J. Marcio N. Jorge

Etiology and management of fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is a challenging condition of diverse etiology and devastating psychosocial impact. Multiple mechanisms may be involved in its pathophysiology, such as altered stool consistency and delivery of contents to the rectum, abnormal rectal capacity or compliance, decreased anorectal sensation, and pelvic floor or anal sphincter dysfunction. A detailed clinical history and physical examination are essential. Anorectal manometry, pudendal nerve latency studies, and electromyography are part of the standard primary evaluation. The evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence may require tests such as cinedefecography, spinal latencies, and anal mucosal electrosensitivity. These tests permit both objective assessment and focused therapy. Appropriate treatment options include biofeedback and sphincteroplasty. Biofeedback has resulted in 90 percent reduction in episodes of incontinence in over 60 percent of patients. Overlapping anterior sphincteroplasty has been associated with good to excellent results in 70 to 90 percent of patients. The common denominator between the medical and surgical treatment groups is the necessity of pretreatment physiologic assessment. It is the results of these tests that permit optimal therapeutic assignment. For example, pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML) are the most important predictor factor of functional outcome. However, even the most experienced examiners digit cannot assess PNTML. In the absence of pudendal neuropathy, sphincteroplasty is an excellent option. If neuropathy exists, however, then postanal or total pelvic floor repair remain viable surgical options for the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence. In the absence of an adequate sphincter muscle, encirclement procedures using synthetic materials or muscle transfer techniques might be considered. Implantation of a stimulating electrode into the gracilis neosphincter and artificial sphincter implantation are other valid alternatives. The final therapeutic option is fecal diversion. This article reviews the current status of the etiology and incidence of incontinence as well as the evaluation and treatment of this disabling condition.

Does perineal descent correlate with pudendal neuropathy

A prospective study was undertaken to assess the potential correlation between increased perineal descent (IPD) and pudendal neuropathy (PN) in 213 consecutive patients. These 165 females and 48 males of a mean age of 62 (range, 18–87) years had constipation (n=115), idiopathic fecal incontinence (n=58), or chronic intractable rectal pain (n=40). All 213 patients underwent cinedefecography (CD) and bilateral pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) assessment. Perineal descent (PD) of more than the upper limit of normal of 3.0 cm during evacuation was considered increased. Pudendal neuropathy was diagnosed when PNTML exceeded the upper limit of normal of 2.2 milliseconds. Although 65 patients (31 percent) had PD, only 16 (25 percent) of these 65 patients had neuropathy. Moreover, PN was also found in 42 (28 percent) of 148 patients without IPD. Conversely, only 16 (28 percent) of the 58 patients who had PN also had IPD, and IPD was present in 49 (32 percent) of 155 patients without PN. The frequency of PN according to the degree of IPD was: 30 to 4.0 cm, 6 of 27 patients (22 percent); 4.1 to 5.0 cm, 4 of 15 (27 percent); 5.1 to 6.0 cm, 4 of 12 (25 percent); 6.1 to 7.0 cm, 2 of 8 (25 percent); and >7.0 cm, 0 of 3 (0 percent). Linear regression analysis was undertaken to compare the relationships between measurements of PD at rest (R), push (P), and change (C=P−R) and values of PNTML. These values for all 213 patients were: R,r=0.048; P,r=0.031; and C,r=−0.050. The correlation coefficients were equally poor for all the individual subgroups analyzed, including the patients sex or diagnosis. In summary, no correlation was found between PD and PNTML. The lack of a relationship was seen for the entire group as well as for those patients with either neuropathy or increased perineal descent. Therefore, the often espoused relationship between increased PD and PN was not supported by this prospective evaluation. Although increased PD and prolonged PNTML are frequently observed in patients with disordered defecation, they may represent independent findings.

Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system

PURPOSE: A study was undertaken to assess the incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidocele as a finding during cinedefecography. METHODS: All patients who underwent cinedefecography between July 1988 and July 1992 were prospectively evaluated. Clinical data were assessed by a standardized questionnaire. Sigmoidocele was classified based on the degree of descent of the lowest portion of the sigmoid: 1° = above the pubococcygeal line; 2° = below the pubococcygeal line and above the ischiococcygeal line; 3° = below the ischiococcygeal line. This classification was then correlated with the patients symptoms and percentage of redundancy relative to rectal length. RESULTS: Twenty-four sigmoidoceles (5.2 percent) were noted in 463 cinedefecographic studies; 289 of these patients had constipation. These five males and 19 females were of a mean age of 57 (range, 20–77) years. Nine patients had 1° sigmoidocele, seven had 2°, and eight had 3°. Percentage of sigmoid redundancy was 51 percent, 65 percent, and 88 percent for 1°, 2°, and 3°, respectively (P=0.0001). Impaired rectal emptying was present in 16 patients (67 percent). Five of eight patients with 3° sigmoidocele underwent colonic resection with or without rectopexy. The other three patients were conservatively managed. One of seven patients with 2° sigmoidocele underwent colectomy, and the other six were conservatively managed as were all nine patients with 1°. Posttreatment improvement was noted in 100 percent (6 of 6) of patients operated on but in only 33 percent (6 of 18) of patients conservatively treated. Thus, this proposed classification system yielded excellent correlation among the mean of level of the sigmoidocele, percentage of redundancy, and clinical symptoms. Furthermore, clinical significance of 3° sigmoidocele is supported by the fact that all five of 3° patients who underwent colonic resection reported symptomatic improvement at a mean follow-up of 23 (range, 15–39) months. CONCLUSION: Sigmoidocele may account for symptoms of obstructed defecation, and, therefore, it must be considered in the differential diagnosis and evaluation of constipation. Staging of sigmoidocele is useful in determining both clinical significance and optimal treatment.

Cinedefecography and electromyography in the diagnosis of nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome.

A prospective study was undertaken to assess the correlation between electromyography (EMG) and cinedefecography (CD) for the diagnosis of nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome (NRPR). Clinical criteria for NRPR included straining, incomplete evacuation, tenesmus, and the need for enemas, suppositories, or digitation. EMG criteria included failure to achieve a significant decrease in electrical activity of the puborectalis (PR) during attempted evacuation. CD criteria included either paradoxical contraction or failure of relaxation of the PR along with incomplete evacuation. In addition, other etiologies for incomplete evacuation, such as rectoanal intussusception or nonemptying rectocele, were excluded by proctoscopy and defecography in all cases. One hundred twelve patients with constipation, 81 females and 31 males, with a mean age of 59 (range, 12–83) years were studied by routine office evaluation, CD, and EMG. Forty-two patients (37 percent) had evidence of NRPR on CD (rectal emptying: none, 24; incomplete, 18). Twenty-eight of these patients (67 percent) also had evidence of NRPR on EMG. EMG findings of NRPR were present in 12 of 70 patients (17 percent) with normal rectal emptying. Conversely, 14 of 72 patients (19 percent) with normal PR relaxation on EMG had an NRPR pattern on CD. The sensitivity and specificity for the EMG diagnosis of NRPR were 67 percent and 83 percent, and the positive and negative predictive values were 70 percent and 80 percent, respectively. Conversely, if EMG is considered as the ideal test for the diagnosis of NRPR, CD had a sensitivity of 70 percent, a specificity of 80 percent, and positive and negative predictive values of 66 percent and 82 percent, respectively. In summary, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of EMG and CD are suboptimal. Therefore, a combination of these two tests is suggested for the diagnosis of NRPR.

Anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome

This prospective study was undertaken to compare the utility of anorectal manometry (ARM) with that of anal electromyography (EMG) and cinedefecography (CD) in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS). One hundred sixteen consecutive patients with a history of chronic constipation were prospectively assessed. These 35 males and 81 females were of a mean age of 60 years, ranging from 18 to 84 years. The incidences of PPS were 63 percent for ARM, 38 percent for EMG, and 36 percent for CD. The correlations of PPS were suboptimal: ARM and EMG, 70 percent; and ARM and CD, 61 percent. A two-tiered system for the manometric classification of PPS was developed. First, the evacuation pressure curve pattern was classified as a normal relaxed downward (Type A; n=43), a nonrelaxed flat or equivocal (Type B; n=36), and a paradoxical upward (Type C; n=37). PPS was noted with increasing incidence within curve types (21 percent in Type A, 64 percent in Type B, and 95 percent in Type C). Second, an evacuation index (EI = evacuation pressure/squeeze pressure) was defined: Group I (El<0; n=43), Group II (0≤EI<0.25; n=24), Group III (0.25≤EI<0.5; n=27), and Group IV (EI≽0.5; n=18). The finding of PPS also correlated with the EI group: 21 percent in Group I, 67 percent in Group II, 74 percent in Group III, and 100 percent in Group IV. This subdivision of curve types and EI groups may provide a role in the diagnosis of PPS.

Patient position during cinedefecography: Influence on perineal descent and other measurements

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the reproducibility of cinedefecography measurements and abnormal findings between the left lateral decubitus and seated positions. METHODS: Prospective patient evaluation included all patients who had lateral radiographs of the pelvis taken at rest, during squeezing, and pushing in both positions. Anorectal angle, perineal descent, and puborectalis length measurements were calculated for each set of radiographs. Pelvic floor dynamics during evacuation were measured as the changes between rest and pushing. Abnormal findings included both increased dynamic and fixed perineal descent, nonrelaxing puborectalis, and premature evacuation. RESULTS: One hundred five consecutive patients underwent cinedefecography. There were statistically significant differences between the positions with regard to anorectal angle (P<0.0001), perineal descent (P=0.0001), and puborectalis length (P=0.0001). Dynamic changes of the anorectal angle, perineal descent, and puborectalis length were not significantly different (P>0.05). However, 6 of 22 (27 percent) patients with fecal incontinence had premature evacuation severe enough to impede measurement only when seated (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: Because of the statistically significant differences between the two positions, centers should always employ the same position for a given diagnostic group.

Prospective Multicenter Trial Comparing Echodefecography With Defecography in the Assessment of Anorectal Dysfunction in Patients With Obstructed Defecation

BACKGROUND: Defecography is the gold standard for assessing functional anorectal disorders but is limited by the need for a specific radiologic environment, exposure of patients to radiation, and inability to show all anatomic structures involved in defecation. Echodefecography is a 3-dimensional dynamic ultrasound technique developed to overcome these limitations. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to validate the effectiveness of echodefecography compared with defecography in the assessment of anorectal dysfunctions related to obstructed defecation. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective observational study. PATIENTS: Women with symptoms of obstructed defecation. SETTING: Six centers for colorectal surgery (3 in Brazil, 1 in Texas, 1 in Florida, and 1 in Venezuela). INTERVENTIONS: Defecography was performed after inserting 150 mL of barium paste in the rectum. Echodefecography was performed with a 2050 endoprobe through 3 automatic scans. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The &kgr; statistic was used to assess agreement between echodefecography and defecography in the evaluation of rectocele, intussusception, anismus, and grade III enterocele. RESULTS: Eighty-six women were evaluated: median Wexner constipation score, 13.4 (range, 6–23); median age, 53.4 (range, 26–77) years. Rectocele was identified with substantial agreement between the 2 methods (defecography, 80 patients; echodefecography, 76 patients; &kgr; = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.48–0.73). The 2 techniques demonstrated identical findings in 6 patients without rectocele, and in 9 patients with grade I, 29 with grade II, and 19 patients with grade III rectoceles. Defecography identified rectal intussusception in 42 patients, with echodefecography identifying 37 of these cases, plus 4 additional cases, yielding substantial agreement (&kgr; = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.57–1.0). Intussusception was associated with rectocele in 28 patients for both methods (&kgr; = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.41–0.83). There was substantial agreement for anismus (&kgr; = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.40–0.81) and for rectocele combined with anismus (&kgr; = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.40–0.82). Agreement for grade III enterocele was classified as almost perfect (&kgr; = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.66–1.0). LIMITATIONS: Echodefecography had limited use in identification of grade I and II enteroceles because of the type of probe used. CONCLUSIONS: Echodefecography may be used to assess patients with obstructed defecation, as it is able to detect the same anorectal dysfunctions found by defecography. It is minimally invasive and well tolerated, avoids exposure to radiation, and clearly demonstrates all the anatomic structures involved in defecation.

New Surgical Options for Fecal Incontinence in Patients With Imperforate Anus

INTRODUCTION: Anorectal malformations are among the various etiologic factors causing fecal incontinence. Patients with imperforate anus are difficult to treat, specifically those with high lesions. The artificial bowel sphincter and electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter are two relatively new techniques that have been used for the treatment of patients with severe refractory fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of these technologies in the treatment of patients with chronic fecal incontinence due to imperforate anus. METHODS: All patients with imperforate anus who had fecal incontinence and underwent either the artificial bowel sphincter procedure or the gracilis neosphincter procedure between February 1995 and December 2000 were evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative incontinence score (Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Score; 0 = perfect continence; 20 = complete incontinence), quality of life, (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, 29 items forming 4 scales), and manometric sphincter pressure results were compared. RESULTS: Eleven patients had artificial bowel sphincter and five had the gracilis neosphincter (one nonstimulated) procedure. There were 11 males and 5 females of a mean age of 25.3 (range, 15–45) years. The mean follow-up time was 1.7 years (5 months to 5.7 years). Eight (50 percent) complications occurred in six patients, including three with fecal impaction (all artificial bowel sphincter), three with device migration (two gracilis neosphincter, one artificial bowel sphincter), and two patients with concomitant wound infection (one gracilis neosphincter, one artificial bowel sphincter); no patients had the devices explanted. Fourteen patients had manometric data (10 artificial bowel sphincter and 4 gracilis neosphincter) available. The overall incontinence score decreased from a preoperative mean of 18.5 to a postoperative mean of 7.5 in the artificial bowel sphincter group (P < 0.01) and from 17.4 to 9.4 in the gracilis neosphincter group (P = 0.06). All four Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scales increased in both the artificial bowel sphincter (lifestyle and depression/self-perception, P = 0.02; coping/behavior and embarrassment, P = 0.03) and the gracilis neosphincter (lifestyle and coping, P = 0.06; depression and embarrassment, P = 0.05) patients. As well, the mean resting and squeeze pressures increased with both techniques (artificial bowel sphincter: P = 0.008 and P = 0.02, respectively; gracilis neosphincter: P = 0.4 and P = 0.1, respectively). All results were statistically significant in the artificial bowel sphincter group. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial bowel sphincter and gracilis neosphincter are efficient methods to treat patients with imperforate anus. These techniques should be considered for patients with imperforate anus and severe fecal incontinence.

Recovery of anal sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure in patients over the age of fifty.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to postoperatively assess the progression of anal sphincter function and clinical outcome in patients ≥50 years old (Group I) compared with those <50 years old (Group II). METHODS: Clinical data were assessed after ileostomy closure by a questionnaire. These data were compiled to obtain an incontinence score, which ranged from 0 (perfect continence) to 20 (total incontinence). Anorectal manometry was performed preoperatively (MN1) and postoperatively, before (MN2) and after (MN3) ileostomy closure. Wilcoxon and pairedt-test were used to compare the clinical and functional results, respectively. RESULTS: Group I consisted of 22 patients (mean age, 56 years) and Group II, 50 patients (mean age, 32 years). No differences were found relative to either preoperative pressures or clinical outcome. However, both the mean and high resting pressures were significantly lower in Group I at the MN2 examination. CONCLUSION: The effect on anal sphincters of ileoanal reservoir in patients over the age of 50 years is similar to that noted in younger patients. Transient impairment of internal anal sphincter function observed after ileoanal reservoir is more severe in older patients (P=0.01). However, as in younger patients, it does completely recover after ileostomy closure.

The value of sphincter asymmetry index in anal incontinence.

Abstract. We tested the value of the sphincter asymmetry index (SAI), an adjunct study of vectormanometry for detecting sphincter defects of difficult clinical diagnosis, in patients with anal incontinence referred for anal manometry. Patients were prospectively classified as having no previous anal trauma (group I, n=13), those with possible trauma (including previous vaginal delivery and anorectal surgery unrelated to the onset of incontinence; group II, n=53), and those with previous anal trauma directly related by the patient to the onset of symptoms (group III, n=39). These were compared to 30 healthy volunteers. Clinical data were compiled to obtain an incontinence score, sphincter defect, mean and maximal pressures, functional anal canal length, and SAI for both resting and squeeze pressure profiles. SAI values for the control group were 7.2±2.3% and 5.8±2.4% for resting and squeeze pressures, respectively. Female controls had shorter anal canals (P=0.0001) and higher SAI during squeeze (P<0.005) than male controls. Incontinence scores were 6.1±3.1, 8.6±3.9, and 12.5±4.9, in groups I, II, and III, respectively (P<0.001). Mean SAI values at rest were 10.3±4.9% in group I, 19.0±10.6% in group II, and 23.6±14.0% in group III (P<0.001); corresponding values during squeeze were 8.6±5.3%, 13.9±7.9%, and 16.8±8.0% (P<0.01). Pressure profiles both at rest and during squeeze were inversely correlated with SAI; therefore the accuracy of SAI was not affected in patients with severe incontinence. Incontinent patients with a previous history of sphincter trauma thus had more severe incontinence, both clinically and manometrically, and higher SAI values than patients without prior trauma. The analysis of the SAI is a valuable tool for determining a traumatic cause of anal incontinence.