J. Lisa Tenover

Proscar: five-year experience

We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of finasteride, an orally active 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor, in 2 previously reported groups of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Prostate volume was measured by magnetic resonance imaging, and the maximum urinary flow rate was assessed noninvasively. Symptoms were scored utilizing a patient self-administered symptom score questionnaire. Total symptom scores ranged from 0 (or asymptomatic) to 35 (severely symptomatic). After an initial double-blind period, the patients in study 1 were treated with 10 mg finasteride for 1 year and then switched to 5 mg finasteride for an additional 4 years, whereas patients in study 2 were treated with 5 mg finasteride for the entire 5 years. A total of 190 patients were randomized in the double-blind studies, 156 entered year 1 of the open extension and 70 patients completed 5 years of finasteride therapy. In both studies prostate volume was reduced from baseline by 30%, dihydrotestosterone was reduced by 72%, and the maximum urinary flow rate improved by approximately 1.5 ml/s. Prostate-specific antigen was decreased by approximately 50%. Finasteride was well tolerated; approximately 10% of patients reported sexual adverse experiences during the 5-year study period, which were considered drug related by the investigators. The incidence in reporting sexual adverse experiences did not increase with the increased duration of treatment: findings consistent with previous reports. In summary treatment of BPH with finasteride for 5 years inhibits the progression of the disease with an excellent safety profile and represents a low-risk medical option for the treatment of symptomatic BPH.

Efficacy and tolerability of finasteride in symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a primary care study

Abstract Because increasing numbers of men are seeking treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from primary care physicians, we sought to assess the efficacy and tolerability of finasteride in a primary care setting. In this randomized, double-masked study, 2112 men with symptomatic BPH received either finasteride (n = 1589) or placebo (n = 523) for 1 year. At 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, urinary symptoms were measured using the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI). Quality of life was assessed using the BPH Impact Index (BII), which assessed bother, worry, physical discomfort, and restriction in activities. Both patients and investigators assessed overall urologic status. Investigators assessed the effect of the drug on plasma lipids in a subset of patients. Patients treated with finasteride had a statistically significant mean decrease in AUASI scores compared with patients treated with placebo beginning at month 6 and continuing throughout the study. At month 12, adjusted mean decreases in AUASI scores were −4.96 for finasteride versus −3.71 for placebo. Statistically significant differences in favor of finasteride were also noted on BII at months 9 and 12. Patient and investigator overall assessments showed greater improvement in the finasteride group beginning at month 6. The incidence of drug-related sexual adverse experiences was significantly greater in finasteride-treated patients but led to withdrawal in only 2.2% of these patients. Overall lipid profile was not significantly altered in either group. Based on improvement in symptoms and quality of life, and on its favorable tolerability profile, finasteride should be considered by primary care physicians for management of symptomatic BPH.

Androgen deficiency in the aging male: when, who, and how to investigate and treat

Androgen deficiency in the aging male (ADAM), also known as andropause, affects an estimated 1 in 200 men. The abnormally low levels of testosterone in these men can usually be managed with androgen supplementation therapy. Because a large proportion of urologic patients are men at or beyond middle age, urologists should be familiar with ADAM, its clinical manifestations, the rational approach to its diagnosis and treatment, and the consequences of treatment. Equally important is responsibility for the patients monitoring, because prolonged androgen replacement therapy can be associated with significant complications, particularly in the prostrate.