J. M. Conrad
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. M. Conrad.
Physical Review Letters | 2002
G. P. Zeller; Kevin Scott McFarland; T. Adams; A. Alton; S. Avvakumov; L. de Barbaro; P. de Barbaro; R. H. Bernstein; A. Bodek; T. A. Bolton; J. Brau; D. Buchholz; H. S. Budd; L. Bugel; J. M. Conrad; R. B. Drucker; B.T. Fleming; R. Frey; J. Formaggio; J. Goldman; M. Goncharov; D. A. Harris; R. A. Johnson; J.H. Kim; S. Koutsoliotas; M.J. Lamm; W. Marsh; D. Mason; John McDonald; C. McNulty
The NuTeV Collaboration has extracted the electroweak parameter sin(2)theta(W) from the measurement of the ratios of neutral current to charged current nu and (-)nu cross sections. Our value, sin(2)theta((on-shell))(W) = 0.2277 +/- 0.0013(stat) +/- 0.0009(syst), is 3 standard deviations above the standard model prediction. We also present a model independent analysis of the same data in terms of neutral-current quark couplings.
Reports on Progress in Physics | 2009
A. Bandyopadhyay; S. Choubey; Raj Gandhi; Srubabati Goswami; B.L. Roberts; J. Bouchez; I. Antoniadis; John Ellis; Gian Francesco Giudice; Thomas Schwetz; S. Umasankar; G. Karagiorgi; A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo; J. M. Conrad; M. H. Shaevitz; Silvia Pascoli; S. Geer; J.E. Campagne; Mark Rolinec; A. Blondel; M. Campanelli; Joachim Kopp; Manfred Lindner; Juha T. Peltoniemi; P.J. Dornan; K. R. Long; T. Matsushita; C. Rogers; Y. Uchida; M. Dracos
The conclusions of the Physics Working Group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and super-beam facility (the ISS) are presented. The ISS was carried out by the international community between NuFact05, (the 7th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories and Super-beams, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Rome, 21–26 June 2005) and NuFact06 (Ivine, CA, 24–30 August 2006). The physics case for an extensive experimental programme to understand the properties of the neutrino is presented and the role of high-precision measurements of neutrino oscillations within this programme is discussed in detail. The performance of second-generation super-beam experiments, beta-beam facilities and the Neutrino Factory are evaluated and a quantitative comparison of the discovery potential of the three classes of facility is presented. High-precision studies of the properties of the muon are complementary to the study of neutrino oscillations. The Neutrino Factory has the potential to provide extremely intense muon beams and the physics potential of such beams is discussed in the final section of the report.The conclusions of the Physics Working Group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and super-beam facility (the ISS) are presented. The ISS was carried out by the international community between NuFact05, (the 7th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories and Superbeams, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Rome, June 21-26, 2005) and NuFact06 (Irvine, California, 2430 August 2006). The physics case for an extensive experimental programme to understand the properties of the neutrino is presented and the role of high-precision measurements of neutrino oscillations within this programme is discussed in detail. The performance of second generation super-beam experiments, beta-beam facilities, and the Neutrino Factory are evaluated and a quantitative comparison of the discovery potential of the three classes of facility is presented. High-precision studies of the properties of the muon are complementary to the study of neutrino oscillations. The Neutrino Factory has the potential to provide extremely intense muon beams and the physics potential of such beams is discussed in the final section of the report. The ISS Physics Working Group Editors: S.F. King1, K. Long2, Y. Nagashima3, B.L. Roberts4, and O. Yasuda5.
Physical Review Letters | 2013
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo; B. C. Brown; L. Bugel; G. Cheng; E. Church; J. M. Conrad; R. Dharmapalan; Z. Djurcic; D. A. Finley; R. Ford; F. G. Garcia; G. T. Garvey; J. Grange; W. Huelsnitz; C. Ignarra; R. Imlay; R. A. Johnson; G. Karagiorgi; T. Katori; T. Kobilarcik; W. C. Louis; C. Mariani; W. Marsh; G. B. Mills; J. Mirabal; C. D. Moore; J. Mousseau; P. Nienaber; B. Osmanov; Z. Pavlovic
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of ν¯e appearance data from 11.27×10²⁰ protons on target in the antineutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of 2 over the previously reported results. An event excess of 78.4±28.5 events (2.8σ) is observed in the energy range 200QEν<1250 MeV. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscillation model, ν¯μ→ν¯e, the best oscillation fit to the excess has a probability of 66% while the background-only fit has a χ² probability of 0.5% relative to the best fit. The data are consistent with antineutrino oscillations in the 0.01<Δm²<1.0 eV² range and have some overlap with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector. All of the major backgrounds are constrained by in situ event measurements so nonoscillation explanations would need to invoke new anomalous background processes. The neutrino mode running also shows an excess at low energy of 162.0±47.8 events (3.4σ) but the energy distribution of the excess is marginally compatible with a simple two neutrino oscillation formalism. Expanded models with several sterile neutrinos can reduce the incompatibility by allowing for CP violating effects between neutrino and antineutrino oscillations.The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of the combined
Physical Review Letters | 2007
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo; A. O. Bazarko; S. J. Brice; B. C. Brown; L. Bugel; J. Cao; L. Coney; J. M. Conrad; D. C. Cox; A. Curioni; Z. Djurcic; D. A. Finley; B. T. Fleming; R. Ford; F. G. Garcia; G. T. Garvey; C. Green; J. A. Green; T. L. Hart; E. Hawker; R. Imlay; R. A. Johnson; P. Kasper; T. Katori; T. Kobilarcik; I. Kourbanis; S. Koutsoliotas; E. M. Laird; J. M. Link; Y. Liu
\nu_e
Physical Review D | 2003
J. M. Conrad; Carlos Perez de los Heros; A. Hallgren; O. Botner
and
Physical Review Letters | 1997
W.G. Seligman; C. G. Arroyo; L. de Barbaro; P. de Barbaro; A.O. Bazarko; R. H. Bernstein; A. Bodek; T. A. Bolton; H. S. Budd; J. M. Conrad; D. A. Harris; R. A. Johnson; Jaegwon Kim; B.J. King; T. Kinnel; M.J. Lamm; W.C. Lefmann; W. Marsh; K. S. McFarland; C. McNulty; S.R. Mishra; D. Naples; P. Z. Quintas; A. Romosan; W. K. Sakumoto; H. Schellman; F. Sciulli; M. H. Shaevitz; W. H. Smith; P. Spentzouris
\bar \nu_e
Physical Review D | 2001
M. Goncharov; N. Suwonjandee; M. H. Shaevitz; A. Romosan; J. Goldman; W. Marsh; D. Mason; J. Brau; P. Nienaber; A. Vaitaitis; M. Tzanov; U. K. Yang; E. D. Zimmerman; Arie Bodek; T. Adams; G. P. Zeller; S. Koutsoliotas; M. Vakili; W. K. Sakumoto; E. G. Stern; Howard S. Budd; R. A. Johnson; T. A. Bolton; H. Schellman; Bonnie Tamminga Fleming; R. Frey; J. Formaggio; M.J. Lamm; R. H. Bernstein; A. Alton
appearance data from
Physical Review D | 2004
M. Sorel; J. M. Conrad; Michael H. Shaevitz
6.46 \times 10^{20}
Physical Review Letters | 2007
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo; W. Metcalf; T. L. Hart; E. Prebys; Z. Djurcic; A. D. Russell; H. Yang; M. H. Shaevitz; R. Tayloe; L. Coney; J. Monroe; E. M. Laird; B. T. Fleming; R. Schirato; J. M. Link; D. Perevalov; I. Stancu; R. Imlay; R. H. Nelson; F. C. Shoemaker; T. Katori; H. A. Tanaka; I. Kourbanis; G. B. Mills; P. Kasper; K. Mahn; T. Kobilarcik; F. G. Garcia; G. McGregor; R. A. Johnson
protons on target in neutrino mode and
Physical Review Letters | 2008
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo; A. O. Bazarko; S. J. Brice; B. C. Brown; L. Bugel; J. Cao; L. Coney; J. M. Conrad; D. C. Cox; A. Curioni; Z. Djurcic; D. A. Finley; B. T. Fleming; R. Ford; F. G. Garcia; G. T. Garvey; C. Green; J. A. Green; T. L. Hart; E. Hawker; R. Imlay; R. A. Johnson; P. Kasper; T. Katori; T. Kobilarcik; I. Kourbanis; S. Koutsoliotas; E. M. Laird; J. M. Link; Y. Liu
11.27 \times 10^{20}