; P = 0.397). Median PFS was 3.7, 3.6 (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.20; P = 0.520), and 3.7 months (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77-1.22; P = 0.403), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed with ganitumab plus gemcitabine. The circulating biomarkers assessed [insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), IGF-binding protein-2, and -3] were not associated with a treatment effect on OS or PFS by ganitumab. CONCLUSION Ganitumab combined with gemcitabine had manageable toxicity but did not improve OS, compared with gemcitabine alone in unselected patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01231347.

Prognostic value of KRAS mutations in stage III colon cancer: post-hoc analysis of the PETACC8 phase III trial dataset

BACKGROUND The prognostic value of KRAS mutations in colon adenocarcinoma is controversial. We examined this question as an ancillary study of the PETACC8 phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed the prognostic impact of KRAS exon 2 mutations in stage III colon cancer patients (n = 1657) receiving adjuvant FOLFOX ± cetuximab therapy included in the PETACC8 trial. Patients with BRAF-mutated cancers were excluded and, as no difference was found for time to recurrence (TTR) and disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms, both were pooled for analysis. Associations with TTR and DFS were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS KRAS mutations were found in 638 of 1657 tumors and linked to shorter TTR (P < 0.001). However, when specific mutations were compared with wild-type, codon 12 mutations [hazard ratio (HR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35-2.04; P < 0.001] but not codon 13 (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.85-1.79; P = 0.26) were significantly associated with shorter TTR, independently of other covariates. The interaction test showed that, regarding tumor location (distal versus proximal), KRAS genotype affects differently on recurrence (P = 0.02) and DFS (P = 0.042). Subgroup analysis showed that KRAS only affected TTR and DFS in distal tumors (n = 1043; 692 wild type; 351 mutated), with an increased risk of relapse (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.51-2.56; P < 0.0001) for KRAS codon 12 mutations and a borderline significance for codon 13 mutations (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00-2.56; P = 0.051). CONCLUSION KRAS exon 2 mutations are independent predictors of shorter TTR in patients with resected stage III distal colon cancers receiving adjuvant therapy. Future clinical trials in the adjuvant setting should consider both the tumor location and KRAS mutations as important stratification factors. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER This is an ancillary study of the PETACC8 trial: EUDRACT 2005-003463-23.

Prognostic Factors and Prognostic Index for Chemonaïve and Gemcitabine-Refractory Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Background: Gemcitabine monotherapy is the cornerstone of the treatment of patients suffering from advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). For a few years, new chemotherapeutic agents and combinations have been under validation. The use of such treatment makes it necessary to determine factors that could predict survival time. Patients and Methods: To identify factors that predict survival time in chemonaïve patients with advanced PC and after gemcitabine failure, a retrospective analysis was performed on patients with advanced PC coming from phase II and III studies and treated with gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy. Results: Ninety-nine patients (median age 66 years, range 27–87) suffering from pathologically proven unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were reviewed. Median overall survival time for the whole population was 251 days and progression-free survival in first- and second-line treatment was 108 and 67 days, respectively. The Cox regression analysis identified aspartate transaminase >53 IU/l, weight loss ≧10% and Karnofsky performance status <90 as significant independent negative prognostic factors in first-line and CA 19-9 >400 IU/ml and albumin ≤3.5 mg/dl in second-line chemotherapy. A prognostic index was calculated from the regression coefficients for each independent prognostic factor and used to classify the patients in 3 different groups with good, intermediate and poor prognosis. The prognosis index in chemonaïve and gemcitabine-refractory patients was (Karnofsy performance status × 0.52) + (weight loss × 1.10) + (aspartate transaminase × 0.82) and (albumin × 1.40) + (CA 19-9 × 0.74), respectively. Conclusions: Predictive factors could be identified in first- and second-line treatments, although they require prospective validation before they could be used in the design and analysis of future clinical trials.

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a multicentre Rare Cancer Network study.

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. The aims of this retrospective study were to analyze the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes of these patients. Between 1994 and 2004, 24 patients with SCCE from several centers were reviewed for data on demographics, presenting symptoms, diagnosis, disease stage, type of treatment, and outcome. SCCE occurs in the sixth decade: median age (interquartile range [IQR]): 65 (59-69) years with a male predominance (63%). The most common complaining symptoms were rapidly progressive dysphagia (79%), weight loss (54%), and retrosternal/epigastric pain (46%). The tumor arises primarily in the middle (52%) or in the lower (35%) third of the esophagus. History of tobacco and alcohol exposure was present in 90% and 70% of case, respectively. Extensive disease was present in 13 cases (54%) at initial diagnosis. The overall median survival (IQR) was 11 (8-20) months for all 24 patients, and the 2-year overall survival was 25.1%. Four patients were alive more than 2 years after treatment. Chemotherapy increased the survival compared with symptomatic management in extensive disease (median survival [IQR]: 9.5 [6-14] vs. 6 [4-7] months, P= 0.05). In limited disease, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy was more effective than non-concurrent treatment (median survival [IQR]: 36 [14-93] vs. 11 [9-15] months, P= 0.04). Two patients were treated by surgery and chemoradiation therapy with a survival of 35 and 66 months. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment of SCCE in all stage. For limited disease SCCE, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the primary choice compared with sequential approach. The role of surgery was not assessable in our study.

Combination of gemcitabine and cetuximab in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Belgian Group of Digestive Oncology

BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinomas are uncommon tumours with a poor prognosis, that frequently present epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression. METHODS In a multi-centre phase II trial, patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, naïve to chemotherapy, received Cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) at week 1, then 250 mg/m(2)/week) and Gemcitabine (1 g/m(2) on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months, using a Simon 2-stage design. Moreover, we assessed the impact of KRAS status and skin toxic effect on efficacy. RESULTS Forty-four patients (41% locally advanced/59% metastatic) were enrolled. Median age was 61.5 years; ECOG PS was 0 (68%) or 1. Six months PFS reached 47%. Median OS was 13.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.8-31.8 months]. Nine patients (20.4%) had PR and disease-control rate was 79.5%. Grade 3/4-related toxic effects were haematological (52.2%), skin rash (13.6%) and fatigue (11.4%). KRAS mutations were found in 7 of 27 patients and had no influence on PFS. Skin toxic effect ≥grade 2 was associated with increased PFS (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION(S) Our study met its primary end point, suggesting that Gemcitabine-Cetuximab has activity in cholangiocarcinoma. KRAS status was not associated with PFS, unlike skin toxic effect, which could be used as a surrogate marker for efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00747097.

Positron emission tomography response evaluation from a randomized phase III trial of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

In a phase III pancreatic cancer study, tumor response by positron emission tomography (PET) (exploratory end point) predicted treatment efficacy, including longer overall survival. nab-Paclitaxel/gemcitabine had a significantly higher rate of metabolic response versus gemcitabine. Overall, 5× more patients had a metabolic response by PET compared with RECIST. PET may be a more sensitive measure of response than radiographic modalities.

A weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)+leucovorin and bi-weekly cisplatin (CDDP) was active and well tolerated in patients with non-colon digestive carcinomas

In patients with non-colon digestive carcinomas, various schedules and doses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin combined with cisplatin (CDDP) have been used extensively. The present study explored the toxicity and activity of a weekly 24-h infusion of high dose 5-FU modulated by high dose leucovorin with bi-weekly CDDP. 59 patients with measurable disease were treated with a weekly infusion of high dose 5-FU (2 or 2.6 g/m2)+leucovorin 500 mg/m2 for 6 weeks and a bi-weekly dose of CDDP (50 mg/m2). All patients had metastatic or locoregionally advanced disease and had a performance status < or =3. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 58 for response. Toxicity was different according to the schedule of 5-FU. Serious adverse events occurred most frequently when 5-FU was given at a dose of 2.6 g/m2 with a high incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (16%) and febrile neutropenia (13%), and led to dose reductions in both CDDP and 5-FU in 13 patients (34%). For patients who started 5-FU at a dose of 2 g/m2, no reduction in 5-FU was required, and only 4 patients required a dose reduction of CDDP (19%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 10% of patients of this group and only 1 patient required hospitalisation for febrile neutropenia. Other grade 3/4 toxicities were rare in both groups. Renal toxicity was infrequent and mild and did not require dose adjustments. The overall response rate was 33%; 19 patients achieved a partial responses (PR). No patient had a complete response (CR). The median duration of response was 5.7 months (range 2-24 months) and the median survival was 7.9 months ( range: 1-30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7-9). The combination of weekly 24-h infusion of high dose 5-FU with leucovorin and bi-weekly cisplatin seems a well-tolerated and active treatment in non-colon digestive carcinomas. A dose of 2 g/m2 of 5-FU seems to be recommended.